The negative impact of intentionally introduced Quercus rubra L. on a forest community

• Autorzy: Woziwoda B. , Kopec D. , Witkowski J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Some alien woody species used in commercial forestry become invasive and, as invaders, cause major problems in natural and semi-natural ecosystems. However, the deliberate introduction of aliens can bring unintended negative changes also within areas of their cultivation. This paper presents the effects of the intentional introduction of the North-American Quercus rubra in European mixed Scots pine-Pedunculate oak forests (POFs): Querco roboris-Pinetum (W. Mat. 1981) J. Mat. 1988. Phytosociological data from field research combined with GIS data analysis of the current distribution of Northern Red oak in the studied habitat were used to determine the composition and structure of forest communities in plots with and without Q. rubra participation. The results show that Q. rubra significantly reduces native species richness and abundance, both in old-growth and in secondary (post-agricultural) forests. Not one resident vascular plant benefits from the introduction of Northern Red oak and only a few are able to tolerate its co-occurrence. The natural restocking of all native woody species is also strongly limited by this alien tree. The introduction of Northern Red oak significantly limits the environmental functions of the POF ecosystem and weakens its economic and social aspects. However, its further cultivation is justified from an economic point of view, as the essential function of the studied forests is commercial timber production, and the introduction of this fast growing alien tree supports the provisioning ecosystem services. A clear description of the level of trade-off between the accepted negative and positive effects of the introduction of Q. rubra on forest ecosystem services requires further interdisciplinary studies.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

negative impact; introduction; Quercus rubra; red oak; biodiversity; commercial forestry; ecosystem service; forest community

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 83
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.39-49,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Woziwoda B.

• Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland

autor

Kopec D.

• Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, University of Lodz, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Lodz, Poland

autor

Witkowski J.

