Physicians’ religiosity and attitudes towards patients
Treść / Zawartość
Background: Many religions underline the value of merciful acts, especially the care of the sick. The aim of the survey was to verify the hypothesis that a higher religiosity correlates with a more desirable ethical attitude towards patients. Method: An anonymous questionnaire consisting of standardized tools: Scale of Attitudes towards the Patient (SAtP) (four dimensions: respect for autonomy, altruism, empathy and holistic approach to a patient), the Scale of Religious Attitudes (SReAt) evaluating the religiosity, and some questions related to the role of religious beliefs in respondents’ professional lives. The research was carried out on a group of 528 Polish physicians, 324 of whom returned the questionnaire (return = 61%); 51% women, 49% men; average work experience: 17.03 years; 93% Catholics. Results: Religiosity correlates positively with altruism (r=0.12; p<0.05), holistic approach (r=0.18; p<0.01) and empathy (r=0.20; p<0.01), but not with respect for autonomy. For the majority of physicians, religious faith is an important supportive factor, especially in making difficult decisions. Surgeons are less religious (M=5.32; SD=1.06) than non-surgeons (M=5.61; SD=0.93); (t= -2.59, p<0.05). Conclusion: Physicians’ religiosity is an essential factor shaping their attitude towards patients. The majority of physicians declared that their religious faith influences their professional decisions, especially in difficult situations. The religiosity variable explains physicians’ moral attitude better than the denomination (religious affiliation) variable. Physician-patient relation frameworks should take into account not only patients’ but also physicians’ cultural and religious beliefs.
- Department of Ethics and Human Philosophy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland; Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
- Department of Ethics and Human Philosophy, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
- Department of Bioethics, Anthropology and General Theory of Medicine, College of Management and Public Administration, Zamość, Poland
- 1. Allport GW. The Person in Psychology. Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.
- 2. Hood RW, Spilka B, Hunsberger B, Gorsuch R L. The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. 2nd Edit., New York: Guilford, 2003.
- 3. Batson CD. Altruism and prosocial behavior. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, eds. McGraw-Hill:Boston, 1998: 282-316.
- 4. Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 6th ed. Oxford University Press, 2009.
- 5. Mueller P S, Plevak D J, Rummans T A. Religious Involvement, Spirituality, and Medicine: Implications for clinical Practice. MayoClin Proc. 2001; 76(12): 1225-1235.
- 6. Koenig H G, McCullough M E, Larson D B. Handbook of Religion and Health. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
- 7. Koenig H. Medicine, Religion and Health: where Science and Spirituality Meet. Templeton Foundation Press, 2008.
- 8. Curlin F A, Lantos J D, Roach Ch J, Sellergren S A, et al. Religious Characteristics of U.S. Physicians. A National Survey. J Gen InternMed. 2005; 20(7): 629-634.
- 9. Daaleman T P, Nease D E Jr. Patient attitudes regarding physician inquiry into spiritual and religious issues. J Fam Pract. 1994; 39: 564-568.
- 10. Frank E, Dell M L, Chopp R. Religious characteristics of US women physicians. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 49: 1717-1722.
- 11. Wenger N S, Carmel S. Physicians’ Religiosity and End-of-Life Care Attitudes and Behaviors. Mt Sinai J M. 2004; 71(5): 335-343.
- 12. Curlin F A, Sellergren SA, Lantos J D, Chin M H. Physicians’ observations and interpretations of the influence of religion andspirituality on health. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167(7): 649-54.
- 13. Lawrence R E, Rasinki K A, Yoon J D, Curlin F A. Obstetriciangynecologists’ beliefs about assisted reproductive technologies. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116(1): 127-35.
- 14. Larochelle M R, Rodriguez K L, Arnold R M, et al. Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatmentintensity. Palliat Med 2009; 23: 460-470.
- 15. Curlin F A, Nwodim C, Vance J L, Chin M H, Lantos J D. To Die, to Sleep: US Physicians, Religious and Other Objections to Physician-Assisted Suicide, Terminal Sedation, and Withdrawal of Life Support. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2008; 25(2): 112-120.
- 16. Seale C. The role of doctors’ religious faith and ethnicity in taking ethically controversial decisions during end-of-life care. J Med Ethics.2010; 36 (11): 677-82.
- 17. Harris L H, Cooper A, Rasinski A, Curlin F A, Lyerly A D. Obstetriciangynecologists’ objections to and willingness to help patients obtain anabortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118 (4): 905-12.
- 18. Curlin F A, Dugdale L S, Lantos J D, Chin M H. Do Religious Physicians Disproportionately Care for the Underserved? Ann Fam Med. 2007;5: 353-360.
- 19. Larochelle M R, Rodriguez K L, Arnold R M, et al. Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatmentintensity. Palliat Med. 2009; 23: 460-470.
- 20. Ka-Po Ch, Sheikh A, Salomon A, Pai S. Doctors and Their Faiths. BMJ. 2003; 326: 135
- 21. Ilana Löwy I. The Polish School of Philosophy of Medicine: From Tyfus Chalubinski (1820-1889) to Ludwik Fleck (1896-1961). Springer, 1990.
- 22. John Paul II. Apostolic Letter Salvifici doloris. Vatican City, 1984 http:// www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_letters/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_11021984_salvifici-doloris_en.html. (access: 2011.05.12).
- 23. The Pontifical Council for Pastoral Assistance to Health Care Workers. The Charter for Health Care Workers. Vatican City, 1995. http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/hlthwork/documents/rc_pc_hlthwork_doc_19950101_charter_en.html. (access: 2011.05.12).
- 24. Prezyna W. Skala postaw religijnych (Scale of Religious Attitudes). Roczniki Filozoficzne. 1968; 16 (4): 75-89. (in Polish).
- 25. CBOS. Wiara i religijność Polaków w dwadzieścia lat po rozpoczęciu przemian ustrojowych (Beliefs and religiosity of Poles twenty years after transformation). CBOS, Warsaw, 2009.
- 26. Roberts J A, Brown D, Elkins T, Larson D B. Factors influencing views of patients with gynecologic cancer about end-of-life decisions. Am JObstet Gynecol. 1997; 176: 166-172.
- 27. Wenger N S, Carmel S. Physicians’ Religiosity and End-of-Life Care Attitudes and Behaviors. Mt Sinai J M. 2004; 71(5): 335-343.
- 28. Roter D L, Hall J A. How physician gender shapes the communication and evaluation of medical care. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001; 76: 673-676.
- 29. Curlin F A, Serrano K D, Baker M G, Carricaburu S L, et al. Following the call: how providers make sense of their decisions to work in faithbasedand secular urban community health centers. J Health Care PoorUnderserved. 2006; 17(4): 944-957.
- 30. John Paul II. Be the Good Samaritan of Modern Times. Vatican City, 1999. www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/hlthwork/documents/rc_pc_hlthwork_doc_09061997_gp-ii-art_en.html); andother documents of Pontifical Council for Health Pastoral Care; www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils) (access: 2011.05. 12).
rekord w opracowaniu