PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2013 | 22 | 3 |
Tytuł artykułu

Hydrological properties of soils in reclaimed and unreclaimed sites after brown-coal mining

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Bulk density, porosity, water holding capacity, water field capacity, wilting point, clay content, hydraulic conductivity, and soil moisture were studied in unreclaimed sites (5, 15, and 25 years old) and reclaimed sites (20-30 years old) on a post-mining spoil heap near Sokolov, Czech Republic. The unreclaimed sites had been spontaneously colonized by shrubs, and the reclaimed sites had been planted with pine, spruce, oak, alder, or meadow (the meadows were created by the spreading of topsoil and grass seed). Soil bulk density decreased with site age and was similar in unreclaimed and reclaimed sites except in the meadow sites, where bulk density was highest. Field capacity (in terms of volumetric soil water content) increased with site age and was similar in unreclaimed and reclaimed sites except for the meadow sites, which had the lowest field capacity. The wilting point (in terms of volumetric soil water content) decreased with age in unreclaimed sites, was higher in reclaimed sites than in unreclaimed sites, and was higher for the meadows than for other sites. Hydraulic conductivity was generally low but was highest in young sites. Soil moisture content had no clear seasonal pattern in young, unreclaimed sites (which had little vegetation), but decreased in summer in all vegetated sites. Soil moisture was highest in the reclaimed alder sites and was lowest in the reclaimed pine and meadow sites. Relative to unreclaimed sites, reclaimed sites had a higher ability to hold water but a higher wilting point, such that water availability for plants was similar in both kinds of sites. The water deficit was highest in the reclaimed oak sites followed by the meadow sites. The latter finding indicates that the spreading of topsoil during reclamation does not result in improved soil moisture conditions 20 years later.
Słowa kluczowe
EN
Wydawca
-
Rocznik
Tom
22
Numer
3
Opis fizyczny
p.645-652,fig.,ref.
Twórcy
autor
  • Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Prague 12800, Charles University in Prague, The Czech Republic
  • Biology Centre, Institute of Soil Biology, AS CR, Ceske Budejovice 37005, The Czech Republic
autor
  • Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University, Prague 16000, The Czech Republic
autor
  • Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Prague 12800, Charles University in Prague, The Czech Republic
  • Biology Centre, Institute of Soil Biology, AS CR, Ceske Budejovice 37005, The Czech Republic
Bibliografia
  • 1. SOURKOVA M., FROUZ J., FETTWEIS U., BENS O., HUTTL R.F., SANTRUCKOVA H. Soil development and properties of microbial biomass succession in reclaimed post mining sites near Sokolov (Czech Republic) and near Cottbus (Germany). Geoderma. 129, 73, 2005.
  • 2. BRADY N.C., WEIL R.R. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Stehen Helba; Cheryl Asherman. 3rd compl. edition. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River. 960, 2002.
  • 3. KURAZ V. Soil properties and water regime of reclaimed surface dumps in the North Bohemian brown-coal region - a field study. Waste Manage. 21, 147, 2000.
  • 4. FROUZ J., ELHOTTOVA D., KURAZ V., SOURKOVA M. Effects of soil macrofauna on other soil biota and soil formation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post mining sites: Results of a field microcosm experiment. Appl. Soil Ecol. 33, 308, 2006.
  • 5. MERMOUD A., XU D. Comparative analysis of three methods to generate soil hydraulic functions. Soil Till. Res. 87, 89, 2006.
  • 6. LI Y.Y., SHAO M.A. Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China. J. Arid Environ. 64, 77, 2006.
  • 7. FROUZ J., VAN DIGGELEN R., PIZL V., STARY J., HANEL L., TAJOVSKY K., KALCIK J. The effect of topsoil removal in restored heathland on soil fauna, topsoil microstructure, and cellulose decomposition: implications for ecosystem resroration. Biodivers. Conserv. 18, 3963, 2009.
  • 8. MAZUR K., SCHOENHEINZ D., BIEMELT D., SCHAAF W., GRUNEWALD U. Observation of hydrological processes and structures in the artificial Chicken Creek catchment. Phys. Chem. Earth. 36, 74, 2011.
  • 9. FROUZ J., KEPLIN B., PIZL V., TAJOVSKY K., STARY J., LUKESOVA A., NOVAKOVA A., BALIK V., HANEL L., MATERNA J., DUKER C., CHALUPSKY J., RUSEK J., HEINKELE T. Soil biota and upper soil layers development in two contrasting post-mining chronosequences. Ecol. Eng. 17, 275, 2001.
