Benefit allocation in the construction supply chain considering carbon emissions

• Autorzy: Du Q. , Huang Y. , Xu Y. , Bai L. , Bao T. , Wang H.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The construction industry has played an important role in reducing carbon emissions. Various policies have been implemented to stimulate construction enterprises to reduce carbon emissions, but the effects of emission reduction are not obvious, for they do not directly benefit the enterprises. This paper employs a modified Shapley value method to study benefit allocation in a construction supply chain considering carbon emissions. Four correction factors are proposed for modifying the initial allocation, namely the contribution rate of inputs, the risk-sharing coefficient, the degree of cooperation and the contribution rate of carbon emissions. We analyze carbon emissions based on an illustrative example of a concrete supply chain consisting of a cement manufacturer, a concrete manufacturer and a construction enterprise, and present our findings. First, the enterprises intend to cooperate to achieve the greatest benefit, and second, the benefit allocation is greatly affected by carbon emissions. Participants that produce more carbon emissions have higher carbon tax costs, which reduce profits. Further suggestions are also presented, which may help enterprises reduce carbon emissions. And policy makers should arrive at a suitable level of carbon tax to promote the smooth progress of projects and to improve the emission reduction effect.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 28
• Numer: 5
• Opis fizyczny: p.3697-3709,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Du Q.

• School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

autor

Huang Y.

• School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

autor

Xu Y.

• School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

autor

Bai L.

• School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

autor

Bao T.

• School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

autor

Wang H.

