PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2007 | 09 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

Mist netting bias, species accumulation curves, and the rediscovery of two bats on Montserrat (Lesser Antilles)

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Mist nets are commonly used to survey bat populations and to estimate bat biodiversity, but several studies have found that mist net capture data and methods are biased due to a number of factors, including size and placement of nets, and the frequency at which investigators check their nets. Despite the wealth of literature and anecdotal reports, few investigators have quantified the interactions of bats with mist nets directly. We employed night vision camcorders to monitor bat behavior when bats encountered a mist net and then utilized these data to reevaluate years of survey data collected on Montserrat, Lesser Antilles. We recorded 2,523 bat passes during 43.3 hours of videotaping in July 2005 and June 2006. Observations conducted on successive nights provide evidence of avoidance-learning behavior in bats. When a mist net was present, 5.4% of bats in the airspace came into contact with the net giving an overall capture rate of 3.2% (range 0–10.3%). Mist nets are not accurately sampling bats that utilize flyways on Montserrat and such fieldwork thereby generates potentially misleading data. Biodiversity assessments and conservation guidelines based on short-term mist net surveys alone are not sufficient or reliable in regards to bats. A pragmatic solution to reduce mist net bias is to repeatedly sample a target region, utilize a variety of netting sites, use variable net sets, and carefully analyze species accumulation curves.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

09

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.423-435,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Biology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
  • Department of Biology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
  • University of Nebraska State Museum, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA
  • Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Trinity, Jersey, JE3 5BP, United Kingdom
autor
  • Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Département Systématique, Paris Cedex 05, France
  • Department of Biology, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA

