PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Czasopismo
2015 | 74 |
Tytuł artykułu

Hierarchy of plasticity traits in responses of Quercus aliena to light conditions and water availability

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This study aimed to investigate plasticity of different plant traits to varied light and water availability. A greenhouse experiment was conducted with Quercus aliena seedlings with two light and four soil water levels. Plant traits related to leaf physiology, morphology, anatomy, and biomass production were determined. The results showed that plant size had significant effects on leaf area, leaf number, shoot height, basal diameter and crown area. After excluding the influence of plant size, water treatment had stronger effects on plants compared to light levels, and their interaction effect was significant. The limited water supply significantly inhibited leaf photosynthetic rate and the fluorescence efficiency under high light. However, leaves submitted to moderate drought stress showed enhanced fluorescence activity under shade condition. Grand plasticity of leaf physiology and growth was the highest, followed by biomass allocation and leaf morphology, and lastly anatomy, and this ranking did not change as resources considered. Among the variables, leaf petiole length, chlorophyll content and leaf area could be selected as candidates for estimation of species’ plasticity to water, light and their interaction, respectively. Therefore, our results suggested that there was a hierarchy existing among traits plasticity in Q. aliena, and supported the aboveground facilitation hypothesis that shade could alleviate the adverse effect of drought.
Słowa kluczowe
EN
Wydawca
-
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
74
Opis fizyczny
p.169-180,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China
autor
  • Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China
  • Institute of Environmental Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China
autor
  • Institute of Environmental Research, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China
autor
  • Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China
autor
  • Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, P. R. China
Bibliografia
  • Alongi D.M. 2008. Mangrove forests: resilience, protection from tsunamis, and responses to global climate change. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 76: 1–13.
  • Aranda I., Castro L., Pardos M., Gil L., Pardos J.A. 2005. Effects of the interaction between drought and shade on water relations, gas exchange and morphological traits in cork oak (Quercus suber L.) seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management 210: 117–129.
  • Arend M., Brem A., Kuster T.M., Guenthardt-Goerg M.S. 2013. Seasonal photosynthetic responses of European oaks to drought and elevated daytime temperature. Plant Biology 15: 169–176.
  • Armas C., Pugnaire F.I. 2009. Ontogenetic shifts in interactions of two dominant shrub species in a semi-arid coastal sand dune system. Journal of Vegetation Science 20: 535–546.
  • Callaway R.M., Pennings S.C., Richards C.L. 2003. Phenotypic plasticity and interactions among plants. Ecology 84: 1115–1128.
  • Canham C.D., Berkowitz A.R., Kelly V.R., Lovett G.M., Ollinger S.V., Schnurr J. 1996. Biomass allocation and multiple resource limitation in tree seedlings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1521–1530.
  • Craven D., Gulamhussein S., Berlyn G.P. 2010. Physiological and anatomical responses of Acacia koa (Gray) seedlings to varying light and drought conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 69: 205–213.
  • Delagrange S., Messier C., Lechowicz M.J., Dizengremel P. 2004. Physiological, morphological and allocational plasticity in understory deciduous trees: importance of plant size and light availability. Tree Physiology 24: 775–784.
  • Du N., Wang R., Liu J., Zhang X., Tan X., Wang W., Chen H., Guo W. 2013. Morphological response of Vitex negundo var. heterophylla and Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa to the combined impact of drought and shade. Agroforestry Systems 87: 403–416.
  • Esquivias M.P., Zunzunegui M., Barradas M.C.D., Álvarez-Cansino L. 2015. Competitive effect of a native-invasive species on a threatened shrub in a Mediterranean dune system. Oecologia 177: 133–146.
  • Funk J.L. 2008. Differences in plasticity between invasive and native plants from a low resource environment. Journal of Ecology 96: 1162–1173.
  • Guerfel M., Baccouri O., Boujnah D., Chaibi W., Zarrouk M. 2009. Impacts of water stress on gas exchange, water relations, chlorophyll content and leaf structure in the two main Tunisian olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticultrae 119: 257–263.
  • Holmgren M. 2000. Combined effects of shade and drought on tulip poplar seedlings: trade-off in tolerance or facilitation? Oikos 90: 67–78.
