Uptake and transport of iron ions (Feplus2, Feplus3) supplied to roots or leaves in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) plants growing under different light conditions

• Autorzy: Borowski E.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Pobieranie i transport żelaza (Feplus2, Feplus3) podanych dokorzeniowo lub dolistnie roślinom szpinaku (Spinacia oleracea L.) rosnącym w zróżnicowanych warunkach świetlnych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In experiments carried out in a phytotron using aqueous cultures, there was investigated the effect of root or foliar application of different types of iron salts on spinach plant productivity, leaf and root iron content as well as the rate of transport of iron from the roots to the leaves. Plants were grown in Hoagland’s solution with a single concentration at two fluorescent light intensities: 290 and 95 μmol × m-2 × s-1 PAR. To fertilize the plants, iron was supplied at a dose of 25 mg Fe in the nutrient solution or as foliar sprays using the following salts: 1 – Fe 0; 2 – FeCl2 × 4H2O; 3 – FeCl3 × 4H2O; 4 – FeSO4 × 7H2O; 5 – Fe2(SO4)3 × nH2O; 6 – Fe-Cit. The obtained results showed that the productivity of spinach plants treated with FeCl2 and FeSO4 using foliar sprays and of those fed with Fe-citrate (Fe-Cit) through the roots was significantly higher than in the case of the other salts used. Root application of the salts used had a significant effect on root iron content, whereas their foliar application significantly affected leaf iron content. In this respect, ferrous salts were generally the most beneficial, while ferric salts were the least beneficial. The rate of transport of iron to the leaves, irrespective of the method of its application, was clearly higher for ferrous salts and Fe-Cit than for ferric salts. The free proline content in the leaves of plants not fertilized with Fe was 2–4 times lower than in plants supplied with this nutrient. An irradiance of 290 μmol × m-2 × s-1 had a positive effect on plant productivity and root Fe content.

PL

W doświadczeniach prowadzonych w fitotronie z użyciem kultur wodnych badano wpływ dokorzeniowej lub dolistnej aplikacji różnych rodzajów soli żelaza na produktywność roślin, zawartość żelaza w liściach i korzeniach., a także wartość indeksu transportu Fe do liści. Rośliny rosły w pożywce Hoaglanda o pojedynczej koncentracji przy dwóch intensywnościach światła fluorescencyjnego: 290 i 95 μmol × m-2 × s-1 w zakresie FAR. W nawożeniu roślin zastosowano żelazo w dawce 25 mg Fe podane do pożywki lub w formie oprysku na liście roślin w postaci następujących soli: 1 – Fe 0, 2 – FeCl2 × 4H2O, 3 – FeCl3 × 4H2O, 4 – FeSO4 × 7H2O, 5 – Fe2(SO4)3 × nH2O, 6 – Fe-Cytr. Uzyskane wyniki wykazały, że produktywność roślin szpinaku traktowanych dolistnie FeCl2 i FeSO4, a dokorzeniowo Fe-Cytr. była istotnie wyższa niż w przypadku pozostałych użytych soli. Aplikacja zastosowanych soli drogą dokorzeniową miała istotny wpływ na zawartość Fe w korzeniach, natomiast drogą dolistną na zawartość Fe w liściach. Najkorzystniejsze pod tym względem były na ogół sole żelazawe, najmniej korzystne sole żelazowe. Indeks transportu żelaza do liści niezależnie od sposobu jego aplikacji był wyraźnie wyższy dla soli żelazawych i Fe-Cytr. niż soli żelazowych. Zawartość wolnej proliny w liściach roślin nie nawożonych Fe była 2–4 krotnie niższa niż u roślin zaopatrywanych w ten składnik. Napromienienie 290 μmol × m-2 × s-1 wpływało pozytywnie tylko na produktywność roślin i zawartość Fe w korzeniach.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Agrobotanica
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 66
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.45-51,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Borowski E.

