Parasitic gastropod bioerosion trace fossil on Cenomanian oysters from Le Mans, France and its ichnologic and taphonomic context

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

We describe and name Loxolenichnus stellatocinctus Breton and Wisshak igen. et isp. nov., a bioerosion trace fossil on an Upper Cenomanian oyster from Le Mans (France). This trace is attributed here to a parasitic gastropod. The characteristics of this ichnospecies are a combination of one or several, vertical or oblique, complete penetrations, and an asymmetrical attachment etching (fixichnion) with a diagnostic set of stellate grooves increasingly distinct towards the margin of the trace. By including two former Oichnus ichnospecies, Loxolenichnus halo comb. nov. and Loxolenichnus taddei comb. nov., Oichnus, is now constrained to pure predation traces (praedichnia). The numerous oysters collected from the Marnes à Pycnodonte biauriculata Formation show associated epibionts and encrusters as well as borers and scrapers. Encrusters comprise 24 taxa while bioerosion trace fossils comprise 17 ichnotaxa ranging from very rare (< 0.1%) to quite abundant (81%). The taphonomic history leading to an ex-situ condensation of these oysters is complex. Both the Gnathichnus and Entobia ichnofacies are represented on the shellgrounds, presumably alternatingly.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

France; Paris Basin; Cretaceous; Late Cretaceous; Cenomanian; Gastropoda; Ostreidae; parasitic gastropod; trace fossil; taphonomy; bioerosion; paleontology; paleozoology

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: 62
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.45–57,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