  • 10. FROUZ J., PRACH K., PIZL V., HANEL L., STARY J., TAJOVSKY K., MATERNA J., BALIK V., KALCIK J., REHOUNKOVA K. Interactions between soil development, vegetation and soil fauna during spontaneous succession in post mining sites. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 44, 109, 2008.
  • 11. KRIBEK B., STRNAD M., BOHACEK Z., SYKOROVA I., CEJKA J., SOBALIK Z. Geochemistry of Miocene lacustrine sediments from the Sokolov Coal Basin (Czech Republic). Int. J. Coal Geol. 37, 207, 1998.
  • 12. KURAZ V., MATOUSEK J. Dielectric soil moisture meter. Patent No. 172234, Praque, 1978.
  • 13. KURAZ V. Testing of a Field Soil Moisture Meter. Geotech. Test. J. 3, 21, 1981.
  • 14. WHALLEY WR., COPE RE., NICHOLL CJ., WHITMORE AP. In – field calibration of a dielectric soil moisture meter designed for use in an access tube. Soil Use Manage. 20, 203, 2004.
  • 15. REYNOLDS WD., ZEBCHUK WD. Hydraulic conductivity in a clay soil: Two measurement techniques and spatial characterization. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 60, 1679, 1996.
  • 16. KODESOVA R., SIMUNEK J., NIKODEM A., JIRKU V. Estimation of the Duel – Permeability Model Parameters using Tension Disk Infiltrometer and Guelph Permeameter. Vadose Zone Journal. 9, 213, 2010.
  • 17. PANSU M., GAUTHEYROU J., LOYER J.Y. Soil Analysis: Sampling, Instrumentation, Quality control. Paris: A. A. Balkema, a member of Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, 495, 2001.
  • 18. HEAD K. H. Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing. Soil Classification and Compaction Test, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons. 1992.
  • 19. PEVERILL K.I., SPARROW L.A. Soil Analysis: an Interpretation manual. 2. Australia: CSIRO Publishing. 371, 2001.
  • 20. ASHBY W. C. Reclamation with trees pre- and postSMCRA in southern Illiois, USA. International Journal of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Environment. 12, 117, 1998.
  • 21. WANG Z., FEYEN J., VAN GENUCHTEN MT, NIELSEN DR. Air entrapment effects on infiltration rate and flow instability. Water Resour. Res. 34, 213, 1998.
  • 22. DOERR SH., SHAKESBY RA., DEKKER LW., RITSEMA CJ. Occurrence, prediction and hydrological effects of water repellency amongst major soil and land-use types in a humid temperate climate. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 57, 741, 2006.
  • 23. DOERR SH., SHAKESBY RA., WALSH RPD. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth Science Reviews. 51, 33, 2000.
  • 24. SONNEVELD MPW., BACKX MAHM., BOUMA J. Simulation of soil water regimes including pedotransfer functions and land-use related preferential flow. Geoderma. 112, 97, 2003.
  • 25. BARTON L., COLMER TD. Ameliorating water repellency under turfgrass of contrasting soil organic matter content: Effect of wetting agent formulation and application frequency. Agr. Water Manage. 99, 1, 2011.
  • 26. ATANASSOVA I., DOERR, SH. Changes in soil organic compound composition associated with heat – induced in soil water repellency. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 62, 516, 2011.
  • 27. PENNA D., TROMP-VAN MEERVELD H.J., GOBBI A., BORGA M., DALLA FONTANA G. The influence of soil moisture on threshold runoff generation processes in an alpine headwater catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc. 15, 689, 2011.
  • 28. MUDRAK O., FROUZ J., VELICHOVA V. Understory vegetation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post-mining forest stands. Ecol. Eng. 36, 783, 2010.
  • 29. FROUZ J., PIZL V., TAJOVSKY K. The effect of earthworms and other saprophagous macrofauna on soil microstructure in reclaimed and un-reclaimed post-mining sites in Central Europe. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 43, 184, 2007.
  • 30. FROUZ J., ELHOTTOVA D., MALY S., PICEK T., PIZL V., SOURKOVA M., TAJOVSKY K. The effect of litter quality and soil faunal composition on organic matter dynamics in post-mining soil: A laboratory study. Appl. Soil Ecol. 37, 72, 2007.
  • 31. ZEITHAML J., PIZL V., SKLENICKA P. Earthworm assemblages in an ecotone between forest and arable field and their relations with soil properties. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 44, 922, 2009.
  • 32. RICHARDS I.G., PALMER J.P., BARRATT P.A. The reclamation of former coal mines and steelworks. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. 717, 1993.
  • 33. MARSHALL T.J., HOLMES J.W., ROSE C.W. Soil Physics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 457, 1996.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikatory
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.agro-8ee4a641-5004-4caf-9f7e-330affd8d178
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.