• Regional Directorate of the State Forests in Lodz, Jana Matejki 16, 91-402 Lodz, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Zobel BJG, van Wyk G, Stahl P. Growing exotic forests. New York, NY: Wiley; 1987.
• 2. Sedjo RA. The potential of high-yield plantation forestry for meeting timber needs. New For. 1999;17(1–3):339–360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006563420947
• 3. Palmberg-Lerche C, Iversen PA, Sigaud P. Global data on forest plantations resources [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2012 Apr 22]; Available from:http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/Y2316E/y2316e0b.htm
• 4. Richardson DM. Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv Biol. 1998;12(1):18–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.96392.x
• 5. Rouget M, Richardson DM, Nel JL, van Wilgen BW. Commercially important trees as invasive aliens: towards spatially explicit risk assessmentat a national scale. Biol Invasions. 2002;4(4):397–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023611713339
• 6. Haysom KA, Murphy ST. The status of invasiveness of forest tree species outside their natural habitat: a global review and discussionpaper [Internet]. 2003 [cited 2012 Feb 22]; Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/j1583e/j1583e00.htm
• 7. Moore BA. Alien invasive species: impacts on forests and forestry–a review [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2012 Feb 20]; Available from: http://www.fao.org//docrep/008/j6854e/j6854e00.htm
• 8. Kohli RK, Jose S, Pal Singh H, Batish DR, editors. Invasive plants and forest ecosystems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2009.
• 9. Martin PH, Canham CD. Dispersal and recruitment limitation in native versus exotic tree species: life-history strategies and Janzen–Connell effects. Oikos. 2010;119(5):807–824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17941.x
• 10. Richardson DM, Rejmánek M. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species – a global review. Divers Distrib. 2011;17(5):788–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00782.x
• 11. Essl F, Moser D, Dullinger S, Mang T, Hulme PE. Selection for commercial forestry determines global patterns of alien coniferinvasions. Divers Distrib. 2010;16(6):911–921. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00705.x
• 12. Vilà M, Basnou C, Pyšek P, Josefsson M, Genovesi P, Gollasch S, et al. How well do we understand the impacts of alien species on ecosystemservices? A pan-European, cross-taxa assessment. Front Ecol Env.2010;8(3):135–144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/080083
• 13. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, et al. A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol. 2012;18(5):1725– 1737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02636.x
• 14. Armstrong AJ, van Hensbergen HJ. Impacts of afforestation with pines on assemblages of native biota in South Africa. Afr J. 1996;175(1):35–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00382167.1996.9629891
• 15. Spellerberg IF, Sawyer JWD. Standards for biodiversity: a proposal based on biodiversity standards for forest plantations. BiodiversConserv. 1996;5(4):447–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00056390
• 16. Vanhellemont M, Verheyen K, Staelens J, Hermy M. Factors affecting radial growth of the invasive Prunus serotina in pine plantations inFlanders. Eur J Res. 2009;129(3):367–375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10342-009-0342-y
• 17. Hutchinson TF, Vankat JL. Invasibility and effects of Amur honeysuckle in southwestern Ohio forests. Conserv Biol. 1997;11(5):1117–1124.http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96001.x
• 18. Orr SP, Rudgers JA, Clay K. Invasive plants can inhibit native tree seedlings: testing potential allelopathic mechanisms. Plant Ecol.2005;181(2):153–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-5698-6
• 19. Stinson KA, Campbell SA, Powell JR, Wolfe BE, Callaway RM, Thelen GC, et al. Invasive plant suppresses the growth of native tree seedlingsby disrupting belowground mutualisms. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(5):e140.http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140
• 20. Meiners SJ. Apparent competition: an impact of exotic shrub invasion on tree regeneration. Biol Invasions. 2007;9(7):849–855. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9086-5
• 21. Webster CR, Jenkins MA, Jose S. Woody invaders and the challenges they pose to forest ecosystems in the eastern United States. J For.2006;104(7):366–374.
• 22. Collier MH, Vankat JL, Hughes MR. Diminished plant richness and abundance below Lonicera maackii, an invasiveshrub. Am Midl Nat. 2002;147(1):60–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2002)147[0060:DPRAAB]2.0.CO;2
• 23. Huebner CD. Vulnerability of oak-dominated forests in West Virginia to invasive exotic plants: temporal and spatial patterns of nine exoticspecies using herbarium records and land classification data. Castanea.2003;68(1):1–14.
• 24. Lichstein JW, Grau HR, Aragón R. Recruitment limitation in secondary forests dominated by an exotic tree. J Veg Sci. 2004;15(6):721–728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02314.x
