Differences in ground reaction forces during landing between volleyball spikes

• Autorzy: Kabacinski J. , Murawa M. , Dworak L.B. , Maczynski J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Introduction. The peak values of the vertical ground reaction force in the landing phase of attacks suggest a external loads of volleyball player. The high dynamic loads during landing in volleyball jumps may cause lower extremity injuries. Aim of Study. The main purpose of this study was to compare the impact forces between three different volleyball attack techniques. Material and Methods. Twelve female volleyball players (mean±standard deviation: age 22.3±4.2 years, body height 183.0±8.7 cm, body mass 74.4±10.9 kg) participated in the laboratory tests. A force platform was used to measure the ground reaction forces (GRFs) during landing in volleyball spikes. The vertical (v) component of GRF and horizontal (h) components (resultant) of GRFs, buildup index of these forces (vBIF, hBIF) and time to peak GRF (Tv, Th) were analyzed. Results. No significant differences in Tv and Th (from 0.05±0.01 s to 0.06±0.01 s) between the three volleyball jumps were demonstrated (p<0.05). Significant differences in the peak vGRF, hGRF, vBIF and hBIF between the back row attack and front row attack (23.7%, 18.2%, 38.2% and 29.7%, respectively), and between the back row attack and slide attack (21.1%, 27.3%, 28.7% and 26.4%, respectively) were found (p<0.05). The highest values of peak vGRF (3.8±0.3 BW∙m⁻¹), peak hGRF (1.1±0.2 BW∙m⁻¹), vBIF (79.4±14.6 BW∙m⁻¹∙s⁻¹) and hBIF (21.2±7.2 BW∙m⁻¹∙s⁻¹) were obtained during landing in the back row attack (p<0.05). Conclusions. The peak vGRF and vBIF during landing in volleyball spikes ranged: from approximately 3 to 4 BW∙m⁻¹ (vGRF) and from approximately 50 to 80 BW∙m⁻¹∙s⁻¹ (vBIF), and were several times higher than hGRF and hBIF. Increased impact forces in spikes indicate higher external loads during landings and a greater risk of lower extremity injuries in female volleyball players.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Trends in Sport Sciences
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 24
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.87-92,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Kabacinski J.

• Department of Biomechanics, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland

autor

Murawa M.

• Department of Biomechanics, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland

autor

Dworak L.B.

• Department of Bionics, University of Arts, Poznan, Poland

autor

Maczynski J.

• Department of Biomechanics, Poznan University of Physical Education, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Adrian MJ, Lauglin CK. Magnitude of ground reaction forces while performing volleyball skills. In: Matsui H, Kobayashi K, eds., Biomechanics VIII-B, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1983. pp. 903-914.
• 2. Bisseling RW, Hof AL, Bredeweg SW, et al. Relationship between landing strategy and patellar tendinopathy in volleyball. Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41: 264-268.
• 3. Blackburn JT, Padua DA. Sagittal-plane trunk position, landing forces, and quadriceps electromyographic activity. J Athl Tr. 2009; 44: 174-179.
• 4. Boden BP, Torg JS, Knowles SB, et al. Video analysis of anterior cruciate ligament injury: abnormalities in hip and ankle kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 252-259.
• 5. Briner WW Jr, Kacmar L. Common injuries in volleyball. Mechanisms of injury, prevention and rehabilitation. Sports Med. 1997; 24: 65-71.
• 6. Colby S, Francisco A, Yu B, et al. Electromyographic and kinematic analysis of cutting maneuvers. Implications for anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med. 2000; 28: 234-240.
• 7. Cortes N, Morrison S, van Lunen BL, et al. Landing technique affects knee loading and position during athletic tasks. J Sci Med Sport. 2012; 15: 175-181.
• 8. Dufek JT, Bates BT. The evaluation and prediction of impact forces during landings. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990; 22: 370-377.
• 9. Ferretti A, Papandrea P, Conteduca F, et al. Knee ligament injuries in volleyball players. Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20: 203-207.
• 10. Fu W, Liu Y, Zhang S. Effects of footwear on impact forces and soft tissue vibrations during drop jumps and unanticipated drop landings. Int J Sports Med. 2013; 34: 477-483.
• 11. Hewett TE, Stroupe AL, Nance TA, et al. Plyometric training in female athletes. Decreased impact forces and increased hamstring torques. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24: 765-773.
• 12. Hughes G, Watkins J, Owen N. Differences between the sexes in knee kinetics during landing from volleyball block jumps. Eur J Sport Sci. 2010; 10: 1-11.
• 13. Lian O, Engebretsen L, Ovrebo RV, et al. Characteristics of the leg extensors in male volleyball players with jumper’s knee. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24: 380-385.
• 14. Lian O, Refsnes PE, Engebretsen L, et al. Performance characteristics of volleyball players with patellar tendinopathy. Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 408-413.
• 15. Lobietti R, Coleman S, Pizzichillo E, et al. Landing technique in volleyball. J Sports Sci. 2010; 28: 1469-1476.
• 16. Madigan LM, Pidcoe PE. Changes in landing biomechanics during a fatiguing landing activity. J Electromyogr Kines. 2003; 13: 491-498.
• 17. Malliaras P, Cook JL, Kent P. Reduced ankle dorsiflexion range may increase the risk of patellar tendon injury among volleyball players. J Sci Med Sport. 2006; 9: 304- -309.
• 18. Mills C, Pain MTG, Yeadon MR. Reducing ground reaction forces in gymnastics’ landings may increase internal loading. J Biomech. 2009; 42: 671-678.
• 19. Olsen OE, Mykelbust G, Engebretsen L, et al. Injury mechanisms for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in team handball: a systematic video analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 1002-1012.
• 20. Reeser JC, Verhagen E, Briner WW, et al. Strategies for the prevention of volleyball related injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2006; 40: 594-600.
• 21. Richards DP, Ajemian SV, Wiley JP, et al. Relation between ankle joint dynamics and patellar tendinopathy in elite volleyball players. Clin J Sport Med. 2002; 12: 266-272.
• 22. Salci Y, Kentel BB, Heycan C, et al. Comparison of landing maneuvers between male and female college volleyball players. Clin Biomech. 2004; 19: 622-628.
• 23. Sorenson SC, Arya S, Souza RB, et al. Knee extensor dynamics in the volleyball approach jump: the influence of patellar tendinopathy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010; 40: 568-576.
• 24. Tillman MD, Hass CJ, Brunt D, et al. Jumping and landing techniques in elite women’s volleyball. J Sports Sci Med. 2004; 3: 30-36.
• 25. Tokuyama M, Ohashi H, Iwamoto H, et al. Individuality and reproducibility in high-speed motion of volleyball spike jumps by phase-matchingand averaging. J Biomech. 2005; 38: 2050-2057.
• 26. Van der Worp H, de Poel HJ, Diercks RL, et al. Jumper’s Knee or Lander’s Knee? A Systematic Review of the Relation between Jump Biomechanics and Patellar Tendinopathy. Int J Sports Med. 2014; 35: 714-722.
• 27. Visnes H, Bahr R. Training volume and body composition as risk factors for developing jumper’s knee among young elite volleyball players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 23: 607-613.
• 28. Withrow TJ, Huston LJ, Wojtys EM, et al. The effect of an impulsive knee valgus moment on in vitro relative ACL strain during a simulated jump landing. Clin Biomech. 2006; 21: 977-983.
• 29. Young MA, Cook JL, Purdam CR, et al. Eccentric decline squat protocol offers superior results at 12 months compared with traditional eccentric protocol for patellar tendinopathy in volleyball players. Br J Sports Med. 2005; 39: 102-105.