Automatyczne systemy wykrywania rui u krów jako narzędzie do poprawy zarządzania stadem

• Autorzy: Jaskowski J.M. , Kmiecik J. , Kierbic A. , Herudzinska M. , Wozna-Wysocka M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Automatic systems of heat detection in cows as a tool for improving herd management

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

There are at least several ways of detecting bovine ovaries, which vary in accuracy, effort and cost associated with the implementation and operation of equipment designed for this purpose. Heat in cows can be most easily detected by systematic, thorough observation of individuals in the herd. Vaginal mucosal resistance measurements were also used, for example, the fitting of ‘balloons’ with paint at the base of the tail or on the back, temperature measurement in the vagina, milk and rumen, determination of progesterone in milk and blood. Currently, high-performance dairy herds are routinely introduced in controlled breeding programs, including timed artificial insemination (TAI) and automated estrus detection (AED) or activity monitoring system (AMS). Most of the commercially available heat detection devices are based on accelerometers or pedometers. These devices have the ability to detect heat in 81.4% to 91.3%. The sensitivity of heat detection was 58.9%, 63.3%, 56.7% and 35.9% respectively for accelerometers (Heatime), pedometers (SAE Afikim, Kibbutz Afikim, Israel), KaMaR markers and heat detectors (Scratchcard). When two of the three systems were combined (different combinations), the sensitivity increased to 75.9%. Similarly, after the combination of visual detection, the sensitivity increased to 96% and the specificity to 90% (visual observation and AMS). Activity monitoring systems are a good and proven tool for improving the management of cows. They respect the principles of well-being as an alternative to reproductive management based solely on traditional methods of detecting ovulation or hormone programs (TAI). It seems, however, that further improvement of the cows fertility in industrial cattle farms will be possible in the future not only using one modern heat detection system, but combining several different methods of heat detection and synchronization.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

bydlo; rozrod zwierzat; zarzadzanie stadem; krowy; ruja; wykrywanie rui; metody; automatyczne systemy wykrywania rui; dokladnosc

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Medycyna Weterynaryjna
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 74
• Numer: 07
• Opis fizyczny: s.434-440,tab.,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Jaskowski J.M.

• Centrum Weterynarii, Uniwersytet im. Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, ul.Gagarina 7, 87-100 Toruń

autor

Kmiecik J.

• Centrum Weterynarii, Uniwersytet im. Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, ul.Gagarina 7, 87-100 Toruń

autor

Kierbic A.

• Centrum Weterynarii, Uniwersytet im. Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, ul.Gagarina 7, 87-100 Toruń

autor

Herudzinska M.

• Centrum Weterynarii, Uniwersytet im. Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, ul.Gagarina 7, 87-100 Toruń

autor

Wozna-Wysocka M.

• *Zakład Biomedycyny Molekularnej, Instytut Chemii Bioorganicznej Polska Akademi Nauk, ul. Z.Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznań

Bibliografia

• Andersson L. M., Okada H., Miura R., Zhang Y., Yoshioka K., Aso H., Itoh T.: Wearablewireless estrus detection sensor for cows. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2016, 127, 101-108.
• Bobowiec R., Studziński T., Babiarz A.: Thermoregulatory effects and electrical conductivity in vagina of cowduringoestrouscycle. Arch. Exp. Vet. Med. 1989, 44, 573-579.
• Brehme U., Ahlers D., Laufeld P., Scheibl P., Scherping E., Werner D.: Brunsterkennung und Gesundheitsüberwachung mittels sensorgestützter Funkdatenlogger. Bau, Technik und Umwelt in der landwirtschaftlichen Nutztierhaltung, Beiträge zur 2001, 5, 44-49.
• Brehme U., Stollberg U., Holz R., Schleusener T.: ALT pedometer – New sensor-aided measurement system for improvement in oestrus detection. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2008, 62, 73-80.
• Burnett T. A., Madureira A. M., Silper B. F., Fernandes A. C. C., Cerri R. L.: Integrating an automated activity monitor into an artificial insemination program and the associated risk factors affecting reproductive performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 1006, 5005-5018.
• Cavalieri J., Eagles V. E., Ryan M., Macmillan K. L.: Comparison of four methods for detection of oestrus in dairy cows with resynchronised oestrous cycles. Aust. Vet. J. 2003, 81, 422-425.
• Chanvallon A., Coyral-Castel S., Gatien J., Lamy J. M., Ribaud D., Allain C., Clément P., Salvetti P.: Comparison of three devices for the automated detection of estrus in dairy cows. Theriogenology 2014, 82, 734-741.
• DeJarnette J. M., Salverson R. R., Marshall C. E.: Incidence of premature estrus in lactating dairy cows and conception rates to standing estrus or fixedtime inseminations after synchronization using GnRH and PGF 2α. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2001, 67, 27-35.
• Delwiche M., Tang X., BonDurant R., Munro C.: Estrus detection with a progesterone biosensor. Transactions of the ASAE 2001, 44, 2003-2008.
• Denis-Robichaud J., Cerri R. L. A., Jones-Bitton A., LeBlanc S. J.: Survey of reproduction management on Canadian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 9339-9351.
• Dolecheck K. A., Heersche G. Jr., Bewley J. M.: Retention payoff-based cost per day open regression equations: Application in a user-friendly decision support tool for investment analysis of automated estrus detection technologies. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 10182-10193.
• Dolecheck K. A., Silvia W. J., Heersche G. Jr., Wood C. L., McQuerry K. J., Bewley J. M.: A comparison of timed artificial insemination and automated activity monitoring with hormone intervention in 3 commercial dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 1506-1514.
• DuPonte M.: The basics of heat (estrus) detection in cattle. Cooperative Extension Service, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Mānoa 2007.
• Firk R., Stamer E., Junge W., Krieter J.: Automation of oestrus detection in dairy cows: a review. Livest Prod Sci. 2002, 75, 219-232.
• Fischer-Tenhagen C., Wetterholm L., Tenhagen B. A., Heuwieser W.: Training dogs on a scent platform for oestrus detection in cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2011, 131, 63-70.
• Fricke P. M., Carvalho P. D., Giordano J. O., Valenza A., Lopes G. Jr., Amundson M. C.: Expression and detection of estrus in dairy cows: the role of new technologies. Animal. 2014, 8, 134-143.
• Fricke P. M., Giordano J. O., Valenza A., Lopes G. Jr., Amundson M. C., Carvalho P. D.: Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows managed for first service using timed artificial insemination with or without detection of estrus using an activity monitoring system. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 2771-2781.
• Frinke P., Valenza A., Lopez Jr. G., Amundson M. C., Giordano J. O.: Assesment of an accelerometer system for detection of estrus and timing of artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. Ir. Vet. J. 2014, 4, 130-138.
• Galon N.: The use of pedometry for estrus detection in dairy cows in Israel. J. Reprod. Dev. 2010, 56, 48-52.
• Galvão K. N., Federico P., De Vries A., Schuenmann A. M.: Economic comparison of reproductive programs for dairy herds using estrus detection, timed artificial insemination, or a combination. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 2681-2693.
• Gil Z., Szarek J., Felenczak A., Nowak C.: Wykorzystanie pomiaru temperatury mleka jako niekonwencjonalnej metody wykrywania rui, schorzeń gruczołu mlekowego i innych chorób oraz ciąży u krów. Med. Weter. 2013, 49, 82-85.
• Guliński P.: Cechy funkcjonalne i ich rola we współczesnej hodowli bydła. Cz. II. Komórki somatyczne mleka, płodność, kondycja, pokrój krów. Przegląd Hodowlany 2011, 79, 13-16.
• Harris B. L., Hempstalk K., de le Rue B. T., Jago J. G., McGowan J. E.: Improving the power of activity-based heat detection using additional automatically captured data. Proceeding New Zealand Society Animal Production, Hamilton, New Zealand 2010, 299-302.
• Ipema A. H., Goenze D., Hogewerf P. H., Houwers H. W. J., van Roest H.: Pilot study to monitor body temperature of dairy cows with a rumen boluss. Comput. Electron. Agr. 2008, 64, 49-52.
• Jędruś A.: Ocena funkcjonalna nowych czujników temperatury mleka. Technika Rolnicza Ogrodnicza Leśna 2015, 6, 23-25.
• King J. O.: The effect of oestrus on milk production in cows. Vet. Rec. 1977, 101, 107-108.