Bibliografia

  • 1. R. J. Baker and H. H. Genoways . 1976. A new species of Chiroderma from Guadeloupe, West Indies (Chiroptera: Phyllostomatidae). Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 39:1–9. Google Scholar
  • 2. R. J. Baker, H. H. Genoways, and J. C. Patton . 1978. Bats of Guadeloupe. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 50:1–16. Google Scholar
  • 3. N. Berry, W. O'Connor, M. W. Holderied, and G. Jones . 2004. Detection and avoidance of harp traps by echolocating bats. Acta Chiropterologica 6:335–346. Google Scholar
  • 4. Conservation International 2007. Rapid Assessment Program. 10 July 2007 < http://web.conservation.org/xp/CIWEB/programs/rap/>. Google Scholar
  • 5. K. Dobson, L. Lumsden, and J. Nelson . 2001. To catch a bat with a harp trap. Bat Research News 42:53. Google Scholar
  • 6. L. E. Ellison, T. J. O'Shea, M. A. Bogan, A. L. Everette, and D. M. Schneider . 2003. Existing data on colonies of bats in the United States: summary and analysis of the United States Geological Survey's population database. Pp 13–19. in Monitoring trends in bat populations of the United States and territories: problems and prospects T. J. O'Shea and M. A. Bogan , editors. U. S. Geological Survey Information and Technology Report, USGS/BRD/ITR-2003-0003. Google Scholar
  • 7. M. B. Fenton 1997. Science and the conservation of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 78:1–14. Google Scholar
  • 8. M. B. Fenton, L. Acharya, D. Audet, M. B C. Hickey, C. Merriman, M. K. Obrist, D. M. Syme, and B. Adkins . 1992. Phyllostomid bats (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) as indicators of habitat destruction in the Neotropics. Biotropica 24:440–446. Google Scholar
  • 9. T. H. Fleming, E. T. Hooper, and D. E. Wilson . 1972. Three Central American bat communities: structure, reproductive cycles, and movement patterns. Ecology 53:555–569. Google Scholar
  • 10. C. M. Francis 1989. A comparison of mist nets and two designs of harp traps for capturing bats. Journal of Mammalogy 70:865–870. Google Scholar
  • 11. C. M. Francis 1994. Vertical stratification of fruit bats (Pteropodidae) in lowland dipterocarp rain-forest in Malaysia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 10:523–530. Google Scholar
  • 12. M. R. Gannon and M. R. Willig . 1998. Long-term monitoring protocol for bats: lessons from the Luquillo Experimental Forest. Pp. in Forest diversity in North, Central, and South America, and the Caribbean: research and monitoring F. Dallmeier and J. Comiskey , editors. Man and Biosphere Series 21:271–291. Google Scholar
  • 13. J. E. Gardner, J. D. Garner, and J. E. Hofmann . 1989. A portable mist netting system for capturing bats with emphasis on Myotis sodalis (Indiana bat). Bat Research News 30:1–8. Google Scholar
  • 14. H. H. Genoways 1998. Two new species of bats of the genus Sturnira from the Lesser Antilles, West Indies. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 176:1–7. Google Scholar
  • 15. H. H. Genoways and J. K. Jones Jr. . 1975. Additional records of the stenodermine bat, Sturnira thomasi, from the Lesser Antillean island of Guadeloupe. Journal of Mammalogy 56:924–925. Google Scholar
  • 16. H. H. Genoways, C. J. Phillips, and R. J. Baker . 1998. Bats of the Antillean island of Grenada: a new zoogeographic perspective. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 177:1–28. Google Scholar
  • 17. H. H. Genoways, R. M. Timm, R. J. Baker, C. J. Phillips, and D. A. Schlitter . 2001. Bats of the West Indian island of Dominica: natural history, areography, and trophic structure. Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University 43:1–43. Google Scholar
  • 18. H. H. Genoways, R. J. Baker, J. W. Bickham, and C. J. Phillips . 2005. Bats of Jamaica. Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University 48:1–155. Google Scholar
  • 19. H. H. Genoways, S. C. Pedersen, P. A. Larsen, G. G. Kwiecinski, and J. J. Huebschman . In press. Bats of Saint Martin, French West Indies/Sint Maarten, Netherlands Antilles. Mastozoologia Neotropical. Google Scholar
  • 20. W. K. Gram and J. Faaborg . 1997. The distribution of Neotropical migrant birds wintering in the El Cielo Biosphere Reserve, Tamaulipas, Mexico. The Condor 99:658–670. Google Scholar
  • 21. D. E. Hirsh, M. Betke, S. Crampton, J. Horn, and T. H. Kunz . 2003. Censusing Brazilian free-tailed bats using infrared thermal imaging and computer vision methods. Bat Research News 44:143. Google Scholar
  • 22. L. Jenni and M. Leuenberger . 1996. Capture efficiency of mist nets with comments on their role in the assessment of passerine habitat use. Journal of Field Ornithology 67:263–274. Google Scholar
  • 23. J. K. Jones Jr. and R. J. Baker . 1979. Notes on a collection of bats from Montserrat, Lesser Antilles. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 60:1–6. Google Scholar
  • 24. J. K. Jones Jr. and C. J. Phillips . 1976. Bats of the genus Sturnira in the Lesser Antilles. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 40:1–16. Google Scholar
  • 25. E. K V. Kalko, C. O. Handley Jr., and D. Handley . 1996. Organization, diversity, and long-term dynamics of a neotropical bat community. Pp 503–553. in Long-term studies of vertebrate communities M. L. Moody and J. A. Smallwood , editors. Academic Press. San Diego, CA. xix + 597. pp. Google Scholar
  • 26. A. J. Kuenzi and M. L. Morrison . 1998. Detection of bats by mist-nets and ultrasonic sensors. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26:307–311. Google Scholar
  • 27. T. H. Kunz and E. L P. Anthony . 1977. On the efficiency of the Tuttle bat trap. Journal of Mammalogy 58:309–315. Google Scholar
  • 28. T. H. Kunz and C. E. Brock . 1975. A comparison of mist nets and ultrasonic detectors for monitoring flight activity of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 56:907–911. Google Scholar
  • 29. T. H. Kunz and A. Kurta . 1988. Capture methods and holding devices. Pp 1–29. in Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats T. H. Kunz , editor. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington D.C. xxii + 533. pp. Google Scholar
  • 30. T. H. Kunz, C. R. Tidemann, and G. C. Richards . 1996. Small volant mammals. Pp 122–146. in Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for mammals D. E. Wilson, F. R. Cole, J. D. Nichols, R. Rudran, and M. S. Foster , editors. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington D.C. xxvii + 409. pp. Google Scholar
  • 31. A. B. Lang, C. D. Weise, E. K V. Kalko, and H. Roemer . 2004. The bias of bat netting. Bat Research News 45:235–236. Google Scholar
  • 32. P. A. Larsen and S. C. Pedersen . 2002. Capture rates of four species of fruitbats on Montserrat. Bat Research News 43:162. Google Scholar
  • 33. P. A. Larsen, H. H. Genoways, and S. C. Pedersen . 2006. New records of bats from Saint Barthélemy, French West Indies. Mammalia 70:321–325. Google Scholar
  • 34. R. J. Larsen, K. A. Boegler, and S. C. Pedersen . 2005. Mist net bias on Montserrat. Bat Research News 46:191. Google Scholar
  • 35. R. J. Larsen, K. A. Boegler, J. C. Kolba, K. W. Cudmore, and S. C. Pedersen . 2006. Montserrat: Mist-netting bias and accumulation curves. Bat Research News 47:121. Google Scholar
  • 36. R. K. Laval 1970. Banding returns and activity periods of some Costa Rican bats. Southwestern Naturalist 15:1–10. Google Scholar
  • 37. K. A. Maccarthy, T. C. Carter, B. J. Steffen, and G. A. Feldhamer . 2006. Efficacy of mist-net protocol for Indiana bats: a video analysis. Northeastern Naturalist 13:25–28. Google Scholar
  • 38. D. W. Morrison 1978. Lunar phobia in a Neotrop-ical fruit bat (Artibeus jamaicensis). Animal Behaviour 26:852–855. Google Scholar
  • 39. M. J. O'Farrell and W. L. Gannon . 1999. A comparison of acoustic versus capture techniques for the inventory of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 80:24–30. Google Scholar
  • 40. S. C. Pedersen 2001. The impact of volcanic eruptions on the bat populations of Montserrat, BWI. American Zoologist 40:1167A. Google Scholar
  • 41. S. C. Pedersen, H. H. Genoways, and P. W. Freeman . 1996. Notes on the bats from Montserrat (Lesser Antilles), with comments concerning the effects of Hurricane Hugo. Caribbean Journal of Science 32:206–213. Google Scholar
  • 42. S. C. Pedersen, H. H. Genoways, M. N. Morton, J. Johnson, and S. E. Courts . 2003. Bats of Nevis, northern Lesser Antilles. Acta Chiropterologica 5:251–267. Google Scholar
  • 43. S. C. Pedersen, H. H. Genoways, M. N. Morton, G. G. Kwiecinski, and S. E. Courts . 2005. Bats of St. Kitts (St. Christopher), northern Lesser Antilles, with comments regarding capture rates of Neotropical bats. Caribbean Journal of Science 41:744–760. Google Scholar
  • 44. S. C. Pedersen, H. H. Genoways, M. N. Morton, V. J. Swier, P. A. Larsen, K. C. Lindsay, R. A. Adams, and J. D. Appino . 2006. Bats of Antigua, northern Lesser Antilles. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 249:1–18. Google Scholar
  • 45. S. C. Pedersen, P. A. Larsen, H. H. Genoways, M. N. Morton, and K. C. Lindsay . 2007. Bats of Barbuda, Northern Lesser Antilles. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Texas Tech University 271:1–20. Google Scholar
  • 46. E. D. Pierson, W. E. Rainey, R. M. Warner, and C. C. White-Warner . 1986. First record of Monophyllus from Montserrat, West Indies. Mammalia 50:269–271. Google Scholar
  • 47. J. V. Remsen Jr. and D. A. Good . 1996. Misuse of data from mist-net captures to assess relative abundance in bird populations. The Auk 113:381–398. Google Scholar
  • 48. N. B. Simmons and R. S. Voss . 1998. The mammals of Paracou, French Guiana, a Neotropical lowland rainforest fauna. Part 1, Bats. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 237:1–218. Google Scholar
  • 49. SYSTAT 2004. Systat version 11 SYSTAT Software Inc. Richmond, CA. Google Scholar

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-8b16e824-df4e-447d-9947-c8247382142e
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.