Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2018 | 27 | 6 |

Tytuł artykułu

Climate change, the evaporation paradox, and their effects on streamflow in Lijiang watershed


Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji



Global warming has become an indisputable fact over the past century, while much research has shown that the rate of potential evapotranspiration had been consistently decreasing throughout the world over the past 50 years. This phenomenon is called the “evaporation paradox.” In this study we tested the trends of potential evapotranspiration and air temperature, and analyzed the effects of climate change on streamflow. The conclusions include: 1) The potential evapotranspiration of the Lijiang watershed is significantly decreased at the 0.1 confidence level and temperature is significantly increased at the 0.01 confidence level. 2) Evaporation paradox exists in the Lijiang watershed, caused mainly by sunshine duration decrease. 3) The annual streamflow and precipitation of Lijiang watershed both showed a decreased trend: compared between the first decade of 1976-1985 and the last decade of 2006-2015, streamflow decreased 8.48% and precipitation decreased 7.65%. 4) The sensitivities of streamflow to precipitation and potential evapotranspiration were 1.4152 and -0.4152, respectively, and the effects of precipitation and potential evapotranspiration on streamflow were a 10.83% decrease and 1.67% increase, respectively.

Słowa kluczowe








Opis fizyczny



  • College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China
  • College of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China


  • 1. YANG K., YE B., ZHOU D., WU B., FOKEN T. Response of hydrological cycle to recent climate changes in the Tibetan Plateau. Climatic Change. 109, 517, 2011.
  • 2. REDDY V.R., SYME G.J. Social sciences and hydrology: An introduction. Journal of Hydrology. 518, 1, 2014.
  • 3. WANG X.S., ZHOU Y. Shift of annual water balance in the Budyko space for a catchment with groundwater dependent evapotranspiration. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences Discussions. 20, 3673, 2015.
  • 4. PENG B., LIU X., YANG T., LI F., LIANG K., HU S., LIU C. Assessment of the influences of different potential evapotranspiration inputs on the performance of monthly hydrological models under different climatic conditions. Journal of Hydrometeorology. 2259, 17, 2016.
  • 5. XIE J., SUN G., CHU H., LIU J., MCNULTY S., NOORMETS A., JOHN R., OUYANG Z., ZHA T., LI H., GUAN W., CHEN J. Long-term variability in the water budget and its controls in an oak-dominated temperate forest. Hydrological Processes. 6054, 28, 2015.
  • 6. LIU C., ZHANG D. Temporal and spatial change analysis of the sensitivity of potential evapotranspiration to meteorological influencing factors in China. Acta Geographica Sinica. 66, 579, 2011.
  • 7. IPCC. Climate Change 2013. Working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report, 2013. The Physical Science Basis: Summary for Policymakers.
  • 8. ABTEW W., OBEYSEKERA J., IRICANIN N. Pan evaporation and potential evapotranspiration trends in South Florida. Hydrological Processes. 25, 958, 2015.
  • 9. FICKLIN D.L., MAXWELL J.T., LETSINGER S.L., GHOLIZADEH H. A climatic deconstruction of recent drought trends in the United States. Environmental Research Letters. 10, 1, 2015.
  • 10. STOCKER F., QIN D., PLATTNER G.K., TIGNOR M., ALLEN S., BOSHUNG A., NAUELS A., XIA Y., BEX V., MIDGLEY P. IPCC, 2013: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Computational Geometry. 18, 95, 2013.
  • 11. XING W., WANG W., SHAO Q., YU Z., YANG T., FU J. Periodic fluctuation of reference evapotranspiration during the past five decades: Does Evaporation Paradox really exist in China?. Scientific Reports. 6, 39503, 2016.
  • 12. PETERSON T.C., GOLUBEV V.S., GROISMAN P.Y. Evaporation losing its strength. Nature. 377, 687, 1995.
  • 13. WANG T., ZHANG J., SUN F., LIU W. Pan evaporation paradox and evaporative demand from the past to the future over China: a review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water. 2017.
  • 14. LU X., BAI H., MU X. Explaining the evaporation paradox in Jiangxi Province of China: Spatial distribution and temporal trends in potential evapotranspiration of Jiangxi Province from 1961 to 2013. International Soil & Water Conservation Research. 4, 45, 2016.
  • 15. BURN D.H., HESCH N.M. Trends in evaporation for the Canadian Prairies. Journal of Hydrology. 336, 61, 2007.
  • 16. JHAJHARIA D., DINPASHOH Y., KAHYA E., SINGH V.P., FAKHERI-FARD A. Trends in reference evapotranspiration in the humid region of northeast India. Hydrological Processes. 26, 421, 2012.
  • 17. ZHANG Q., QI T., LI J., SINGH V.P., WANG Z. Spatiotemporal variations of pan evaporation in China during 1960-2005: changing patterns and causes. International Journal of Climatology. 35, 903, 2015.
