The investigation of different patterns of in-feed or in-water probiotics administration methods on performance, small intestinal morphology and SRBC-reactive immune responses of Japanese quail

• Autorzy: Seifi K. , Karimi-Torshizi M.A. , Rahimi S.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Badanie wpływu różnych metod podawania probiotyków w paszy lub w wodzie na wydajność i morfologię jelita cienkiego oraz SRBC reakcyjne odpowiedzi odpornościowej u przepiórek japońskich

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the current study was to investigate whether continuous consumption of probiotics is advantageous over intermittent consumption. A total of 336 1-d-old Japanese quail chicks were randomly divided into seven experimental groups and administered probiotics throughout the experiment in different manners via, A – no probiotics administered (control group), B – probiotics fed continuously, C – probiotics fed for 2 d on & 2 d off, D – probiotics fed for 1 d on & 4 d off, E – probiotics in drinking water throughout the experiment, F – probiotics in drinking water for 2 d on & 2 d off, G – probiotics in drinking water for 1 d on & 4 d off. Administration of probiotic as feed additive significantly increased body weight gain (P < 0.01). Feed intake was lower (P < 0.01) in group F compared with other groups. The birds in groups C, D and G had the lowest feed conversion ratio (P < 0.01). In comparison with control quails, ileum length and duodenum and ileum villus was higher in probiotic-received birds (P < 0.01). Crypt depth was increased (P < 0.01) by probiotics treatments. Number of goblet cells of duodenum and ileum increased in groups B, C, E and F (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in heterophil: lymphocyte ratio among the groups. Consumption of probiotics increased the blood serum total immunoglobin (P < 0.01), IgM (P < 0.05) and IgY (P < 0.01) levels. It was concluded that administration of probiotic either in feed or in water improved the quail’s performance and immunity. Regarding advantages of administration of probiotics in drinking water this method is recommended in quail production system

PL

Celem pracy było sprawdzenie, czy ciągłe spożywanie probiotyków przez przepiórki japoń-skie jest korzystne w porównaniu z okresowym ich podawaniem. Grupę składającą się z 336 jednodniowych przepiórek japońskich podzielono losowo na siedem grup eksperymentalnych, którym w różny sposób podawano probiotyki w czasie trwania eksperymentu: A – brak podaży probiotyków (grupa kontrolna), B – probiotyki podawane w paszy stale, C – probiotyki podawane w paszy przez 2 dni oraz brak podaży przez 2 kolejne dni, D – probiotyki podawane w paszy przez 1 dzień oraz brak podaży przez 4 kolejne dni, E – probiotyki podawane w wodzie pitnej stale, F – probiotyki podawane w wodzie pitnej przez 2 dni oraz brak podaży przez kolejne 2 dni, G – probiotyki podawane w wodzie pitnej przez 1 dzień oraz brak podaży przez 4 kolejne dni. Stosowanie probiotyków jako dodatków paszowych znacząco wspomaga przyrosty masy ciała (P < 0,01). Spożycie paszy było niższe (P < 0,01) w grupie F w porównaniu z pozostałymi grupa-mi. Ptaki z grup C, D i G wykazywały najniższe wskaźniki wykorzystania paszy (P <0,01). W porównaniu z grupą kontrolną długości jelita biodrowego i dwunastnicy, a także kosmków w jelicie biodrowym były wyższe u ptaków, u których stosowano probiotyki (P < 0,01). Zastosowa-nie probiotyków skutkowało wzrostem głębokości krypt jelitowych (P < 0,01). Liczba komórek kubkowych w dwunastnicy i w jelicie biodrowym była wyższa w grupach B, C, E i F (P < 0,01). Nie zaobserwowano w badanych grupach znaczących różnic w stosunku heterofilii do limfocytów. Spożycie probiotyku przez przepiórki skutkowało wzrostem poziomu całościowej puli immunoglo-bulin (P < 0,01), IgM (P < 0,05) i IgY (P < 0,01) w surowicy krwi. Stosowanie u przepiórek probio-tyków – zarówno w paszy, jak i wodzie pitnej – miało korzystny wpływ na wydajność i odporność ptaków. Biorąc pod uwagę zalety podawania probiotyków przepiórkom w wodzie pitnej, należy stwierdzić, że jest to zalecany system podawania u omawianego gatunku ptaków

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Natural Sciences
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 33
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.327-340,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Seifi K.