• Department of Plant Physiology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Akademicka 13, 20-950 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• Alvarez-Fernández A., Paniagua P., Abadia J., Abadia A. 2003. Effects of Fe deficiency chlorosis on yield and fruit quality in peach (Prunus persica L.
• Batsch). J. Agric. Food Chem. 51: 5738-5744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf034402c
• Baligar V.C., Schaffert R.E., Das Santos H.L., Pitta G.V.E., Bahia Filho A.F. 1993. Growth and nutrient uptake parameters in sorghum as influenced by aluminium. Agron. J. 85: 1068–1074. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500050021x
• Bates L.S., Waldren R.R., Teare J.D. 1973. Rapid determination of free proline for water – stress studies. Plant Soil, 39: 205–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060
• Bienfait H.F., Bimo R.J., Bliek A.M. Duivenvoorden J.F., Fontaine J.M. 1983. Characterization of ferric reducing activity in roots of Fe-deficient Phaseolus vulgaris. Physiol. Plant. 59: 196–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb00757.x
• Binzel M.L., Hasegawa P.M., Rhodes D., Handa S., Handa A.K., Bressan R.A. 1987. Solute accumulation in tobacco cells adapted to NaCl. Plant Physiology, 84: 1408–1415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.84.4.1408
• Borowski E., Michałek S. 2010. The effects of foliar fertilization of French bean with iron salts and urea on some physiological processes in plants relative to iron uptake and translocation in leaves. Acta. Scient. Pol. Hort. Cult. 10: 183–193.
• Brown J.C., Jolley V.D. 1986. An evaluation of concepts related to iron deficiency chlorosis. J. Plant. Nutr. 9: 175–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904168609363435
• Brüggeman W., Mass-Kantel K., Moog P.R. 1993. Iron uptake by leaf mesophyll cells: the role of the plasma membrane – bound ferric – chelate reductase. Planta, 190: 151–155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00196606
• Cacmak I., Wetering D.A.M., Marschner H., Bienfait H.F. 1987. Involvement of superoxide radical in extracellular ferric reduction by iron – deficient bean roots. Plant Physiol. 85: 310–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.85.1.310
• Fernandez V., Ebert G., Winkelmann G. 2005. The use of microbial siderophores for foliar iron application studies. Plant and Soil, 272: 245–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-004-5212-2
• Fernandez V, Del Rio V., Abadia J., Abadia A. 2006. Foliar iron fertilization of peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch): Effect of iron compounds, surfactants and other adjuvants. Plant Soil, 289: 239–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9132-1
• Kannan S., Wittwer S.H. 1965. Effects of chelation and urea on iron absorption by intact leaves and enzymically isolated leaf cells. Plant Physiol. 40: 12–18.
• Ketchum R.E.B., Warren R.C., Klima L.J., Lopez-Gutierrez F., Nabors M.W. 1991. The mechanism and regulation of proline accumulation in suspension cultures of the halophytic grass Distichlis spicata L. Plant Physiology, 137: 368–374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0176-1617(11)80147-1
• Larbi A., Morales F., López –Millan A.F., Gogorcena Y., Abadia A., Moog P.R., Abadia J. 2001. Technical advance: reduction of Fe (III)-chelates by mesophyll leaf disks of sugar beet. Multi – component origin and effects of Fe deficiency. Plant Cell Physiol. 42: 94–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pce012
• Longnecker N., Weich R.M. 1990. Accumulation of apoplastic iron in plant roots. Plant Physiol. 92: 17–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.92.1.17
• Mortvedt J.J. 1991. Correcting iron deficiencies in annual and perennial plants: Present technologies and future prospects. Plant and Soil, 130: 273–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00011883
• Pardha Saradhi P., Alia, Vani B. 1993. Inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport is the prime cause behind proline accumulation during mineral deficiency in Oryza sativa. Plant and Soil, 155/156: 465–468.
• Reed D.W., Lyons C.G., McEachern G.R. 1988. Field evaluation of inorganic and chelated iron fertilizers as foliar sprays and soil application. J. Plant Nutr. 11: 1369–1378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904168809363894
• Rombola A.D., Brüggeman W., Togliavini M., Marangoni B., Moog P.R. 2000. Iron source affects iron reduction and re-greening of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) leaves. J. Plant. Nutr. 23: 1751–1765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904160009382139
• Rombola A.D., Brüggeman W., López-Millán A.F., Togliavini M., Abadia J., Maragoni B., Moog P.R. 2002. Biochemical responses to iron deficiency in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). Tree Physiol. 22: 869–875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.12.869
• Römheld V., Marschner H. 1986. Mobilization of iron in the rhizosphere of different plant species. Adv. Plant Nutr. 2: 155–204.
• Sieńko M.J., Plane R.A. 1980. Chemia podstawy i zastosowanie. Chemistry principles and applications. Wyd. Nauk. Techn. Warszawa. (in Polish)
• Sijmons P.C., Briel W., Bienfait H.F. 1984. Cytosolic NADPH is the electron donor for extracellular Fe-III reduction in iron – deficient bean roots. Plant Physiol. 75: 219–221.
• Silver J. 1993. Introduction to Fe chemistry. In “The chemistry of iron”, Glasgow, UK: Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman and Hall.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu