Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 17 |

Tytuł artykułu

Effect of EMS on induced morphological mutants and chromosomal variation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp)

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji



Effect of EMS (ethyl methane sulphonate) on induced morphological mutants and chromosomal variation in cowpea was studied using five different doses of mutagen along with a control in randomized blocked design with three replications. The morphological mutants there are two types of viable and chlorophyll mutants. Viable mutant contains tall, dwarf, early maturity, late maturity, leaf mutants pod mutant and flower mutants. The frequency of chlorophyll mutant contains albino, xantha and viridis. This concentration can damage or modify important components of plant cells and have been reported to affect the morphology, anatomy, biochemistry and physiology of plants differentially depending on the concentration level. These effects include changes in the cellular structure and metabolism of the plants e.g., dilation of thylakoid membranes, alteration in photosynthesis, modulation of the antioxidative system and accumulation of phenolic compounds. The morphological and chromosomal variation was found to be mutagen sensitive in somatic cells of cowpea. It was found to increase with increasing the concentration of EMS in Cowpea plants. The chemical mutagen like ethyl methane sulphonate induces high frequency of chromosomal changes like anaphasic bridge; anaphasic laggard, anaphasic bridge and clumbing of chromosome were including control plants also observed.






Opis fizyczny



  • Division of Cytogenetics and Mutation Breeding, Department of Botany, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar - 608002, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Division of Cytogenetics and Mutation Breeding, Department of Botany, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar - 608002, Tamil Nadu, India


