The comparison of particle size distributions measured by sedimentation methods and laser diffraction shows the underestimation of the fine (clay) fraction. This is attributed mainly to the shape of clay particles being different than spherical. The objective of this study was to demonstrate differences in the results of particle size distributions of soils determined with the method of laser diffraction using two different dispersion units of the Malvern Mastersizer 2000.
Arriaga F.J., Lowery B., and Mays M.D., 2006. A fast method for determining soil particle size distribution using a laser instrument. Soil Sci., 171, 663-674.
Beuselinck L., Govers G., Poesen J., Degraer G., and Froyen L., 1998. Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with sieve-pipette method. Catena, 32, 193-208.
Bieganowski A., Ry¿ak M., and Witkowska-Walczak B., 2010. Determination of soil aggregate disintegration dynamics using laser diffraction. Clay Minerals, 45, 23-34.
Blott S.J. and Pye K., 2006. Particle size distribution analysis of sand-sized particles by laser diffraction: an experimental investigation of instrument sensitivity and the effect of particle shape. Sedimentology, 53, 671-685.
BrzeziñskaM., Rafalski P.,W³odarczyk T., Szarlip P., and Brzeziñski K., 2011. How much oxygen is needed for acetylene to be consumed in soil? J. Soils Sediments, 11, 1142-1154.
Eshel G., Levy G.J., Mingelgrin U., and Singer J.M., 2004. Critical evaluation of the use of laser diffraction for particlesize distribution analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 736-743.
Gliñski J., Ostrowski J., Stêpniewska Z., and Stêpniewski W., 1991. The bank of representative mineral soils of Poland (in Polish). Problemy Agrofizyki, 66, 5-57.
ISO 13320, 2009. Particle size analysis – laser diffraction methods.
Joó S., Tóth J., Samua G., and Földényi R., 2010. Investigation of humic substances by particle size distribution of soils and by determination of zeta potential. Proc. 15th Meet. Int. Humic Substances Soc., June 27 – July 2, Tenerife, Spain.
Konert M. and Vandenberghe J., 1997. Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction. Sedimentology, 44, 523-535.
Nosalewicz A. and Nosalewicz M., 2011. Effect of soil compaction on dehydrogenase activity in bulk soil and rhizosphere. Int. Agrophys., 25, 47-51.
Pye K. and Blott S.J., 2004. Particle size analysis of sediments, soils and related particulate materials for forensic purposes using laser granulometry. Forensic Sci. Int., 144, 19-27.
Ry¿ak M. and Bieganowski A., 2010. Determination of particle size distribution of soil using laser diffraction - comparison with areometric metod. Int. Agrophys., 24, 177-181.
Ry¿ak M. and Bieganowski A., 2011. Methodological aspects of determining soil particle-size distribution using the laserdiffraction method. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci., 174(4), 624-633.
S³awiñskiC.,Witkowska-WalczakB.,LipiecJ.,andNosalewiczA., 2011. Effect of aggregate size on water movement in soils. Int. Agrophys., 25, 53-58.
Sperazza M., Moore J.N., and Hendrix M.S., 2004. High-resolution particle size analysis of naturally occurring very finegrained sediment through laser diffractometry. J. Sedimentary Res., 74, 736-743.
Taubner H., Roth B., and Tippkötter R., 2009. Determination of soil texture: Comparison of the sedimentation method and the laser-diffraction analysis. J. Plant Nutr. Soil. Sci., 172, 161-171.
Tóth G., Makó A., and Máté F., 2009. Designation of local varieties in the Hungarian soil classification system: Remarks from a viewpoint of land evaluation application. Eurasian Soil Sci., 42(13), 1448-1453
WłodarczykT., StêpniewskiW.,BrzeziñskaM., and Majewska U., 2011. Various textured soil as nitrous oxide emitter and consumer. Int. Agrophys., 25, 287-297.