  • Huang X., Yin C., Duan B., Li C. 2008. Interactions between drought and shade on growth and physiological traits in two Populus cathayana populations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 38: 1877–1887.
  • Jimenez M.D., Pardos M., Puértolas J., Kleczkowski L.A., Pardos J.A. 2009. Deep shade alters the acclimation response to moderate water stress in Quercus suber L. Forestry 82: 285–298.
  • Lei Y.B., Yin C.Y., Li C.Y. 2006. Differences in some morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses to drought stress in two contrasting populations of Populus przewalskii. Physiologia Plantarum 127: 182–191.
  • Lichtenthaler H.K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods in Enzymology 148: 350–382.
  • Maxwell K., Johnson G.N. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence – a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51: 659–668.
  • Mielke M.S., Schaffer B. 2010. Photosynthetic and growth responses of Eugenia uniflora L. seedlings to soil flooding and light intensity. Environmental and Experimental Botany 68: 113–121.
  • Navas M.L., Garnier E. 2002. Plasticity of whole plant and leaf traits in Rubia peregrina in response to light, nutrient and water availability. Acta Oecologica 23: 375–383.
  • Nicotra A.B., Atkin O.K., Bonser S.P., Davidson A.M., Finnegan E.J., Mathesius U., Poot P., Purugganan M.D., Richards C.L., Valladares F., Kleunen M. 2010. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science 15: 684–692.
  • Oguchi R., Hikosaka K., Hirose T. 2003. Does the photosynthetic light acclimation need change in leaf anatomy? Plant Cell and Environment 26: 505–512.
  • Paquette A., Bouchard A., Cogliastro A. 2007. Morphological plasticity in seedlings of three deciduous species under shelterwood under-planting management does not correspond to shade tolerance ranks. Forest Ecology and Management 241: 278–287.
  • Puértolas J., Pardos M., Jiménez M., Aranda I., Pardos J. 2008. Interactive responses of Quercus suber L. seedlings to light and mild water stress: effects on morphology and gas exchange traits. Annals of Forest Science 65: 611–611.
  • Quero J.L., Villar R., Maranon T., Zamora R. 2006. Interactions of drought and shade effects on seedlings of four Quercus species: physiological and structural leaf responses. New Phytologist 170: 819–833.
  • Rice S.A., Bazzaz F.A. 1989. Quantification of plasticity of plant traits in response to light intensity: comparing phenotypes at a common weight. Oecologia 78: 502–507.
  • Sack L., Grubb P.J. 2002. The combined impacts of deep shade and drought on the growth and biomass allocation of shade-tolerant woody seedlings. Oecologia 131: 175–185.
  • Semchenko M., Zobel K. 2005. The effect of breeding on allometry and phenotypic plasticity in four varieties of oat (Avena sativa L.). Field Crops Research 93: 151–168.
  • Smith T., Huston M. 1989. A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities. Vegetatio 83: 49–69.
  • Valladares F., Sanchez-Gomez D., Zavala M.A. 2006. Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications. Journal of Ecology 94: 1103–1116.
  • Weiner J. 2004. Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 6: 207–215.
  • Woodruff D.R., Meinzer F.C., Lachenbruch B. 2008. Height-related trends in leaf xylem anatomy and shoot hydraulic characteristics in a tall conifer: safety versus efficiency in water transport. New Phytologist 180: 90–99.
  • Wright S.D., Mcconnaughay K.D. 2002. Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny. Plant Species Biology 17: 119–131.
  • Wyka T.P., Oleksyn J. 2014. Photosynthetic ecophysiology of evergreen leaves in the woody angiosperms – a review. Dendrobiology 72: 3–27
  • Zhang X.Q., Liu J., Welham C.V.J., Liu C., Li D., Chen L., Wang R.-Q. 2006. The effects of clonal integration on morphological plasticity and placement of daughter ramets in black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia). Flora 201: 547–554.
  • Zunzunegui M., Ain-Lhout F., Barradas M.C., Alvarez-Cansino L., Esquivias M.P., Novo F. 2009. Physiological, morphological and allocation plasticity of a semi-deciduous shrub. Acta Oecologica 35: 370–379.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-90683b19-0205-4098-9e28-63ac5c6a6814
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.