Gobiids of the Dniprodzerzhynsk Reservoir (Dnieper River, Ukraine): distribution and habitat preferences

• Autorzy: Didenko A.V.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background. The Dniprodzerzhynsk reservoir is one of six reservoirs built on the Dnieper River, which currently supports important commercial and recreational fisheries. To date, there are no published data on the reservoir’s non-commercial fish species, among which gobies are considered to be the most abundant and important species. The goal of this work was to contribute to general knowledge on local gobiid fauna, focusing on their mesohabitat preferences. Materials and Methods. Sampling in the Dniprodzerzhynsk reservoir was conducted during late August of 2011 and 2012 within the framework of routine annual juvenile fish surveys in the Dnieper reservoirs. Fish were collected at sampling sites located along the reservoir shoreline using a beach seine made of mill sieving gauze (1 mm mesh size). Mesohabitat features were recorded at each beach seine haul site, and included maximum depth, substrate type, and vegetation density. These data were used to identify fish mesohabitat preferences with the aid of Ivlev’s electivity index. Results. Seven gobiid species were collected: western tubenose goby, Proterorhinus semilunaris (Heckel, 1837); knout goby, Mesogobius batrachocephalus (Pallas, 1814); Pontian monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814); round goby, N. melanostomus (Pallas, 1814); racer goby, Babka gymnotrachelus (Kessler, 1857); Pontian bighead goby, Ponticola kessleri (Günter, 1861); and ratan goby, Ponticola ratan (von Nordmann, 1840). Ratan goby was recorded for the first time from this reservoir. Most frequently encountered were monkey goby (76.27%), followed by western tubenose goby (32.20%), racer goby (31.36%), round goby (14.41%), bighead goby (10.17%), while knout and ratan gobies were the most rare (each accounting for 1.69%). All gobiids showed preferences for certain mesohabitat features such as bottom substrate and aquatic vegetation density. Conclusion. The gobiid fauna of the reservoir is rich and is dominated by monkey goby. The occurrence of ratan goby, an estuarine and marine species that adapted to freshwater conditions, is an evidence for ongoing Ponto-Caspian gobiid invasion to the Dnieper reservoirs.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 43
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.257-266,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Didenko A.V.

• Institute of Fisheries of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• Bănărescu P. 1964. Pisces—Osteichthyes (pestii ganoizi şi ososii). Vol. 13. Fauna Republicii Populare Rome.Editura Academia Republicii Populare Rom穗e, Bucureşti,Romania. [In Romanian.]
• Barton D.R., Johnson R.A., Campbell L., Petruniak J.,Patterson M. 2005. Effects of round gobies (Neogobius melanostomus) on dreissenid mussels and other invertebrates in eastern Lake Erie, 2002–2004. Journal of Great Lakes Research 31 (Suppl. 2): 252–261. DOI:10.1016/S0380-1330(05)70318-X
• Beling D.E. 1927. Materi稷i do ihtiofavni r. Pivd. Bog. [Materiale to ichthyofauna of the southern Bug River.] Zbirnik Prac′ Dniprovskoi biologičnoi stancii 2: 334–357. [In Ukrainian.]
• Borcherding J., Hertel A., Breiden S. 2013. Activity and competitive behaviour of invasive Neogobius melanostomus and Ponticola kessleri (Gobiidae) from the River Rhine,Germany. Ethology Ecology and Evolution 25 (4): 351–365.DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2013.806361
• Brownscombe J.W., FoxM.G. 2012. Range expansion dynamice of the invasive round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) In a river system. Aquatic Ecology 46 (2): 175–189. DOI:10.1007/s10452-012-9390-3
• Bulahov V.L. [Bulakhov V. L.], Novic′kij R.O., [Novitsky R.O.],PahomovO.E. [PakhomovO.E.],HristovO.O. [KhristovO.O.]2008. Biologične riznomanitt Ukraini. Dnipropetrovs′ka oblast′. Krugloroti (Cyclostomata). Ribi (Pisces).[“Biological diversity of Ukraine. Dnipropetrovsk region.Cyclostomes (Cyclostomata). Fishes (Pisces)”.] Vidavnictvo DNU, Dnipropetrovs′k, Ukraine. [In Ukrainian.]
• Cepkin E.A., Sokolov L.I., Rusalimčik A.V. 1992. Ekologiâ byčka-kruglea – slučajnogo akklimatizanta v vodoemah bassejna Moskva-reki. [Ecology of round goby—an accidental introduced species in water bodies of Moskva River basin.] Biologičeskie nauki 1: 46–51. [In Russian.]