  • 18. MCVICAR T.R., RODERICK M.L., DONOHUE R.J., NIEL T.G.V. Less bluster ahead? Ecohydrological implications of global trends of terrestrial near-surface wind speeds. Ecohydrology. 5, 381, 2012.
  • 19. LIU X., LIU W., XIA J. Comparison of the streamflow sensitivity to aridity index between the Danjiangkou Reservoir basin and Miyun Reservoir basin, China. Theoretical & Applied Climatology. 111, 683, 2013.
  • 20. BABEL M.S., BHUSAL S.P., WAHID S.M., AGARWAL A. Climate change and water resources in the Bagmati River Basin, Nepal. Theoretical & Applied Climatology. 115, 639, 2014.
  • 21. WANG L., LIU H.L., BAO A.M., PAN X.L., CHEN X. Estimating the sensitivity of runoff to climate change in an alpine-valley watershed of Xinjiang, China. Hydrological Sciences Journal. 61, 1069, 2015.
  • 22. ANDREASSIAN V., CORON L., LERAT J., MOINE N.L. Climate elasticity of streamflow revisited - an elasticity index based on long-term hydrometeorological records. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences Discussions. 12, 3645, 2016.
  • 23. LI B., CHEN F. Using the aridity index to assess recent climate change: a case study of the Lancang River Basin, China. Stochastic Environmental Research & Risk Assessment. 29, 1071, 2015.
  • 24. FAN H., XU L., TAO H., FENG W., CHENG J., YOU H. Accessing the Difference in the Climate Elasticity of Runoff across the Poyang Lake Basin, China. Water. 9, 135, 2017.
  • 25. LIU X., LIU C., LUO Y., XIA J. Dramatic decrease in streamflow from the headwater source in the central route of China’s water diversion project: Climatic variation or human influence? Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 117, 6113, 2012.
  • 26. ALLEN R.G., PEREIRA L.S., RAES D., SIMITH M. Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome, Italy: United Nations FAO. 1998.
  • 27. HAMED K.H. Trend detection in hydrologic data: the Mann-Kendall trend test under the scaling hypothesis. Journal of Hydrology. 349, 350, 2008.
  • 28. LIANG L.Q., LI L.J., LIU Q.A. Temporal variation of reference evapotranspiration during 1961-2005 in the Taoer River basin of Northeast China. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology. 150, 298, 2010.
  • 29. HU S., LIU C., ZHENG H., WANG Z., YU J. Assessing the impacts of climate variability and human activities on streamflow in the water’ source area of Baiyangdian Lake. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 22, 895, 2012.
  • 30. RENNER M., SEPPELT R., BERNHOFER C. Evaluation of water-energy balance frameworks to predict the sensitivity of streamflow to climate change. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences & Discussions. 213, 98, 2012.
  • 31. PEEL M.C., MCMAHON T.A., FINLAYSON B.L. Vegetation impact on mean annual evapotranspiration at a global catchment scale. Water Resources Research. 46, 2095, 2010.
  • 32. STANHILL G., COHEN S. Global dimming: a review of the evidence for a widespread and significant reduction in global radiation with discussion of its probable causes and possible agricultural consequences. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology. 107, 255, 2001.
  • 33. ABTEW W., OBEYSEKERA J., IRICANIN N. Pan evaporation and potential evapotranspiration trends in South Florida. Hydrological Processes. 25, 958, 2015.
  • 34. STANHILL G., MOLLER M. Evaporative climate change in the British Isles. International Journal of Climatology. 28, 1127, 2010.
  • 35. HOSSAIN S., HOMMA K., SHIRAIWA T. Decadal and monthly change of an empirical coefficient in the relation between solar radiation and the daily range of temperature in Japan: implications for the estimation of solar radiation based on temperature.[J]. Plant Production Science. 17, 333, 2014.
  • 36. WANG J., DONG J., WANG S., LU G., Oyler J., SMITH W.K., ZHAO M., LIU J., RUNNING S. Decreasing net primary production due to drought and slight decreases in solar radiation in China from 2000 to 2012. Journal of Geophysical Research. 122, 261, 2017.
  • 37. WANG Y., WILD M., SANCHEZ -LORENZO A., MANARA V. Urbanization effect on trends in sunshine duration in China. Annales Geophysicae. 35, 839, 2017.
  • 38. SHEN X., LIU B., LI G., WU Z., JIN Y., YU P., ZHOU D. Spatiotemporal change of diurnal temperature range and its relationship with sunshine duration and precipitation in China. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 119, 13, 2015.
  • 39. YE Y., SU Y.X., LI Z., WANG Y., LIANG J. The analysis on sunshine duration spatial and temporal variations over Guangxi in recent 50 years. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin. 29, 196, 2013 [In Chinese].

Typ dokumentu



Identyfikator YADDA

JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.