PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2009 | 53 | 3 |

Tytuł artykułu

Effect of methisoprinol administered in ovo on the histological structure of the bursa of Fabricius in turkeys

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The study was aimed at determining the effect of a synthetic immunomodulator - methisoprinol - administered in ovo on the histological structure of the bursa of Fabricius in turkeys. The experiments were conducted on three groups of BUT 9 turkeys hatched from eggs to which, on day 26 of incubation, methisoprinol was administered in a dose of 5 mg (group I) or 20 mg per egg (group II). The poults hatched from the eggs treated with a physiological solution of NaCl in a dose of 0.1 ml per egg served as a control (group III). Turkeys were decapitated at the age of 5 d, and the bursas of Fabricius were collected and prepared for histological studies. The study demonstrated that the bursa of Fabricius in the turkeys hatched from eggs administered with 5 mg of methisoprinol, as compared to the organ in the control poults, differed in a greater number of lymphatic nodules, with a tangible division into the cortical and medullary parts. In turn, the bursa of Fabricius in the turkeys hatched from the eggs administered with methisoprinol at a dose of 20 mg/egg, was characterised by a thick wall with a prominent muscular coat and poorly developed folds with no lymphatic nodules. The morphometric examination of the folds showed a statistically lower number of lymphatic nodules in the bursas of Fabricius collected from the poults hatched from eggs to which methisoprinol was administered at a dose of 20 mg/egg, as compared to that recorded in the organs of turkeys hatched from the eggs treated with methisoprinol at a dose of 5 mg/egg and to that of the control group. Thus, the study demonstrated that methisoprinol used at a dose of 5 mg/egg might be applied as a preparation effectively modulating the immune processes in turkeys.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

53

Numer

3

Opis fizyczny

p.471-476,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland
autor
  • Department of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland
autor
  • Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland
  • Department of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland
autor
  • Department of Poultry Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-957 Olsztyn, Poland

Bibliografia

  • 1. Dietert R.D., Golemboski K.A.: Environment-immune interactions. Poult Sci 1994, 73, 1062-1076.
  • 2. Dohms J.E., Saif Y.M.: Criteria for evaluation immunosuppression. Avian Dis 1997, 28, 305-310.
  • 3. Douglas J., Buddiger N.: How today's social, political and consumer -driven environment influences the business objectives of the primary breeders: genotype, environment and nutrition interactions. 4th International Symposium on Turkey Diseases, Berlin, 2002, pp. 1-12.
  • 4. Friedman A., Bartov I., Sklan D.: Humoral immune response impairment following excess vitamin E nutrition in the chick and turkey. Poult Sci 1998, 77, 956-962.
  • 5. Grindstaff J.L., Hasselquist D., Nilsson J.K., Sandell M., Smith H.G., Stjernman M.: Transgenerational priming of immunity: maternal exposure to a bacterial antigen enhances offspring humoral immunity. Proc Biol Sci 2006, 273, 2551-2557.
  • 6. Grondel J.L., Angenent G.C., Egberts E.: The influence of antibiotics on the immune system. Investigations on the cellular functions of chicken leukocytes in vitro. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1985, 10, 307-316.
  • 7. Guiro S.: Investigations on the immunosuppressive effect of haemorrhagic enteritis virus (HEV) infection in turkeys. Doctoral thesis, Olsztyn, 2000.
  • 8. Kim I.-J., Sou S.K., Kim H., Yeuh H.-Y., Sharma J.M.: Characteristics of bursal T lymphocytes induced by infectious bursal disease virus. J Virol 2000, 74, 8884- 8892.
  • 9. Koncicki A.: Characteristics of domestic adenovirus isolates of hemorrhagic enteritis (HE) in turkeys and evaluation of epizootic situation in Poland. Acta Acad Agricult Tech Olst Veterinaria 1996, 22, 1-43.
  • 10. Koncicki A., Rumińska E., Stenzel T., Mazur- Gonkowska B., Tykałowski B.: Application of isoprinosine in ovo to immunomodulation in turkeys. XIX International Poultry Symposium PB WPSA Olsztyn, 2007, p. 63.
  • 11. Lundqvist M.L., Middleton D.L., Radford C., Warr G.W., Magor K.E.: Immunoglobulins of the non- galliform birds: antibody expression and repertoire in the duck. Dev Comp Imunnol 2006, 30, 93-100.
  • 12. Masteller E.L.: B cell development in the chicken. Poult Sci 1994, 72, 1289-1293.
  • 13. Moya P., Alonso M.L., Baixeras E., Ronda E.: Immunomodulatory activity of isoprinosine on experimental viral infections in avian models. Int J Immunopharmacol 1984, 6, 339-343.
  • 14. Nagaraja K.V., Patel B.L., Emery D.A., Pomeroy B.S., Newman J.A.: In vitro depression of the mitogenic response of lymphocytes from turkeys infected with hemorrhagic enteritis virus. Am J Vet Res 1982, 43, 134-136.
  • 15. Nagaraja K.V., Patel B.L., Emery D.A., Pomeroy B.S., Newman J.A.: In vitro evaluation of B-lymphocyte function in turkeys infected with hemorrhagic enteritis virus. Am J Vet Res 43, 502-504.
  • 16. Paranithiotis E., Ratcliffe M. J. H.: Survivors of bursal B cells production and emigration. Poult Sci 1994, 73, 991-997.
  • 17. Powell P.C.: Immune mechanisms in infections in poultry. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1987, 15, 87-113.
  • 18. Qureshi M.A., Edens F.W., Havenstein G. B.: Immune system dysfunction during exposure to poults enteritis and mortality syndrome agents. Poult Sci 1997, 76, 564-569.
  • 19. Rautenschlein S., Sharma J.M.: Immunopathogenesis of hemorrhagic enteritis virus (HEV) in turkeys. Dev Comp Immunol 2000, 24, 237-246.
  • 20. Rautenschlein S., Neumann U.: Modulation of avian immune system: suppression versus induction of immunity. Polish J Vet Sci 2004, 7, 39-46.
  • 21. Rumińska-Groda E.: The influence of isoprinosine on the immunological dynamic phenomenon as well as on course HEV and E. coli infection in turkeys. Doctoral thesis, Olsztyn, 2002.
  • 22. Rumińska E., Koncicki A., Stenzel T.: Structure and function of the avian immune system in birds. Medycyna Wet 2008, 64, 265-268.
  • 23. Rzedzicki J., Kowalska M.: The influence of nutrition on immunity of animals. Medycyna Wet 1992, 48, 249-251.
  • 24. Seto F.: Early development of avian immune system. Poult Sci 1981, 60, 1981-1995.
  • 25. Sharma J.M., Karaca K., Pertile T.: Virus-induced immunosuppression in chickens. Poult Sci 1994, 73, 1082-1086.
  • 26. Suresh M., Sharma J.M.: Hemorrhagic enteritis virus induced changes in the lymphocyte subpopulations in turkeys and the effect of experimental immunodeficiency on viral pathogenesis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 1995, 45, 139-150.
  • 27. Stenzel T., Tykałowski B., Andrzejewski M., Koncicki A.: The influence of methisoprinol applied in ovo on the percentage of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T-lymphocyte subpopulations in turkeys. Medycyna Wet 2008, 64, 1157-1160.
  • 28. Tykałowski B., Stenzel T., Mazur-Lech B., Andrzejewski M., Koncicki A.: The influence of methisoprinol applied in ovo upon hatchability and health status of turkeys. Polish J Vet Sci 2009, 12, 203-207.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-6bd7f2b0-ab98-4b3d-9b80-7ef9b0fa4705
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.