PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 59 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Coexisting aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) communities: interdependence in various habitats

Autorzy

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The paper presents the comparison of species diversity and evenness indices calculated for coexisting communities of aphids and ants. In six study areas, localised in Upper Silesia (Poland), representing acidophilous oak-forest (Molinio caeruleae – Quercetum roboris), moist meadow (Molinietum caeruleae) and xerothermic grassland (Sileno-Phleetum) the community structure of aphids and ants (species number and abundance) was determined. The number of ant nests and aphid colonies was determined by searching the squares of 25 m2 during vegetation seasons in 2006 and 2007. This provided the base to calculate the Shannon’s diversity index and evenness index of both groups. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis showed significant correlation only in the case of the number of species of both groups in a particular study area. It showed no significant correlation of values of diversity and evenness indices; however, considerable differences of values between both groups in various habitat types were recorded. The results are discussed with reference to the habitat history and maintenance, also reflecting the mutualistic relationship between ants and aphids.

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

59

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.835-840,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia, Bankowa 9, 40–007 Katowice, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Antonova V., Penev L. 2006 – Change in thezoogeographical structure of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) caused by urban pressure in the Sofia region (Bulgaria) – Myrmecol. News 8: 271–276.
  • Babczyńska-Sendek B. 2005 – Problemy fitogeograficzne i syntaksonomiczne kserotermow Wyżyny Śląskiej [Phytogeographic and syntaxonomic problems of the Silesian Upland xerotherms] – Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach, 2296, 237 pp. (in Polish).
  • Blinova S.V. 2008 – Changes in ant assemblages under conditions of a large industrial center – Russ. J. Ecol. 39: 148–150.
  • Buchs W. 2003 – Biodiversity and agri-environment indicators - general scopes and skills with special reference to the habitat level – Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98: 35–78.
  • Cempulik P., Hadaś T.B., Holeksa K., Kasperek J., Kłys G., Przywara Z., Szulc-Guziak D. 1998 – Piekary Śląskie. Przyroda na Gornym Śląsku [Piekary Śląskie. Nature of Lower Silesia] – Wyd. Kubajak, 96 pp. (in Polish).
  • Collinge S.K. 2000 – Effects of grassland fragmentation on insect species loss, colonization, and movement patterns – Ecology, 81: 2211–2226.
  • Czechowski W. 1980 – Mrowki Lasius niger (L.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) wskaźnikiem stopnia skażenia środowiska miejskiego [The ants Lasius niger (L.) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) as indicator of urban environment pollution] – Prz. Zool. 24: 113–121 (in Polish).
  • Dahms H., Wellstein C., Wolters V., Dauber J. 2005 – Effects of management practices on ant species richness and community composition in grasslands (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) – Myrmecol. News 7: 9–16.
  • Dauber J., Bengtsson J., Lenoir L. 2006 – Evaluating effects of habitat loss and landuse continuity on ant species richness in seminatural grassland remnants – Conserv. Biol. 20: 1150–1160.
  • Dauber J., Wolters V. 2004 – Edge effects on ant community structure and species richness in an agricultural landscape – Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 901–915.
  • Depa Ł., Wojciechowski W. 2009 – Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidinea) of Garb Tarnogorski and their trophobiotic relations with ants – Ann. Up. Siles. Mus. (Ent.) 18: 5–110.
  • Folgarait P.J. 1998 – Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: a review – Biodivers. Conserv. 7: 1221–1244.
  • Galle L., Meszaros H., Zovanyi G., Győri-Durgő H., Marko B., Kiss K. 2007 – Monitoring ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Central Europe experiences – Myrmecol. News 10: 105.
  • Hawkins C.P., Norris R.H., Hogue J.N., Feminella J.W. 2000 – Development and evaluation of predictive models for measuring the biological integrity of streams – Ecol. Appl. 10: 1456–1477.
  • Karhu K.J. 1998 – Effects of ant exclusion during outbreaks of a defoliator and a sap-sucker on birch – Ecol. Entomol. 23: 185–194.
  • Klimaszewski S.M., Czylok A., Herczek A., Wojciechowski W. 1995 – The composition and structure of aphid consortia (Aphidinea) on birches (Betula pendula) as indicators of the habitat condition in regions of industrial activity (The aglomerations of Silesia and Cracow) – Acta Biol. Siles. 27: 7–19.
  • Klimaszewski S.M., Wojciechowski W., Czylok A., Gębicki C., Herczek A., Jasińska J. 1980 – Zgrupowania wybranych grup pluskwiakow rownoskrzydłych (Homoptera) i rożnoskrzydłych (Heteroptera) w lasach rejonu huty „Katowice” [Communities of bugs (Heteroptera and Homoptera) in forests near the ‘Katowice’ smelting] – Acta Biol. Siles. 6: 22–39 (in Polish).
  • Mabelis A.A., Chardon J.P. 2005 – Survival of the Black bog ant (Formica transkaucasicaNasanov) in relation to the fragmentation of its habitat – J. Insect Conserv. 9: 95–108.
  • Majer J.D. 1983 – Ants: bioindicators of minesite rehabilitation, land-use and land conservation – Environ. Manage. 7: 375–383.
  • Majer J.D., Orabi G., Bisevac L. 2007 – Ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) pass the bioindicator scorecard – Myrmecol. News 10: 69–76.
  • Molnar N., Kovacs E., Galle L. 2000 – Habitat selection of ant-tended aphids on willow trees – Tiscia, 32: 31–34.
  • New T.R. 2000 – How useful are ant assemblages for monitoring habitat disturbance on grasslands in south eastern Australia? – J. Insect Conserv. 4: 153–159.
  • Novgorodova T.A. 2005 – Ant-aphid interactions in multispecies ant communities: some ecological and ethological aspects – Eur. J. Entomol. 102: 495–501.
  • Petal J. 1980 – The effect of industrial pollution of Silesia on populations of ants – Pol. J. Ecol. 6: 665–672.
  • Schlick-Steiner B.C., Steiner F.M., Moder K., Bruckner A., Fiedler K., Christian E. 2006 – Assessing ant assemblages: pitfall trapping versus nest counting (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) – Insect. Soc. 53: 274–281.
  • Stadler B., Dixon A.F.G. 1999 – Ant attendance in aphids: why different degrees of myrmecophily? – Ecol. Entomol. 24:363–369.
  • Styrsky J.D., Eubanks M.D. 2007 – Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects – P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 274: 151–164.
  • Trojan P. 1992 – Analiza struktury fauny [The analysis of the structure of fauna] – Memorabilia Zool. 47: 1–120 (in Polish).
  • Trojan P. 1994 – The shaping of the diversity of invertebrate species in the urban green space of Warszawa – Memorabilia Zool. 49: 167–173.
  • Wojciechowski W., Minoranskij V., Kocot G. 1991 – Aphids (Aphidinea) as bioindicators of the environmental condition within the zone of emission of the zinc-smelting works „Miasteczko Śląskie” – Acta Biol. Siles. 18: 75–83.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-76404d52-181a-496c-b088-81ce2ef9ff0a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.