• Department of Poultry Science Tarbiat Modares University in Tehran, Tehran, Iran

autor

Karimi-Torshizi M.A.

• Department of Poultry Science Tarbiat Modares University in Tehran, Tehran, Iran

autor

Rahimi S.

• Department of Poultry Science Tarbiat Modares University in Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Bibliografia

• ARSLAN C. 2004. Effect of dietary probiotic supplementation on growth performance in the rock partridge (Alectoris graeca). Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 28: 887–891.
• ARSLAN C., SAATCI M. 2004. Effects of probiotic administration either as feed additive or by drinking water in performance and blood parameters of Japanese quail. Arch. Lebensmittelhyg., 68: 160–163.
• AWAD W.A., GHAREEB K., ABDEL-RAHEEM S., BÖHM J. 2009. Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histomorphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 88: 49–56.
• BELLEY A., KELLER K., GÖTTKE M., CHADEE K., GÖETTKE M. 1999. Intestinal mucins in colonization and host defense against pathogens. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 60: 10–15.
• BAI S.P., WU A.M., DING X.M., LEI Y., BAI J., ZHANG K.Y., CHIO J.S. 2013. Effects of probiotic--supplemented diets on growth performance and intestinal immune characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 92: 663–670.
• CAKIR S., MIDILLI M., EROL H., SIMSEK N., CINAR M., ALTINTAS A., ALP H., ALTINTA L., CENGIZ Ö., ANTALYALI A. 2008. Use of combined probiotic-prebiotic, organic acid and avilamycin in diets of Japanese quails. Rev. Med. Vet., 159: 565–569.
• CASPARY W.F. 1992. Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 55: 299S–308S.
• CENGIZ Ö., KÖKSAL B.H., TATLI O., SEVIM Ö., AHSAN U., ÜNER A.G., ULUTAŞ P.A., BEYAZ D., BÜYÜKYÖRÜK S., YAKAN A.,ÖNOL A.G. 2015. Effect of dietary probiotic and high stocking density on the performance, carcass yield, gut microflora, and stress indicators of broilers. Poult. Sci., 94: 2395–2403.
• CHIMOTE M.J., BARMASEL B.S., RAUT A.S., DHOK A.P., KURALKAR S.V. 2009. Effect of supplementation of probiotic and enzymes on performance of Japanese quails. Vet. World., 2: 219–220.
• COX C.M., DALLOULR.A. 2015. Immunomodulatory role of probiotics in poultry and potential in ovo application. Benef. Microbes., 6: 45–52.
• DAWKINS M.S., DONNELLY C.A., JONES T.A. 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature., 427: 342–344.
• DEPLANCKE B., GASKINS H.R., 2001. Microbial modulation of innate defence. Goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 73: 1131–1141.
• ECKERTN.H., LEE J.T., HYATT D., STEVENS S.M., ANDERSON S., ANDERSON P.N., BELTRAN R., SCHATZMAYR G., MOHNL M., CALDWELL D.J. 2010. Influence of probiotic administration by feed or drinking water on growth parameters of broilers reared on medicated and non-medicated diets. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 19: 59–67.
• FAN Y.K., CROOM J., CHRISTENSEN V.L., BLACK B.L., BIRD A.R., DANIEL L.R., MCBRIDE B.W., EISEN E.J. 1997. Jejunal glucose uptake and oxygen consumption in turkey poults selected for rapid growth. Poult. Sci., 76: 1738–1745.
• JOHNSON R., LEONARD P. 1994. Editors. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract. 3rd ed., Raven Press, New York, p. 1283.
• FULLER R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol., 66: 365–378.
• GRIMES J.L., RAHIMI S., OVIEDO E., SHELDON B.W., SANTOS B.O. 2008. Effect of directfed microbial (Primalac) on turkey poult performance and susceptibility to oral salmonella challenge. Poult. Sci., 87: 1464–1470.
• HAGHIGHI H.R., GONG J., GYLES C.L., HAYES M.A., SANEI B., PARVIZI P., GIS AVI H., CHAMBERS, J.R., SHARIF S. 2005. Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol., 12: 1387–1392.
• HIGGINS S.E., HIGGINS J. P., WOLFENDEN A.D., HENDERSON S.N., TORRES-RODRIGUEZ A., TELLEZ G., HARGIS B. 2008. Evaluation of a lactobacillus-based probiotic culture for the reduction of Salmonella enteritidis in neonatal broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 87: 27–31.
