Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence data provide resolution to sister-group relationships within Pteronotus (Chiroptera: Mormoopidae)

• Autorzy: Van Den Bussche R.A. , Weyandt S. E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Whereas it is generally agreed that the Neotropical bat family Mormoopidae, as well as the two mormoopid genera (Mormoops and Pteronotus) are each monophyletic, relationships among the six extant species of Pteronotus remain unresolved. The purpose of this study was to evaluate phylogenetic relationships within Pteronotus using DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial ribosomal and cytochrome b genes and the nuclear Recombination Activating Gene-2 based on likelihood inferential techniques (maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetics). Results of this study present, for the first time, a fully resolved and strongly supported phylogeny for all relationships within Pteronotus. These data strongly support: sister-group relationships between davyi and gymnonotus (subgenus pteronotus), between macleayii and quadridens (subgenus chilonycteris), and between the subgenera pteronotus and chilonycteris. Pteronotus personatus is sister to this clade and P. parnellii is the most basal lineage of Pteronotus. Although this is the first study to provide a fullyresolved and strongly supported hypothesis for the phylogenetic relationships among species of Pteronotus, future work must focus on phylogeographic surveys within each species because previous studies have suggested that parnellii and personatus may contain undescribed species.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: 05
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.1-13,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Van Den Bussche R.A.

• Department of Zoology and Collection of Vertebrates, 430 Life Sciences West, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA

autor

Weyandt S. E.

