PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2014 | 21 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Fundamental movement patterns and potential risk of injuries in 1st and 2nd division Polish handball players

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Introduction. The Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) is one of modern functional assessment tools used, for example, for qualitative evaluation of fundamental movement patterns and potential injury risks. Aim of Study. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of handball players with the use of Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) in consideration of their competitive level, position on the court and symmetry of movement patterns. Material and Methods. Thirty 1st and 2nd division handball players participated in the study. All subjects were healthy men aged 23.23 ± 3.59 years, with body height of 184 ± 5.6 cm and body mass of 86.37 ± 8.61 kg. The players performed seven tests from the Functional Movement Screen™. Statistical analysis was made using the SPSS Statistics 21.0 software package. The level of statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results. No significant differences in handball players’ general characteristics were found between both divisions. Student’s t-test showed no significant differences between the two groups in total FMS™ score. Statistically significant differences were noted in the Shoulder Mobility (SM) test (U = 308.5; p = 0.014) between the right and the left upper extremity. Conclusions. The study revealed no statistically significant differences in FMS™ test scores between the 1st and 2nd division handball players as well as between players in different playing positions on the court. Also no higher risk of injury was shown among the 1st and 2nd division handball players. The study confirmed, however, characteristic adaptation of the throwing arm typical for throwing sports in the form of glenohumeral internal rotation deficit.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

21

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.145-151,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor
  • SpOrtopedic, Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Adapted Physical Activity, The Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Adapted Physical Activity, The Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Kinesiotherapy, The Jozef Pilsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Gallahue D. Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults, 7th edition eBook: David Gallahue, John Ozmun, Jacqueline Goodway: Amazon. co.uk: Kindle Store. 2014.
  • 2. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-Participation Screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - Part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 1(2): 62-72.
  • 3. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-Participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - Part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 1(3): 132-139.
  • 4. Gorostiaga EM, Granados C, Ibanez J, Izquierdo M. Differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity among elite and amateur male handball players. Int J Sports Med. 2005; 26(3): 225-232.
  • 5. Gorostiaga EM, Granados C, Ibanez J, Gonzalez- Badillo JJ, Izquierdo M. Effects of an entire season on physical fitness changes in elite male handball players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38(2): 357-366.
  • 6. Joy EA, Paisley TS, Price R, Jr., Rassner L, Thiese SM. Optimizing the collegiate preparticipation physical evaluation. Clin J Sport Med. 2004; 14(3): 183-187.
  • 7. Dallinga JM, Benjaminse A, Lemmink KA. Which screening tools can predict injury to the lower extremities in team sports?: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2012; 42(9): 791-815.
  • 8. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2007; 2(3): 147-158.
  • 9. Chorba RS, Chorba DJ, Bouillon LE, Overmyer CA, Landis JA. Use of a functional movement screening tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 5(2): 47-54.
  • 10. Kiesel KB, Butler RJ, Plisky PJ. Prediction of injury by limited and asymmetrical fundamental movement patterns in American football players. J Sport Rehabil. 2014; 23(2): 88-94.
  • 11. Schneiders AG, Davidsson A, Horman E, Sullivan SJ. Functional movement screen normative values in a young, active population. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 6(2): 75-82.
  • 12. Almeida GP, Silveira PF, Rosseto NP, Barbosa G, Ejnisman B, Cohen M. Glenohumeral range of motion in handball players with and without throwing-related shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22(5): 602-607.
  • 13. Kiesel K, Plisky P, Butler R. Functional movement test scores improve following a standardized off-season intervention program in professional football players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 21(2): 287-292.
  • 14. Kawałek K, Garsztka T. An analysis of muscle balance in professional field hockey players. TRENDS in Sport Sciences [Internet]. 2013; 4(20): 181-187.
  • 15. Pieper HG, Muschol M. Sportverletzungen und Überlastungsschäden im Handballsport. 2007; 23(1): 4-10.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-7626b900-5df0-48de-9d71-b7fc426c4735
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.