• HOMMA H., SHINOHARA T. 2004. Effects of probiotic Bacillus cereus toyoi on abdominal fat accu-mulation in the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Anim. Sci. J., 75: 37–41.
• IMONDI A.R., BIRD F.H. 1966. The turnover of intestinal epithelium in the chick. Poult. Sci., 45: 142–147.
• KALBANE V.H., GAFFAR M.A., DESHMUKH S.V.1992. Effect of probiotic and nitrofurin on performance of growing commercial pullets. Ind. J. Poult. Sci., 27: 116–117.
• KARIMI-TORSHIZI M.A., MOGHADDAM A.L., RAHIMI S.H., MOJGANI N. 2010. Assessing the effect of administering probiotics in water or as a feed supplement on broiler performance and immu-ne response. Br. Poult. Sci., 51: 178–184.
• KIERRNAN J.A. 2008. Histological And Histochemical Methods. 4th Ed. Scion, Bloxham.
• KLINKEN V., JAN-WLLEM B., DEKKER J., BULLER H., EINERHAND A.W.C. 1995. Mucin gene structure and expression. Protection vs. adhesion. Am. J. Physiol., 269: 613–627.
• LI L.L., HOU Z.P., LI T.J., WU G.Y., HUANG R.L., TANG Z.R., YANG C.B., GONG J., YU H., KONG X.F., PAN E. 2008. Effects of dietary probiotic supplementation on ileal digestibility of nutrients and growth performance in 1- to 42-day-old broilers. J. Sci. Food Agric., 88: 35–42
• LITTELL R.C., MILLIKEN G.A., STROUP W.W., WOLFINGER R.D. 1996. SAS System for Mixed Mo-dels. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.luCAs A.m,. JAmroz C. 1961. Atlas of Avian Hematology. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.
• MASTBAUM I., YOSSILEWITSCH L., GRIMBERG M., KEDEM M., VIOLA S., RAND N., DVORIN A., NOY Y., LITMAN M. 1997. Effects of the probiotic “Primalac” on broilers administered either as a feed additive or in the drinking water. 11th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Faaborg, Denmark, pp. 511–513.
• NRC 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th revised edition. National Academy Press, Wa-shington, DC.
• POTTEN C.S. 1998. Stem cells in the gastrointestinal epithelium. Numbers, characteristics and death. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 353: 821–830.
• QURESHI M.A., HAVENSTEING B. 1994. A comparison of the immune performance of a 1991 commercial broiler with a 1957 random bred strain when fed ‘typical’ 1957 and 1991 boiler diets. Poult. Sci., 73: 1805–1812.
• RAHIMI S., KATHARIOU S., GRIMES J.L., SILETZKYR M. 2011.Effect of directfed microbials on performance and Clostridium perfringens colonization of turkey poults. Poult. Sci., 90: 2656–266
• SAMANYA M., YAMAUCHI K. 2002. Histological alterations of intestinal villi in chickens fed dried Bacillus subtilis var. natto. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 133: 95–104.
• STEEL R.G.D., TORRIE J.H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc, New York.
• VRANIC M., MAZIJA H., GREBESA D., MUZIC S. 2006. Effect of ascogen on the growth performance and carcass yield of Japanese quails. Acta Vet., 56: 275–283.
• XU Z.R., HU C.H., XIA M.S., ZHAN X.A.,WANG M.Q. 2003. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poult. Sci., 82: 1030–1036.
• YAMAN H., ULUKANLI Z., ELMALI M., UNAL Y. 2006. The effect of a fermented probiotic, the kefir, on intestinal flora of poultry domesticated geese (Anser anser). Rev. Med. Vet., 157: 379–386.
• YASON C.V., SUMMERS B.A., SCHAT K.A. 1987. Pathogenesis of rotavirus infection in various age groups of chickens and turkeys: pathology. Am. J. Vet. Res., 48: 927–938.
• YEO J., KIM K. 1997. Effect of feeding diets containing an antibiotic, a probiotic, or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci., 76: 381–385.
• ZULKIFLI I., ABDULLAH N., AZRIN N.M., HO Y.W. 2000. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial broiler strains fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracycline under heat stress conditions. Bri. Poult. Sci., 41: 593–597