Consistency of the wind power industry, including the process of sustainable planning and space management

• Autorzy: Malczyk T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Development of the wind power industry in Poland is more and more dynamic, which is proving interest in obtaining more energy from renewable sources. It is one of more efficient and attractive forms of eco-energetic activity. At the same time, wind energy is a unique, dominant spatial form that clearly influences the quality of the landscape. This is a reason why it frequently evokes dichotomous feelings. Not questioning the need for existence of this branch of energy production, and even seeking the possibility of its further sustainable development, it is reasonable to develop a consistent assessment method to influence eco-energetic investments in the landscape and environment. It will enable defining, testing, and creating planning methods to facilitate and implement policy of broadly-understood sustainable development. In the article design capabilities and implementation possibilities of projects, called wind farms, were discussed on the basis of examples of the existing and planned projects in Poland. Merging scientific fields related to renewable energy sources and spatial planning requires development of method pursuing the idea of environmental protection and sustainable development, both of eco-energetic and spatial nature. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the need to define research areas whose solution allows us to determine a coherent methodology for the evaluation and location of wind farms in the process of sustainable planning and space management.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.699-707,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Malczyk T.

• Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Applied Science in Nysa, Poland
• Institute of Landscape Architecture, University of Environmental and Life Sciences in Wrocław, Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. JERPÁSEN G. B., LARSEN K. C. Visual impact of wind farms on culture heritage: A Norwegian case study, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31, 206, 2011.
• 2. MALCZYK T. Antropopresja ekoenergetyczna w procesie zmiany krajobrazu na przykładzie wybranych farm wiatrowych w Polsce (Ecopower anthropopression in the process of changing of the Landscape on the example of selected wind farms in Poland), Publishing House of Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, p. 7-14, 26-62, 163-187, 2013 [In Polish].
• 3. GROTH T. M., VOGT CH. A. Rural wind farm development: Social, environmental and economic features important to local residents, Renewable Energy, 63, 1, 2014.
• 4. ROOPALI P. Resisting and Reconciling Big Wind: Middle Landscape Politics in the New American West, Antipode, USA, 43 (3), 754, 2011.
• 5. MOLNAROVA K., SKLENIČKA P., STIBOREK J., SVOBODOVA K., SALEK M., BRABEC E. Visual preferences for wind turbines: Location, numbers and respondent characteristics, Applied Energy, 92, 269, 2012.
• 6. MALCZYK T. Eco Energy Anthropopression in the Landscape for Example the Wind Park "Lipniki", Landscape Architecture, 36 (3), 37, 2012.
• 7. LISIK A. (ed.), Odnawialne źródła energii w architekturze (Renewable energy sources in architecture), Publishing House of Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, 167, 2002. [In Polish].
• 8. FROST&SULLIVAN, Favorable Winds Blow for Offshore Wind Power, PR Newswire US, California, USA, 1, 2012.
• 9. RYŃSKA E. D. Architect w procesie tworzenia harmonijnego środowiska (Architect in a process of creation of harmonious environment), Publishing House of Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 11-25, 117-136, 2004 [In Polish].
• 10. KARDAS S.J., JASIŃSKA M. Społeczny wymiar zrównoważonego rozwoju organizacji (Social dimension of organization sustainable development), Studio Emka Publishing House, Warsaw, 15, 2010 [In Polish].
• 11. TORUŃSKI J., WYRĘBEK H. Zrównoważony rozwój regionów (Sustainable regions development), Studio Emka Publishing House, Warsaw, 105, 2011 [In Polish].
• 12. KULAS Z. Szanse i zagrożenia dla energetyki wiatrowej, Wiedza drogą do sukcesu - kreowanie innowacyjności (Opportunities and threats for the wind power industry, knowledge as a road to success -innovation creation), Publishing House of PWSZ in Nysa, 91, 2010/11 [In Polish].
• 13. MIKOŚ J. Budownictwo ekologiczne (Ecological construction), Publishing House of Politechnika Śląska, Gliwice, 54, 2000 [In Polish].
• 14. SOBAŃSKI R., KABAT M, NOWAK W. Jak pozyskać ciepło z ziemi (How to acquire heat from the ground), Centralny Ośrodek informacji budownictwa, Warsaw, 13-20, 17-26, 2000 [In Polish].
• 15. KOM, Energia 2020 A Strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure energy, European Commission, Brussels, 7, 2010. [In Polish].
• 16. SZLACHTA J. Możliwości zastosowania odnawialnych źródeł energii na obszarach wiejskich (The possibilities of applying renewable energy sources in rural areas), [in:] Ag-ritourism, renewable energy, eco-agriculture, environment shaping (ed. T Malczyk), Publishing House of PWSZ in Nysa, Nysa, 139, 2010. [In Polish].