Bibliografia

• Adams, A. 1860. On a new genus and some new species of Mollusca from Japan. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 3: 414–422.
• Agassiz, L. 1840–1845. Etudes critiques sur les mollusques fossiles. 58+287 pp. De Petitpierre and de H. Wolfrath, Neuchâtel.
• Beuck, L., López-Correa, M., and Freiwald, A. 2008. Biogeographical distribution of Hyrrokkin (Rosalinidae, Foraminifera) and its host-specific morphological and textural trace variability. In: M. Wisshak and L. Tapanila (eds.), Current Developments in Bioerosion. Erlangen Earth Conference Series, 329–360. Springer, Berlin.
• Bongrain, M. 1995. Traces de bioérosion sur un Pectinidae (Bivalvia) du Miocène d’Aquitaine (SO France): un cas possible de commensalisme entre Pectinidae et Capulidae. Geobios 28: 347–358.
• Bottjer, D.J. 1982. Paleoecology of epizoans and borings on some Upper Cretaceous chalk oysters from the Gulf Coast. Lethaia 15: 75–84.
• Bromley, R.G. 1975. Comparative analysis of fossil and recent echinoid bioerosion. Palaeontology 18: 725–739.
• Bromley, R.G. 1981. Concepts in ichnotaxonomy illustrated by small round holes in shells. Acta Geológica Hispánica 16: 55–64.
• Bromley, R.G. 1992. Bioerosion: Eating rocks for fun and profit. In: C.G. Maples and R.R. West (eds.), Trace Fossils. Short Courses in Paleontology No. 5, 121–129. Paleontological Society, Knoxville.
• Bromley, R.G. and Heinberg, K. 2006. Attachment strategy of organisms on hard substrates: A palaeontological view. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 232: 429–453.
• Bromley, R.G. and Martinell, J. 1991. Centrichnus, new ichnogenus for centrically patterned attachment scars on skeletal substrates. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark 38: 243–252.
• Bromley, R.G. and Surlyk, F. 1973. Borings produced by brachiopod pedicles, fossil and Recent. Lethaia 6: 349–365.
• Bronn, H.G. 1837–1838. Lethea Geognostica oder Abbildungen und Beschri bung der für die Gebirgs-Formationen bezeichnendsten Versteinerungen. II: Das Kreide und Molassen-Gebirge [plates: 1837; text: 1838], 545–1350. Schweitzerbart, Stuttgart.
• Brünnich Nielsen, K. 1931. Serpulidae from the Senonian and Danian deposits of Denmark. Meddelelser fra Geologisk Forening 8: 71–113.
• Crosse, M.H. 1858. Diagnoses de coquilles nouvelles. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie Pure et Appliquée 2 (10): 81.
• Desmarest, A.G. 1825. Oursin. In: J.L.M. Defrance (ed.), Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles, Tome 37, 59–102. F.G. Levrault, Strasbourg.
• Dhondt, A.V. 1984. The unusual Cenomanian oyster Pycnodonte biauriculatum. Geobios (Mémoire Spécial) 8: 53–61.
• El-Hedeny, M. 2007. Encrustation and bioerosion on Middle Miocene bivalve shells and echinoid skeletons: paleoenvironmental implications. Revue de Paléobiologie 26: 381–389.
• Farinati, E. and Zavala, C. 2002. Trace fossils on shelly substrate. An example from the Miocene of Patagonia, Argentina. Acta Geologica Hispanica 37: 29–36.
• Freneix, S. and Viaud, J.-M. 1986. Huîtres du Crétacé supérieur du bassin de Challans Commequiers (Vendée). Biostratigraphie, taxinomie, paléobiologie. Bulletin Trimestriel de la Société Géologique de Normandie et des Amis du Muséum du Havre 73: 13–79.
• de Gibert, J.M., Domènech, R., and Martinell, J. 2007. Bioerosion in shell beds from the Pliocene Roussillon Basin, France: Implications for the (macro)bioerosion ichnofacies model. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52: 738–798.
• Goldfuss, A. 1826–1844. Petrefacta Germaniae. Vol. 1 (1826–1833) viii+252 pp.; Vol. 2 (1834–1840) iii+312 pp.; Vol. 3 (1841–1844) iv+128 pp. Arnz and Co., Dusseldorf.
• Guéranger, E. 1867. Album paléontologique du département de la Sarthe, représentant au moyen de la photographie les fossiles recueillis dans cette circonscription. 20 pp. De Beauvais et Vallienne, Le Mans.
• Guillier, A. 1886. Géologie du Département de la Sarthe. 430 pp. Monnoyer, Le Mans.
• von Hagenow, F. 1840. Monographie der Rügenschen Kreideversteinerungen, II. Radiarien und Annulaten, nebst Nachträgen zur ersten Abtheilung. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde 1840: 629–672.
• Juignet, P. 1974. La Transgression crétacée sur la bordure Orientale du Massif Armoricain. Aptien, Albien, Cénomanien de Normandie et du Maine. Le Stratotype du Cénomanien. 806 pp. Thèse de Doctorat d’État, University Caen, Caen [CNRS AO 9.643].
• Juignet, P. 1980. Cénomanien. In: C. Mégnien and F. Mégnien (eds.), Synthèse géologique du Bassin de Paris, Vol. 1: Stratigraphie et paléogéographie. Mémoire BRGM 101: 292–297.
• Kabat, A.R. 1990. Predatory ecology of naticid gastropods with review of shell boring predation. Malacologia 32: 155–193.
• Kaim, A., Jenkins, R.G., Tanabe, K., and Kiel, S. 2014. Mollusks from late Mesozoic seep deposits, chiefly in California. Zootaxa 3861: 401–440.
• Kase, T. and Ishikawa, M. 2003. Mystery of naticid predation history solved: evidence from a “living fossil” species. Geology 31: 403–406.
• Kelley, P.H. and Hansen, T.H. 2003. The fossil record of drilling predation on bivalves and gastropods. In: P.H. Kelley, M. Kowalewski, and T.H. Hansen (eds.), Predator—Prey Interactions in the Fossil Record. Topics in Geobiology 20: 113–139. Plenum Press, New York
• Kelly, S.R.A. and Bromley, R.G. 1984. Ichnological nomenclature of clavate borings. Palaeontology 27: 793–807.
• Kiel, S., Campbell, K.A., Elder W.P., and Little C.S.T. 2008. Jurassic and Cretaceous gastropods from hydrocarbon seeps in forearc basin and accretionary prism settings, California. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53: 679–703.
• King, P.P. and Broderip, W.J. 1835. Description of the Cirrhipeda, Conchifera and Mollusca, in a collection formed by the Officers of H.M.S. Adventure and Beagle employed between years 1826 and 1830 in surveying the Southern Coasts of South America, including the Straits of Magalhaens and the Coast of Tierra del Fuego. The Zoological Journal 5: 332–349.
