PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2012 | 54 | 2 |

Tytuł artykułu

DNA damage in Crepis capillaris cells in response to in vitro condition

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
We analyzed DNA damage, mitotic activity and polyploidization in Crepis capillaris callus cells during short- and long-term in vitro culture, and the influence of plant growth regulators on these processes. Changes in the concentration of growth regulators altered the stability of callus. The level of DNA damage was highly dependent on the growth regulator composition of the medium. Cytokinin at high concentrations damaged DNA in the absence of auxin. Short- and long-term callus differed in sensitivity to growth regulators. Mitotic activity changed when callus was transferred to medium with modified growth regulators. Callus cell nuclear DNA content increased with age and in response to plant growth regulators. Hormones played a role in the genetic changes in C. capillaris callus culture. We demonstrated the usefulness of C. capillaris callus culture as a model for analyzing the effect of culture conditions, including plant growth regulators, on genetic stability.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

54

Numer

2

Opis fizyczny

p.93-101,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Plant Anatomy and Cytology, University of Silesia, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland
autor
autor

Bibliografia

  • AGOSTINO IB, and KIEBER JJ. 1999. Molecular mechanisms of cytokinin action. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2:359–364.
  • BOER BGW, and MURRAY JAH. 2000. Triggering the cell cycle in plants. Trends in Cell Biology 10: 245–250.
  • CARIMI F, ZOTTINI M, FORMENTIN E, TERZI M, and LO SCHIAVO F. 2003. Cytokinins: new apoptotic inducers in plants.Planta 216: 413–421.
  • COENEN C, and LOMAX TL. 1997. Auxin-cytokinin interactions in higher plants: old problems and new tools. Trends inPlant Science 2(9): 351–356.
  • COLLINS AR. 2004. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair. Biotechnology 26: 249– 261.
  • ELENA SF, and LENSKI RE. 2003. Evolution experiments with microorganisms: the dynamics and genetic bases ofadaptation. Nature Reviews Genetics 4: 457–469.
  • FRAS A, and MALUSZYNSKA J. 2004. The correlation between the chromosome variation in callus and genotype ofexplants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 121:145–154.
  • FRAS A, JUCHIMIUK J, SIWINSKA D, and MALUSZYNSKA J. 2007. Cytological events in explants of Arabidopsis thalianaduring early callogenesis. Plant Cell Reports 26(11):1933–1939.
  • GALBRAITH DW, HARKINS KR, and KNAPP S. 1991. Systemic endopolyploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana. PlantPhysiology 96: 985–989.
  • HAO YJ, and DENG XX. 2004. Occurrence of chromosomal variation and plant regeneration from long-term-culturedcitrus callus. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant 38: 472–476.
  • HARTIG K, and BECK E. 2006. Crosstalk between auxin, cytokinins and sugars in the plant cell cycle. PlantBiology 8: 389–396.
  • JOACHIMIAK A, and ILNICKI T. 2003. Nuclear morphology, polyploidy, and chromatin elimination in tissue culture ofAllium fistulosum L. Acta Societatis BotanicorumPoloniae 72(1): 11–17.
  • JOHN PCL, ZHANG K, DONG C, DIEDERICH L, and WIGHTMAN F. 1993. p34cdc2 related proteins in control of cell cycleprogression, the switch between division and differentiationin tissue development, and stimulation of division byauxin and cytokinin. Australian Journal of PlantPhysiology 20: 503–526.
  • JOUBES J, and CHEVALIER C. 2000. Endoreduplication in higher plants. Plant Molecular Biology 43: 735–745.
  • KWASNIEWSKA J, GRABOWSKA M, KWASNIEWSKI M, and KOLANO B. 2012. Comet-FISH using rDNA probes in analysis of mutagen-induced DNA damage in plant cells. Environmentaland Molecular Mutagenesis 53(5): 369–375.
  • LESNIEWSKA J, SIMEONOVA E, SIKORA A, MOSTOWSKA A, and CHARZYŃSKA M. 2000. Applications of the comet assay instudies of programmed cell death (PCD) in plants. ActaSocietatis Botanicorum Poloniae 69(2): 101–107.
  • LOPEZ CMR, WETTEN AC, and WILKINSON MJ. 2010. Progression erosion of genetic and epigenetic variation incallus-derived cocoa (Theobroma cacao) plants. NewPhytologist 186: 856–868.
  • MARCHETTI MA, KUMAR S, HARTSUIKER E, MAFTAHI M, CARR AM, FREYER GA, BURHANS WC, and HUBERMAN JA. 2002. Asingle unbranched S-phase DNA damage and replicationfork blockage checkpoint pathway. Proceedings ofNational Academy of Sciences 99(11): 7472–7477.
  • MEINS F, JR. 1989. Habituation: heritable variation in the requirement of cultured plant cells for hormones.Annual Review of Genetics 23: 395–408.
  • MILLER CO, SKOOG F, VON SALTZA HM, OKUMURA FS, and STRONG FM. 1955. Kinetin: structure and synthesis ofkinetin. Journal of American Chemical Society 77:2662–2663.
  • MLEJNEK P, and PROCHAZKA S. 2002. Activation of caspase-like proteases and induction of apoptosis by isopentenyladenosinein tobacco BY-2 cells. Planta 215: 158–166.
  • MURASHIGE T, and SKOOG F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures.Physiologia Plantarum 15: 473–497.
  • PFEIFFER P, GOEDECKE W, KUHFITTIG-KULLE S, and OBE G. 2004. Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair andtheir impact on the prevention and formation of chromosomalaberrations. Cytogenetics and GenomeResearch 104: 7–13.
  • PHILLIPS RL, KAEPPLERT SM, and OLHOFT P. 1994. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences 91: 5222–5226.
  • PISCHKE M, HUTTLIN E, HEGEMAN A, and SUSSMAN M. 2006. A transcriptome-based characterization of habituation inplant tissue culture. Plant Physiology Preview 140:1255–1278.
  • RICHARD C, LESCOT M, INZE D, and DE VEYLDER L. 2002. Effect of auxin, cytokinin, and sucrose on cell cycle geneexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana cell suspension culture.Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 69: 167–176.100 Kwasniewska et al.
  • ROSS J, and O’NEILL D. 2001. New interaction between classical plant hormones. Trends in Plant Sciences 6(1): 2–4.
  • SACRISTAN MD. 1971. Karyotypic changes in callus cultures from haploid and diploid plants of Crepis capillaris (L.)Waller. Chromosoma 33: 273–283.
  • SACRISTAN MD, and WENDT-GALLITELLI MF. 1973. Tumorous cultures of Crepis capillaris: chromosomes and growth.Chromosoma 43: 279–288.
  • SCHIAVO FL, BALDAN B, COMPAGNIN D, GANZ R, MARIANI P, and TERZI M. 2000. Spontaneous and induced apoptosis inembryogenic cell cultures of carrot (Daucus carota L.) indifferent physiological states. European Journal of CellBiology 79: 294–298.
  • SKOOG F, and MILLER CO. 1957. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro.Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 11:118–131.
  • VAPPER M, and KALLAK H. 1986. Karyotypic differentiation of long-term callus culture of Crepis capillaris. Biologia Plantarum 28(6): 417–423.

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-73386381-b924-4f55-9085-7e94391e142c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.