Ecosystem services and recreational values as building blocks for eco development in NATURA 2000 sites

• Autorzy: Tomaskinova J. , Tomaskin J. , Soporska P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper reports the results of research aimed at assessing the recreational value (in the context of cultural value) of SCI Vtáčnik (central Slovakia), which is visited by about 16,000 tourists per year. The questionnaire survey was conducted from April to October 2015. The return rate of the questionnaire was 61.8% (309 respondents) out of 500 distributed copies consisting of 24 questions each. Following the processing of the results using the method of travel costs, with an average duration of stay of 1.38 day and respondents’ costs of €51.25 per person/per stay, the total recreational value was calculated at €820.051,2. The overall ecosystem assessment services of the evaluated protected area result from recreational activities estimated at €81.54 when converted to 1 ha of total area of SCI Vtáčnik. Recreational value (VTR) just setting off costs directly linked to visits of the protected area is €212.188,8, and in recalculation on 1 ha of the total area a value of €21.10 was obtained.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: 28
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.1925-1932,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Tomaskinova J.

• Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University in Banska Bystrica, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia

autor

Tomaskin J.

• Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University in Banska Bystrica, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia

autor

Soporska P.

• Department of Environment, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University in Banska Bystrica, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• 1. Diaz S., Demissew S., Joly C., Lonsdale W.M., Larigauderie A. A Rosetta stone for nature’s benefits to people. PLoS Biology, 13 (1), 1, 2015.
• 2. Constanza R., d´Arge R., De Groot R.S., Farber M., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O´Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van del Belt M. The Value of the World´s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, 387, 253, 1997.
• 3. Turner R.K., Daily G.C. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental and Resources Economics, 39, 25, 2008.
• 4. Gómez-Baggethun E., Ruiz-Pérez M. Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography, 35, 613, 2011.
• 5. Kaltenborn B.P., Linnell J.D.C., Baggethun E.G., Lindhjem H., Thomassen J., Chan K.M. Ecosystem Services and Cultural Values as Building Blocks for ‘The Good life’. A Case Study in the Community of Røst, Lofoten Islands, Norway. Ecological Economics, 140, 166, 2017.
• 6. Carpenter S.R., Bennett E.M., Peterson G.D. Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecology and Society, 11, 29, 2006.
• 7. Daniel T.C., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W., Chan K.M.A., Constanza R., Elmqvist T., Courtney G.F., Gobster P.H., Gret-Regamy A., Lave R., Muhar S., Penker M., Ribe R.G., Schauppenlehner T., Sikor T., Soloviy I., Spierenburg M., Taczanowska K., Tam J., Von der Dunk A. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. PNAS, 109, 8812, 2012.
• 8. De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complex, 7, 260, 2010.
• 9. Kareiva P., Tallis H., Ricketts T.H., Daily G.C., Polasky S. Natural Capital: Theory & Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services, Oxford University Press: Oxford, England, 256 pp., 2011.
• 10. Nahuelhual L., Carmona A., Laterra P., Barrena J. A mapping approach to assess intangible cultural ecosystem services: the case of agriculture heritage in Southern Chile. Ecol. Indic., 40, 90, 2014.
• 11. Satterfield T., Gregory R., Klain S., Roberts M., Chan K.M. Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 117, 103, 2013.
• 12. Syrbe R., Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefitting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators, 21, 80, 2012.
• 13. Van Berkel D.B., Verburg P.H. Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Indicators, 37, 163, 2014.
• 14. Farber S.C., Constanza R., Wilson M.A. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41, 375, 2002.
• 15. Constanza R., Fishera B., Alib S., Beerc C., Bondd L., Boumansa B., Danigelise N.L., Dickinson J., Elliott C., Farleya J., Gayerg D.E., MacDonald Glennh L., Hudspeth T., Mahoney D., McCahill L., McIntosh B., Reed B., Turab Rizvi S.A., Rizzo D.M., Simpatico T., Snapp R. Quality of life: an approach integrating opportunities, human needs, and subjective well-being. Ecological Economics, 61, 267, 2006.