• 17. ROMAŃSKI L. Przedstawienie możliwości wdrożenia konkretnych rodzajów OZE w gospodarstwach domowych z uwzględnieniem regionalnych uwarunkowań - Energia wiatru i wody, Konferencja OZE dla domu i biznesu (Presentation of possibilities of implementation of specific kinds of RSE in households taking into consideration regional conditions - Energy of wind and water, Conference for RSE house and business), ODR in Wrocław, 2010. [In Polish].
• 18. JANIKOWSKI R. Zarządzanie antropopresją w kierunku zrównoważonego rozwoju społeczeństwa i gospodarki (Management of anthropopression towards sustainable development of the society and economy), Difin, Warsaw, 12, 2004 [In Polish].
• 19. JANIKOWSKI R. Zarządzani ekologiczne (Ecological management), Akademicka Oficyna PLJ, Warsaw, 1999 [In Polish].
• 20. LENARTOWICZ K. Słownik o psychologii Architektury dla studiujących architekturę (Glossary of Architecture psychology for architecture students), Publishing House of Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, 97, 1997 [In Polish].
• 21. McCARTHY J. First World political ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use movement, Environment and Planning, 34, 1281, 2002.
• 22. DUNCAN J. S. and DUNCAN N. G. Landscape of Privilege: The Politics of the Aesthetic in a American Suburb, Routledge, New York, 2004.
• 23. CoEIWEP, Environmental Impacts of Wind-Energy Projects, Committee on Environmental Impacts of Wind Energy Projects, National Academies Press, Washington, p. 10-18, 48-90, 97-120, 2007.
• 24. WEIGT M. Góry Opawskie, przydrożne kapliczki, krzyże i figury Projekt "Powiat Prudnicki-Mikroregion Krnovski-twórcze pogranicze" (Opawskie Mountains, wayside shrines, crosses and statues, Project "Prudnicki District-Krnovski Microregion-creative borderland"), Prudnik, 13, 2009 [In Polish].
• 25. ROOPALI P. Resisting and Reconciling Big Wind: Middle Landscape Politics in the New American West, Department of Environmental Studies, Macalester College, St Paul, MN, Antipode, USA, 43 (3), 754, 2011.
• 26. AusWEA i ACNT, Wind Farms and Landscape Values, Australian Wind Energy Association and Australian Council of National Trusts, Australia, 2, 2004.
• 27. FLAGA A. Inżynieria wiatrowa (Wind engineering), Arkady, Warsaw, 639, 2008 [In Polish].
• 28. YUANCHANG D., ZHI Y., SHA L. A review on scale and siting of wind farms in China, Wind Energy, 14, 463, 2011.
• 29. EWEA, Annual Report 2013, The European Wind Energy Association, 6, 2013.
• 30. GWEC, Global Wind Report 2014, Global Wind Energy Council, Belgium, 7, 2014.
• 31. GAWLIKOWSKA A. Renewable energy in urban planning on the example of wind energy, Architecture and City Planning Committee, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2/2013, 148, 2013.
• 32. RADZIEWICZ W. Produkcja energii elektrycznej w elektrowni wiatrowej w zależności od potencjału wiatru na różnych wysokościach (Production of electric power in wind power stations depending on wind potential on various heights), Opole University of Technology, 1, 2009 [In Polish].
• 33. IMIGW. The Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, 1971-2001. Information of Opole Province in Brussels, Belgium, 2001. [In Polish].
• 34. DILLON CONSULTING LIMITED. McLean's Mountain Wind Farm Environmental Screening Report/Environmental Impact Statement, Toronto, Ontario, 2009.
• 35. KONDRACKI W. Geografia Polski - Mezoregiony fizyczno-geogeaficzne (Geography of Poland - physical - geogeaphic mesoregions): PWN, Warsaw, 1994 [In Polish].
• 36. ALLEN W.M. Tools for Evaluating Wind Turbine Visibility, Technical Considerations in Siting Wind Developments: NWCC Research Meeting, Washington, 16, 2005.
• 37. HECKLAU J. Visual Characteristics of Wind Turbines, Technical Considerations in Siting Wind Developments: NWCC Research Meeting, Washington, 13, 2005.
• 38. BADORA K.:Lokalizacja farm wiatrowych w południwej części województwa opolskiego a uwarunkowania przyrodniczo-krajobrazowe (Location of wind farms in the southern part of the Opolskie Province and natural -landscape conditions), Inżynieria Ekologiczna No. 23, Technology Basics Department, Lublin University of Technology, 97, 2010 [In Polish].
• 39. STRYJECKI M., MILEŃCZUK K. Wytyczne w zakresie prognozowania oddziaływań na środowisko farm wodnych (Guidelines regarding forecasting of environmental impact of wind farms), General Directorate for Environmental Protection, Warsaw, 27, 2011 [In Polish].
• 40. MANCHADO C., OTERO C., GÓMEZ-JÁUREGUI V., ARIAS R. BRUSCHI V., CENDRERO A. Visibility analysis and visibility software for the optimisation of wind farm design, Renewable Energy 60, 388, 2013.
• 41. Scottish Natural Heritage, Siting and Designing windfarms in the landscape, p. 2, 17-43, 2009.
• 42. BAJEROWSKI T., BIŁOZOR A., CIEŚLAK I., SANETRA A., SZCZEPAŃSKA A. Ocena i wycena krajobrazu (Assessment and evaluation of the Landscape), Educatera Publishing House, Olsztyn, 30, 2007 [In Polish].
• 43. WEJCHERT K. Elementy kompozycji urbanistycznej (Elements of urban composition), Arkady, 171, 1984 [In Polish].
• 44. LUC Land Use Consultants, Landscape Sensitivity Analysis for Wind Energy Development in Bath and North East Somerset, London, 7, 2010.
• 45. HURTADO J.P., FERNANDEZ J., PARRONDO J.L., BLANCO E. Spanish method of visual impact evaluation in wind farms, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 8 (5), 483, 2004.
• 46. SAŁYGA-RZOŃCA A, BURIAN M. Waloryzacja zabytkowego zasobu wsi województwa opolskiego - cele, metody, praktyka (Valorization of historic resources of villages of the Opole Province - goals, methods, practice), Regional Center of Research and Documentation of Monuments in Opole, 7, 2010.
• 47. MICHALIK-ŚNIEŻEK M., CHMIELEWSKI T.J. Analiza porównawcza kompozycji panoram widokowych Płaskowyżu Nałęczowskiego i Roztocza Zachodniego (Comparative analysis of view panoramas of Płaskowyż Nałęczowki and Roztocze Zachodnie), Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, XXXIII, 253, 2012 [In Polish].
• 48. RADOMSKI C. Agrometeorologia (Agrometeorology), PWN, Warszawa, 240, 1987 [In Polish].
• 49. MALCZYK T. Wytyczne do projektowania zieleni (Guidelines for greenery designing), Publishing House of PWSZ in Nysa, 19, 2005. [In Polish].
• 50. BUCHAN N. Visual Assessment of Windfarms: Best Practice, Edinburgh, University of Newcastle, p. 10-15, 17-20, 2002.
• 51. ROONŚ. Raport o oddziaływaniu na środowisko przedsięwzięcia PW Lipniki (Report on the environmental impact of the project Lipniki PW), Opole, 2007 [In Polish].
• 52. ROONŚ. Raport o oddziaływaniu na środowisko zespołu 2 elektrowni wiatrowych projektowanych w okolicy miejscowości Gostkowo, Natura (Environmental impact report of 2 planned wind power stations in the area of Gostkowo, Natura) (study by team), Gdynia, 48, 2009 [In Polish].
• 53. ROONŚ. Raport o oddziaływaniu przedsięwzięcia na środowisko Parku Elektrowni Wiatrowych "Staroźreby" (Environmental impact report of the Wind Power Stations Park "Staroźreby"), IDEA-ECO, Warsaw, p. 41, 124, 137, 167, 2011 [In Polish].
• 54. ROOŚ. Budowa Farmy Wiatrowej Lubrza wraz z infrastrukturą towrzyszącą (Construction of the Lubrza Wind Farm along with the accompanying infrastructure), p. 37, 50-53, 87, 2012 [In Polish].
• 55. RESOLUTION. W sprawie uchwalenia miejscowego planu zagospodarowania przestrzennego terenów lokalizacji farmy wiatrowej na gruntach wsi Browiniec Polski - Rostkowice -Wików (Adoption of the local spatial development plan of the areas of location of the wind farm in Browiniec Polski - Rostkowice - Wilków), Resolution No XXXVII/411/10 of the Municipal Council in Biała, 2010. [In Polish].
• 56. OTEROA C, MANCHADOA C, ARIAS R., BRUSCHI M.V., GÓMEZ-JÁUREGUI V., CENDRERO A. Wind energy development in Cantabria, Spain. Methodological approach, environmental, technological and social issues, Renewable Energy, 40, 137, 2012.
• 57. MANCHADOA C., OTEROA C., GÓMEZ-JÁUREGUI V., ARIAS R., BRUSCHI V., CENDRERO A. Visibility analysis and visibility software for the optimisation of wind farm design, Renewable Energy, 60, 388, 2013.
• 58. CETIN M. Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22 (5), 420, 2015.
• 59. CETIN M. Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kasta-monu City, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187:640, 2015.
• 60. CETIN M. Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: a case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2015.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/60728