PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2011 | 57 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

The use of RAPD markers for detecting genetic similarity and molecular identification of chamomile (Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rausch.) genotypes

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

PL
Wykorzystanie markerów RAPD do określenia podobieństwa genetycznego oraz molekularnej identyfikacji genotypów rumianku pospolitego (Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rausch)

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The objectives of this study was to assess the of genetic similarity and identification of 13 wild species and 7 cultivars of chamomile using RAPD markers. 53 RAPD primers were screened, only 12 produced polymorphic and repeatable fragments. In total, all primers used produced 157 fragments out of which 149 were polymorphic. The RAPDbased genetic similarity was estimated. Genetic similarity matrix was applied for cluster analysis through UPGM A method. On the dendrogram, only genotypes from Austria, Czech Republic as weel as genotypes collected in area of Lublin were grouped together. The remaining genotypes from the same area were located in different groups. Present study demonstrated that RAPD markers provided a practical and effective method not only to evaluate the genetic similarity and relationships but also to identify chamomile genotypes.
PL
Celem badań było określenie podobieństwa genetycznego oraz identyfikacja 13 dzikich gatunków i 7 odmian rumianku pospolitego za pomocą markerów RAPD. Spośród 53 starterów wybrano 12, które amplifikowały polimorficzne i powtarzalne produkty, łącznie uzyskano 157 fragmentów, z których 149 było polimorficznych. Podobieństwo genetyczne oszacowano w oparciu o markery RAPD. Analizę skupień wykonano metodą średnich połączeń UPGM A. Na uzyskanym dendrogramie tylko genotypy pochodzące z Austrii, Czech oraz zebrane w okolicach Lublina ulegały wspólnemu skupieniu. Reszta analizowanych genotypów pochodzących z tych samych regionów ulegała skupieniu w różnych grupach. Przedstawione badania wykazują, że metoda RAPD jest dobrą metodą nie tylko do oszacowania podobieństwa genetycznego, ale także do identyfikacji genotypów rumianku pospolitego.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