• 25. Simberloff D, Parker IM, Windle PN. Introduced species policy, management, and future research needs. Front Ecol Env. 2005;3(1):12–20.http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0012:ISPMAF]2.0.CO;2
• 26. van Wilgen BW, Dyer C, Hoffmann JH, Ivey P, Le Maitre DC, Moore JL, et al. National-scale strategic approaches for managingintroduced plants: insights from Australian acacias inSouth Africa: strategic approaches for managing introducedacacias. Divers Distrib. 2011;17(5):1060–1075. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00785.x
• 27. Chytrý M, Wild J, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Dendoncker N, Reginster I, et al. Projecting trends in plant invasions in Europe under differentscenarios of future land-use change: projecting future plant invasionsin Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2012;21(1):75–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00573.x
• 28. Hulme PE. Weed risk assessment: a way forward or a waste of time? J Appl Ecol. 2012;49(1):10–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02069.x
• 29. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.
• 30. Young SL. What contributions are invasive plant species making to ecosystem services? J Soil Water Conserv. 2010;65(2):31A–32A. http://dx.doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.2.31A
• 31. de Wit MP, Crookes DJ, van Wilgen BW. Conflicts of interest in environmental management: estimating the costs and benefits ofa tree invasion. Biol Invasions. 2001;3(2):167–178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014563702261
• 32. Patterson TM, Coelho DL. Ecosystem services: foundations, opportunities, and challenges for the forest products sector. Ecol Manage.2009;257(8):1637–1646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.11.010
• 33. Devine K, Fei S. A review of impacts by invasive exotic plants on forest ecosystem services. In: Proceedings of the 17th central hardwoodforest conference GTR-NRS-P-78. Newtown Square, PA: USDA ForestService, Northern Research Station; 2011. p. 425–435.
• 34. Bucharova A, van Kleunen M. Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North Americanwoody species in Europe. J Ecol. 2009;97(2):230–238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01469.x
• 35. Hereźniak J. American trees and shrubs in the Polish territories. In: Ławrynowicz M, Warcholińska AU, editors. Łódź: Scientific Societyin Łódź; 1992. p. 97–150. (vol 9).
• 36. Magni Diaz CR. Reconstitution de l’introduction de Quercus rubra L. en Europe et conséquences génétiques dans les populations allochtones.Paris: ENGREF; 2004.
• 37. Król S. Northen red oak – Quercus rubra L. in forest environment in western part of Poland. Pr Kom Nauk Rol Kom Nauk Leśnych.1967;21:419–482.
• 38. Vansteenkiste D, de Boever L, van Acker J. Alternative processing solutions for red oak (Quercus rubra) from converted forests in Flanders,Belgium. In: Proceedings of the COST action E44 conference on broad spectrum utilization of wood at BOKU. Vienna: BOKU; 2005. p. 13–26.
• 39. Rédei K, Csiha I, Keserű Z, Rásó J, Győri J. Management of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) stands in the Nyírség forest region (EasternHungary). Hung Agric Res. 2010;3:13–17.
• 40. Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C, Hejda M, Arianoutsou M, Essl F, et al. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends,geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia. 2008;80:101–149.
• 41. Woziwoda B. Expansion of northern red oak Quercus rubra L. supported by anthropogenic factors. In: Mazur S, Tracz H, editors. VIIIsymposium of protection of forests ecosystem: human threats to forestecosystems, identification – monitoring – management. Warsaw:Warsaw University of Life Sciences Press; 2008. p. 259–263.
• 42. Sander IL. Quercus rubra L. northern red oak. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1990. (vol 2).
• 43. Murat E. Forest cultivation in details. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Świat; 2002.
• 44. AHEC (American Hardwood Export Council) [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2012 Nov 30]; Available from: http//www.ahec-europe.org
• 45. Chmura D. Penetration and naturalization of invasive alien plant species (neophytes) in woodlands of the Silesian Upland (SouthernPoland). Nat Conserv. 2004;60:3–11.
• 46. Otręba A, Ferchmin M. Alien tree species as indicators of environmental transformation in Kampinoski National Park. SiM CEPL.2007;2/3(16):234–244.
• 47. Jakubowska-Gabara J, Woziwoda B. Decrease of vascular flora diversity in forest communities connected with invasive red oak Quercusrubra L. In: Coles S, Dimopoulos P, editors. 52 Symposium of IAVS:vegetation processes and human impact in a changing world. Chania:Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p. 179.
• 48. Marozas V, Straigytė L, Šepetienie J. Comparative analysis of alien oak (Quercus rubra L.) and native common oak (Quercus robur L.) vegetation in Lithuania. Acta Biol Univ Daugavpilensis. 2009;9(1):19–24.
• 49. Pyšek P, Danihelka J, Sádlo J, Chrtek JJ, Chytrý M, Jarošík V, et al. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition):checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia.2012;84:155–255.