• Kočí, T., Jäger, M., and Morel, N. 2016. Sabellid and serpulid worm tubes (Polychaeta, Canalipalpata, Sabellida) from the historical stratotype of the Cenomanian (Late Cretaceous; Le Mans region, Sarthe, France). Annales de Paléontologie [published online].
• Kollmann, H.A. 2015. Les gastéropodes. In: N. Morel (ed.), Stratotype Cénomanien. Patrimoine géologique 6, 172–178, CD: 64–69. Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris.
• Lamarck, J.B. 1801. Système des animaux sans vertèbres ou tableau général des classes, des ordres et des genres de ces animaux. 432 pp. Déterville, Paris.
• Lamarck, J.B. 1806. Mémoire sur les fossiles des environs de Paris. Annales du Muséum d’Histoire naturelle, Paris 8: 156–166.
• Lamarck, J.B. 1819. Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres, présentant les caractères généraux et particuliers de ces animaux, leur distribution, leurs classes, leurs familles, leurs genres et la citation des principales espèces qui s’y rapportent. Vol. 6. 343 pp. Verdière, Paris.
• Lamouroux, J.V.F. 1821. Exposition méthodique des genres de l’ordre des polypiers avec leur description et celles des principales espèces figu rées dans 74 planches, les 63 premières appartenant à l’histoire naturelle des Zoophytes d’Ellis et Solander. 115 pp. Mme Veuve Agasse, Paris.
• Lopes, R.P. 2011. Ichnology of fossil oysters (Bivalvia, Ostreidae) from the southern Brazilian coast. Journal of Geosciences 7: 94–103.
• MacEachern, J.A., Pemberton, S.G., Gingras, M.K., and Bann, K. 2007. The ichnofacies paradigm: a fifty-year retrospective. In: W. Miller III (ed.), Trace Fossils. Concept, Problems, and Prospects, 52–77. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
• Mägdefrau, K. 1937. Lebensspuren fossiler “Bohr”-Organismen. Beiträge zur Naturkundlichen Forschung in Südwestdeutschland 2: 54–67.
• Matsukuma, A. 1978. Fossil boreholes made by shell-boring predators or commensals. Part 1: Boreholes of capulids gastropods. Venus, Japan Journal of Malacology 37: 29–45.
• Matteucci, R., Manni, R., and Di Bella, L. 2012. Echinoid grazing traces on ostreid shell-ground from the Pliocene Ficulle quarry (central Italy). Journal of Mediterranean Earth Science 4: 71–79.
• Néraudeau, D., Pineau, J.-P., and Dudicourt, J.-C. 2015. Les oursins cénomaniens de l’Ouest de la France (Sarthe et Charentes). In: N. Morel (ed.), Stratotype Cénomanien. Patrimoine Géologique 6, 209–228. Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris.
• Neumann, C. and Wisshak, M. 2009. Gastropod parasitism on Late Cretaceous to Early Paleocene holasteroid echinoids. Evidence from Oichnus halo isp. n. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 284: 115–119.
• Neumann, C., Wisshak, M., Aberhan, M., Girod, P., Rösner, T., and Bromley, R.G. 2015 Centrichnus eccentricus revisited. A new view on anomiid bivalve bioerosion. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 60: 539–549.
• Obert, D. 1988. Notice explicative de la feuille Bouloire. Carte géologique de la France à 1/50000, 359. 32 pp. BRGM éd., Orléans.
• d’Orbigny A. 1842–1843. Paléontologie française. Description des Mollusques et Rayonnés fossiles de France. Terrains Crétacés. Tome II: Gastéro podes. Texte (1842): 456 pp. Atlas (1842–1843): pls. 149–236. Arthus Bertrand, Paris.
• d’Orbigny, A. 1850. Prodrome de paléontologie stratigraphique universelle des animaux Mollusques et Rayonnés, Volume 1. ix + 392 pp. Victor Masson, Paris.
• d’Orbigny, A. 1850–1852. Paléontologie française. Description des Mollusques et Rayonnés fossiles. Terrains crétacés, tome cinquième. Bryozoaires. 1192 pp. Victor Masson, Paris.
• Orr, V. 1963. The drilling habit of Capulus danieli (Crosse) (Mollusca: Gastropoda). The Veliger 5: 63–67.
• Portlock, J.E. 1843. Report on the Geology of the County of Londonderry and of Parts of Tyrone and Fermanagh. xxxi + 748 pp. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Dublin.
• Pulteney, R. 1813. Catalogues of the Birds, Shells and Some of the More Rare Plants of Dorsetshire from the New Enlarged Edition of Mr. Hutchin’s History of That County. 92 pp. J. Nichols, London.
• Reeve, L.A. 1852–1853. Monograph of the Genus Pecten. Conchologia Iconica, Vol. 8. 35 pp. Published by the author, London.
• Ruggiero, E. and Raia, P. 2014. Oichnus taddei, a new fossil trace produced by capulids on brachiopod shells. Spanish Journal of Palaeontology 29: 15–24.
• de Saint-Seine, R. 1956. Les cirripèdes acrothoraciques échinicoles. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 5: 299–303.
• Santos, A., Mayoral, E., and Muñiz, F. 2003. New trace fossils produced by etching molluscs from the Upper Neogene of the Southern Iberian Peninsula. Acta Geologica Polonica 53: 181–188.
• Santos, A., Mayoral, E., and Muñiz, F. 2005. Bioerosion scars of acorn barnacles from the southwestern Iberian Peninsula, Upper Neogene. Rivista Italiana di Paeontologia e Statigrafia 111: 181–189.
• de Sowerby, J.C. 1829. The Mineral Conchiology of Great Britain, Part 1. vii + 234 pp. B. Meredith et al., London.
• Stenzel, H.B. 1971. Oysters. In: R.C. Moore (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part N, Volume 3: Mollusca 6, Bivalvia, N953–1224. The Geological Society of America, Boulder.
• Vermeij, G.J. 1998. Sabia on shells: a specialized pacific-type commensalism in the carribean Neogene. Journal of Paleontology 72: 465–472.
• Videt, B. 2004. Dynamique des paléoenvironnements à huitres du Crétacé Supérieur nord-aquitain (SO France) et du Mio-Pliocène andalou (SE Espagne): biodiversité, analyse séquentielle, biogéochimie. Mémoires Géosciences Rennes 108: 1–261.
• Voigt, E. 1965. Über parasitische Polychaeten in Kreide-Austern sowie einige andere in Muschelschalen bohrende Würmer. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 39: 193–211.
• Voigt, E. 1975. Tunnelbaue rezenter und fossilier Phoronidea. Paläontologisches Zeitschrift 49: 135–167.
• Wisshak, M., Kroh, A., Bertling, M., Knaust, D., Nielsen, J.K., Jagt, J.W.M., Neumann, C., and Nielsen, K.S.S. 2015. In defence of an iconic ichnogenus—Oichnus Bromley, 1981. Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae 85: 445–451.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4202/app.00304.2016