In vitro callus and shoot organogenesis from leaf and stem explants of Chamaedaphne calyculata

• Autorzy: Zrobek-Sokolnik A. , Dynowski P. , Holdynski C.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Leatherleaf Chamaedaphne calyculata (L) Moench is a relict, rare and endangered species in Poland. There are no reports on the micropropagation of Chamaedaphne calyculata in the literature. Therefore, the aim of this study was to propose a propagation protocol for leatherleaf via indirect organogenesis using leaves and stems (internodal segments) derived from mature plants growing in a natural stand and from plants grown in vitro as explants. The medium developed by Anthony et al. (2004) with 100%, 50% and 25% salt concentrations, supplemented with IAA (5 and 10μM) and TDZ (5 and 10μM), was used for callus development and the induction of adventitious shoots. The media developed by Anthony et al. (2004) and Anderson (1980), both containing 10μM TDZ and 5μM IAA or 2.28μM zeatin, were used for adventitious shoot elongation. Secondary explants proved to be the most effective starting material for callus induction, the regeneration and elongation of adventitious shoots. The most supportive medium for callus induction and growth and the induction of adventitious shoots was the full medium proposed by Anthony et al. (2004) containing 5μM IAA and 10μM TDZ. Anderson’s (1980) medium containing 2.28μM zeatin delivered optimal results in the elongation of adventitious shoots of Ch. calyculata. Roots were cultivated on Anderson’s (1980) phytohormone-free medium. Approximately 65% of the plantlets survived after transfer to the sphagnum-peat and perlite mixture (3:1). The plants grew normally without any signs of morphological variation. This study makes the first ever attempt to propose an effective micropropagation protocol for Ch. calyculata.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

in vitro culture; callus; shoot; organogenesis; leaf; stem; explant; Chamaedaphne calyculata; Ericaceae; micropropagation; plant species; plant conservation

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Dendrobiology
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 72
• Opis fizyczny: p.85-92,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Zrobek-Sokolnik A.

• Department of Botany and Nature Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Lodzki 1, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Dynowski P.

• Department of Botany and Nature Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Lodzki 1, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland

autor

Holdynski C.

• Department of Botany and Nature Protection, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Plac Lodzki 1, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

• Anderson W.C. 1980. Tissue culture propagation of red and black raspberries, Rubus idaeus and R. occidentalis. ActaHorticulturae 112: 124–132.
• Anthony J.M., Senarata T., Dixon K.W., Sivasithamparam K. 2004. Somatic embryogenesis for mass propagation of Ericaceae – a case study with Leucopogon verticillatus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 76: 137–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:TICU.0000007285.73884.fc
• Brown D.C.W., Thorpe T.A. 1986. Plant regeneration by organogenesis. In: Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants. Vol. 3. Vasil, I.K.(ed.). Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 49–66.
• Cao X., Hammerschlang F.A. 2000. Improved shoot organogenesis from leaf explants of highbush blueberry. HortScience 35: 945–947.
• Cuenca B., Vieitez A.M. 1999. Histological Study of in vitro development of adventitious buds on leaf explants of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant 35: 326–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11627-999-0043-8
• Debnath S.C. 2003. Improved shoot organogenesis from hypocotyl segments of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant 39: 490–495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/IVP2003458
• Gajdosova A., Ostrolucka M.G., Libiakova G., Ondruskova E., Simala D. 2006. Microclonal propagation of Vaccinium sp. and Rubus sp. and detection of genetic variability in culture in vitro. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 14: 103–119.
• Gamborg O.L., Miller R.A., Ojima K. 1968 Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Experimental Cell Research 50: 151–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5
• He S.-S., Liu Ch.-Z., Saxena P.-K. 2007. Plant regeneration of an endangered medicinal plant Hydrastis canadensis L. Scientia Horticulturae 113: 82–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2007.01.014
• Hruskoci J.D., Read P.E. 1992. In vitro shoot regeneration from internode segments and internode-derived callus of blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). HortScience 27: 571.
• Hruskoci J.D., Read P.E. 1993. In vitro shoot regeneration from internode segments and internode-derived callus of blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Acta Horticulturae 346:127–132.
• Huetteman C.A., Preece J.E. 1993. Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 33: 105–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01983223
• Kruszelnicki J. 2001. Chamedafne północna (Chamaedaphne calyculata L. Moench). In: Polska czerwona księga roślin. Paprotniki i rośliny kwiatowe. Zarzycki K., Kaźmierczakowa R. (red.). Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera PAN, Kraków, pp. 283–285.
• Litwińczuk W., Wadas M. 2008. Auxin-dependent development and habituation of highbush blueberry (Vaccinium covilleanum But. Et Pl.) ‘Herbert’ in vitro shoot cultures. Scientia Horticulturae 119: 41–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.07.007
• Lloyd G., McCown B. 1980. Commercially-feasible micropropagation of Mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Combined Proceedings, International Plant Propagators’ Society 30: 421–427.
• Lu C.-Y. 1993. The use of thidiazuron in tissue culture. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology – Plant 29: 92–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02632259
• Malinowska H., Janyszek A., Szczepaniak M. 2004. Propagation of leather leaf Chamaedaphne calyculata (L.) Moench from seeds and shoot cuttings. Dendrobiology 52: 33–37.
• McCown B.H. 2000. Woody shrubs and trees. In: Plant Tissue Culture. Techniques and Experiments. Smith R.H. (ed.). Academic Press, USA, pp. 123–133.
• Meiners J., Shwab M., Szankowski I. 2007. Efficient in vitro regeneration systems for Vaccinium species. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 89: 169–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9230-7
• Moerman D. 1998. Native American Ethnobotany. Timber Press, Oregon, pp. 135–145.
• Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tabasco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
• Shelyuto V.L., Glyzin B.I. 1975. Guaiaverin from Chamaedaphne calyculata. – Vitebsk Medical Institute. Translated from Khimiya Prirodnkh Soedinenii 4: 515.
• Shevade A., Preece J.E. 1993. In vitro shoot and floral organogenesis from stem explants from Rhododendron PJM group clone. Scientia Horticulturae 56: 163–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(93)90017-K
• Singh K.K., Kumar S., Rai L.K., Krishna A.P. 2003. Rhododendrons conservation in the Sikkim Himalaya. Current Science 85: 602–606.
• Skoog F., Miller C.O. 1957. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. In: The Biological Action of Growth Substances. Porter H.K. (ed.). Academic Press, New York pp. 118–131.
• Tiwari O.N., Chauhan U.K. 2006. Rhododendron conservation in Sikkim Himalaya. Current Science 90: 532–541.
• Tomsone S., Gertnere D. 2003. In vitro shoot regeneration from flower and leaf explants in Rhododendron. Biologia Plantarum 46: 463–465.
• Tomsone S., Gertnere D., Novikova D. 2004. The influence of thidiazuron on shoot regeneration and proliferation of rhododendrons in vitro. Acta Universitatis Latviensis, Biology 676: 239–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024363210872
• Vejsadova H. 2008. Growth regulator effect on in vitro regeneration of rhododendron cultivars. HortScience (Prague) 35: 90–94.
• Zimmerman R.H., Broome O.C. 1980. Blueberry micropropagation. – Proceedings of the Conference on Nursery Production of Fruit Plants through Tissue Culture USDA-SEA, Agricultural Research Results ARR-NE 11: 44–47.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12657/denbio.072.007