Efektywność projektów reintrodukcji głuszca (Tetrao urogallus) w Europie

• Autorzy: Merta D. , Zawadzka D. , Krzywinski A.

Warianty tytułu

EN

Effectiveness of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) reintroduction projects in Europe

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The study focuses on capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) and other Galliformes birds reintroduction projects carried out in Europe since the 1950s. In Germany alone, there have been eleven projects involving the release of a total of ca. 5,000 caprcaillies, mainly obtained from the closed breeding centres. The majority of birds died shortly after release. The high mortality was caused by great pressure from predators and the poor adaptation of the birds bred in captivity to the wild−life conditions. The high mortality among the birds from artificial breeding is associated with changed morphology (e.g. shorter digestive tract, less−developed pectoral muscles), physiology, and behaviour (insufficiently developed social and anti−predatory behavioural mechanisms). Survival rates among the birds released into the wild were primarily affected by the method of breeding and release, quality of habitat, and pressure from predators. The survival rates of translocated birds were higher than those obtained from traditional breeding in aviaries. Better results were also obtained with the 'born to be free' method of breeding and release based on social contact between the mother and chicks. The following actions are obligatory in reintroduction projects: predators reduction, evaluation and improvement in the quality of environment, as well as long−term monitoring of birds. The factors crucial for the effectiveness are: the total number of birds released, the number of released birds in subsequent years, and the overall duration of the project.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

lesnictwo; lowiectwo; ptaki lowne; gluszec; Tetrao urogallus; hodowla zwierzat; metoda born to be free; zagrozenia zwierzat; drapiezniki; warunki siedliskowe; reintrodukcja; Europa

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Sylwan
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 159
• Numer: 10
• Opis fizyczny: s.863-871,bibliogr.

Twórcy

autor

Merta D.

• Zakład Ekologii i Ochrony Środowiska, Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie, ul.Podbrzezie 3, 31-054 Kraków

autor

Zawadzka D.

• Instytut Nauk Leśnych, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Filia w Tomaszowie Mazowieckim, ul.Konstytucji 3 Maja 65/67, 97-200 Tomaszów Mazowiecki

autor

Krzywinski A.

