An analysis of the barbell motion depending on its weight in disabled powerlifting

• Autorzy: Seidel W. , Zurowska A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The aim of the study was to assess the symmetry of flexion and extension movements in upper limbs in disabled powerlifters during bench press with different barbell loads. Material/Methods: 29 disabled athletes from the National Powerlifting Team were examined. Mean age was between 23.9 ± 6.1. Mean sport experience was 5.4 ± 3.6 years. Results: Both flexion and extension movement were performed symmetrically, which was indicated by an insignificant (p < 0.05) difference in the movement onset in the left and the right upper limb. Conclusions: Time differences in the movement onset and the achievement of maximal angular velocity were statistically insignificant in all trials (loads from 40% to 95% 1RM). During extension with loads over 60% 1RM differences in time of achieving maximal angular velocity were statistically significant or close.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

barbell motion; weight; disabled powerlifting; powerlifting; motion analysis; athlete

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. The Journal of Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 06
• Numer: 3
• Opis fizyczny: p.193-198,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Seidel W.

• Department of Disability Sport, University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, I.J.Paderewskiego 35, bud. P4 pok. 2/47, 51-612 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Zurowska A.

• Angulus Silesius State School of Higher Vocational Education in Walbrzych, Walbrzych, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1.Borniquez C, Crivellini M, Divieti L, Galli M. Mental stress influence on movement. In: Barabos A, Fabian G, eds. Biomechanics in Sport. Budapest: Hungarian University of Physical Education; 1995, 65-68.
• 2. Carpes FP, Bini RR, Mota CB. Training level, perception and bilateral asymmetry during multi-joint legpress exercise. Braz J Biomotricity. 2008;2:51-62.
• 3. Dias RMR, Cyrino ES, Salvador EP, et al. Influence of familiarization process on muscular strength assessment in 1-RM test. Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte. 2005;11(1):39-42.
• 4. Dohoney P, Chromiak JA, Lemire D, Abadie BR, Kovacs C. Prediction of one repetition maximum (1- RM) strength from a 4-6 RM and 7-10 RM submaximal strength test in healthy young adult males. J Exerc Physiol 2002;5(3):54-59.
• 5. Hakkinen K, Kraemer WJ, Newton RU. Muscle activation and force production during bilateral and unilateral concentric and isometric contractions of the knee extensors in men and women at different ages. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;37:131-142.
• 6. Howard JD, Enoka RM. Maximum bilateral contractions are modified by neurally mediated interlimb effects. J Appl. Physiol. 1991;70:306-316.
• 7. Kawakami Y, Sale DG, MacDougall JD, Moroz JS. Bilateral deficit in plantar flexion: relation to knee joint position, muscle activation, and reflex excitability. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1998;77:212-216.
• 8. Koh TJ, Grabiner MD, Clough CA. Bilateral deficit is larger for step than for ramp isometric contractions. J Appl Physiol. 1993;74:1200-1205.
• 9. Migasiewicz J, Wiesner W, Seidel W, et al. Analysis of selected parameters of powerlifting technique of disabled competitors. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2006;(15)2:603-606.
• 10. Nosaka K, Sakamoto K. The repeated bout effect of reduced-load eccentric exercise on elbow flexor muscle damage. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001;85(1-2):34-40.
• 11. Oda S, Moritani T. Maximal isometric force and neural activity during bilateral and unilateral elbow flexion in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1994;69:240-243.
• 12. Owings TM, Grabiner MD. Fatigue effects on the bilateral deficit are speed dependent. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(8):1257-1262.
• 13. Seki T, Ohtsuki T. Influence of simultaneous bilateral exertion on muscle strength during voluntary submaximal isometric contraction. Ergonomics. 1990;33:1131-1142.
• 14. Smak W, Neptune RR, Hull ML. The influence of pedaling rate on bilateral asymmetry in cycling. J Biomech. 1999;32(9):899-906.
• 15. Vint PF, Hinrichs RN. Differences between one-foot and two-foot vertical jump performances. J Appl Biomech. 1996;12:338-358.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/bjha-2014-0017