An integrated spatial method for minimizing environmental damage of transmission pipelines

• Autorzy: Yildirim V. , Yomralioglu T. , Nisanci R. , Colak E.H. , Bediroglu S. , Memisoglu T.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Pipelines are essential for transporting energy resources over long distances. Pipeline projects cause many environmental, economic, and social problems. The construction of large-scale infrastructures such as natural gas/oil pipelines involves extensive disturbance for regional ecosystems. Therefore, it is very important to ensure bad effects of transmission pipeline routes considering environmental sensitivities. In order to do this, we used a geographical information system with multi-criteria decision-making techniques to create an environmental care model. In this study, we applied the order preference by similarity to ideal solution technique to integrate environmental sensitivity into the planning of a natural gas transmission pipeline project. For this purpose, route optimization was carried out for the ongoing operation of an existing 84.33 km natural gas transmission line. An environmentally sensitive optimum route was determined according to environmental impact assessment criteria. The experimental studies confirmed that our road is superior to the current road when compared with the 13 spatial criteria used for analysis. Our road has only seven stream passes while the current road has 20, our road has no quality soil pass on the other side while the current road has a 661-m quality soil pass, and our road is more cost-efficient at 77.89 km as opposed to the current road’s 84.33 km. This paper declares that optimized and sophisticated GIS-multicriteria decision method tools/models solve natural gas transmission project routing problems in terms of environmental sensitivities and costefficiency.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 6
• Opis fizyczny: 2653-2563,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Yildirim V.

• Faculty of Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey

autor

Yomralioglu T.

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey

autor

Nisanci R.

• Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey

autor

Colak E.H.

• Faculty of Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey

autor

Bediroglu S.

• Faculty of Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey

autor

Memisoglu T.