• Park Dzikich Zwierząt Kadzidłowo, Kadzidłowo 2, 12-220 Ruciane-Nida

Bibliografia

• Aschenbrenner H. 1982. Keeping and rearing of grouse in enclosures, problems and experience. W: Lovel T. W. I. [red.]. Proc. of Int. Symp. on Grouse. Edinburgh. 212-218.
• Bejcek V., Stastny K., Marhoul P., Bufka L., Cerveny J. 2007. Results of Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) recovery programme in the Czech Republic. Abstracts of XXVIII Congress of IUGB, Uppsala, Sweden.
• Bergmann H. H., Seiler C., Klaus S. 2000. Release projects with Grouse – a plea for translocations. Proceedings of the International Conference in Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republik, 24-26 March 2000. 33-42.
• Bielczyk E. 2010. Wpajanie cech człowieka na przykładzie wybranych gatunków zwierząt. Kosmos 59 (3-4): 451-457.
• Braunisch V., Suchant R. 2007. A model for evaluating the ‘habitat potential’ of a landscape for capercaillie Tetrao urogallus: a tool for conservation planning. Wildl. Biol. 13 (1): 21-33.
• Brzeziecki B., Drozdowski S., Zawadzka D., Zawadzki J. 2012. Quantification of ecological preferences of the Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus by means of the Habitat Suitability Index: a case study in the Augustów Forest. Pol. J. Ecol. 60 (4): 233-242.
• Dickens M. J., Delehanty D. J., Romero L. M. 2010. Stress: An inevitable component of animal translocation. Biol. Cons. 143: 1329-1341.
• Dziedzic R., Steliga L., Rzońca Z. 2008. Hodowla i restytucja głuszca w Lasach Państwowych. W: Ochrona kuraków leśnych. CILP, Warszawa. 101-111.
• Ewen J. G., Armstrong D. P., Parker K. A., Seddon P. J. 2012. Reintroduction Biology: Integrating Science and Management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• Graf R. F., Bollmann K., Suter W., Bugmann H. 2005. The importance of spatial scale in habitat models: capercaillie in the Swiss Alps. Landsc. Ecol. 20: 703-717.
• Grimm V., Storch I. 2000. Minimum viable population size of capercaillie Tetrao urogallus: results from a stochastic model. Wildl. Biol. 6 (4): 219-225.
• Hagemeijer W., Blair M. [red.]. 1997. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds. Poyser, London.
• Hĺkansson J. 2007. Behavioral aspects of conservation breeding Red junglwfawl (Gallus gallus) as a case study. Diss. No 1137. Linkoping University, Sweden.
• IUCN. 2009. Guidelines for Reintroductions of Galliformes for Conservation Purposes. SSC Re-introduction Specialists Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: Word Pheasant Association.
• Kamieniarz R., Panek M. 2008. Zwierzęta łowne w Polsce na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Stacja Badawcza OHZ PZŁ w Czempiniu.
• Klaus S., Bergmann H. H. 1994. Distribution, status and limiting factors of capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) in Central Europe, particularly in Germany, including an evaluation of reintroductions. W: Restoration plans for some European galliformes: hazel grouse, capercaillie and black grouse. Gibier Faune Sauvage 11: 57-80.
• Krzywiński A., Kasperczyk B. 1998. Głuszec i cietrzew w hodowli zamkniętej. Łowiec Polski 6: 18-19.
• Krzywiński A., Keller M., Kobus A. 2011. Wsiedlanie kuraków leśnych metodą „born to be free”. Studia i Materiały CEPL, Rogów 13, 2 (27): 241-251.
• Krzywiński A., Keller M., Kobus A. 2013. ‘Born to be free’ an innovatory method of restitution and protection of endangered and isolated grouse population (Tetraonidae). Vogelwelt 134 (1): 55-64.
• Krzywiński A., Kobus A. 2009. Doskonalenie półnaturalnego odchowu cietrzewi metodą „born to be free” i pierwsze obserwacje w zastosowaniu jej u głuszców. W: Bobek B., Mikoś J., Wasilewski R. [red.]. Gospodarka łowiecka i ochrona populacji dzikich zwierząt na Pomorzu Gdańskim. PTL, RDLP w Gdańsku. 349-365.
• Kurki S., Helle P., Linden H., Nikula A. 1997. Breeding success of black grouse and capercaillie in relation to mammalian predator densities on two spatial scales. Oikos 79: 301-310.
• Lindner U., Thieleman L. 2013. A pilot study for reintroduction of the Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus in the Lower Lusatia region – a first interim report. Vogelwelt 134: 83-90.
• Liukkonen-Anttila T., Saartoala R., Hissa R. 2000. Impact of hand-rearing on morphology and physiology of the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus). Comp. Biochem. and Physiol. 125: 211-221.
• Mäkinen T., Pyornila A., Putaala A., Hissa R. 1997. Effects of captive rearing on Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus physiology and anatomy. Wildl. Biol. 3: 294.
• Marcström V., Kenward R., Engren E. 1988. The impact of predation on boreal tetraonids during vole cycles: an experimental study. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 859-872.