• Kozdrowski R., Twardoń J., Dejneka G. J., Dzięcioł M.: Wpływ nasilenia objawów rujowych oraz kondycji na wyniki unasienniania bydła. Med. Weter. 2006, 62, 969-1088.
• Lehrer A. R., Lewis G. S., Azinbud E.: Oestrus detection in cattle: recent developments. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1992, 28, 355-361.
• Liu X., Spahr S. L.: Automated Electronic Activity Measurement for Detection of Estrus in Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 2906-2912.
• McArthur A. J., Easdon M. P., Gregson K.: Milk temperature and detection of oestrus in dairy cattle. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 1992, 51, 29-46.
• McGowan J. E., Burke C. R.: Validation of a technology for objectively measuring behawior in dairy cows and its application for oestrus detection. Procced Of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 2007, 67, 136-142.
• Michaelis I.: Activity monitoring in dairycattle: Evaluation of a technical estrus detection device. Doctoral dissertation, Freie Universität, Berlin 2016.
• Michaelis I., Burfeind O., Heuwieser W.: Evaluation of oestrous detection in dairy cattle comparing an automated activity monitoring system to visual observation. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2014, 49, 621-628.
• Michaelis I., Hasenpusch E., Heuwieser W.: Estrus detection in dairy cattle: Changes after the introduction of an automated activity monitoring system? Tierarztl Prax. 2013, 41, 159-165.
• Mollenhorst E., Griffioen G., Nielen M., Werven van T.: The use of body temperature to detect estrus and predict optimal time of insemination. The First North American Conference on Precision Dairy Management, 2010.
• Müller R., Schroder L.: A new method to measure behavioral activity levels in dairy cows. Applied Behaviour Science 2003, 83, 247-258.
• Nelson S. T., Haadem C. S., Nødtvedt A., Hessle A., Martin A. D.: Automated activity monitoring and visual observation of estrus in a herd of loose housed Hereford cattle: Diagnostic accuracy and time to ovulation. Theriogenology 2017, 87, 205-211.
• Neves R. C., Leslie K. E., Walton J. S., Leblanc S. J.: Reproductive performance with an automated activity monitoring system versus a synchronized breeding program. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 5683-9563.
• Peralta O. A., Pearson R. E., Nebel R. L.: Comparison of three estrus detection systems during summer in a large commercial dairy herd. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2005, 87, 59-72.
• Redden K. D., Kennedy A. D., Ingalls J. R., Gilson T. L.: Detection of estrus by radiotelemetric monitoring of vaginal and ear skin temperature and pedometer measurements of activity. J. Dairy Sci. 1993, 76, 713-721.
• Roelofs J. B., Van Eerdenburg F., Soede N. M., Kemp B.: Various behavioral signs of estrous and their relationship with time of ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1366-1377.
• Roelofs J. B., Van Erp-van der Kooij E.: Estrus detection tools and their applicability in cattle: recent and perspectival situation. Anim. Reprod. 2015, 12, 498-504.
• Rorie R. W., Bilby T. R., Lester T. D.: Application of electronic estrus detection technologies to reproductive management of cattle. Theriogenology 2002, 57, 137-148.
• Roth H.: Automatisches Erkennen des Konzeptions-optimums bei Milchkühen mit Hilfe rechnergestützter Systeme zur Herdenüberwachung. Landbauforsch. Voelkenrode, Sonderh. 1987, 83.
• Sakatani M., Takahashi M., Takenouchi N.: The efficiency of vaginal temperature measurement for detection of estrus in Japanese Black cows. J. Reprod. Develop. 2016, 62, 201-207.
• Schofield S. A., Phillips C. J. C., Owens A. R.: Variation in the milk production, activity rate and electrical impedance of cervical mucus over the oestrous period of dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1991, 24, 231-248.
• Secchiari P., Romagnoli S., Mele M., Ferramosca R.: Use of a computerized pedometer for heat detection in dairy cows. Zoot. Nutr. Anim. 1998, 24, 119-124.
• Stevenson J. S., Hill S. L., Nebel R. L.: Ovulation timing and conception risk after automated activity monitoring in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 4296-4308.
• Suthar V. S., Burfeind O., Patel J. S., Dhami A. J., Heuwieser W.: Body temperature around induced estrus in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 2368-2373.
• Talukder S., Kerrisk K. L., Ingenhoff L., Thomson P. C., Garcia S. C., Celi P.: Infrared technology for estrus detection and as a predictor of time of ovulation in dairy cows in a pasture-based system. Theriogenology 2014, 81, 925-935.
• Kumar P., Rao S., Krishna T., Kumar N., Chaurasia S., Patel N. B.: Heat detection techniques in cattle and buffalo. Veterinary World 2013, 6, 363-369.
• Valenza A. J., Giordano O., Lopes G. Jr., Vincenti L., Amundson M. C., Fricke P. M.: Assessment of an accelerometer system for detection of estrus and for treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone at the time of insemination in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 7115-7127.
• Vazquez Diostado J. A., Barker Z. E., Hodges H. R., Amory J. R., Croft D. P., Bell N. J., Codling N. A.: Classification of behaviour in housed dairy cows using an accelerometer-based activity monitoring system. Animal Biotelemetry 2015, 3, 15.
• Zimmermann L., Martin R., Zerbe H.: Automatisierte Fruchtbarkeits- und Gesundheitsüberwachung bei der Milchkuh. Tierarztl Prax. 2016, 44, 242-251.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21521/mw.5989