PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 57 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Additivity of ISSR markers in natural hybrids of related forest species Bromus benekenii and B. ramosus (Poaceae)

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The co-occurrence of hybrids and parental species in similar ecological niches poses a question on the role of traits additivity and overdispersion (emergence of new traits) in microevolutionary processes. We analysed genetic polymorphism of Bromus benekenii, B. ramosus and the spontaneous hybrid B. benekenii × B. ramosus in sympatric and allopatric parts of the species distribution in Europe, based on non-coding regions of the taxon genomes (ISSR genetic fingerprinting). We tested 68 individuals in 7 populations, including a hybrid population in N France. Altogether 233 polymorphic ISSR bands (loci) were obtained. We found that the parent species were genetically distinct and the hybrids had an additive pattern of ISSR bands found in the putative parental species (NMDS, STRUCTURE); however, there was evidence of introgression towards B. ramosus (NEWHYBRIDS, UPGMA classifications, Nei's D genetic distance). Bromus benekenii had 72, B. ramosus 21 and the hybrids 9 private bands (genetic overdispersion), probably resulting from the rearranged genomes. Based on its low genetic divergence index DW, the hybrid population seems to be at a young age. We argue that in the face of anthropogenic landscape transformations favouring secondary contacts, the hybrids may competitively replace the parental species in sympatric areas.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

57

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.82-94,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Science, University of Agriculture, Lobzowska 24, 31-140 Krakow, Poland
  • Department of Botany and Nature Protection, University of Silesia, Bankowa 12, 40-007 Katowice, Poland
autor
  • Department of Plant Ecology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Lubicz 46, 31-512 Krakow, Poland
autor
  • Department of Plant Breeding and Seed Science, University of Agriculture, Lobzowska 24, 31-140 Krakow, Poland
autor
  • Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 27, 31-501 Krakow, Poland

Bibliografia

  • AAGAARD SMD, SÅSTAD SM, GREILHUBER J, and MOEN A. 2005.A secondary hybrid zone between diploid Dactylorhizaincarnata ssp. cruenta and allotetraploid D. lapponica(Orchidaceae). Heredity 94: 488–496.
  • ABBOTT R, ALBACH D, ANSELL S, ARNTZEN JW, BAIRD SJE, BIERNE N. et al. 2013. Hybridization and speciation.Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26: 229–246.
  • ANDERSON EC, and THOMPSON EA. 2002. A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocusgenetic data. Genetics 160: 1217–1229.
  • APOSTOL BL, BLACK IV WC, REITER P, and MILLER BR. 1996. Population genetics with RAPD-PCR markers: the breedingstructure of Aedes aegypti in Puerto Rico. Heredity76: 325–334.
  • ARCHIBALD JK, WOLFE AD, and JOHNSON SD. 2004. Hybridization and gene flow between a day- and nightfloweringspecies of Zaluzianskya (Scrophulariaceaes.s., tribe Manuleeae), American Journal of Botany91(9): 1333–1344.
  • ARMSTRONG KC. 1984. Chromosome pairing affinities between Old and New World species of Bromus section Pnigma.Canadian Journal of Botany 62: 581–585.
  • ARNOLD ML. 1997. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
  • ARNOLD ML, and HODGES SA. 1995. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? Trends in Ecology andEvolution 10: 67–71.
  • BAACK EJ, and RIESEBERG LH. 2007. A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation. Current Opinion inGenetics and Development 17: 513–518.
  • BÄßLER M, JÄGER EJ, ROTHMALER W, and SCHUBERT R. 1994. Gefässpflanzen: Atlasband. 1–752. Fischer, Jena [u. a.].
  • BAUMEL A, AINOUCHE ML MISSET MT, GOURRET J-P, and BAYER RJ. 2003. Genetic evidence for hybrydization betweenthe native Spartina martima and the introducedSpartina alterniflora (Poaceae) in South – West France:Spartina × neyrautii re-examined. Plant Systematicsand Evolution 237: 87–97.
  • BIANCO CL, FERNÁNDEZ JA, MIGLIARO D, CRINO P, and EGEAGILABERT C. 2011. Identification of F1 hybrids of artichokeby ISSR markers and morphological analysis.Molecular Breeding 27: 157–170.
  • BLEEKER W, and HURKA H. 2001 Introgressive hybridization in Rorripa (Brassicaceae): gene flow and its consequencesin natural and anthropogenic habitats. MolecularEcology 10: 2013–2022.
  • BONIN A, BELLEMAIN E, BRONKEN EIDESEN P, POMPANON F, BROCHMANN C, and TABERLET P. 2004. How to track andassess genotyping errors in population genetics studies.Molecular Ecology 13: 3261–73.
  • BUERKLE CA, MORRIS RJ, ASMUSSEN MA, and RIESEBERG LH. 2000. The likelihood of homoploid hybrid speciation.Heredity 84: 441–451.
  • BUSSELL JD, WAYCOTT M, and CHAPPILL JA. 2005. Arbitrarily amplified DNA markers as characters for phylogeneticinference. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution andSystematics 7: 3–26.
  • CARVALHO A, MATOS M, LIMA-BRITO J, GUEDES-PINTO H, and BENITO C. 2005. DNA fingerprint of F1 interspecifichybrids from the Triticeae tribe using ISSRs. Euphytica143: 93–99.
  • CHARLESWORTH D. 1995. Evolution under the microscope. Current Biology 5 (8): 835–836.
  • DANGI RS, LAGU MD, CHOUDHARY LB, RANJEKAR PK, and GUPTA VS. 2004. Assessment of genetic diversity in Trigonellafoenum-graecum and Trigonella caerulea using ISSRand RAPD markers. BMC Plant Biology 4: 4–13.
  • DE HERT K, JACQUEMYN H, VAN GLABEKE S, ROLDÁN-RUIZ I, VANDEPITTE K, LEUS L, and HONNAY O. 2011. Patterns ofhybridization between diploid and derived allotetraploidspecies of Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) cooccurringin Belgium. American Journal of Botany98 (6): 946–955.
  • DURAND JD, UNLÜ E, DOADRIO I, PIPOYAN S, and TEMPLETON AR. 2000. Origin, radiation, dispersion and allopatric hybridization in the chub Leuciscus cephalus.Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, BiologicalSciences 267 (1453): 1687–1697.
  • EARL DA, and VON HOLDT BM. 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4 (2): 359–361.
  • EVANNO G, REGNAUT S, and GOUDET J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the softwarestructure: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14:2611–2620.
  • EXCOFFIER L, LAVAL G, and SCHNEIDER S. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software packag e for populationgenetics data analysis. Evolutionary BioinformaticsOnline 1: 47–50.
  • FALUSH D, STEPHENS M, and PRITCHARD JK. 2007. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data:dominant markers and null alleles. Molecular EcologyNotes 7: 574–578.
  • FELDMAN M, LIU B, SEGAL G, SHAHAL ABBO S, LEVY AA, and VEGA JM. 1997. Rapid elimination of low-copy DNAsequences in polyploid wheat: A possible mechanism fordifferentiation of homoeologous chromosomes. Genetics147: 1381–1387.
  • FERGUSON D, and SANG T. 2001. Speciation through homoploid hybridization between allotetraploids in peonies (Paeonia). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (7): 3915–3919.
  • FREY L. 2000. Trawy Niezwyciężone (wybrane zagadnienia z historii, taksonomii i biologii Poaceae). ZakładSystematyki Roślin Naczyniowych, Instytut Botaniki im.W. Szafera, Polska Akademia Nauk, Kraków.
  • FROMM M, and HATTEMER H. 2003. Inheritance of allozymes and hybridization in two European Tilia species. Nature91 (3): 337–344.
  • FUERTES AGUILAR J, ROSELLO JA, and NIETO FELINER G. 1999. Molecular evidence for the compilospecies model of reticular evolution in Armeria (Plumbaginaceae).Systematic Biology 48 (4): 735–754.
  • GRĄDZIELEWSKA A, GRUSZECKA D, LEŚNIOWSKA-NOWAK J, and PACZOS-GRZĘDA E. 2012. Identification of hybridsbetween triticale and Aegilops juvenalis (Thell.) Eig anddetermination of genetic similarity with ISSRs. Geneticsand Molecular Research 11 (3): 2147–2155.
  • HANSEN KT, ELVEN R, and BROCHMANN C. 2000. Molecules and morphology in concert: tests of some hypotheses in arcticPotentilla (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany87 (10): 1466–1479.
  • HARDIG TM, BRUNSFELD SJ. FRITZ RS, MORGAN M, and ORIANS CM. 2000. Morphological and molecular evidence forhybridization and introgression in a willow (Salix)hybrid zone. Molecular Ecology 9: 9–24.
  • HÖRANDL E, GREILHUBER J, KLÍMOVÁ K, PAUN O, TEMSCH E, EMADZADE K, and HODÁLOVÁ I. 2009. Reticulate evolutionand taxonomic concepts in the Ranunculus auricomuscomplex (Ranunculaceae): insights from the analysis ofmorphological, karyological and molecular data. Taxon58 (4): 1194–1215.
  • HUBISZ MJ, FALUSH D, STEPHENS SM, and PRITCHARD JK. 2009. Inferring weak population structure with the assistanceof sample group information. Molecular EcologyResources 9 (5): 1322–1332.
  • ILNICKI T, and KOłODZIEJEK J. 2008. Chromosome numbers of Potentilla subsect. Collinae (Rosaceae) from Poland.Caryologia 61 (2): 170–175.
  • ILNICKI T, JOACHIMIAK A, SUTKOWSKA A, and MITKA J. 2011. Cytotypes distribution of Aconitum variegatum L. inCentral Europe, In: Zemanek B [ed.], Geobotanist andTaxonomist. A volume dedicated to Professor A. Zającon the 70th anniversary of his birth, Institute of Botany, 169–192. Jagiellonian University, Cracow.
  • KRUSKAL JB. 1964. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29: 28–42.
  • LEXER CH, HEINZE B, ALIA R, and RIESEBERG LH. 2004. Hybrid zones as a tool for identifying adaptive genetic variationin outbreeding forest trees: lessons from wild annualsunflowers (Helianthus spp.). Forest Ecology andManagement 197 (1–3): 49–64.
  • LI A, and GE S. 2001. Genetic variation and clonal diversity of Psammochloa villosa (Poaceae) detected by ISSR markers.Annals of Botany 87: 585–590.
  • LYNCH M, and MILLIGAN B. 1994. Analysis of population-genetic structure using RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology 3:91–99.
  • MALLET J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature 446: 279–283.
  • MATUSZKIEWICZ W. 2001. Przewodnik do Oznaczania Zbiorowisk Roślinnych Polski. Wydawnictwo NaukowePWN, Warszawa.
  • MEIMBERG H, RICE KJ, MILAN NF, NJOKU CC, and MCKAY JK. 2009. Multiple origins promote the ecological amplitudeof allopolyploid Aegilops (Poaceae). American Journal ofBotany 96 (7): 1262–1273.
  • MEUSEL H, JÄGER E, and WEINERT E. 1965. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropäischen Flora. Fischer, Jena.
  • MITKA J. 2003. The Genus Aconitum L. (Ranunculaceae) in Poland and Adjacent Countries. Institute of Botany,Jagiellonian University, Kraków.
  • MITKA J, SUTKOWSKA A, ILNICKI T, and JOACHIMIAK AJ. 2007. Reticulate evolution of high alpine Aconitum(Ranunculaceae) in the Eastern Sudetes and WesternCarpathians. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, seriesBotanica 49 (2): 15–26.
  • MIZIANTY M. 1995. Trawy – grupa roślin, która odniosła ewolucyjny sukces. Wiadomości Botaniczne 39 (1/2): 59–70.
  • MURATOVA VS. 1931. Common beans (Vicia faba L.) Bulletin of Applied Botany Genetic and Plant Breeding Suppl,50: 1–298.
  • NEI M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences70: 3321–3323.
  • NEI M, and LI WH. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 76:5269–5273.
  • NIELSEN LR. 2000. Natural hybridization between Vanilla claviculata (W. Wright) Sw. and V. barbellata Rchb.f.(Orchidaceae): genetic, morphological, and pollinationexperimental data. Biological Journal of the LinneanSociety 133: 285–302.
  • NOLTE AW, and TAUTZ D. 2010. Understanding the onset of hybrid speciation. Trends in Genetics 26 (2): 54–58.
  • OKLEJEWICZ K, CHWASTEK E, SZEWCZYK M, BOBIEC A, and MITKA J. 2013. Distribution of Crataegus (Rosaceae) in S-EPoland along a gradient of anthropogenic influence.Polish Journal of Ecology 61 (4): 683–691.
  • PARKER PG, SNOW AA, SCHUG MD, BOOTON GC, and FUERST PA. 1998. What molecules can tell us about populations:choosing and using a molecular marker. Ecology 79 (2):361–382.
  • PAUN O, SCHÖNSWETTER P, WINKLER M, INTRABIODIV CONSORTIUM and TRIBSCH A. 2008. Historical divergence versus contemporary gene flow: evolutionary history ofthe calcicole Ranunculus alpestris group(Ranunculaceae) in the European Alps and theCarpathians. Molecular Ecology 17: 4263–4275.
  • PETIT C, BRETAGNOLLE F, and FELBER F. 1999. Evolutionary consequences of diploid-polyploid hybrid zones in wildspecies. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14 (8):306–311.
  • PRITCHARD JK, STEPHENS M, and DONELLY P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.Genetics 155: 945–959.
  • RIESEBERG LH. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 28:359–389.
  • RIESEBERG LH, and WILLIS JH. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317: 910–914.
  • ROSENBERG NA, PRITCHARD JK, and WEBER JL, et al. 2002. Genetic Structure of Human Populations. Science 298:2381–2385.
  • RUTKOWSKI L. 1998. Klucz do Oznaczania Roślin Naczyniowych Polski Niżowej. Wydawnictwo NaukowePWN, Warszawa.
  • SANG T, CRAWFORD D, and STUESSY T. 1997. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography ofPaeonia (Paeoniaceae). American Journal of Botany84(8): 1120–1136.
  • SEEHAUSEN O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19 (4): 198–207.
  • SHIGA T, and KADONO Y. 2007. Natural hybridization of the two Nuphar species in northern Japan: Homoploid hybridspeciation in progress? Aquatic Biology 86: 123–131.
  • SICA M, GAMBA G, MONTIERI S, GAUDIO L, and ACETO S. 2005. ISSR markers show differentiation among Italian populationsof Asparagus acutifolius L. BMC Genetics 6:17.
  • SOKAL RR, and MICHENER CD. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. University ofKansas Science Bulletin 38: 1409–1438.
  • SOLTIS PS, and SOLTIS DE. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60:561–588.
  • SCHOENER TW. 1974. Resource partioning in ecological communities. Science 185: 27–39.
  • SCHÖNSWETTER P, and TRIBSCH A. 2005. Vicariance and dispersal in the alpine perennial Bupleurum stellatum L.(Apiaceae). Taxon 54: 725–732.
  • STACE CA. 1993. Taksonomia Roślin i Biosystematyka. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
  • STEBBINS GL. 1981. Chromosomes and evolution in the genus Bromus (Gramineae). Botanische Jahrbücher furSystematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie102: 359–379.
  • STEPANSKY A, KOVALSKI I, and PERL-TREVES R. 1999. Interspecific classification of melons (Cucumis melo L.)in view of their phenotypic and molecular variation.Plant Systematics and Evolution 271: 313–332.
  • SUTKOWSKA A, MITKA J, GLIMOS E, and WARZECHA T. 2007. Phylogenetic relations among selected species of genusBromus, subgenus Festucaria (Poaceae). In: Frey L [ed.],Biological Issues in Grasses, 169–179. W. SzaferInstitute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków.
  • SUTKOWSKA A, and MITKA J. 2008. RAPD analysis points to Old World Bromus species as ancestral to New World subgen. Festucaria. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, ser. Botanica 50/2: 117–125.
  • SUTKOWSKA A, BOROŃ P, and MITKA J. 2013. Natural hybrid zone of the Aconitum species in the Western Carpathians: Linnaean taxonomy and ISSR fingerprinting.Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, ser. Botanica 55/1:114–126.
  • SUTKOWSKA A. PASIERBIŃSKI A. WARZECHA T. and MITKA J. 2014. Multiple cryptic refugia of forest grass Bromus benekenii in Europe as revealed by ISSR fingerprinting and species distribution modelling. Plant Systematics and Evolution 300: 1437–1452.
  • Wachowiak W, and Prus-GŁowacki W. 2008. Hybridisation processes in sympatric populations of pines Pinussylvestris L., P. mugo Turra and P. uliginosa Neumann. Plant Systematics and Evolution 271: 29–40.
  • WARZECHA T, SUTKOWSKA A, and GÓRAL H. 2014. Male sterility of triticale lines generated through recombination of triticaleand rye maintainers. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 12 (3): 1124–1130.
  • YEH F, YANG R, and BOYLE T. 1999. POPGENE version 1.32. Microsoft-based freeware for population genetic analysis.Canada: Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Center,University of Alberta.
  • VEKEMANS X, BEAUWENS T, LEMAIRE M, and ROLDAN-RUIZ T. 2002. Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism(AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasyand of a relationship between degree of homoplasyand fragment size. Molecular Ecology 11: 139–151.
  • ZALEWSKA-GAŁOSZ J, and RONIKIER M. 2012. Molecular evidence for two rare Potamogeton natans hybrids with reassessment of Potamogeton hybrid diversity in Poland. Aquatic Botany 103: 15–22.
  • ZHIVOTOVSKY LA. 1999. Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers.Molecular Ecology 8: 907–913.
  • ZIELIŃSKI R. 1982. An electrophoretic and cytological study of hybridisation between Aconitum napellus ssp. skerisoare (2n=32) and A. variegatum (2n=16). I.Electrophoretic evidence. Acta Societatis BotanicorumPoloniae 51: 453–464.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-7ed93bee-0f2a-447d-b924-f947b5b0ffe3
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.