• Faculty of Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. ZEINOLABEDIN Y., YAHYAPOOR M.S., SHIRZAD Z. The Geopolitics of Energy in the Caspian Basin. Int. J. Environ. Res. 5 (2), 501, Spring 2011, ISSN: 1735-6865, 2010.
• 2. RANJBAR P., SHAFIEEFAR M., REZVANDOUST J. Modeling of Oil Spill and Response in Support of Decreasing Environmental Oil Effects Case Study: Blowout from Khark Subsea Pipelines (Persian Gulf). Int. J. Environ. Res. 8 (2), 289, Spring 2014, ISSN: 1735-6865, 2014.
• 3. MARUFUZZAMAN M., EKSIOGLU S.D., HERNANDEZ R. Truck versus pipeline transportation cost analysis of wastewater sludge. Transportation Research Part A. 74, 14, 2015.
• 4. BALOGUN A., MATORI A., LAWAL D.U., CHANDIO I. Optimal Oil Pipeline Route Selection using GIS: Community Participation in Weight derivation and Disaster Mitigation, 2012 International Conference on Future Environment and Energy, IPCBEE, 28, IACSIT Press, Singapore, 2012.
• 5. LIDSKOG R., ELANDER I. Sweden and the Baltic Sea pipeline: Between ecology and economy. Marine Policy. 36, 333, 2012.
• 6. TAVANA M., BEHZADIAN M., PIRDASHTI M., PIRDASHTI H.A PROMETHEE-GDSS for oil and gas pipeline planning in the Caspian Sea basin. Energy Economics. 36, 716, 2013.
• 7. NUSSBAUM M. Pipeline Route Selection: The factors you consider during the routing phase can make or break your pipeline project. Right of Way, January/ February, 2012.
• 8. NANAY J., STEGEN K.S. Russia and the Caspian region: challenges for transatlantic energy security. Journal of Transatlantic Studies. 10 (4), 343, 2012.
• 9. WINROW M.G. The Southern Gas Corridor and Turkey’s Role as an Energy Transit State and Energy Hub. Insight Turkey. 15 (1), 145, 2013.
• 10. YILDIRIM T. Turkey’s place in the path of the development of common energy politics of the European Union. Journal of International Studies. 6 (2), 94, 2013.
• 11. GUIMARÃES B., SIMÕES P., MARQUES R. Does performance evaluation help public managers? A Balanced Scorecard approach in urban waste services. Journal of Environmental Management. 91 (12), 2632, ISSN: 0301-4797, 2010.
• 12. THOMAIDIS F., MAVRAKIS D. Optimum Route of the South Transcontinental Gas Pipeline in SE Europe using AHP. Journal Of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis. 14, 77, 2010.
• 13. HUANG Y., FIPPS G., MAAS S.J., FLETCHER R.S. Airborne Remote Sensing for Detection of Irrigation Canal Leakage. Irrig. and Drain, DOI: 10.1002/ird., 2009.
• 14. JAFARI S., ZAREDAR N. Land Suitability Analysis using Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development. 1 (5), ISSN: 2010-0264, 2010.
• 15. BALOGUN A., MATORI A., YUSSOF K., LAWAL D.U., CHANDIO I.A. Geographic Information System (GIS) in Offshore Pipeline RouteSelection: Past, Present, and Future. Pensee Journal. 75 (9), 374, ISSN 00314773, 2013.
• 16. CHOI Y., UM J., PARK M. Finding least-cost paths across a continuous raster surface with discrete vector networks. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. 41 (1), 75, DOI: 10.1080/15230406.2013.850837, 2014.
• 17. MARTINEZ-GRANA A.M., GOY J.L., ZAZO C. Water and Wind Erosion Risk in Natural Parks – A Case Study in “Las Batuecas–Sierra de Francia” and “Quilamas” Protected Parks (Central System, Spain). Int. J. Environ. Res. 8 (1), 61, ISSN: 1735-6865, 2014.
• 18. VUKICEVIC J.S., NEDOVIC-BUDIC Z. GIS Based Multicriteria Analysis in Integration of SEA Process Into Planning, Case Study: South West Region, Republic of Ireland. Int. J. Environ. Res. 6 (4), 1053-, ISSN: 1735-6865, 2012.
• 19. 19. YILDIRIM, V., YOMRALIOGLU, T., NISANCI, R. A Raster Based Geospatial Model for Natural Gas Transmission Line Routing, Book Chapter, Natural Gas Extraction to End Use. 101-118, Rijeka, Crotia, ISBN; 978-953-51-0820-7, 2012.
• 20. BAGLI S., GENELETTI D., ORSI F. Routing of power lines through least-cost path analysis and multicriteria evaluation to minimize environmental impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 31, 234, 2011.
• 21. EFFAT H., HASSAN O.A. Designing and evaluation of three alternatives highway routes using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and the least-cost path analysis, application in Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences. 16, 141, 2013.
• 22. PINTO F., FIGUEIRA J., MARQUES R. A multi-objective approach with soft constraints for water supply and wastewater coverage improvements. European Journal of Operational Research. 246 (2), 609, ISSN: 1435-246X, 2015.
• 23. AISSI H., CHAKHAR S., MOUSSEAU V.GIS-based multicriteria evaluation approach for corridor siting. Environmental and Planning B: Planning Design. 39 (2), 287, 2011.
• 24. SILVA S., ALMEIDA L., DIAS L. Biogas plants site selection integrating Multicriteria Decision Aid methods and GIS techniques: A case study in a Portuguese region. Biomass and Bioenergy. 71, 58, 2014.
• 25. GARCIA J.L., ALVARADO A., BLANCO J., JIMENEZ, E., MALDONADO A.A., CORTES G. Multi-attribute evaluation and selection of sites for agricultural product warehouses based on an Analytic Hierarchy Process. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 100, 60, 2014.
• 26. OUMA Y.O., YABANN C., KIRICHU M., TATEISHI, R. Optimization of Urban Highway Bypass Horizontal Alignment: A Methodological Overview of Intelligent Spatial MCDA Approach Using Fuzzy AHP and GIS. Advances in Civil Engineering, ID 182568, 26, http://dx.doi. org/10.1155/2014/182568, 2014.
• 27. FERRETTI V., POMARICO S. Integrated sustainability assessments: a spatial multicriteria evaluation for siting a waste incinerator plant in the Province of Torino (Italy). Environ Dev Sustain. 14, 843, DOI 10.1007/s10668-012-9354-8, 2012.
• 28. DURDURAN Ş.S. A decision making system to automatic recognize of traffic accidents on the basis of a GIS platform. Expert Systems with Applications. 37, 7729, 2010.
• 29. OCALIR E., ERCOSCUN O., TUR R. An integrated model of GIS and fuzzy logic (FMOTS) for location decision of taxicab stands. Exp Sys App. 37, 4892, 2010.
• 30. KOWKABI L., RAHMAN A.R., BADRI A., RAJAEE A. The Application of Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making to Prioritize the Landscapes with high Ecologicalvalue: Khoshk River in Shiraz. Int. J. Environ. Res. 7 (2), 423, ISSN: 1735-6865, 2013.
• 31. VAFAEI F., HARATI A.N. Strategic Management in Decision Support System for Coastal Flood Management. Int. J. Environ. Res. 4 (1), 169, 2010.
• 32. DEMETRIOU D., SEE L., STILLWELL J. A Spatial Multi-Criteria Model for the Evaluation of Land Redistribution Plans. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 1, 272, doi :10.3390/ijgi1030272, 2010.
• 33. RODRIGUES J.C., SIMAO A., ANTUNES C.H. A GISbased multicriteria spatial decision support system for planning urban infrastructures. Decision Support Systems. 51, 720, 2011.
• 34. SANTOS L., RODRIGUES C., ANTUNES C.H. A web spatial decision support system for vehicle routing using Google Maps. Decision Support Systems. 51, 1, 2011.
• 35. CHEN Y., YU J., KHAN S. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environmental Modelling & Software. 25 (12), 1582, 2010.
• 36. DA CRUZ N., MARQUES R. A multi-criteria model to determine the sustainability level of water services. IWA. Water Asset Management International pp. 16-20. 1814-5434. 2013.
• 37. WANG Z.X., WANG Y.Y. Evaluation of the provincial competitiveness of the Chinese high-tech industry using an improved TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications. 41, 2824, 2014.
• 38. LOURENZUTTI R., KROHLING R.A. The Hellinger distance in Multicriteria Decision Making: An illustration to the TOPSIS and TODIM methods. Expert Systems with Applications. 41, 4414, 2014.
• 39. PAZAND K., HEZARKHANI A., ATAEI M. Using TOPSIS approaches for predictive porphyry Cu potential mapping: A case study in Ahar-Arasbaran area (NW, Iran). Computers & Geosciences. 49, 62, 2012.
• 40. CHURCH R.L., MURRAY A.T. Business site selection, location analysis and GIS. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, 2009.
• 41. GONCALVES A.B. An extension of GIS-based least-cost path modelling to the location of wide paths. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 24 (7), 983, 2010.
• 42. TUIK. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do., 2014

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/63655