• 50. Tokarska-Guzik B. The establishment and spread of alien plant species (kenophytes) in the flora of Poland. Katowice: University ofSilesia Press; 2005.
• 51. Institute of Nature Conservation PA of S. Alien species in Poland. Data base [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2012 Feb 18]; Available from: http//www.iop.krakow.pl/ias
• 52. Riepšas E, Straigytè L. Invasiveness and ecological effects of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) in Lithuanian forests. Balt For. 2008;14(2):122–130.
• 53. Kuc M, Piszczek M, Janusz A. Importance of northern red oak Quercus rubra L. in forest ecosystems and economic calculus in Regional Directorateof State Forests in Katowice. SiM CEPL. 2012;33(4):152–159.
• 54. Obwieszczenie Marszałka Sejmu Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 25 sierpnia 2009 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu ustawy o ochronie przyrody. 2009.
• 55. Dz. U. 2009.151.1220. Art.120. p. 4.
• 56. Rozwałka Z. Zasady hodowli lasu. Bedoń: Ośrodek Rozwojowo- Wdrożeniowy Lasów Państwowych w Bedoniu; 2003.
• 57. Haze M, editor. Zasady hodowli lasu. Warsaw: Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych; 2012.
• 58. Dz. U. 2011.2010.1260
• 59. Woziwoda B, Kałucka I, Ruszkiewicz-Michalska M, Sławska M, Sławski M, Tołoczko W, et al. Interdisciplinary research of ecologicaleffects of Northern Red oak Quercus rubra L. introduction in forestecosystems (central Poland) – the principles and aims of study. SiMCEPL. 2012;33(4):181–192.
• 60. Peterken GF. A method for assessing woodland flora for conservation using indicator species. Biol Cons. 1974;6(4):239–245. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0006-3207(74)90001-9
• 61. Majchrowska A, Woziwoda B. Effects of forest history on the biodiversity of vascular plants flora. In: Holeksa J, Babczyńska-Sendek B,Wika S, editors. The role of geobotany in biodiversity conservation.Katowice: University of Silesia Press; 2009. p. 49–58.
• 62. Matuszkiewicz JM. Forest communities of Poland. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2001.
• 63. Matuszkiewicz W. A guide to identification of the plant communities of Poland. Warsaw: Polish Scientific Publishers PWN; 2002.
• 64. Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie: Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde. 3rd ed. Vienna: Springer-Verlag; 1964.
• 65. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination(version 4.5). Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power; 2002.
• 66. Canham CD, Finzi AC, Pacala SW, Burbank DH. Causes and consequences of resource heterogeneity in forests: interspecific variationin light transmission by canopy trees. Can J Res. 1994;24(2):337–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x94-046
• 67. Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Düll R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulißen D. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scr Geobot. 1991;18:1–248.
• 68. Kwiatkowska AJ. Changes in the species richness, spatial pattern and species frequency associated with the decline of oak forest. Vegetatio.1994;112(2):171–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00044691
• 69. Sonohat G, Balandier P, Ruchaud F. Predicting solar radiation transmittance in the understory of even-aged coniferous stands in temperateforests. Ann Sci. 2004;61(7):629–641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2004061
• 70. Tinya F, Márialigeti S, Király I, Németh B, Ódor P. The effect of light conditions on herbs, bryophytes and seedlings of temperate mixedforests in Őrség, Western Hungary. Plant Ecol. 2009;204(1):69–81.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-008-9566-z
• 71. Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involveda-a critical reviewfor temperate and boreal forests. Ecol Manage. 2008;254(1):1–15.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038
• 72. Knight KS, Oleksyn J, Jagodzinski AM, Reich PB, Kasprowicz M. Overstorey tree species regulate colonization by native andexotic plants: a source of positive relationships between understoreydiversity and invasibility: tree species, diversity, and invasibility.Divers Distrib. 2008;14(4):666–675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00468.x
• 73. Robakowski P, Bielinis E. Competition between sessile oak (Quercus petraea) and black cherry (Padus serotina) : dynamics of seedlingsgrowth. Pol J Ecol. 2011;59(2):297–306.
• 74. Starfinger U. Die Einbürgerung der Spätblühenden Trubenkirsche (Padus serotina Ehrh.) in Mitteleuropa. LandschaftsenwicklungUmweltforchung. 1990;69:119.
• 75. Godefroid S, Phartyal SS, Weyembergh G, Koedam N. Ecological factors controlling the abundance of non-native invasive blackcherry (Prunus serotina) in deciduous forest understory in Belgium.Ecol Manage. 2005;210(1–3):91–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.024
• 76. Dzwonko Z. Effect of proximity to ancient deciduous woodland on restoration of the field layer vegetation in a pine plantation. Ecography. 2001;24(2):198–204. http://dx.doi. org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2001.240210.x