Bibliografia

• Adams, R. A., and S. C. Pedersen. 2000. Ontogeny, functional ecology, and evolution of bats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 398 pp.
• Alfaro, M. E., S. Zoller, and F. Lutzoni. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo Sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 20: 255-266.
• Anderson. S., M. H. L. de Bruiln, A. R. Coulson, I. C. Eperon, F. Sanger, and I. G. Young. 1982. Complete sequence of bovine mitochondrial DNA: conserved features of the mammalian mitochondrial genome. Journal of Molecular Biology, 156: 683-717.
• Baker, R. J., and J. W. Bickham. 1980. Karyotypic evolution in bats: evidence of extensive and conservative chromosomal evolution in closely related taxa. Systematic Zoology, 29: 239-253.
• Baker, R. J., C. A. Porter, J. C. Patton, and R. A. Van Den Bussche. 2000. Systematics of bats of the family Phyllostomidae based on RAG2 DNA sequences. Occasional Papers, Museum of Texas Tech University, 202: 1-16.
• Bowles, J. B„ J. P. Cope, and E. A. Cope. 1979. Thermal ecology of mustached and ghost-faced bats (Mormoopidae) in Venezuela. Journal of Mammalogy, 73: 365-378
• De Rijk, P., Y. van de Peer, S. Chapella, and R. D. Wachter. 1994. Database on the structure of the large ribosomal subunit RNA. Nucleic Acids Research, 22: 3495-3501.
• Dowton, M., and A. D. Austin. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy — the behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Systematic Biology, 51: 19-31.
• Emmons, L. H. 1997. Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide, 2nd edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 307 pp.
• Farris, J. S., M. Kallersjo, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics, 10: 315-319.
• Gaut, B. S., and P. O. Lewis. 1995. Success of maximum-likelihood phylogeny inference in the 4- taxon case. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 12: 152-162.
• Goldman, N. 1998. Phylogenetic information and experimental design in molecular systematics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 265: 1779-1786.
• Hoofer, S. R., S. A. Reeder, E. W. Hansen, and R. A. Van Den Bussche. In press. Molecular phylogenetics and taxonomic review of noctilionoid and vespertilionoid bats (Chiroptera: Yangochiroptera). Journal of Mammalogy.
• Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1995. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Systematic Biology, 44: 17—48.
• Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. R. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17: 754-755.
• Hulva, P., and I. Horáček. 2002. Craseonycteris thonglongyai (Chiroptera: Craseonycteridae) is a rhinolophoid: molecular evidence from cytochrome b. Acta Chiropterologica, 4: 107-120.
• Kearney, T. C., M. Volleth, G. Contrafatto, and P. J. Taylor. Systematic implications of chromosome GTG-band and bacula morphology four Southern African Eptesicus and Pipistrellus and several other species of Vespertilioninae (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Acta Chiropterologica, 4: 55-76.
• Koopman, K. F. 1993. Order Chiroptera. Pp. 137-241, in Mammal species of the world, a taxonomic reference, 2nd edition (D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 1206 pp.
• Koopman, K. F. 1994. Chiroptera: systematics. Handbook of Zoology, Vol. VIII, part 60, Mammalia. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 217 pp.
• Leaché, A. D„ and T. W. Reeder. 2002. Molecular
• systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloperus undulates): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Systematic Biology, 51: 44-68.
• Lewis, P. O. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 30-37.
• Lewis-Oritt, N., C. A. Porter, and R. J. Baker. 2001. Molecular systematics of the family Mor- moopidae (Chiroptera) based on cytochrome b and Recombination Activating Gene 2 sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 20: 426-436.
• Lin, Y.-H., and D. Penny. 2001. Implications for bat evolution from two new complete mitochondrial genomes. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 18: 684-688.
• Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
• Madsen, O., M. Scally, C. J. Douady, D. J. Kao, R. W. DeBry, R. Adkins, H. M. Amrine, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. de Jon, and M. S. Springer. 2001. Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals. Nature, 409: 610-614.
• Mickevich, M. E, and J. S. Farris. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology, 30: 351-370.
• Murphy, W. J., E. Eizirk, W. E. Johnson, Y. P. Zhang, O. A. Ryder, and S. J. O'Brien. 2001a. Molecular phylogenetics and the origin of placental mammals. Nature, 409: 614-618.
• Murphy, W. J., E. Eizirk, S. J. O'Brien, O. Madsen, M. Scally, C. J. Douady, E. Teeling, O. A. Ryder, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. de Jong, and M. S. Springer. 2001b. Resolution of early placental mammal radiations using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science, 294: 2348-2351.
• Nikaido, M., M. Harada, Y. Cao, M. Hasegawa, and N. Okada. 2000. Monophyletic origin of the order Chiroptera and its phylogenetic position among Mammalia, as inferred from the complete sequence of the mitochondrial DNA of a Japanese megabat, the Ryuku flying fox (Ptero- pus dasymallus). Journal of Molecular Evolution, 51: 318-328.
• Novacek, M. J. 1992. Morphological and molecular inroads to phylogeny. Pp. 85-131, in Interpreting the hierarchy of nature: from systematic patterns to evolutionary process theories (L. Grande and O. Rieppel, eds.). Academic Press, New York, 298 pp.
• Novacek, M. J., and A. R. Wyss. 1986. Higher-level relationships of the Recent Eutherian orders: morphological evidence. Cladistics, 2: 257-287.
• Novick, A. 1963. Orientation in Neotropical bats. II. Phyllostomatidae and Desmodontidae. Journal of Mammalogy, 44: 44-56.
• Patton, J. C., and R. J. Baker. 1978. Chromosomal homology and evolution of phyllostomatoid bats. Systematic Zoology, 27: 449-462.
• Porter, C. A., S. R. Hoofer, R. A. Van Den Bussche, T. E. Lee, Jr., and R. J. Baker. In press. Systematics of the round-eared bats (Tonatia and Lophostoma) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequences. Journal of Mammalogy.
• Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14: 817-818.
• Reid, F. A. 1997. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and southeast Mexico. Oxford University Press, New York, 334 pp.
• Simmons, N. B., and T. M. Conway. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of mormoopid bats (Chiroptera: Mormoopidae) based on morphological data. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 258: 1-97.
• Simmons, N. B., and R. S. Voss. 1998. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana: a Neotropical lowland rainforest fauna. Part I. Bats. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 237: 1-219.
• Sites, J. W., Jr., J. W. Bickham, and M. W. Haiduk. 1981. Conservative chromosomal change in the bat family Mormoopidae. Canadian Journal of Genetic Cytology, 23: 459-167.
• Smith, J. D. 1972. Systematics of the chiropteran family Mormoopidae. University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, Miscellaneous Publications No. 56: 1-132.
• Springer, M. S., and E. Douzery. 1996. Secondary structure, conservation of functional sites, and rates of evolution among mammalian mitochondrial 12S rRNA genes based on sequences from placentals, marsupials, and a monotreme. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 43: 357-373.
• Swofford, D. L. 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
• Teeling, E. C., M. Scally, D. J. Kao, M. L. Romagnoli, M. S. Springer, and M. J. Stanhope. 2000. Molecular evidence regarding the origin of echolocation and flight in bats. Nature, 403: 188-192.
• Teeling, E. C., O. Madsen, R. A. Van Den Bussche, W. W. de Jong, M. J. Stanhope, and M. S.Springer. 2002. Microbat paraphyly and the convergent evolution of a key innovation in Old World rhinolophoid microbats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99: 1431-1436.
• Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jean-Mougin, and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignments aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 25: 4876-1882.
• Van Den Bussche, R. A., and R. J. Baker. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of the New World bat genus Phyllostomus based on cytochrome B DNA sequence variation. Journal of Mammalogy, 74: 793-802.
• Van Den Bussche, R. A., R. J. Baker, H. A. Wichman, and M. J. Hamilton. 1993. Molecular phylogenetics of Stenodermatini bat genera: congruence of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 10: 944-959.
• Van Den Bussche, R. A., J. L. Hudgeons, and R. J. Baker. 1998. Phylogenetic accuracy, stability, and congruence: relationships within and among the New World bat genera Artibeus, Dermaura, and Koopmania. Pp. 59-71, in Bat biology and conservation (T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 365 pp.
• Van Den Bussche, R. A., S. R. Hoofer, and N. B. Simmons. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of mormoopid bats using mitochondrial gene sequences and morphology. Journal of Mammalogy, 83: 40-48.
• Vater, M. 1998. Adaptations of the auditory periphery of bats for echolocation. Pp. 231-247, in Bat biology and conservation (T. H. Kunz and P. A. Racey, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 365 pp.
• Vater, M. 2000. Evolutionary plasticity and ontogeny of the bat cochlea. Pp. 137-173, in Ontogeny, functional ecology, and evolution of bats (R. A. Adams and S. C. Pedersen, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 398 pp.
• Volleth, M., and K.-G. Heller. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships of vespertilionid genera (Mammalia: Chiroptera) as revealed by karyological analysis. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung, 32: 11-34.
• Volleth, M., G. Bronner, M. C. Göpfert, K.-G. Heller, O. von Helversen, and H.-S. Yong. 2001. Karyotype comparison and phylogenetic relationships of Pipistrellus-like bats (Vespertil- ionidae; Chiroptera; Mammalia). Chromosome Research, 9: 25-46.
• Weins, J. J. 1998. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Systematic Biology, 47: 568-581.
• Whelan, S., P. Lió, and N. Goldman. 2001. Molecular Phylogenetics: state-of-the-art methods for looking into the past. Trends in Genetics, 17: 262-272.
• Yoder, A. D., J. A. Irwin, and B. A. Payseur. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for the slow loris phytogeny. Systematic Biology, 50: 408-424.

Uwagi

PL