PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 67 | 10 |

Tytuł artykułu

Sposoby zapobiegania zrostom pooperacyjnym

Warianty tytułu

EN
Prevention of postoperative adhesions – a review of methods

Języki publikacji

PL

Abstrakty

EN
Postoperative adhesion formation is a natural consequence of injured tissue surfaces (following incision, cauterization, suturing, or other means of trauma) fusing together to form scar tissue. Peritoneal adhesions are fibrous bands of tissues formed between organs that are normally separated and/or between organs and the internal body wall after peritoneal injury. Adhesions may cause subsequent serious sequels, including: small bowel obstruction, chronic abdominal and pelvic pain which require difficult reoperative surgery. A good surgical technique is a good injury minimalizing method and a crucial part of adhesion prevention, but technique alone cannot effectively eliminate adhesions. Although a variety of different products for preventing adhesions is available, no universal method has been developed so far. This review article will introduce the pathophysiology of adhesion formation in the peritoneal cavity. And it will also review the current methods for adhesion prevention, e.g. fluids, gels, mechanical barriers and others pharmaceuticals.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

67

Numer

10

Opis fizyczny

s.678-682,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor
  • Katedra i Klinika Chirurgii, Wydział Medycyny Weterynaryjnej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, pl.Grunwaldzki 51, 50-366 Wrocław
autor