• 77. Augusto L, Dupouey JL, Ranger J. Effects of tree species on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests. AnnSci. 2003;60(8):823–831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/forest:2003077
• 78. Collier M, Farrell EP. The environmental impact of planting broadleaved trees on acid-sensitive soils. Literature review. Dublin: COFORD;2007.
• 79. Straigytė L, Žalkauskas R. Effect of climate variability on Quercus rubra phenotype and spread in Lithuanian forests. Dendrobiology.2012;67:79–85.
• 80. Richardson DM, Macdonald IAW, Forsyth GG. Reduction in plant species richness under stands of alien trees and shrubs in fynbosbiome. Afr J. 1989;149(1):1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00382167.1989.9628986
• 81. Winter M, Schweiger O, Klotz S, Nentwig W, Andriopoulos P, Arianoutsou M, et al. Plant extinctions and introductions lead to phylogeneticand taxonomic homogenization of the European flora.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(51):21721–21725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907088106
• 82. Peterken GF. Ecological effects of introduced tree species in Britain. Ecol Manage. 2001;141(1–2):31–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00487-4
• 83. Olden JD, Poff NL. Towards the mechanistic understanding and prediction of biotic homogenization. Am Nat. 2003;162(4):442–460.http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/378212
• 84. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM, Pyšek P. Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In: van der Maarel E, Franklin J, editors.Vegetation ecology. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 387–424.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118452592.ch13/summary
• 85. Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invadedcommunities. J Ecol. 2009;97(3):393–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x
• 86. Hibbs DE. Forty years of forest succession in central New England. Ecology. 1983;64(6):1394–1401. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1937493
• 87. Wangen S, Webster C. Spatial and temporal dynamic of exotic tree invasions: lesson from a shade–tolerant invader, Acer platanoides. In:Kumar Kohli R, Jose S, Pal Singh H, Rani Batish D, editors. Invasiveplants and forest ecosystems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2008. p. 71–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420043389.ch5
• 88. Dodet M, Collet C. When should exotic forest plantation tree species be considered as an invasive threat and how should we treat them?Biol Invasions. 2012;14(9):1765–1778. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0202-4
• 89. Zieliński J, Nowak G. Trees and shrubs used in rehabilitation of industrial waste stockpiles. In: Drozdek ME, editor. Plants for special tasks.Sulechów: Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa; 2011. p. 455–466.
• 90. Thomaes A, Keersmaeker L, Schrijver A, Vandekerkhove K, Verschelde P, Verheyen K. Can tree species choice influence recruitmentf ancient forest species in post-agricultural forest? Plant Ecol. 2010;212(4):573–584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9847-1
• 91. Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, et al. Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of thenew ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeo. 2006;15(1):1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x
• 92. Kubiak D. Lichens of red oak Quercus rubra in the forest environment in the Olsztyn Lake District (NE Poland). Acta Mycol. 2006;41(2):319–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/am.2006.033
• 93. Price list of the wood range. Załącznik nr 1. In: Zarządzenie nr 1/13 Nadleśniczego Nadleśnictwa Poddębice z dnia 2 stycznia 2013 r.Poddębice: Nadleśnictwo Poddębice; 2013. p. 1–4.
• 94. Bellon S, Tumiłowicz J, Król S, editors. Alien woody species in forest management. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne;1977.
• 95. Danusevičius J, Gabrilavičius R, Danusevičius D. Quality of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) stands on abandoned land. Balt For. 2002;8:51–56.
• 96. Hulme PE, Nentwig W, Pyšek P, Vila M. Common market, shared problems: time for a coordinated response to biological invasionsin Europe? Biological invasions: towards a synthesis. Neobiota.2009;8:3–19.
• 97. Pejchar L, Mooney HA. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol Evol. 2009;24(9):497–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.016
• 98. Yokomizo H, Possingham HP, Hulme PE, Grice AC, Buckley YM. Cost-benefit analysis for intentional plant introductions under uncertainty.Biol Invasions. 2012;14(4):839–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-011-0120-x
• 99. Danielewicz W, Maliński T. Trees and shrubs of alien origin in Wielkopolski National Park. Rocz Dendrol. 1997;45:65–81.
• 100. Adamowski W, Dworak L, Ramanjuk I. 102 - Atlas of alien woody species of the Białowieża primeval forest. Phytocoenosis (N.S.). CartogrGeobot. 2002;supp 14:7–303.
• 101. Verloove F. Catalogue of the Neophytes in Belgium (1800–2005). Scr Bot Belg. 2006;39:1–89.
• 102. Medvecká J, Kliment J, Májeková J, Halada Ľ, Zaliberová M, Gojdičová E, et al. Inventory of the alien flora of Slovakia. Preslia.2012;84:257–309.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5586/asbp.2013.035