  • [1] Acharya, S.N., J.E. Thomas and S.K. Basu, 2007. Improvement in the medicinal and nutritional properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). In: S.N. Acharya, J.E. Thomas (eds) Advances in medicinal plant research, Research Signpost, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
  • [2] Ahloowalia, B.S., M. Maluszynski, and K. Nichterlein. 2004. Global impact of mutation- derived varieties. Euphytica, 135: 187-204.
  • [3] Alexander, P. and K.A. Stacey, 1958. Comparison of the changes produced by ionizing radiation and by the alkylating agents: evidence for a similar mechanism at the molecular level. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 68: 1225.
  • [4] Barone, A. and F. Saccardo, 1990. Pachytene morphology of cowpea chromosomes. In cowpea genetic resources. Edited by N.Q. Ng and L.M. Monti. IITA Ibadan, Nigeria. Pp. 137-143.
  • [5] Bautz, E. and Freese, E. 1960. On the mutagenic effects of alkylating agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, 46: 1585.
  • [6] Brockes, P. and P.D. Lawley, 1960. The reaction of mustard gas with nuclei acid in vivo and in vitro. J. Biochem, 77: 478.
  • [7] Chowdhury, S., A. K. Datta and S. Maity, 2009. Cytogenetical and agronomical aspects of radiation induced marker trait mutants in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.), Indian J. Sci and Tech, 2(5): 58-61.
  • [8] Diouf, M., S. Boureima, T. Diop and M.Cagirgan, 2010. Gamma rays-induced mutant spectrum and frequency in sesame, Turk. J. Field Crops, 15(1): 99-105.
  • [9] Freese, E. 1963. Molecular mechanism of mutations. Molecular Genetics. Academic Press, pp. 207.
  • [10] Gaul, H., 1964. Mutation in plant breeding. Rad. Bot., 4: 155-232.
  • [11] Gottschalk, W., 1972. Combination of mutated genes as an additional tool in plant breeding. In: induced mutations and plant improvement, IAEA Vienna, pp. 199-215.
  • [12] Greene E. A., et al., 2003. Spectrum of chemically induced mutations from a large-scale reverse-genetic screen in Arabidopsis. Genetics, 164(2): 731-740.
  • [13] Gunkel, J.K. and A.H. Sparrow, 1961. Ionizing radiations: biochemical, physiological and morphological aspects of their effect on plants. In: W. Rubland (ed.). Encyclopedia of plant physiology, Springer, Berlin. 16: 555-611.
  • [14] Gustafsson, A., 1940. The mutation system of the chlorophyll apparatus. Lond Univ. Arsskr., 36: 1-40.
  • [15] Heslot, H. 1965. The nature of mutations. Rad. Bot. 5: 3-45.
  • [16] Jabeen, N., and B. Mirza, 2004. Ethyl methane sulfonate induces morphological mutations in Capsicum annuum. Int. J. Agri. Biol, 6 (2): 340-345.
  • [17] Juliet Hepziba, S. and M. Subramanian, 2002. Induced macromutants in M3 and M4 generations of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Crop Res., 24(1): 63-66.
  • [18] Kreig, D.R. 1963. EMS induced reversion of bacteriophage T4 rII mutants. Genetics, 48: 561.
  • [19] Lawley, P.D., 1966. Effects of some chemical mutagen and carcinogens on nuclei acids. Progr. Nucleic acid Res. Mol. Bio, 5: 89.
  • [20] Lee, Y. I., I.S. Lee and Y.P. Lim, 2002. Variation in sweet potato regenerates from gamma-rays irradiated embryogenic callus. J. Plant Biotech, 4: 163-170.
  • [21] Maluszynski, K.N., L.N. Zanten and B.S. Ahloowalia, 2000. Officially released mutant varieties. The FAO/IAEA Database. Mut. Breed. Rev, 12: 1-12.
  • [22] Marimuthu, K.M. and M.K. Subramaniam, 1960. An iron alum haematoxylin squash schedule for the root tips of Dolichos lablab L. Curr. Sci., 29: 482-483.
  • [23] Natarajan, A.T., 2005. Chemical mutagenesis: from plants to human. Curr. Sci. 89(2): 312-316.
  • [24] Nerkar, Y.S., 1973. Induced mutations of polygenic significance in Lathyrus sativus. Indian J. Genet, 33: 324-325.
  • [25] Pignone, D., S. Cifarelli and P. Perrino, 1990. Chromosome identification in Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. In Cowpea genetic resources. Edited by N.Q. Ng and L.M. Monti. IITA Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 144-150.
  • [26] Rekha, K. and A. Langer, 2007. Induction and assessment of morpho-biochemical mutants in Artemisia pallens Bess. Genet. Resour. Crop. Evol, 54: 437-443.
  • [27] Saccardo, F., A. Del Giudice, and I. Galasso, 1992. Cytogenetics of cowpea. In Biotechnology: enhancing research on tropical crops in Africa. Edited by Thottappilly, G., L.M. Monti, D.R. Mohan Raj, and A.W. Moore. Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation, Wageningen, The Netherlands, and the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp 89-98.
  • [28] Sengupta, S. and A.K. Datta, 2005. Induced narrow leaf mutant of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Indian J. Genet., 65(1): 59-60.
  • [29] Singh, B.B., D.R.Mohan Raj, K.E. Dashiell and L.E.N. Jackai (Eds.), 1997. Advances in cowpea research, co publication of international institute of tropical agriculture (IITA) and Japan international research center for agricultural sciences (JIRCAS), IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. Sayce publishing, Devon, UK.
  • [30] Singh, V.P. and R. Sharma. 1993. γ-rays and EMS induced leaf mutants in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L) Wilczek). Curr. Sci, 65: 636-638.
  • [31] Vandana., and D.K. Dubey, 1995. Frequency and spectrum of mutations induced by NMU and DES in khesari (Lathyrus sativus L.) var. EC-50 (Macrosperma). Res. J. Pl. Environ., 11: 5-9.
  • [32] Yadava, H.S., A.N. Tikle and D.V. Bhagat, 2003. Effect of induced mutation through gamma rays on growth and yield parameters of kodo-millet. J. Soil and Crops, 13(1): 25-28.

Typ dokumentu



Identyfikator YADDA

JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.