Bibliografia

  • 1.Al-Jaroudi D., Tulandi T.: Adhesion prevention in gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004, 59, 360-362.
  • 2.Alpay Z., Saed G., Diamond M.: Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention. Semin Reprod. Med. 2008, 26, 13-21.
  • 3.Alponat A., Lakshminarasappa S., Yavuz N.: Prevention of adhesions by Seprafilm, an absorbable adhesion barrier: An incisional hernia model in rats. Am. Surg. 1997, 63, 818-821.
  • 4.Arikan S., Adas G., Barut G.: An evaluation of low molecular weight heparin and hyperbaric oxygen treatment in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions and wound healing. Am. J. Surg. 2005, 189, 155-157.
  • 5.Avsar A., Avsar F., Sahin M.: Diphenhydramine and hyaluronic acid derivatives reduce adnexal adhesions and prevent tubal obstructions in rats. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2003, 106, 50-55.
  • 6.Bateman B., Nunley W., Kitchen J.: Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesion: an assessment of ibuprofen. Fertil Steril. 1982, 38, 107-115.
  • 7.Boland G., Weigel R.: Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J. Surg. Res. 2006, 132, 3-5.
  • 8.Buckenmaier C., Summers M., Hetz S.: Effect of the antiadhesive treatments, carboxymethylcellulose combined with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator and Seprafilm, on bowel anastomosis in the rat. Am. Surg. 2000, 66, 1041-1043.
  • 9.Burns J., Colt M., Burgees L.: Preclinical evaluation of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane. Eur. J. Surg. Suppl. 1997, 40, 120.
  • 10.Cohen B., Heyman T., Mast D.: Use of intraperitoneal solutions for preventing pelvic adhesions in the rat. J. Reprod. Med. 1983, 28, 649-653.
  • 11.Corrales F., Corrales M., Schirmer C.: Preventing intraperitoneal adhesions with vitamin E and sodium hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose: A comparative study in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2008, 23, 36-40.
  • 12.Damario M., Rock J.: Methods to prevent postoperative adhesion formation in gynecologic surgery. J. Gynecol. Technol. 1995, 1, 77-87.
  • 13.De Wilde R., Trew G.: Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in ginaecological burgery. Expert consensus position. Gynacol. Surg. 2007, 4, 161-168.
  • 14.De Wilde R., Trew G.: Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in ginaecological burgery. Expert consensus position. Part-2 steps to reduce adhesions.Gynecol. Surg. 2007, 4, 243-253.
  • 15.Ellis H.: The clinical significance of adhesions: Focus on intestinal obstruction. Eur. J. Surg. Suppl. 1997, 577, 5-7.
  • 16.Ergul E., Korukluoglu B.: Peritoneal adhesions: Facing the enemy. International Journal of Surgery 2008, 6, 253-260.
  • 17.Ezberci F., Bulbuloglu E., Ciragil P.: Intraperitoneal tenoxicam to prevent abdominal adhesion formation in a rat peritonitis model. Surg. Today 2006, 36, 361-369.
  • 18.Golan A., Stolik O., Wexler S.: Prostaglandins: A role in adhesion formation. An experimental study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 1990, 69, 339-341.
  • 19.Goldberg E., Burns J., Yaacobi Y.: Prevention of postoperative adhesions by precoating tissues with dilute sodium hyaluronate solutions. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1993, 381, 191-194.
  • 20.Gonzalez-Quintero V., Cru-Pachano F.: Preventing adhesions in obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. Rev. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 2, 38-45.
  • 21.Harris E., Morgan R., Rodeheaver G.: Analysis of the kinetics of peritoneal adhesion formation in the rat and evaluation of potential antiadhesive agents. Surgery 1995, 117, 663-669.
  • 22.Heidrick G., Pippitt C., Morgan M.: Efficacy of intraperitoneal sodium carboxymethylcellulose in preventing postoperative adhesion formation. J. Reprod. Med. 1994, 39, 575-579.
  • 23.Holtz G., Baker E., Tsai C.: Effect of 32% dextran 70 on peritoneal adhesions. Fertility and Sterility 1980, 34, 394-395.
  • 24.Imai A., Suzuki N.: Topical non-barrier agents for postoperative adhesion prevention in animal models. European Journal of Obstetrics&Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2010, 149, 131-135.
  • 25.Jackson B.: Observations on intraperitoneal adhesions: An experimental study. Surgery 1958, 44, 507-514.
  • 26.Khorram-Manesh A., Ardakani J., Behjati H.: The effect of opioids on the development of postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2006, 51, 560-562.
  • 27.Kryszak K., Świeżyński K.: Anatomia zwierząt. Narządy wewnętrzne i układ krążenia. T. 2, PWN, Warszawa 2009, 26-34.
  • 28.Kuryszko J., Zarzycki J.: Anatomia mikroskopowa zwierząt domowych i człowieka. PWN, Warszawa 1995, s. 177-178.
  • 29.Kuryszko J., Zarzycki J.: Histologia zwierząt. PWRiL, Warszawa 2000, s. 382-384.
  • 30.Leach R., Burns J., Dawe E.: Reduction of postsurgical adhesion formation in the rabbit uterine horn model with use of hyaluronate/carboxymethylcellulose gel. Fertil Steril. 1998, 69, 415-420.
  • 31.Leach R., Henry R.: Reduction of postoperative adhesions in the rat uterine model with poloxamer 407. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1990, 162, 1317-1319.
  • 32.LeGrand E., Rodgers K., Girgis W.: Efficacy of tolmetin sodium for adhesion prevention in rabbit and rat models. J. Surg. Res. 1994, 56, 67-70.
  • 33.Levinson C., Swolin K.: Postoperative adhesions: Etiology, prevention and therapy. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1980, 23, 1213-1220.
  • 34.Loeffer K.: Anatomie und Physiologie der Haustiere. Eugen Ulmer GmbH&Co, Stuttgart 1994, 234-235.
  • 35.Nappi C., Di Spiezio S., Greco E.: Prevention of adhesions in gynaecological endoscopy. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2007, 13, 379-394.
  • 36.Nishimura K., Shimanuki T., DiZerega G.: Ibuprofen in the prevention of experimentally induced postoperative adhesions. Am. J. Med. 1984, 77, 102-106.
  • 37.Porter J., McGregor F., Mullen D.: Fibrinolytic activity of mesothelial surfaces. Surg. Forum 1969, 20, 80-82.
  • 38.Querleu D., Vankeerberghen D., Deffense F.: Adjuvant treatment of tubal surgery. Randomized prospective study of systemically administered corticosteroids and noxythiolin. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Bio I Reprod. 1989, 18, 935-940.
  • 39.Revaux A., Ducarme G., Luton D.: Preventionof intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery. Ginecol. Obstet. Fertil. 2008, 36, 311-317.
  • 40.Revuelta J., Garcia-Rinaldi R., Val F.: Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene surgical membrane for pericardial closure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1985, 89, 451-455.
  • 41.Rodgers K., Girgis W., DiZerega G.: Intraperitoneal tolmetin prevents postsurgical adhesion formation in rabbits. Int. J. Fertil. 1990, 35, 40-45.
  • 42.Roman H., Canis M., Kamble M.: Efficacy of three adhesionpreventing agents in reducing severe peritoneal trauma induced by bipolar coagulation in a laparoscopic rat model. Fertil Steril. 2005, 83, 1113-1116.
  • 43.Ryan G., Groberty J., Majno G.: Mesothelial injury and recovery. Am. J. Pathol. 1973, 71, 93-112.
  • 44.Sanfilippo J., Cox J., Nealon N.: Comparison of corticosteroid therapy in the prevention of pelvic tissue reaction and adhesion formation. Int. J. Fertil. 1986, 30, 57-61.
  • 45.Tarhan O., Barut I., Sutcu R.: Pentoxifylline, a methylxanthine derivative, reduces peritoneal adhesions and increases peritoneal fibrinolysis in rats. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2006, 209, 249.
  • 46.Turkcapar A., Ozarslan C., Erdem E.: The effectiveness of low molecular weight heparin on adhesion formation in experimental rat model. Int Surg. 1995, 80, 92-95.
  • 47.Utian W., Goldfarb J., Starks G.: Role of dextran 70 in microtubal surgery. Fertility and Sterility 1979, 31, 79-82.
  • 48.Verco S., Peers E., Brown C.: Development of a novel glucose polymer solution (icodextrin) for adhesion prevention: Pre-clinical studies. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 15, 1764-1769.
  • 49.Wallwiener M., Brucker S., Hierlemann H.: Innovative barriers for peritoneal adhesion prevention: Liquid or solid? A rat uterine horn model. FertilSteril. 2006, 86, 1266-1269.
  • 50.Ward B. C., Panitch A.: Abdominal Aghesions: Current and Novel Therapies. Journal of Surgical Research 2011, 165, 91-111.
  • 51.Wiseman D., Huang W., Johns D.: Time-dependent effect of tolmetin sodium in a rabbit uterine adhesion model. J. Invest. Surg. 1994, 7, 527-530.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-92c41e40-8816-4672-8013-e73d6e645621
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.