Assessment of potentially probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from chickens

• Autorzy: Kizerwetter-Swida M. , Binek M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study was performed in order to isolate lactobacilli from chicken droppings and to select strains with the most promising probiotic properties. Lactobacillus strains were isolated from a flock of healthy laying hens. The first selection criterion was the ability to inhibit the growth of Salmonella Enteritidis. Then the tolerance to low pH and bile salt, the ability to coaggregate with pathogenic bacteria and hydrogen peroxide production were evaluated. Four isolates showing the best antagonistic activity against Salmonella Enetritidis were selected for further research. All isolates tested tolerated low pH and bile salt, likewise all produced hydrogen peroxide. They efficiently coaggregated with C. perfringens and relatively less with E. coli. Isolate 03’04 displayed above-average results in all criteria, thus it is considered as a potential probiotic for chickens, and will be further evaluated for health promoting effect in animals. The results presented in this study confirm the strain specific probiotic properties and prove the probiotic potential of isolate 03’04. Strong antagonistic properties against C. perfringens exhibited by certain Lactobacillus strains indicate the possibility to use them as a component of probiotic supplement in necrotic enteritis of poultry.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 19
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.15-20,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kizerwetter-Swida M.

• Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Binek M.

• Department of Preclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Ciszewskiego 8, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Anderson RC, Cookson AL., McNabb WC, Kelly WJ, Roy NC (2010) Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 2648 is a potential probiotic that enhances intestinal barrier function. FEMS Microbiol Lett 309: 184-192.
• Bujnakova D, Strakova E, Kmet V (2014) In vitro evaluation of the safety and probiotic properties of lactobacilli isolated from chicken and calves. Anaerobe 29: 118-127.
• Bull M, Plummer S, Marchesi J, Mahenthiralingam E (2013) The life history of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a probiotic: a tale of revisionary taxonomy, misidentification and commercial success. FEMS Microbiol Lett 349: 77-87.
• Cao L, Yang XJ, Li ZJ, Sun FF, Wu XH, Yao JH (2012) Reduced lesions in chickens with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis by Lactobacillus fermentum 1.20291. Poult Sci 91: 3065-3071.
• Ehrmann MA, Kurzak P, Bauer J, Vogel RF (2002) Characterization of lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J Appl Microbiol 92: 966-975.
• Eschenbach DA, Davick PR, Williams BL, Klebanoff SJ, Young-Smith K, Critchlow CM, Holmes KK (1989) Prevalence of hydrogen peroxide-producing Lactobacillus species in normal women and women with bacterial vaginosis. J Clin Microbiol 27: 251-256.
• FAO/WHO (2002) Joint FAO/WHO Working group report on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in food. London, Ontario, Canada, pp 1-11.
• Garriga M, Pascual M, Monfort JM, Hugas M (1998) Selection of lactobacilli for chicken probiotic adjuncts. J Appl Microbiol 84: 125-132.
• Hashemi SM, Shahidi F, Mortazavi SA, Milani E, Eshaghi Z (2014) Potentially probiotic Lactobacillus strains from traditional Kurdish cheese. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 6: 22-31.
• Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Ali MA, Jalaludin S (1996) Antagonistic effects of intestinal Lactobacillus isolates on pathogens of chicken. Lett Appl Microbiol 23: 67-71.
• Juárez Tomás MS, Wiese B, Nader-Macias ME (2005) Effects of culture conditions on the growth and auto-aggregation ability of vaginal Lactobacillus johnsonii CRL 1294. J Appl Microbiol 99: 1383-1391.
• Kizerwetter-Świda M, Binek M (2009) Protective effect of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus strain on infection with pathogenic bacteria in chickens. Pol J Vet Sci 12: 15-20.
• Kizerwetter-Świda M, Binek M (2005) Selection of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus strains towards their inhibitory activity against poultry enteropathogenic bacteria. Pol J Microbiol 54: 287-294.
• Klaenhammer TR, Altermann E, Pfeiler E, Buck BL, Goh YJ, O’Flaherty S, Barrangou R, Duong T (2008) Functional genomics of probiotic Lactobacilli. J Clin Gastroenterol 42 (Suppl 3): S160-S162.
• Kõll P, Mandar R, Marcotte H, Leibur E, Mikelsaar M, Hammarström L (2008) Characterization of oral lactobacilli as potential probiotics for oral health. Oral Microbiol Immunol 23: 139-147.
• Lee NK, Yun CW, Kim SW, Chang HI, Kang CW, Paik HD (2008) Screening of Lactobacilli derived from chicken feces and partial characterization of Lactobacillus acidophilus A12 as an animal probiotics. J Microbiol Biotechnol 18: 338-342.
• Lima ET, Andreatti Filho RL, Okamoto AS, Noujaim JC, Barros MR, Crocci AJ (2007) Evaluation in vitro of the antagonistic substances produced by Lactobacillus spp. isolated from chickens. Can J Vet Res 71: 103-107.
• Messaoudi S, Kergourlay G, Dalgalarrondo M, Choiset Y, Ferchichi M, Prévost H, Pilet MF, Chobert JM, Manai M, Dousset X (2012a) Purification and characterization of a new bacteriocin active against Campylobacter produced by Lactobacillus salivarius SMXD51. Food Microbiol 32: 129-134.
• Messaoudi S, Madi A, Prevost H, Feuilloley M, Manai M, Dousset X, Connil N (2012b) In vitro evaluation of the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus salivarius SMXD51. Anaerobe 18: 584-589.
• Rehman HU, Vahjen W, Awad WA, Zentek J (2007) Indigenous bacteria and bacterial metabolic products in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Arch Anim Nutr 61: 319-335.
• Saarela M, Mogensen G, Fonden R, Matto J, Mattila-Sandholm T (2000) Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties. J Biotechnol 84: 197-215.
• Sabir F, Beyatli Y, Cokmus C, Onal-Darilmaz D (2010) Assessment of potential probiotic properties of Lactobacillus spp., Lactococcus spp., and Pediococcus spp. strains isolated from kefir. J Food Sci 75: M568-M573.
• Schillinger U, Lücke FK (1989) Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat. Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 1901-1906.
• Taheri HR, Moravej H, Tabandeh F, Zaghari M, Shivazad M (2009) Screening of lactic acid bacteria toward their selection as a source of chicken probiotic. Poult Sci 88: 1586-1593.
• Valeriano VD, Parungao-Balolong MM, Kang DK (2014) In vitro evaluation of the mucin-adhesion ability and probiotic potential of Lactobacillus mucosae LM1. J Appl Microbiol. 117: 485-497.
• Walter J (2008) Ecological role of lactobacilli in the gastrointestinal tract: implications for fundamental and biomedical research. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 4985-4996.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/pjvs-2016-0003