Wpływ relacji człowiek-zwierzę na dobrostan i produkcyjność zwierząt

• Autorzy: Petrynka M. , Klocek C.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Influence of human-animal relationship on animals’ welfare and productivity

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Modern technologies of animal husbandry, which minimize human contact with animals, may create situations perceived by animals as a threat. Additionally, as a result of improper handling of animals and only periodical (incidental) contacts with humans, these interactions are often marked with fear and aversion. This affects the level of welfare of farm animals, as well as production results and the quality of products obtained. It is therefore necessary to develop effective and practical strategies of alleviating stress in animals and of promoting a more positive human-animal relationship. Results of studies on the perception of people by livestock may prove useful in developing such a model of animal husbandry. This knowledge may also facilitate the interpretation of observed animal behavior and lead to the development of new research methods.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zwierzeta gospodarskie; chow zwierzat; relacje czlowiek-zwierze; dobrostan zwierzat; produkcyjnosc zwierzat; utrzymanie zwierzat; obsluga zwierzat; postepowanie ze zwierzetami; traktowanie zwierzat

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 68
• Numer: 08
• Opis fizyczny: s.479-482,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Petrynka M.

• Katedra Hodowli Trzody Chlewnej i Małych Przeżuwaczy, Wydział Hodowli i Biologii Zwierząt, Uniwersytet Rolniczy w Krakowie, Al.Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków

autor

Klocek C.

Bibliografia

• 1. Albright J. L.: Dairy cattle husbandry, [w:] Grandin T.: Livestock Handling and Transport. Wallingford, U.K., CAB International 1993, s. 95-108.
• 2. Bakken M., Moe R., Smith A.: Radio telemetry: a method of evaluation stress and learning ability in the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes). Proc. Int. Congr. Appl. Ethol., Berlin 1993, s. 591-594.
• 3. Barnett J. L., Hemsworth P. H., Hennessy D. P., McCallum T. M., Newman E. A.: The effects of modifying the amount of human contact on the behavioural, physiological and production responses of laying hens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994, 41, 87-100.
• 4. Boissy A., Bouissou M. F.: Effects of early handling on heifers' subsequent reactivity to humans and to unfamiliar situations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1988, 22, 259-273.
• 5. Boissy A., Terlouw C. E. M., Le Neindre P.: Presence of cues from stressed conspecifics increases reactivity to aversive events in cattle: evidence for the existence of alarm substances in urine. Physiol. Behav. 1998, 63, 489-495.
• 6. Boivin X., Braastad B. O.: Effects of handling during temporary isolation after early weaning on goat kids' later response to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996, 48, 61-71.
• 7. Boivin X., Le Neindre P., Chupin J. M., Garel J. P., Trillat C.: Influence of breed and early management on ease of handling and open-field behaviour of cattle. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992b, 32, 313-323.
• 8. Boivin X., Le Neindre P., Garel J. P., Chupin J. M.: Influence of breed and rearing management on cattle reactions during human handling. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994, 39, 115-122.
• 9. Boivin X., Nowak R., Despre’s G., Tournadre H., Le Neindre P.: Discrimination between shepherds by lambs reared under artificial conditions. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 75, 2892-2898.
• 10. Boivin X., Tournadre H., Le Neindre P.: Hand feeding and gentling influence early weaned lamb's attachment responses to their stockperson. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 78, 879-884.
• 11. Bouissou M. F., Vandenheede M.: Fear reactions of domestic sheep confronted with either a human or an human-like model. Behav. Process. 1995, 34, 81-92.
• 12. Breuer K., Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L., Matthews L. R., Coleman G.: Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 66, 273-288.
• 13. Breuer K., Hemsworth P. H., Coleman G. J.: The effect of positive or negative handling on the behavioural and physiological responses of nonlactating heifers. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 84, 3-22.
• 14. English P., Burgess G., Segundo R., Dunne J.: Stockmanship: Improving the Care of the Pig and Other Livestock. Farming Press, Ipswich, UK 1992.
• 15. Gonyou H. W., Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L.: Effects of frequent interactions with humans on growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1986, 16, 269-278.
• 16. Grandin T., Curtis S. E., Taylor I. A.: Toys, mingling and driving reduce excitability in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1987, 65 (Suppl. 1), 230.
• 17. Gross W. B., Siegel P. B.: Socialization as a factor in resistance to disease, feed efficiency, and response to antigen in chickens. Am. J. Vet Res. 1982, 43, 2010-2012.
• 18. Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L.: Human-animal Interactions, [w:] Price E. O.: Farm Animal Behavior, The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Saunders W. B., Philadelphia, PA. 1987a, 339-356.
• 19. Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L.: The effect of aversively handling pigs, either individually or in groups, on their behaviour, growth and corticosteroids. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1991, 30, 61-72.
• 20. Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L.: The effects of early contact with humans on the subsequent level of fear of humans in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1992, 35, 83-90.
• 21. Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L.: The human-animal relationship and its importance in pig production. Pig News Inf. 1987b, 8, 133-136.
• 22. Hemsworth P. H., Barnett J. L., Tilbrook A. J., Hansen C.: The effects of handling by humans at calving and during milking on the behaviour and milk cortisol concentrations of primiparous dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1989b, 22, 313-326.
• 23. Hemsworth P. H., Brand A., Willems P. J.: The behavioural response of sows to the presence of human beings and their productivity. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1981b, 8, 67-74.
• 24. Hemsworth P. H., Coleman G. J.: Human-Livestock Interactions: The Stockperson and the Productivity of Intensively Farmed Animals. CAB International, Wallingford, UK 1998.
• 25. Hemsworth P. H., Coleman G., Barnett J. L., Borg S., Dowling S.: The effects of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 80, 68-78.
• 26. Jones R. B.: Fear and distress, [w:] Appleby M. C., Hughes B. O. (Eds.): Animal Welfare. CAB International, Wallingford, UK 1997, 75-87.
• 27. Jones R. B.: Reduction of the domestic chick’s fear of human beings by regular handling and related treatments. Anim. Behav. 1993, 46, 991-998.
• 28. Kendrick K. M.: Intelligent perception. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998, 57, 213-231.
• 29. Kendrick K. M., Atkins K., Hinton M. R., Broad K. D., Fabre-Nys C., Keverne B.: Facial and vocal discrimination in sheep. Anim. Behav. 1995, 49, 1665-1676.
• 30. Korff J., Dyckhoff B.: Analysis of the human animal interaction demonstrated in sheep by using the model of "social support", [w:] Hemsworth P. H., Spinka M., Kostal L.: Proc. 31st Internat. Congress Internat. Soc. Applied Ethology, Prague, Czech Republic 1997, s. 87-88.
• 31. Lansade L., Bertrand M., Boivin X., Bouissou M. F.: The effects of handling at weaning on manageability and reactivity of foals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 87, 131-149.
• 32. Le Neindre P., Boivin X., Boissy A.: Handling of extensively kept animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996, 49, 73-81.
• 33. Lensink J., Fernandez X., Cozzi G., Florand L., Veissier I.: The influence of farmers' behavior on calves' reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2001b, 79, 642-652.
• 34. Levine S.: Noxious stimulation in infant and adult rats and consummatory behaviour. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1958, 51, 220-233.
• 35. Lewis N. J., Hurnik J. F.: The effect of some common management practices on the ease of handling of dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998, 58, 213-220.
• 36. Lyons D. M.: Individual differences in temperament of domestic dairy goats and the inhibition of milk ejection. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1989, 22, 269-282.
• 37. Mateo J. M., Estep D. Q., McCann J. S.: Effects of differential handling on the behaviour of domestic ewes Ovis aries. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1991, 32, 45-54.
• 38. Metz J. H. M.: The response of farm animals to humans-examples of the epistemology of experimental research, [w:] Seabrook M. F.: The Role of the Stockman in Livestock Productivity and Management. CEC, Luxembourg 1987, 23-37.
• 39. Millot J. L., Filiatre J. C., Eckerlin A., Gagnon A. C., Montagner H.: Olfactory cues in the relations between children and their pet dogs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1987, 19, 189-195.
• 40. Miura A., Tanida H., Tanaka T., Yoshimoto T.: The influence of human posture and movement on the approach and espace behaviour of weanling pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1996, 49, 247-256.
• 41. Munksgaard L., De Passille A. M., Rushen J., Thodberg K., Jensen M. B.: Discrimination of people by dairy cows based on handling. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80, 1106-1112.
• 42. Pedersen V.: Long-term effects of different handling procedures on behavioural, physiological, and production-related parameters in silver foxes. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994, 40, 285-296.
• 43. Pedersen V., Jeppesen L. L.: Effects of early handling on later behaviour and stress-sensitivity in silver foxes. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1990, 26, 383-393.
• 44. Pinchbeck G. L., Clegg P. D., Proudman C. J., Morgan K. L., French N. R.: Whip use and race progress are associated with horse falls in hurdle and steeplechase racing in the UK. Equine Vet. J. 2004, 36, 384-389.
• 45. Price E. O.: Behavioural aspects of animal domestication. Q. Rev. Biol. 1984, 59, 1-32.
• 46. Rosales A. G.: Managing stress in broiler breeders: a review. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 1994, 3, 199-207.
• 47. Rushen J., De Passille A. M., Munksgaard L.: Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior and heart rate at milking. J. Dairy Sci. 1999b, 82, 720-727.
• 48. Rushen J., Taylor A. A., De Passille A. M.: Domestic animals' fear of humans and its effects on welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1999a, 65, 285-303.
• 49. Shabalina A. T.: Dominance rank, fear scores and reproduction in cockerels. Br. Poult. Sci. 1984, 25, 297-301.
• 50. Søndergaard E., Halekoh U.: Young horses' reactions to humans in relation to handling and social environment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2003, 84, 265-280.
• 51. Suarez S. D., Gallup G. G.: Open-field behaviour in chickens: the experimenter is a predator. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 1982, 96, 432-439.
• 52. Tanida H., Miura A., Tanaka T., Yoshimoto T.: Behavioral response to humans In individually handled weanling pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1995, 42, 249-259.
• 53. Tanida H., Miura A., Tanaka T., Yoshimoto T.: The role of handling in communication between humans and weanling pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1994, 40, 219-228.
• 54. Tanida H., Miura A., Tanaka T., Yoshimoto T.: The role of handling in communication between humans and weanling pigs. Proc. VII World Conf. Anim. Prod., Canada 1993, 3, 400-401.
• 55. Vandenheede M., Bouissou M. F.: Fear reactions of ewes to photographic images. Behav. Process. 1994, 32, 17-28.
• 56. Waiblinger S., Boivin X., Pedersen V., Tosi M., Janczak A., Visser E., Jones B.: Assesing the human-animal relationship in farmer spiecies: A critical revive. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006, 101, 185-242.
• 57. Waiblinger S., Menke C., Korff J., Bucher A.: Previous handling and gentle interactions affect behaviour and heart rate of dairy cows during a veterinary procedure. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2004, 85, 31-42.
• 58. Walton J. R.: Pigs, [w:] Anderson R. S., Edney A. T. B.: Practical Animal Handling. Pergamon, Oxford 1991, 67-75.
• 59. Waran N., McGreevy P., Casey R. A.: Training methods and horse welfare, [w:] Waran N.: The Welfare of Horses. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands 2002, 151-180.