Administration of Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 to young piglets improved their health and growth

• Autorzy: Cai C.J. , Cai P. P. , Hou C. L. , Zeng X. F. , Qiao S. Y.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study determined the effects of Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 administered early in the life of piglets on their growth, faecal microflora, immune index and antioxidant activity. Twelve litters of 3-day-old crossbreed piglets were randomly assigned to either of two treatments: piglets in the control group were orally administered 2 ml saline per day per piglet from day 3 to day 5 of life; piglets in the probiotics group were given 2 ml rejuvenation liquid of L. fermentum spray-dried powder (≥ 109 CFU ml–1). Compared with the control group, oral administration of L. fermentum tended to increase the weight gain (P < 0.10) of piglets from day 3 until day 17 of life, and significantly (P < 0.05) increased the number of Lactobacillus in faeces, the concentrations of IgM, IgG, IgA and glutathione, the activity of glutathione peroxidase, and the total antioxidant capacity in plasma of piglets on day 17. In conclusion, oral administration of L. fermentum to piglets early in life could be beneficial by establishing appropriate intestinal microbial flora.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.222-227,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Cai C.J.

• State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, 100193 Beijng, China

autor

Cai P. P.

• Third Affiliated Hospital, Qiqihar Medical University, 161006 Heilongjiang, China

autor

Hou C. L.

• State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, 100193 Beijng, China

autor

Zeng X. F.

• State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, 100193 Beijng, China

autor

Qiao S. Y.

• State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, China Agricultural University, 100193 Beijng, China

Bibliografia

• Abe F., Ishibsahi N., Shimamura S., 1995. Effect of administration of Bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria to newborn calves and piglets. J. Dairy Sci. 78, 2838–2846
• Benyacoub J., Czarnecki-Maulden G.L., Cavadini C., Sauthier T., Anderson R.E., Schiffrin E.J., von der Weid T., 2003. Supplementation of food with Enterococcus faecium (SF68) stimulates immune functions in young dogs. J. Nutr. 133, 1158–1162
• Blomberg L., Henriksson A., Convey P.L., 1993. Inhibition of adhesion of Escherichia coli K88 to piglet ileal mucus by Lactobacillus spp. Microbiology 59, 34–39
• Cabrera R.A., Lin X., Campbell J.M., Moeser A.J., Odle J., 2012. Influence of birth order, birth weight, colostrum and serum immunoglobulin G on neonatal piglet survival. J. Anim. Sci. Biotech. 3, 42–50
• Cai C.J., Thaler B., Liu D.W., Wang J.J., Qiao S.Y., 2012. Optimization of spray-drying workflow as a method for preparing concentrated cultures of Lactobacillus fermentum. J. Anim. Vet. Adv.11, 2769–2774
• Cromwell G.L., 2001. Antimicrobial and promicrobial agents. In: A. Lewis, L. Southern (Editors). Swine Nutrition. 2nd Edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (USA), pp. 401
• Dunne C., O’Mahony L., Murphy L., Thornton G., Morrissey D., 2001. In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: Correlation with in vivo findings. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 73, 386S–392S
• Finegold S.M., Sutter V.L., Mathisen G.E., 1983. Normal indigenous intestinal flora. In: D.J. Hentges (Editor). Human Intestinal Microflora in Health and Disease. Academic Press. New York, pp. 3–31
• Haghighi H.R., Gong J., Gyles C.L., Hayes M.A., Zhou H., Sanei B., Chambers J.R., Sharif S., 2006. Probiotics stimulate production of natural antibodies in chickens. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 13, 975–980
• Huang C.H., Qiao S.Y., Li D.F., Piao X.S., Ren J.P., 2004. Effects of Lactobacilli on the performance, diarrhea incidence, VFA concentration and gastrointestinal microbial flora of weaning pigs. Asian-Austr. J. Anim. Sci. 17, 401–409
• Jonsson E., Conway P., 1992. Probiotics for pigs. In: R. Fuller (Editor). Probiotics: The Scientific Basis. Chapman & Hall, London (UK), pp. 260–316
• Li X.J., Yue L.Y., Guan X.F., Qiao S.Y., 2008. The adhesion of putative probiotic lactobacilli to cultured epithelial cells and porcine intestinal mucus. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104, 1082–1091
• Mackie R.I., Abdelghani S., Gaskins H.R., 1999. Developmental microbial ecology of the neonatal gastrointestinal tract. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 69, Suppl., 1035S–1045S
• NRC, 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th Edition. National Academy Press. Washington, DC
• Salmon H., Berri M., Gerdts V., Meurens F., 2009. Humoral and cellular factors of maternal immunity in swine. Develop. Comp. Immunol. 33, 384–393
• Silva M., Jacobus N.V., Deneke C., Gorbach S.L., 1987. Antimicrobial substance from a human Lactobacillus strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31, 1231–1233
• Stavric S., Kornegay E.T., 1995. Microbial probiotic for pigs and poultry. In: R.J. Wallace, A. Chesson (Editors). Biotechnology in Animal Feeds and Animal Feeding. Wiley-VCH Publisher. Weinheim, pp. 205
• Szabó I., Wieler L.H., Tedin K., Scharek-Tedin L., Taras D., Hensel A., Appel B., Nöckler K., 2009. Influence of a probiotic strain of Enterococcus faecium on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 infection in a porcine animal infection model. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2621–2628
• Turner J.L., Dritz S.S., Minton J.E., 2001. Review: alternatives to conventional antimicrobials in swine diets. Prof. Anim. Sci. 17, 217–226
• Wang A.N., Cai C.J., Zeng X.F., Zhang F.R., Zhang G.L., Thacker P.A., Wang J.J., Qiao S.Y., 2013. Dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 improves the anti-oxidative activity of weanling piglets challenged with diquat. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114, 1582–1591
• Wang A.N., Yi X.W., Yu H.F., Dong B., Qiao S.Y., 2009. Free radical scavenging activities of Lactobacillus fermentum in vitro and its antioxidative effect on growing-finishing pigs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107, 1140–1148
• Wang X., Yang F., Liu C., Zhou H., Wu G., Qiao S., Li D., Wang J., 2012. Dietary supplementation with the probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 and the antibiotic aureomycin differentially affects the small intestinal proteomes of weanling piglets. J. Nutr. 142, 7–13
• William H.C., 2000. Producing pigs without antibiotic growth promoters. Adv. Pork Prod. 11, 47–56
• Yu H.F., Wang A.N., Li X.J., Qiao S.Y., 2008. Effect of viable Lactobacillus fermentum on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and immunity of weaned pigs. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 17, 61–69

Uwagi

Rekord w opracowaniu