• School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China

Bibliografia

• 1. CHAU C.K., HUI W.K., NG W.Y., POWELL G. Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options. Resource, Conservation & Recycling, 61 (4), 22, 2012.
• 2. HONG J.K., SHEN G.Q., FENG Y., LAU S.T., MAO C. Greenhouse gas emissions during the construction phase of a building: a case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 249, 2015.
• 3. LI L.J., CHEN K.H. Quantitative assessment of carbon dioxide emissions in construction projects: A case study in Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 394, 2017.
• 4. ZHANG X.C., WANG F.L. Assessment of embodied carbon emissions for building construction in China: Comparative case studies using alternative methods. Energy & Building, 130, 330, 2016.
• 5. CHOU J.S., YEH K.C. Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions simulation and environmental cost analysis for building construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 137, 2015.
• 6. ZHOU P., WANG M. Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review. Ecological Economics, 125, 47, 2016.
• 7. GALINATO G.I., YODER J.K. An integrated tax-subsidy policy for carbon emission reduction. Resource & Energy Economics, 32 (3), 310, 2010.
• 8. DU S.F., ZHU L.L., LIANG L., MA F. Emission-dependent supply chain and environment-policy-making in the ‘cap-and-trade’ system. Energy Policy, 57 (C), 61, 2013.
• 9. NIE P.Y., CHEN Y.H., YANG Y.C., WANG X.H. Subsidies in carbon finance for promoting renewable energy development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 677, 2016.
• 10. WANG C.X., WANG W., HUANG R.B. Supply chain enterprise operations and government carbon tax decisions considering carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 152, 271, 2017.
• 11. CHANG Y., RIES R.J., WANG Y.W. The embodied energy and environmental emissions of construction projects in China: An economic input-output LCA model. Energy Policy, 38 (11), 6597, 2010.
• 12. BAZAN E., JABER M.Y., ZANONI S. Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer-retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 394, 2016.
• 13. LIAO Z.L., ZHU X.L., SHI J.R. Case study on initial allocation of Shanghai carbon emission trading based on Shapley value. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 338, 2015.
• 14. DADHICH P., GENOVESE A., KUMAR N., ACQUAYE A. Developing sustainable supply chains in the UK construction industry: A case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 271, 2015.
• 15. HONG J.T., ZHANG Y.B., DING M.Q. Sustainable supply chain management practices, supply chain dynamic capabilities, and enterprise performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3508, 2017.
• 16. KATOK E., PAVLOV V. Fairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory study. Journal of Operations Management, 31 (3), 129, 2013.
• 17. SHAPLEY L.S. A value for n-person games. American Political Science Review, 28, 307, 1953.
• 18. DINAR A., HOWITT R.E. Mechanisms for allocation of environmental control cost: empirical tests of acceptability and stability. Journal of Environmental Management, 49 (2), 183, 1997.
• 19. SCHMEIDLER D. The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 17 (6), 1163, 1969.
• 20. PUERTO J., PEREA F. Finding the nucleolus of any n -person cooperative game by a single linear program. Computers & Operations Research, 40 (10), 2308, 2013.
• 21. WU Q., REN H.B., GAO W.J., REN J.X. Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions. Energy, 119, 384, 2017.
• 22. HASAN K.N., SAHA T.K., CHATTOPADHYAY D., EGHBAL M. Benefit-based expansion cost allocation for large scale remote renewable power integration into the Australian grid. Applied Energy, 113 (1), 836, 2014.
• 23. SHANG T.C., ZHANG K., LIU P.H., CHEN Z.W., LI X.P., WU X. What to allocate and how to allocate? – Benefit allocation in Shared Savings Energy Performance Contracting Projects. Energy, 91, 60, 2015.
• 24. KONSTANTELOS I., PUDJIANTO D., STRBAC G., DECKER J.D. Integrated North Sea grids: the costs, the benefits and their distribution between countries. Energy Policy, 101, 28, 2017.
• 25. HU L., ZHANG W.G., YE X.S. Profit allocation of PPP Model Based on the Revised Shapely. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 25 (2), 149, 2011.
• 26. HE T.X., ZHANG Y.N., SHI L.Y., CHEN G.W. Allocation research of stakeholders based on stakeholder satisfaction with the PPP project benefits. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 32 (3), 66, 2015.
• 27. AYDOGAN E.K. Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (4), 3992, 2011.
• 28. PAWLAK Z. Rough sets. International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, 11 (5), 341, 1982.
• 29. CHEN Y.H., HUANG G. Improved method of determining comprehensive weight based on rough set theory and AHP. Measurement & Control Technology, 36 (6), 132, 2017.
• 30. CHEN A.B., GU D.S., LIU H.Q. Weights analysis of factors affecting the stability of mined-out areas based on analytic hierarchy process and rough sets theory. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 07 (9), 50, 2011.
• 31. ZHANG W.Y., M Y., CHEN X., ZHANG Y.F. Combined with rough set and AHP to determine the attribute weight. Measurement & Control Technology, 32 (10), 125, 2013.
• 32. YE J., WANG L. Research on comprehensive evaluation method based on rough set and AHP. Application Research of Computers, 27 (7), 2486, 2010.
• 33. CHEN J.V., YEN D.C., RAJKUMAR T.M., TOMOCHKO N.A. The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 33 (3), 262, 2011.
• 34. MITCHELL E.M., KOVACH J.V. Improving supply chain information sharing using Design for Six Sigma. European Research on Management & Business Economics, 22 (3), 147, 2016.
• 35. LI J., SU Q., MA L. Production and transportation outsourcing decisions in the supply chain under single and multiple carbon policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 1109, 2016.
• 36. ZHANG Z., ZHANG A.Z., WANG D.P., LI A.J., SONG H.X. How to improve the performance of carbon tax in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2060, 2016.
• 37. SANDANAYAKE M., ZHANG G.M., SETUNGE S. Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings – Two case studies. Building & Environment, 95, 189, 2016.
• 38. AKAN M.Ö.A., DHAVALE D.G., SARKIS J. Greenhouse gas emissions in the construction industry: an analysis and evaluation of a concrete supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1195, 2017.
• 39. IPCC, 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. 2006.
• 40. ZAHNG Y. Evaluation of carbon dioxide reduction of life cycle for buildings (PhD thesis). National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan. 2002.
• 41. LUO Z., YANG L., HAN B. Research on CO2 emission calculation method and CO2 reduction strategies of building materials. Building Science, 27, 1, 2011.
• 42. WANG Y. Whole life cycle carbon emissions research of industrialized precast construction (PhD thesis). Southeast University, China. 2016.
• 43. GAN M., YANG S., LI D.D., WANG M.F., CHEN S., XIE R.H., LIU J.Y. A novel intensive distribution logistics network design and profit allocation problem considering sharing economy. Complexity, 2018 (2), 1, 2018.
• 44. JOKAR Z., MOKHTAR A. Policy making in the cement industry for CO2 mitigation on the pathway of sustainable development-A system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.286, 2018.
• 45. SHEN W.G., CAO L., LI Q., ZHANG W.S., WANG G.M., LI C.C. Quantifying CO2 emissions from China’s cement industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1004, 2015.
• 46. ALI M.B., SAIDUR R., HOSSAIN M.S. A review on emission analysis in cement industries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15 (5), 2252, 2011.
• 47. MA L., WANG L., WU K.J., TSENG M.L. Assessing co-benefit barriers among stakeholders in Chinese construction industry. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 137, 101, 2018.
• 48. CHEN Z.Y., NIE P.Y. Effects of carbon tax on social welfare: A case study of China. Applied Energy, 183, 1607, 2016.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/94995