• Charlebois P.M., Corkum L.D., Jude D.J., Knight C. 2001.The round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) invasion:Current research and future needs. Journal of Great Lasek Research 27 (3): 263–266. DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(01)70641-7
• Cooper M.J., Ruetz III C.R., Uzarski D.G., Shafer B.M.2009. Habitat use and diet of the round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) in coastal areas of Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 24 (3): 477–488.DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2009.9664321
• Corkum L.D., Sapota M.R., Skora K.E. 2004. The round goby, Neogobius melanostomus, a fish invader on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Biological Invasions 6 (2): 173–181.DOI: 10.1023/B:BINV.0000022136.43502.db
• Czugała A., Woźniczka A. 2010. The River Odra estuary-another Baltic Sea area colonized by the round goby Neogobius melanostomus Pallas, 1811. Aquatic Invasions. 5 (Suppl. 1): S61–S65. DOI: 10.3391/ai.2010.5.S1.014
• Denisova A.I., Timčenko V.M., Nahšina E.P., Novikov B.I., Râbov A.K., Bass Â.I. 1989. Gidrologia i gidrohimiâ Dnepra i ego vodohraniliŝ. [Hydrology and hydrochemistry of the Dnieper River and its reservoirs.] Naukova Dumka,Kiev, Ukraine. [In Russian.]
• Didenko О.V. [Didenko О.V.], Gurbik O.B. [Gurbyk O.B.] 2012. Osoblivosti živlenn sudaka (Sander lucioperca (L.))Kanivs′kogo vodoshoviŝa u vesn穗ij period. [“Peculiarities of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) diet in the Kaniv reservoir during spring period.”] Ribogospodars′ka nauka Ukraini 1 (19): 28–35. [In Ukrainian.]Robot A.G.,Kuz′menko U.G.,Maksimenko M.L., Spesivyj T.V.,Zaruba O.G., Malofeeva A.I. 2003. Ob′′dy i sostav ulovov rybolovov-lubitelej na Kahovskom vodohraniliŝe.[Amounts and composition of recreational fishermen catches in the Kakhovka reservoir.] Rybnoe hozajstvo Ukrainy 5:4–6. [In Russian.]
• Erős T., Sevcsik A., Tóth B. 2005. Abundance and night-time habitat use patterns of Ponto-Caspian gobiid species (Pisces, Gobiidae) in the littoral zone of the River Danube, Hungary.Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21 (4): 350–357. DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00689.x
• French III J.R.P., Jude D.J. 2001. Diets and diet overlap of nonindigenous gobies and small benthic native fishes coinhabiting the St. Clair River, Michigan. Journal of Great Lakes Research 27 (3): 300–311. DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(01)70645-4
• Grinževs′kij M.V. 1998. Akvakul′tura Ukraini (organizacijnoekonomični aspekti). [Aquaculture of Ukraine (organizational-economical aspects.] Vil′na Ukraina, L′viv, Ukraine.[In Ukrainian.]
• Gursoy Gaygusuz C.G., Tarkan A.S., Gaygusuz O. 2010. The diel changes in feeding activity, microhabitat preferences and abundance of two freshwater fish species in small temperate streams (Omerli, Istanbul). Ekoloji 19 (76): 15–24.DOI: 10.5053/ekoloji.2010.763
• Ivlev V.S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes.Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.
• Janáč M., Valová Z., Jurajda P. 2012. Range expansion and habitat preferences of non-native 0+ tubenose goby (Proterorhinus semilunaris) in two lowland rivers in the Danube basin. Fundamental and Applied Limnology/Archiv for Hydrobiologie 181 (1): 73–85. DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2012/0321
• Johnson T.B., Bunnell D.B., Knight C.T. 2005. A Potential new energy pathway in central Lake Erie: The round goby connection. Journal of Great Lakes Research 31 (Suppl. 2): 238–251. DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(05)70317-8
• Jude D.J., DeBoe S.F. 1996. Possible impact of gobies and other introduced species on habitat restoration efforts.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53 (S1):136–141. DOI: 10.1139/f96-001
• Jurajda P., Černý J., Polačik M., Valová Z., Janáč M., Blažek R., Ondračková M. 2005. The recent distribution and abundance of non-native Neogobius fishes in the Slovak section of the River Danube. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21 (4): 319–323. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00688.x
• Kalinina E.M. 1976. Razmnoženie i razvitie AzovoČenomorskih byčkov. Naukova dumka, Kiev, Ukraine.[In Russian.]
• Koblickaâ A.F. 1981. Opredelitel′ molodi presnovodnyh ryb.[Key for identification of juvenile freshwater fishes.] Legkaâ i piŝeva promyšlennost′, Moskva, Russia. [In Russian.]
• Kottelat M., Freyhof J. 2007. Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Kottelat and Freyhof, Cornol, Switzerland, Berlin,Germany.
• Kováč V., Copp G.H., Sousa R.P. 2009. Life-history traits of invasive bighead goby Neogobius kessleri (G・ther, 1861)from the middle Danube River, with a reflection on chich goby species may win the competition. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 25 (1): 33–37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01189.x
• Marsden J.E., Charlebois P.,Wolfe K., Jude D., Rudnicka S.1996. The round goby (Neogobius melanostomus): A review of European and North American literature with notes from the Round Goby Conference, Chicago 1996. Illinois Natura History Survey, Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 96/10.Lake Michigan Biological Station, Zion, IL, USA.
• Movčan U.V. [Movchan Yu.V.] 2012. Ribi Ukraini. [“Fishes of Ukraine.”] Zoloti vorota, Kiiv, Ukraine. [In Ukrainian.]
• Neilson M.E., Stepien C.A. 2009. Escape from the Ponto-Caspian: Evolution and biogeography of an endemic goby species flock (Benthophilinae: Gobiidae: Teleostei).Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52 (1): 84–102.DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.023
• Pinčuk V.I. 1964. O byčkah ratane (Gobius ratan (Nordmann))Dnestrovskoj banki i širmane (Gobius syrman (Nordmann))Dnestrovskogo limana. [On ratan goby (Gobius ratan (Nordmann)) of the Dniester bank and syrman goby (Gobis syrman (Nordmann)) of the Dniester lagoon.] Voprosy ichtiologii [Voprosy Ichtiologii] 4 (2): 389–392. [In Russian.]
• Pinčuk V.I., Smirnov A.I., Koval′ N.V., Ševčenko P.G. 1985.O sovremennom rasprostranenii byčkovyh ryb (Gobiidae,Pisces) v bassejne Dnepra. [On current distribution of gobiids (Gobiidae, Pisces) in the Dnieper River basin.] In: Braginskij L.P. (ed.) Gidrobiologičeskie issledovaniâ presnyh vod: sbornik naučnyh trudov. [Hydrobiological studies of fresh waters: a collection of scientific papers.Naukova dumka, Kiev, Ukraine. [In Russian.]
• Ray W.J., Corkum L.D. 2001. Habitat and site affinity of the round goby. Journal of Great Lakes Research 27 (3):329–334. DOI: 10.1016/S0380-1330(01)70648-X
• Ricciardi A., MacIsaac H.J. 2000. Recent mass invasion of the North American Great Lakes by Ponto-Caspian species.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15 (2): 62–65. DOI:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01745-0
• Sapota M.R., Skóra K.E. 2005. Spread of alien (non-indigenous)fish species Neogobius melanostomus in the Gulf of Gdansk (south Baltic). Biological Invasions 7 (2): 157–164.DOI: 10.1007/s10530-004-9035-0
• Slynko Yu.V.,Dgebuadze Yu.Yu.,Novitskiy R.A.,Kchristov O.A.2011. Invasions of alien fishes in the basins of the largest rivers of the Ponto-Caspian basin: Composition, vectors,invasion routes, and rates. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 2 (1): 49–59. DOI: 10.1134/S2075111711010085
• Smirnov A.I. 1986. Okuneobraznye (byčkovidnye), skorpenoobraznye,kambaloobraznye, prisoskoobraznye,udil′ŝikoobraznye. [Perciforms (gobiids), scorpaeniforms,pleuronectiforms, gobiesociforms, lophiiforms.] Fauna Ukrainy Vol. 8. Part 5. [Fauna of Ukraine.] Naukova dumka,Kyiv. [In Russian.]
• Smokorowski K.E., Geiling W.D., Pratt T.C. 2008. Effects of experimental addition of structural habitat to decommissioned aquatic aggregate systems. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2816. Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
• Suhojvan P.G., Vâtčanina L.I. 1989. Rybnoe naselenie i ego ryboproduktivnost′. [Fish fauna and its productivity.] In: Zimbalevska L.N., Suhojvan P.G., Černogorenko M. (eds.)Bespozvonočnye i ryby Dnepra i ego vodohraniliŝ. Naukowa dumka, Kiev, Ukraine. [In Russian.]
• van Kessel N., Dorenbosch M., Spikmans F. 2009. First record of Pontian monkey goby, Neogobius fluviatilis (Pallas, 1814), in the Dutch Rhine. Aquatic Invasions 4 (2):421–424. DOI: 10.3391/ai.2009.4.2.24
• Vasil’eva E.D. 2003. Main alterations in ichthyofauna of the largest rivers of the northern coast of the Black Sea in the last 50 years: A review. Folia Zoologica 52 (4): 337–358.
• Witkowski A., Grabowska J. 2012. The non-indigenous freshwater fishes of Poland: Threats to the native ichthyofauna and consequences for the fishery: A review. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 42 (2): 77–87. DOI:10.3750/AIP2011.42.2.01

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu