Wpływ konkurencji na przyrost grubości buka (Fagus sylvatica L.) i sosny (Pinus sylvestris L.) w dwupiętrowych drzewostanach bukowo-sosnowych

• Autorzy: Dudzinska M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Effect of competition on diameter growth of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in two-storeyed beech-pine stands

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The studies were based on the empirical material collected from 88 sample plots located in 78 beech−pine stands and 10 pine stands with beech undergrowth. The effect of the competition of beech trees from the understorey and pine trees on the radial increment (r) and basal area increment (g) was investigated. The strength of the competition was determined using distance−independent indices, which did not take into account the position of a tree in the stand. The effect of the competition on the basal area growth of both beech and pine trees was found to be greater than on the radial growth.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; drzewostany bukowo-sosnowe; drzewa lesne; konkurencja roslin; buk zwyczajny; Fagus sylvatica; sosna zwyczajna; Pinus sylvestris; przyrost grubosci; przyrost piersnicowego pola przekroju; przyrosty radialne

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 157
• Numer: 10
• Opis fizyczny: s.730-736,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Dudzinska M.

• Zakład Zarządzania Zasobami Leśnymi, Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa, ul.Braci Leśnej 3, Sękocin Stary, 05-090 Raszyn

Bibliografia

• Bella I. E. 1971. A new competition model for individual trees. For. Sci. 17: 364−372.
• Biging G. S., Dobbertin M. 1992. A comparison of distance−dependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees. For. Sci. 38 (3): 695−720.
• Daniels R. F., Burkhart H. E., Clason T. R. 1986. A comparison of competition measures for predicting growth of loblolly pine trees. Can. J. For. Res. 16: 1230−1237.
• Doyle T. W. 1983. Competition and growth relationship in a mixed−aged, mixed−species forest community. Ph. D. diss., Univ. of Tenn.
• Hatch C. R., Gerrard D. J., Tappeiner II J. C. 1975. Exposed crown surface area: A mathematical index of individual tree growth potential. Can. J. For. Res. 5: 224−228.
• Holmes M. J., Reed D. D. 1991. Competition indices for mixed species northern hardwoods. For. Sci. 37 (5): 1338−1349.
• Husch B., Beers T. W., Kershaw J. A. Jr. 2003. Forest Mensuration. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
• Lorimer C. G. 1983. Tests of age−independent competition indices for individual trees and natural hardwood stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 6: 343−360.
• Martin G. E., Ek A. R. 1984. A comparison of competition measures and growth models for predicting plantation red pine diameter and height growth. For. Sci. 30 (3): 731−743.
• Pelz D. R. 1978. Estimating individual tree growth with tree polygons. W: Fries J., Burkhart H. E., Max T. A. [red.]. Growth models for long term forecasting of timber yields. Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Sch. For. Wildl. Resour. FWS−1−78. 172−178.
• Pukkala T. 1989. Methods to describe the competition process in a tree stand. Scand. J. For. Res. 4: 187−202.
• Pukkala T., Kolström T. 1987. Competition indices and the prediction of radial growth in Scots pine. Silva Fennica 21 (1): 55−67.
• Schröder J., von Gadow K. 1999. Testing a new competition index for maritime pine in northwestern Spain. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 280−283.
• Tomé J. M., Burkhart H. E. 1989. Distance−dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees. For. Sci. 35 (3): 816−831.
• Wilson F. G. 1946. Numerical expression of stocking in terms of height. J. For. 44: 756−761.
• Wykoff W. R., Crookston N. L., Stage A. R. 1982. User’s guide to the stand prognosis model. Int. For. and Range Exp. Sta. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT−133.