• Marshall K., Edward-Jones G. 1998. Reintroducing capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) into southern Scotland: identification of minimum viable populations at potential release sites. Biol. Conserv. 7: 275-296.
• Merta D., Kobielski J., Krzywiński A., Rzońca Z. 2013. Preliminary results of the Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) recovery program in Bory Dolnośląskie Forest, south-western Poland. Vogelwelt 134: 65-74.
• Merta D., Kobielski J., Krzywiński A., Theuerkauf J., Gula R. 2015. Mother-assisted rearing (‘born to be free’ method) increases post-release survival and reduces the exploratory movements of young Capercaillies. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 61 (2): 299-302.
• Nappee C. 2008. Le Grand Tetras (Tetrao urogallus) dans les Cevennes: histoire d’une reintroduction difficile. Ornithos 15: 282-293.
• Nasiadka P., Świtalska T. 2014. Ocena potencjalnych zasobów pokarmowych i osłon dla kuropatwy w miejscach ich reintrodukcji w warunkach rolnictwa ekstensywnego. Sylwan 158 (7): 539-552.
• Panek M. 1988. Study of introduction of aviary-reared partridges. Proc. of common partridge (Perdix perdix). Polish Hunting Association: 217-224.
• Parish D. M. B., Sotherton N. W. 2007. The fate of released captive-reared grey partridges Perdix perdix: implications for reintroduction programmes. Wildl. Biol. 13: 140-149.
• Putaala A., Hissa R. 1995. Effects of hand-rearing on physiology and anatomy in the grey partridge. Wildl. Biol. 1: 27-31.
• Putaala A., Hissa R. 1998. Breeding dispersal and demography of wild and hand-reared grey partridges Perdix perdix in Finland. Wildl. Biol. 4: 137-145.
• Robertson P. A. 1989. Survival of released pheasant Phasianus colchicus in Ireland. Jour. of Zool. 214: 683-695.
• Romanov A. N. 1988. Gluchar. Agropromizdat, Moskwa.
• Rzońca Z. 2011. Hodowla głuszców w Nadleśnictwie Wisła. Nadleśnictwo Wisła.
• Sage R. B., Putaala A., Pradell-Ruiz V., Greenall T. L., Woodburn M. I. A., Draycott R. A. H. 2003. Incubation success of released hand reared pheasant (Phasianus colchicus) compared with wild ones. Wildl. Biol. 9: 179-184.
• Schroth K. E. 1991. Survival, movements and habitat selection of released Capercaillie in the north-east Black Forest in 1984-1989. Ornis Scandinavica 22: 249-254.
• Seiler Ch., Angelstam P., Bergmann H. H. 2000. Conservation Releases of captive reared Grouse in Europe. What do we know and what do we need? Cahiers d’Ethologie 20: 235-252.
• Siano R., Bairlein F., Exo K. M., Herzog S. A. 2006. Survival, causes of death and spacing of captive-reared Capercaillies (Tetrao urogallus L.) released in the Harz Mountains National Park. Vogelwarte 44: 145-158.
• Siano R., Herzog S. A., Exo K. M., Bairlein F. 2011. Nahrungswahl ausgewilderter Auerhühner (Tetrao urogallus L.) im Harz. Vogelwarte 49: 137-148.
• Siano R., Klaus S. 2013. Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus release projects in Germany after 1950 – a review. Vogelwelt 134: 3-18.
• Sirkiä S., Helle P., Lindén H., Nikula A., Norrdahl K., Saurosa P., Valkeajärvi P. 2011. Persistence of Capercaillie (Tetrao uroagllus) lekking areas depends on forest cover and fine-grain fragmentation of boreal forest landscapes. Ornis Fenn. 88: 14-29.
• Sokos C. K., Birtsas P. K., Tsachalidis E. P. 2008. The aims of galliforms release and choice of techniques. Wildl. Biol. 14: 412-422.
• Starling A. 1991. Captive breeding and release. Ornis Scand. 22: 255-257.
• Storch I. 2002. On spatial resolution in habitat models: Can small-scale forest structure explain capercaillie numbers? http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art6
• Storch I. [red.]. 2007. Grouse – Status Survey and Action Plan 2006-2010 IUCN. Gland Switzerland and Cambridge UK. and World Pheasant Association. Fordinbridge, UK.
• Strauss E., Sodeikat G. 2008. Reintroduction projects of black grouse (Tetrao tetrix) in Germany failed. Abstracts of 11th International Grouse Symposium. Whitehorse, Yukon Territory, Canada, 11-15 September 2008.
• Tomiałojć L. 1992. Obawy związane z rozmnażaniem dzikich zwierząt w niewoli jako metodą ochrony gatunków. KOP PAN, Warszawa.
• Unger C., Klaus S. 2008. A translocation study using capercaillie Tetrao urogallus from Central Russia. Grouse News 36: 16-20.
• Wagner E. 1987. Effect of inadequate predator control on the reintroduction of capercaillie. The 4th International Grouse Symposium. Lam, West Germany.
• Walker A. 2010. The reintroduction of black grouse to the Isle of Arran, Scotland. Grouse News 40: 13-16.
• Wolf C. M., Griffith B., Reed C., Temple S. A. 1996. Avian and mammalian translocations: update and reanalysis of 1987 survey data. Cons. Biol. 10: 1142-1154.
• Zawadzka D. 2014. Podręcznik najlepszych praktyk ochrony głuszca i cietrzewia. Centrum Koordynacji Projektów Środowiskowych, Warszawa.