PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2016 | 75 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Comparative anatomical study of standard percutaneous and modified medialised percutaneous Bunnell type repair for artificial Achilles tendon rupture: positive effect of medialisation of the stitches with lower risk of sural nerve injury

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Background: Less invasive percutaneous acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) repair techniques gain popularity because of lower risk of surgical wound complications. But these approaches have an increased risk of sural nerve iatrogenic injury as this sensory nerve is usually not visualised during minimally invasive operative procedures. We compared standard percutaneous Bunnell type and our proposed modified-medialised percutaneous technique in a cadaver study to evaluate potential advantages. Materials and methods: Ten pairs of fresh frozen specimens were divided into two groups for comparative anatomical study. Tenotomies of Achilles tendons were made and wounds sutured. Ten standard and 10 modified-medialised repairs were applied for artificially performed ruptures. All sutured tendons were dissected meticulously. We carefully looked at repaired Achilles tendon end-to-end contact and adaptation, distance from Achilles insertion in calcaneal tubercle to place where sural nerve crosses lateral border of the Achilles tendon and possible sural nerve and vein entrapment. Groups were compared using Fisher’s exact and Student-T tests. Results: All ends of sharply dissected tendons in both groups were in sufficient contact. No measurable diastasis between tendon ends was found in all cases. No entrapment of sural nerve or vein was found in modified percutaneous Bunnell suture technique group, whereas 7 of 10 sural nerves and 9 small saphenous veins were entrapped when using standard percutaneous Bunnell type technique. Average distance from Achilles tendon insertion in tuber calcanei to sural nerve crossing the lateral border of Achilles was 93 mm. Conclusions: Medialisation of percutaneous suture in AATR repair shows clear advantages compared to standard non medialised technique ensuring a possible lower incidence of sural nerve entrapment injury. Our modified percutaneous Bunnell type technique allows sufficient adaptation of ruptured Achilles tendon. (Folia Morphol 2016; 74, 1: 53–59)

