Laboratory effect of Boni Protect containing Aureobasidium pullulans (de Bary) Arnoud in the control of some fungal diseases of apple fruit

• Autorzy: Wagner A. , Hetman B. , Kopacki M. , Jamiolkowska A. , Krawiec P. , Lipa T.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Laboratoryjna ocena biopreparatu Boni Protect, zawierającego Aureobasidium pullulans (de Bary) Arnoud. (Boni Protect) do ochrony jabłek przed niektórymi chorobami grzybowymi

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The efficacy of Aureobasidium pullulans (in the biopreparation Boni Protect) against different pathogens of apples (Botrytis cinerea, Monilinia fructigena, Penicillium expansum, and Pezicula malicorticis) was evaluated under laboratory conditions. The biocontrol product was applied at concentrations of 0.05%, 0.1%, and 0.5%. Fruits of apple cultivars ‘Jonagold Decosta’ and ‘Pinova’ were used. Boni Protect was very effective against B. cinerea on cv. ‘Jonagold Decosta’, reducing disease incidence by 55–83.8%. On ‘Pinova’ apples, this biological control product was the most efficient at earlier stages of the experiment. It inhibited grey mold by 65% after 5 days from inoculation and only by 14% after 20 days. On cv. ‘Jonagold Decosta’, Boni Protect at a concentration of 0.1% was also effective against M. fructigena, reducing brown rot by 31.4–74.5%, but its efficiency on cv. ‘Pinova’ was not significant. Blue mold caused by P. expansum was inhibited only slightly by the biocontrol product, while P. malicorticis proved to be the most resistant to its antagonistic abilities.

PL

W warunkach laboratoryjnych badano skuteczność biopreparatu Boni Protect, zawierającego Aureobasidium pullulans (de Bary) Arnoud, w ochronie jabłek przeciwko Botrytis cinerea, Monilinia fructigena, Penicillium expansum i Pezicula malicorticis. Biopreparat stosowano w stężeniach 0,05%, 0,1% i 0,5% na jabłkach odmian ‘Jonagold Decosta’ i ‘Pinova’. Boni Protect był bardzo skuteczny w ochronie owoców ‘Jonagold Decosta’ przed B. cinerea, obniżając nasilenie choroby o 55–83.8%. Na jabłkach odmiany ‚Pinova’ biopreparat był najbardziej skuteczny na początku doświadczenia. Hamował rozwój szarej pleśni o 65% po 5 dniach od inokulacji i tylko o 14% po 20 dniach. Boni Protect w stężeniu 0,1% był również skuteczny w ochronie jabłek ‘Jonagold Decosta’ przed M. fructigena, hamując rozwój brunatnej zgnilizny o 31,4–74,5%, ale działanie na owoce odmiany ‘Pinova’ było znikome. Rozwój sinej pleśni, powodowanej przez P. expansum był hamowany tylko nieznacznie przez biopreparat, podczas gdy P. malicorticis okazał się najbardziej odporny na jego uzdolnienia antagonistyczne.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Agrobotanica
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 66
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.77-88,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Wagner A.

• Department of Plant Protection and Quarantine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczynskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

autor

Hetman B.

• Department of Plant Protection and Quarantine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczynskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

autor

Kopacki M.

• Department of Plant Protection and Quarantine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczynskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

autor

Jamiolkowska A.

• Department of Plant Protection and Quarantine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczynskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

autor

Krawiec P.

• Department of Pomology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczynskiego 58, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

autor

Lipa T.