57

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.38-47,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Institute of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, University of Life Sciences, Akademicka 15, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Franke R, Schilcher H. Relevance and use of chamomile (Matricaria recutita L.). Acta Hort 2007; 749:29-43.
  • 2. Manifesto MM , Schlotter AR, Hoop HE, Suarez EY , Dobcovsky J. Quantitive evaluation of genetic diversity in wheat germplasm using molecular markers. Crop Sci 2001; 41:682-90.
  • 3. Letchamo W, Marquard R. The pattern of active substances accumulation in chamomile genotypes nder different growing conditions and harvesting frequencies. Acta Hort 1993; 331:357-64.
  • 4. Pourohit SS, Vyas SP. Medicinal plant cultivation. Agrobios, India 2004.
  • 5. Botcher H, Gunter I, Frank R, Warnstorff K. Physiological postharvest response of Matricaria (M. recutita) flowers. Postharvest Biol Technol 2001; 22(1):39-51.
  • 6. N irr B. Herb cultivation and their utilization. Delhi 2002.
  • 7. G ichuki ST, Berenyi M, Zhang D, Hermann M, Schmidt J, Glossol J, Burg K. Genetic diversity in sweet potato (Ipomea atatas) in relationship to geographic source as assessed with RAPD markers. Genet Crop Ev 2003; 5:429-37.
  • 8. Anthony F, Bertrand B, Quiros O, Wilches A, Lashermes P, Berthaud J, Charrier A. Genetic diversity ofwild coffee (Coffea arabica L.) using molecular markers. Euphytica 2004; 118(1):53-65.
  • 9. Hagidimitriou M, Katsiotis A, Menexes G, Pontikis C, Loukas M. Genetic diversity of major Greek olive cultivars using molecular (AFLPs and RAPDs) markers and morphological traits. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 2005; 130(2):211-17.
  • 10. K olodinska Brantestam A, von Bothmer R, Dayteg C, Rashal I, Tuvesson S, Weibull J. Genetic diversity changes and relationships in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) germplasm of Nordic and Baltic areasas shown by SSR markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Ev. 2007; 54(4):749-58.
  • 11. Srivastava S, Gupta PS, Saxena VK, Srivastava HM. Genetic diversity analysis in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) using isozymes, RAPD and ISSR markers. Cytologia 2007; 72(3):265-74.
  • 12. Horvath A, Christmann H, Laigret F. Genetic diversity and relationships among Prunus cerasifera (cherry plum) clones. Can. J. Bo. 2008; 86(11):1311–18.
  • 13. Ray Choudhury P, Singh IP, George B, Verma AK, Singh NP.. Assessment of genetic diversity of pigeonpea cultivars using RAPD analysis. Biol. Plantarum 2009; 52(4):648-53.
  • 14. W illiams JGK , Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl Acid Res 1990; 18:6531-5.
  • 15. Virk PS, Ford-Lloyd BV, Jackson MT, Newbury HJ. Use of RAPD for the study of diversity within plant germplasm collections. Heredity 1995; 74:170-79.
  • 16. W olf HT, Zündorf I, Winckler T, Bauer R, Dingermann T. Characterization of Echinacea species and detection of possible adulterations by RAPD analysis. Planta Med 1999; 65(8):773-4.
  • 17. K apteyn J, Goldsbrough PB, Simon JE. Genetic relationships and diversity of commercially relevant Echinacea species. Theor Appl Genet 2002; 105(2-3):369-76.
  • 18. K hanuja SPS, Shasany AK, Srivastava A, Kumar S. Assessment of genetic relationships in Mentha species. Euphytica 2000; 111(2):121-5.
  • 19. Shasany AK, Darokar MP, Dhawan S, Gupta AK, Gupta S, Shukla AK, Patra NK , S. Khanuja PS. Use of RAPD and AFLP markers to identify inter- and intraspecific hybrids of Mentha L. J. Hered. 2005; 96(5):542-9.
  • 20. N ebauer SG, del Castillo-Agudo L, Segura J. An assessment of genetic relationships within the genus Digitalis based on PCR-generated RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2000; 100(8):1209-16.
  • 21. N ebauer SG, Castillo-Agudo L, Segura J. RAPD variation within and among natural population of outcrossing willow-leaved faxglove (Digitalis obscura L.). Theor Appl Genet 1999; 98:985-94.
  • 22. Hadian J, Tabatabaei SMF, Naghavi MR, Jamzad Z, Ramak-Masoumi T. Genetic diversity of Iranian accessions of Satureja hortensis L. based on horticultural traits and RAPD markers. Sci Hortic 2007; 115(2):196-202.
  • 23. C heng Z, Lu BR, Baldwin BS, Sameshima K, Chen JK. Comparative studies of genetic diversity in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) varieties based on analysis of agronomic and RAPD data. Hereditas 2002; 136(3):231-9.
  • 24. W agner C, Friedt W, Marquard RA, Ordon F. Molecular analyses on the genetic diversity and inheritance of (-)-a-bisabolol and chamazulene content in tetraploid chamomile (Chamomilla recutita (L.) Rausch.). Plant Sci 2005; 169:917-27.
  • 25. Solouki M, Mehdikhani H, Zeinali H, Emamjomeh AA.. Study of genetic diversity in chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) based on morphological traits and molecular markers. Sci Hortic 2008; 117(3):281-7.
  • 26. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 1987; 19:11-15.
  • 27. Belaj A, Trujillo I, de la Rosa R, Rallo L, Giménez MJ.. Polymorphism and discrimination capacity of randomly amplified polymorphic markers in olive germplasm bank. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 2001; 126(1):64-71.
  • 28. Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 1999; 98(1):107-12.
  • 29. N ei M, Li WH. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1979; 76:5269-73.
  • 30. Rohlf FJ. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 5.1. New York 2001.
  • 31. C hen L, Gao Q, Chen D, Xu C. The use of RAPD markers for detecting genetic diversity, relationship and molecular identification of Chinese elite tea genetic resources [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] preserved in a tea germplasm repository. Biodivers Conserv 2005; 14(6):1433-44.
  • 32. Prakash S, Van Staden J. Assessment of genetic relationships between Rhus L. species using RAPD markers. Genet Resour Crop Ev 2007; 54(1):7-11.
  • 33. Baraket, G., Chatti, K., Saddoud, O., Mars, M., Marrakchi, M., Trif,i M., Salhi-Hannachi, A. Genetic analysis of Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Sci Hortic 2009; 120”487-92.
  • 34. Tatikonda L, Wani SP, Kannan S, Beerelli N, Sreedevi TK, Hoisington DA, Devi P, Varshney RK. AFLPbased molecular characterization of an elite germplasm collection of Jatropha curcas L., a biofuel plant. Plant Sci 2009; 176(4):505-13.

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-9653672e-f3b9-447e-ba0e-5ac7f498aa45
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.