• 16. Welsch H. Implications of happiness research for environmental economics. Ecological Economics, 68, 2735, 2009.
• 17. Tengberg A., Fredholm S., Eliasson I., Knez I., Saltzman K., Wetterberg O. Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2, 14, 2012.
• 18. Chan K.M.A., Guerry A.F., Balvanera P., Klain S., Satterfield T., Basurto X., Bostrom A., Chuenpagdee R., Gould R., Halpern B.S., Hannas N., Levine J., Norton B., Ruckelshaus M., Russell R., Tam J., Woodside U. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. Bioscience, 62, 744, 2012.
• 19. Chan K.M.A., Satterfield T., Goldstein J. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8, 2012.
• 20. Masný M., Zaušková Ľ. The abandonment of agricultural land: A case study of Strelníky (The Poľana Biosphere Reserve – Slovakia). Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 9, 17, 2014.
• 21. European Commission. The Economics of ecosystems & biodiversity: An interim report. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 68 pp., 2008.
• 22. Považan R., Getzner M., Švajda J. On the valuation of ecosystem services in Muránska Planina National Park. EcoMont, 7, 61, 2015.
• 23. European Commission. Mid - term evaluation of the EU Biodiversity Strategy by the year 2020. Ecosystems LTD.: Brussels, Belgium, 16 pp., 2016.
• 24. Ancuta C., Olaru M., Popa N., Isfanescu R., Jigoria-Oprea I., Jigoria-Oprea L. Evaluation of the sustainable development of rural settlements. Case study: Rural settlements from Romania Banat. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 10, 67, 2015.
• 25. Bole D., Pipan P., Komac B. Cultural values and sustainable rural development: A brief introduction. Acta Geographica Slovenica, 53, 367, 2013.
• 26. Maes J., Teller A., Erhard M., Liquete C., Braat L., Berry P., Egoh B., Puydarrieux P., Fiorina C., Santos F., Paracchini M.L., Keune H., Wittmer H., Hauck J., Fiala I., Verburg P.H., Condé S., Schägner J.P, San Miguel J., Estreguil C., Ostermann O., Barredo J.I., Pereira H.M., Stott A., Laporte V., Meiner A., Olah B., Royo G.E., Spyropoulou R., Petersen J.E., Maguire C., Zal N., Achilleos E., Rubin A., Ledoux L., Brown C., Raes C., Jacobs S., Vandewalle M., Connor D., Bidoglio G. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services: An analytical framework for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Publications office of the European Union: Luxembourg, Luxembourg, 188 pp., 2013.
• 27. Bucur C., Strobel D. Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Carpathian Protected Areas – Guidelines for rapid assessment. Green Steps: Brasov, Romania, 38, 2011.
• 28. Považan R., Kadlečík J. Valuation of Ecosystem services in Carpathian Protected Areas with focus on Slovakia – Guidelines for rapid assessment. State Nature Protection of Slovak republic: Banska Bystrica, Slovak republic, 38 pp., 2014.
• 29. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and Human Well-being: A framework for assessment, Island Press: Washington, DC., USA, 266, 2003.
• 30. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and Human Well-being : Synthesis. Island Press: Washington, DC., USA, 258, 2005.
• 31. Kumar M., Kumar P. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics, 64, 808, 2008.
• 32. MA. Ecosystem and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press: Washington, DC., USA, 155 pp., 2005.
• 33. Satz D., Gould R.K., Chan K.M., Guerry A., Norton B., Satterfield T., Halpern B.S., Levine J., Woodside U., Hannahs N., Basurto X., Klain S. The challenges of incorporating cultural ecosystem services into environmental assessment. Ambi., 42, 675, 2013.
• 34. Gould R.K., Klain S.C., Ardoin N.M., Satterfield T., Woodside U., Hannahs N., Daily G.C., Chan K.M. A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values using a cultural ecosystem services frame. Conservation Biology, 29, 575, 2015.
• 35. Ament J.M., Moore CH.A., Herbst M., Cumming G.S. Cultural Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas: Understanding Bundles, Trade-Offs, and Synergie. Conservation Letters, 10, 440, 2017.
• 36. Kruger M., Saayman M. Travel motivation of tourists to Kruger and Tsitsikamma National Parks: a comparative study. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res., 40, 93, 2010.
• 37. Považan R. Recreational values NP Veľká Fatra (Slovakia). Acta Universitatis Matthiae Belii, 15, 82, 2013.
• 38. Mišutová B. Economic evaluation of ecosystem services in the protected area: master thesis. Matej Bel University: Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, 78 pp., 2015.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/90623