• Department of Pomology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Leszczynskiego 58, 20-069 Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• Achbani E.H., Mounir R., El Jaafari S., Douira A., Benbouazza A., Jijakli M.H. 2005. Selection of antagonists against Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea, two post harvest apple parasites. 57th International Symposium on Crop Protection. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 70 (3): 143–149.
• Auwerkerken A., Davey M.W., Van Den Putte A., Keulemans J. 2007. Screening for Botrytis cinerea resistant apple cultivars. Acta Hort. 814: 759–764.
• Bencheqroun S.K., Bajji M., Massart S., Bentata F., Labhilili M., Achbani H., El Jaafari S., Jijakli M.H. 2006. Biocontrol of blue mold on apple fruits by Aureobasidium pullulans (strain Ach 1–1): in vitro and in situ evidence for possible involvement of competition for nutrients. Commun. Agric. Appl. Biol. Sci. 71 (3): 1151–1157.
• Borecki Z. 1984. Fungicydy stosowane w ochronie roślin. PWN, Warszawa (in Polish).
• Chi Z., Wang F., Chi L., Yue L., Liu G., Zhang T. 2009. Bioproducts from Aureobasidium pullulans, biotechnologically important yeast. Appl. Micr. Biotech. 82: 793–804. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1882-2
• Droby S., Cohen L., Daus A., Weiss B., Horev B., Chalutz E., Katz H., Keren-Tzun M., Shachnai A. 1998. Commercial testing of Aspire: a yeast preparation for the biocontrol of postharvest decays citrus. Biol. Control, 12: 97–101.
• El-Ghaout A., Smilanick J., Wisniewski M., Wilson C.L. 2000. Improved control of apple and citrus fruit decay with a combination of Candida saitoana and 2-deoxy-D-glucose. Plant Dis. 84: 249–253.
• Falconi C.J., Mendgen K. 1994. Epiphytic fungi on apple leaves and their value for control of the postharvest pathogens Botrytis cinerea, Monilinia fructigena and Penicillium expansum. Z. Pflkrankh. Pflschutz. 101: 38–47.
• Ippolito A., Ghaouth A. E., Wilson C. L., Wisniewski M. 2000. Control of postharvest diseases of apple fruit by Aureobasidium pullulans and induction of defense responses. Postharv. Biol. Tec. 19: 265–272.
• Leibinger W., Breuker B., Hahn M., Mendgen K. 1997. Control of postharvest pathogens and colonization of the apple surface by antagonistic microorganisms in the field. AGRIS Record, 87 (11): 1103–1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.11.1103
• Lima G., Ippolito A., Nigro F., Salerno M. 1997. Effectiveness of Aureobasidium pullulans and Candida oleophila against postharvest strawberry rots. Postharv. Biol. Tec. 10: 169–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(96)01302-6
• Lima G., De Curtis F., Castoria R., De Cicco V. 2003. Integrated control of apple post- harvest pathogens and survival of biocontrol yeasts in semi-commercial conditions. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 109: 341–349.
• Mounir R., Durieux A., Bodo E., Allard C., Simon J.P., Achbani E.H., El-Jaafari S., Dounira A., Jijakli M.H. 2007. Production, formulation and antagonistic activity of the biocontrol like-yeast Aureobasidium pullulans against Penicillium expansum. Biotechnol. Lett. 29: 553–559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10529-006-9269-2
• Pouliot J.M., Walton I., Parkhouse M.N., Abu-Lail L.I., and Camesano T.A. 2005. Adhesion of Aureobasidium pullulans is controlled by uronic acid based polymers and pullulan. Biomacromolecules, 6: 1122–1131.
• Prasongsuk S., Sullivan R.F., Kuhirun M., Eveleigh D.E., and Punnapayak H. 2005. Thailand habitats as source of pullulan producing strains of Aureobasidium pullulans. World J. Microb. Biot. 21: 393–398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-004-2237-x
• Rosslenbroich H.J., Stuebler D. 2000. Botrytis cinerea- history of chemical control and novel fungicides for its management. Crop Prot. 19: 557–561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00072-7
• Saravanakumar D., Ciavorella K., Spadaro D., Garibaldi A., Gullino M.L. 2008. Metschnikowia pulcherrima strain MACH1 outcompetes Botrytis cinerea, Alternaria alternata and Penicillium expansum in apples through iron depletion. Postharv. Biol. Tec. 49: 121–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.11.006
• Scharma R.R., Singh D., Singh R. 2009. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. by microbial antagonists; A review. Biol. Control, 50(3): 205–222.
• Schena L., Ippolito A., Zahavi T., Cohen L., Nigro F., and Droby S. 1999. Genetic diversity and biocontrol activity of Aureobasidium pullulans isolates against postharvest rots. Postharv. Biol. Tec. 17: 189–199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00036-8
• Schena L., Nigro F., Pentimone I., Ligorio A., and Ippolito A. 2003. Control of postharvest rots of sweet cherries and table grapes with endophytic isolates of Aureobasidium pullulans. Postharv. Biol. Tec. 30: 209–220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00111-X
• Sugar D., Spotts R.A. 1999. Control of Postharvest Decay in Pear by Four Laboratory- grown Yeasts and Two Registered Biocontrol Products. Plant. Dis. 83 (2): 155–158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.2.155
• Takesako K., Ikai, K., Haruna F., Endo M., Shimanaka K., Sono E., Nakamura T., Kato I., and Yamaguchi H. 1991. Aureobasidins, new antifungal antibiotics. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and properties. J. Antibiot. 44: 919–924. http://dx.doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.44.919
• Vero S., Mondino P., Burgueno J., Soubes M., Wiśniewski M. 2002. Characterization of biocontrol activity of two yeast strains from Uruguay against blue mold of apple. Postharv. Biol. Tec. 26: 91–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(01)00199-5
• Wagner A., Kordowska-Wiater M., Hetman B. 2006. Wpływ wybranych szczepów drożdży na rozwój szarej pleśni na owocach jabłoni. / Effect of selected yeast strains on grey mold development in apple fruits. Prog. Plant Prot. 46(2): 625–628 (in Polish).
• Vinas I., Usall J., Teixido N., Sanchis V. 1998. Biological control of major postharvest pathogens on apple with Candida sake. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 40: 9–16.
• Zhang A., Spadaro D., Garibaldi A., Gullino M.L. 2010a. Efficacy of antagonist Aureobasidium pullulans PL5 against postharvest pathogens of peach, apple and plum and its mode of action. Biol. Control, 54(3): 172–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.05.003
• Zhang A., Spadaro D., Garibaldi A., Gullino M.L. 2010b. Selection and evaluation of new antagonists for their efficacy against postharvest diseases of peaches. Postharv. Biol. Tec. 55: 174–181.

Uwagi

PL

Rekord w opracowaniu