Mutational changes in Delphinium malabaricum (Huth.) Munz.: a potential ornamental plant

• Autorzy: Kolar F.R. , Ghatge S.R. , Nimbalkar M.S. , Dixit G.B.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Delphinium malabaricum; ornamental plant; mutational change; ethyl methanesulphonate; sodium azide; physical mutagen; gamma-ray; mutation frequency

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Journal of Horticultural Research
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.5-15,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kolar F.R.

• Karnataka State Women’s University, Vijayapur – 586108 (Karnataka), India

autor

Ghatge S.R.

• Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Plant Breeding, Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416 004 (MS), India

autor

Nimbalkar M.S.

• Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Plant Breeding, Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416 004 (MS), India

autor

Dixit G.B.

• Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Plant Breeding, Department of Botany, Shivaji University, Kolhapur-416 004 (MS), India

Bibliografia

• Bhattacharya C. 2003. Effect of ethyl methane sulpho-nate on carnation Dianthus caryophyllus L. Envi-ron. Ecol. 212: 301-305.
• Blanché C. 1991. Revisió biosistemàtica del gènere Del-phinium L. a la Península Ibèrica i a les Illes Bale-ars. Arxius de la Secció de Ciències de l’Institut d’Estudis Catalans 98: 1-288. (in Spanish)
• Blixt S. 1961. Quantitative studies of induced mutations in peas. V. Chlorophyll mutations. Agri Hortique Genetica 19: 402-447.
• Bonnett H.T., Djurberg I., Fajardo M., Glimelius K. 1993. A mutation causing variegation and abnor-mal development in tobacco is associated with an altered mitochondrial DNA. The Plant Journal 3: 519-525. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.03040519.x.
• Boyko A., Kathiria P., Zemp F.J., Yao Y., Pogribny I., Kovalchuk I. 2007. Transgenerational changes in the genome stability and methylation in pathogen-infected plants. Nucleic Acids Research 35: 1714-1725. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm029.
• Chowdhery H.J., Wadhwa B.M. 1984. Flora of Himachal Pradesh. III Volumes. Howrah, Botanical Survey of India, pp. 16-18.
• Datta S.K., Gupta M.N. 1984. ‘Saroda’ and ‘Sukumari’ – new rose cultivars evolved by gamma irradiation. Science and Culture 50: 200-201.
• Davies K.M., Schwinn K.E., 1997. Flower colour. In: Geneve R.L., Preece J.E., Merkle S.A. (Eds.), Bio-technology of ornamental plants. CAB Interna-tional, pp. 259-294.
• El-Mokadem H.E., Mostafa G.G. 2014. Induction of mu-tations in Browallia speciosa using sodium azide and identification of genetic variation by peroxi-dase enzyme. African Journal of Biotechnology 13: 106-111. DOI: 10.5897/AJB2013.13302.
• Gaul H. 1964. Mutations in plant breeding. Radiation Botany 4: 155-232. DOI: 10.1016/S0033-7560(64)80069-7.
• Gottschalk W., Wolff G. 1983. Induced mutations in plant breeding. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics, vol. 7, 238 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81997-1.
• Goud J.V. 1967. Induced polygenic mutation in hexa-ploid wheats. Radiation Botany 7: 321-331. DOI: 10.1016/0033-7560(67)90021-X.
• Gustafsson Å. 1940. The mutation system of the chlo-rophyll apparatus. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift 2(11): 1-40.
• Hansel H. 1968. An estimate of the rate of chlorophyll mutations in barley taking account of multiply mu-tated M1 – nuclei. In: Mutations in plant breeding II, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 139-150.
• Jaenisch R., Bird A. 2003. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature Genetics Supple-ment 33: 245-254. DOI: 10.1038/ng1089.
• Kapoor M., Kumar P., Lal S. 2014. Gamma radiation in-duced variations in corn marigold (Glebionis segetum) and their RAPD-based genetic relation-ship. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84(7): 796-801.
• Kawai T., Sato H. 1969. Studies on early heading muta-tions in rice. Bulletin of the National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Series D (Japan) 20: 1-33.
• Kolar F., Pawar N., Dixit G. 2011. Induced chlorophyll mutations in Delphinium malabaricum (Huth) Munz. Journal of Applied Horticulture 13: 18-24.
• Laneri U., Franconi R., Altavista P. 1990. Somatic muta-genesis of Gerbera jamesonii hybrid: irradiation and in vitro cultures. Acta Horticulturae 280: 395-402. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1990.280.64.
• Levine R.P. 1972. Interactions between nuclear and or-ganelle genetic systems. In: Evolution of Genetic systems. Brookhaven Symposia in Biology 23: 503-533.
• Marki A., Bianu-Morea M. 1970. Gamma-rays and EMS-induced mutations on flax (Linum usitatissi-mum L.). Genetika 6: 24-28. (in Russian)
• Mol J., Grotewold E., Koes R. 1998. How genes paint flowers and seeds. Trends in Plant Science 3: 212-217. DOI: 10.1016/S1360-1385(98)01242-4.
• Nilan R.A., Vig B.K. 1976. Plant test systems for detection of chemical mutagens. In: Hollaender A. (Ed.), Chem-ical mutagens: Principles and methods for their detec-tion, vol. 4, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 143-170.
• Polunin O., Stainton A. 1984. Flowers of the Himalaya. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp. 6-8.
• Raghava S.P.S., Negi S.S., Sharma T.V.R.S., Balakrish-nan K.A. 1988. Gamma rays induced mutants in gladiolus. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture and Biol-ogy 17(1): 5-10.
• Rau M.A. 1993. Ranunculaceae. In: Sharma B.D., Bala-krishnan N.P., Rao R.R., Hajara P.K. (Eds.), Flora of India. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, 145 p.
• Schum A., Preil W. 1998. Induced mutations in ornamen-tal plants. In: Jain S.M., Brar D.S., Ahloowalia B.S. (Eds.), Somaclonal variation and induced muta-tions in crop improvement. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture 32: 333-366. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9125-6_17.
• Shah T.M., Mirza J.I., Haq M.A., Atta B.M. 2006. In-duced genetic variability in chickpea (Cicer ari-etinum L.) I. Frequency and spectrum of chloro-phyll mutations. Pakistan Journal of Botany 38(4): 1217-1226.
• Sharma S.K., Sharma B. 1984. Pattern of induced macro- and micro-mutations with gamma-rays and NMU in lentil. Environmental and Experimental Botany 24: 343-351. DOI: 10.1016/0098-8472(84)90031-5.
• Swaminathan M.S. 1964. A comparison of mutation in-duction in diploids and polyploids. In: The use of induced mutations in plant breeding. Rad. Mut. Or-gan. FAO/IAEA Vienna, pp. 619-641.
• Tambe A.B., Pachore M.V., Giri S.P., Andhale B.S., Ap-parao B.J. 2010. Induced chlorophyll mutations in soybean Glycine max (L.) Merill. Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences, Supplement 1: 142-145.
• Walther F., Sauer A. 1986. Analysis of radiosensitivity – a basic requirement for in vitro somatic mutagene-sis III. Rose cultivars. Gartenbauwissenschaft 51: 40-43.
• Wildman S.G. 1973. An approach towards ascertaining the function of chloroplast DNA in tobacco plants. In: Boardman N.K., Linnane A.W., Smillie R.M. (Eds.), Autonomy and biogenesis of mitochondria of chloroplasts. North-Holland Publishing, pp. 402-412.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/johr-2015-0012