Designing effective habitat studies: quantifying multiple sources of variability in bat activity

• Autorzy: Fischer J. , Stott J. , Law B. S. , Adams M. D. , Forrester R. I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Common aims of habitat studies are to differentiate between (i) suitable and unsuitable sites for a given species, and (ii) sites used by different communities of species. To quantify differences between sites, field data of site use must be precise enough that true underlying between-site variability is not masked by within-site measurement error. We designed a pilot study to guide the development of a survey protocol for a habitat study on bats in an agricultural landscape in southeastern Australia. Three woodland sites and two scattered tree sites of 2 ha each were surveyed for nine consecutive nights. At three locations within each site (spaced > 50 m apart) one or two Anabat detectors were mounted 1 m above ground or in a tree (2 m above ground). We used mixed regression models to quantify multiple sources of variability in bat calling activity, and graphical data analysis to visualise how increases in survey effort were likely to affect inference. For the five most active species, we found that typically over 40% of variability in nightly detections occurred at the between-site level; approximately 10% occurred between locations within sites; approximately 20% was explained by night-to-night differences; and approximately 30% of variability was not attributable to systematic variation within experimental units. Differences in community composition between sites were clearly evident when two or more detectors per site were used for four or more nights. We conclude with six general considerations for the design of effective habitat studies. These are to (i) consider key contrasts of interest; (ii) use data from mild, calm, dry nights only; (iii) calibrate detectors; (iv) use multiple detectors where possible, or move a single detector within a site; (v) survey for multiple nights; and (vi) where vertical differentiation in habitat use is likely, mount detectors at different heights. These considerations need to be balanced within the context of financial and logistical constraints.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Chiropterologica
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: 11
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.127-137,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Fischer J.

• The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia

autor

Stott J.

• The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia

autor

Law B. S.

• Forest Science Centre, Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 100 Beecroft NSW 2119, Australia

autor

Adams M. D.

• Forest Science Centre, Department of Primary Industries, PO Box 100 Beecroft NSW 2119, Australia

autor

Forrester R. I.

• Statistical Consulting Unit, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200,Australia