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

75

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.53-59,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Centre of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty, Republican Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Department of Embryology and Human Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Centre of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty, Republican Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
autor
  • Centre of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty, Republican Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
autor
  • Centre of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty, Republican Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Centre of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical Faculty, Republican Vilnius University Hospital, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Department of Embryology and Human Anatomy, Medical Faculty, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
autor
  • Orthopaedics Department, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Aktas S, Kocaoglu B (2009) Open versus minimal repair with Achillon device. Foot Ankle Int, 30: 391–397.
  • 2. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Siddiqui F, Morrow F, Busse J, Leighton RK, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic overview and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 400: 190–200.
  • 3. Bruggeman NB, Turner NS, Dahm DL, Voll AE, Hoskin TL, Jacofsky DJ, Haidukewych GJ (2004) Wound complications after open Achilles tendon repair. An analysis of risk factors. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 427: 63–66.
  • 4. Carmont MR, Heaver C, Pradhan A, Mei-Dan O, Gravare Silbernagel K (2013) Surgical repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: the cost-effectiveness of open versus percutaneous repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 21: 1361–1368.
  • 5. Ceccarelli F, Berti L, Giurati L, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2007) Percutaneous and minimally invasive techniques of Achilles’ tendon repair. Clin Orthop Rel Res, 458: 188–193.
  • 6. Citak M, Knobloch K, Albrecht K, Krettek C, Huffner T (2007) Anatomy of the sural nerve in a computer-assisted model: implications for surgical minimally-invasive Achilles tendon repair. Br J Sports Med, 41: 456–458.
  • 7. Flavin R, Gibney RG, O’Rourke SK (2007) A clinical test to avoid sural nerve injuries in percutaneous Achilles tendon repairs. Injury, 38: 845–847.
  • 8. Gigante A, Moschini A, Verdenelli A, Del Torto M, Ulisse S, de Palma L (2008) Open vs percutaneous repair in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized prospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy, 16: 204–209.
  • 9. Haji A, Sahai A, Symes A, Vyas JK (2004) Percutaneous versus open tendo achillis repair. Foot Ankle Int, 25: 215–218.
  • 10. Hamilton PD, Brown M, Ferguson N, Adebibe M, Maggs J, Solan M (2009) Surgical anatomy of the proximal release of the gastrocnemius: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int, 30: 1202–1206.
  • 11. Henrıquez H, Munoz R, Carcuro G, Bastıas Ch (2012) Is percutaneous repair better than open repair in acute Achilles tendon rupture? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470: 998–1003.
  • 12. Hockenbury RT, Johns JC (1990) A biomechanical in vitro comparison of open versus percutaneous repair of tendon achilles. Foot Ankle, 11: 67–72.
  • 13. Huelke DF (1958) The origin of the peroneal communicating nerve in adult man. Anat Rec, 132: 81–92.
  • 14. Jiang N, Wang B, Chen A, Dong F, Yu B (2012) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis based on current evidence. Int Orthop, 36: 765–773.
  • 15. Kakiuchi M (1995) A combined open and percutaneous technique for repair of tendo Achillis. Comparison with open repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77: 60–63.
  • 16. Kammar H, Carmont MR, Kots E, Laver L, Mann G, Nyska M, Mei-Dan O (2014) Anatomy of the sural nerve and its relation to the Achilles tendon by ultrasound examination. Orthopedics, 37: e298–e301.
  • 17. Keating JF, Will EM (2011) Operative versus non-operative treatment of acute rupture of tendo Achillis: a prospective randomised evaluation of functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 93: 1071–1078.
  • 18. Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, Crawford J, Brammar T, Parker M (2005) Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87: 2202–2210.
  • 19. Klein W, Lang DM, Saleh M (1991) The use of the Ma-Griffith technique for percutaneous repair of fresh ruptured tendo Achillis. Chir Organi Mov, 76: 223–228.
  • 20. Kocher MS, Bishop J, Marshall R, Briggs KK, Hawkins RJ (2002) Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: expected-value decision analysis. Am J Sports Med, 30: 783–790.
  • 21. Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ (1994) The sural nerve in the foot and ankle: an anatomic study with clinical and surgical implications. Foot Ankle Int, 15: 490–494.
  • 22. Lim J, Dalal R, Waseem M (2001) Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: a prospective randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Int, 22: 559–568.
  • 23. Ma GW, Griffith TG (1977) Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon. A new technique Clin Orthop, 128: 247–255.
  • 24. Maes R, Copin G, Averous C (2006) Is percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. Acta Orthop Belg, 72: 179–183.
  • 25. Majewski M, Rohrbach M, Czaja S, Ochsner P (2006) Avoiding sural nerve injuries during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair. Am J Sports Med, 34: 793–798.
  • 26. Mazur L, Młyniec A, Tomaszewski K, Walocha J, Uhl T (2014) A multiscale model of the Achilles tendon: from molecular and coarse-grain simulations to a macroscale hyperelastic model. Wulfenia, 21: 341–355.
  • 27. McMahon SE, Smith TO, Hing CB (2011) A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional to minimally invasive approaches for repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Surg, 17: 211–217.
  • 28. Metz R, van der Heijden GJ, Verleisdonk EJ, Tamminga R, van der Werken C (2009) Recovery of calf muscle strength following acute Achilles tendon rupture treatment: a comparison between minimally invasive surgery and conservative treatment. Foot Ankle Spec, 2: 219–226.
  • 29. Metz R, Verleisdonk EJ, van der Heijden GJ, Clevers GJ, Hammacher ER, Verhofstad MH, van der Werken C (2008) Acute Achilles tendon rupture: minimally invasive surgery versus nonoperative treatment with immediate full weight bearing: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med, 36: 1688–1694.
  • 30. Mizia E, Tomaszewski KA, Rutowicz B, Konopka T, Pasternak A, Walocha JA (2014) Computer-assisted assessment of the histological structure of the human sural nerve. Folia Morphol, 73: 292–297.
  • 31. Moller M, Movin T, Granhed H, Lind K, Faxen E, Karlsson J (2001) Acute rupture of tendo Achillis. A prospective randomised study of comparison between surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83: 843–848.
  • 32. Nilsson-Helander K, Silbernagel KG, Thomeé R, Faxén E, Olsson N, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2010) Acute Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized, controlled study comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures. Am J Sports Med, 38: 2186–2193.
  • 33. Ortigüela ME, Wood MB, Cahill DR (1987) Anatomy of the sural nerve complex. J Hand Surg Am, 12: 1119–1123.
  • 34. Porter KJ, Robati S, Karia P, Portet M, Szarko M, Amin A (2014) An anatomical and cadaveric study examining the risk of sural nerve injury in percutaneous Achilles tendon repair using the Achillon device. Foot Ankle Surg, 20: 90–93.
  • 35. Rowley DI, Scotland TR (1982) Rupture of the Achilles tendon treated by a simple operative procedure. Injury, 14: 252–254.
  • 36. Solomon LB, Ferris L, Tedman R, Henneberg M (2001) Surgical anatomy of the sural and superficial fibular nerves with an emphasis on the approach to the lateral malleolus. J Anat, 199 (Part 6): 717–723.
  • 37. Wagnon R, Akayi M (2005) The Webb-Bannister percutaneous technique for acute Achilles’ tendon ruptures: a functional and MRI assessment. J Foot Ankle Surg, 44: 437–444.
  • 38. Webb J, Moorjani J, Radford M (2000) Anatomy of the sural nerve and its relation to the Achilles tendon. Foot Ankle Int, 21: 475–477.
  • 39. Webb JM, Bannister GC (1999) Percutaneous repair of the ruptured tendo Achillis. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81: 877–880.
  • 40. Wilkins R, Bisson LJ (2012) Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med, 40: 2154–2160.
  • 41. Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, Mohtadi NG, Giffin JR, Fowler P, Kean CO, Kirkley A (2010) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92: 2767–2775.
  • 42. Wong J, Barrass V, Maffulli N (2002) Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med, 30: 565–575.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-98538aae-7d3b-4b72-9a74-18df796f30de
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.