Bibliografia

• Adam, M. D., M. J. Lacki, and L. G. Shoemaker. 1994. Influence of environmental conditions on flight activity of Plecotus townsendii virginianus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Brimleyana, 21: 77-85.
• Adams, M. D. 2000. Bat activity around scattered remnant trees in a rural landscape. The Australian Bat Society Newsletter, 14: 7-13.
• Adams, M., T. R. Reardon, P. R. Baverstock, and C. H. S. Watts. 1988. Electrophoretic resolution of species boundaries in Australian Microchiroptera. IV. The Mollossidae (Chiroptera). Australian Journal of Biological Science, 41: 315-326.
• Arita, H. T., and M. B. Fenton. 1997. Flight and echolocation in the ecology and evolution of bats. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 12: 53-58.
• Austin, M. P. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling, 157: 101-118.
• Broders, H. G. 2003. Another quantitative measure of bat species activity and sampling intensity considerations for the design of ultrasonic monitoring studies. Acta Chiropterologica, 5: 235-241.
• Clarke, K. R., and R. M. Warwick. 1994. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK, 172 pp.
• Dorrough, J., and C. Moxham. 2005. Eucalypt establishment in agricultural landscapes and implications for landscapescale restoration. Biological Conservation, 123: 55-66.
• Duchamp, J. E., M. Yates, R. M. Muzika, and R. K. Swihart. 2006. Estimating probabilities of detection for bat echolocation calls: an application of the double-observer method. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34: 408-412.
• Duffy, A. M., L. F. Lumsden, C. R. Caddle, R. R. Chick, and G. R. Newell. 2000. The efficacy of Anabat ultrasonic detectors and harp traps for surveying microchiropterans in south-eastern Australia. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 127-144.
• Fenton, M. B., and G. P. Bell. 1981. Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. Journal of Mammalogy, 62: 233-243.
• Gibbons, P., and M. Boak. 2002. The value of paddock trees for regional conservation in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Management and Restoration, 3: 205-210.
• Gibson, M., and L. Lumsden. 2003. The Anascheme automated bat call identification system. The Australian Bat Society Newsletter, 20: 24-26.
• Griffin, D. R. 1971. The importance of atmospheric attenuation for the echolocation of bats (Chiroptera). Animal Behaviour, 19: 55-61.
• Guisan, A., and N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 135: 147-186.
• Hayes, J. P. 1997. Temporal variation in activity of bats and the design of echolocation-monitoring studies. Journal of Mammalogy, 78: 514-524.
• Hayes, J. P. 2000. Assumptions and practical considerations in the design and interpretation of echolocation-monitoring studies. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 225-236.
• Hayes, J. P., and J. C. Gruver. 2000. Vertical stratification of bat activity in an old-growth forest in western Washington. Northwest Science, 74: 102-108.
• Lachlan CMA. 2006. Lachlan Action Plan. Lachlan Catchment Management Authority, Cowra, New South Wales, 199 pp.
• Larson, D. J., and J. P. Hayes. 2000. Variability in sensitivity of Anabat II bat detectors and a method of calibration. Acta Chiropterologica, 2: 209-213.
• Law, B. S. 2004. Challenges for managing bats in the State forests of New South Wales. Pp. 748-760, in Conservation of Australia’s forest fauna, 2nd edition (D. Lunney, ed.). Royal Zoological Society of New South Wales, Mosman, 1073 pp.
• Law, B. S., and M. Chidel. 2006. Eucalypt plantings on farms: Use by insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 133: 236-249.
• Law, B., J. Anderson, and M. Chidel. 1998. A bat survey in State Forests on the south-west slopes region of New South Wales with suggestions for improvements in future surveys. Australian Zoologist, 30: 467-479.
• Law, B. S., J. Anderson, and M. Chidel. 1999. Bat communities in a fragmented forest landscape on the south-west slopes of New South Wales, Australia. Biological Conservation, 88: 333-345.
• Law, B. S., M. Chidel, and G. Turner. 2000. The use by wildlife of paddock trees in farmland. Pacific Conservation Biology, 6:130-143.
• Lumsden, L. F., and A. F. Bennett. 2005. Scattered trees in rural landscapes: foraging habitat for insectivorous bats in south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 122: 205-222.
• Lumsden, L. F., A. F. Bennett, S. P. Krasna, and J. E. Silins. 1995. The conservation of insectivorous bats in rural landscapes of northern Victoria. People and Nature Conservation: 142-148.
• Lumsden, L. F., A. F. Bennett, and J. E. Silins. 2002. Location of roosts of the lesser long-eared bat Nyctophilus geoffroyi and Gould’s wattled bat Chalinolobus gouldii in a fragmented landscape in south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 106: 237-249.
• Manning, A. D., J. Fischer, and D. B. Lindenmayer. 2006. Scattered trees are keystone structures — implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 132: 311-321.
• Menzel, J. M., M. A. Menzel, J. C. Kilgo, W. M. Ford, J. W. Edwards, and G. F. McCracken. 2005. Effect of habitat and foraging height on bat activity in the coastal plain of South Carolina. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69: 235-245.
• Milne, D. J., M. Armstrong, A. Fisher, T. Flores, and C. R. Pavey. 2004. A comparison of three survey methods for collecting bat echolocation calls and species-accumulation rates from nightly Anabat recordings. Wildlife Research, 31: 57-63.
• Milne, D. J., A. Fisher, I. Rainey, and C. R. Pavey. 2005. Temporal patterns of bats in the top end of the Northern Territory, Australia. Journal of Mammalogy, 86: 909-920.
• Moreno, C. E., and G. Halffter. 2000. Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37: 149-158.
• O’Farrell, M. J., and W. L. Gannon. 1999. A comparison of acoustic versus capture techniques for the inventory of bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 80: 24-30.
• O’Neill, M. G., and R. J. Taylor. 1986. Observations on the flight patterns and foraging behavior of Tasmanian bats. Australian Wildlife Research, 13: 427-432.
• Patriquin, K. J., L. K. Hogberg, B. J. Chruszcz, and R. M. R. Barclay. 2003. The influence of habitat structure on the ability to detect ultrasound using bat detectors. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 31: 475-481.
• Pinheiro, J. C., and D. M. Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer-Verlag, New York, 528 pp.
• Richards, G. C. 1989. Nocturnal activity of insectivorous bats relative to temperature and prey availability in tropical Queensland. Australian Wildlife Research, 16: 151-158.
• Spooner, P., I. Lunt, and W. Robinson. 2002. Is fencing enough? The short-term effects of stock exclusion in remnant grassy woodlands in southern NSW. Ecological Management and Restoration, 3: 117-126.
• Verboom, B., and K. Spoelstra. 1999. Effects of food abundance and wind on the use of tree lines by an insectivorous bat, Pipistrellus pipistrellus. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77: 1393-1401.
• Waters, T. J., and A. L. Walsh. 2002. The influence of bat detector brand on the quantitative estimation of bat activity. Bioacoustics, 5: 205-221.
• Weller, T. J., and C. J. Zabel. 2002. Variation in bat detections due to detector orientation in a forest. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30: 922-930.