Floodplain management in the context of assessment and changes of flood risk and the environment – a review

• Autorzy: Glosinska E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article presents the problems of floodplain management in the context of the assessment and changes of flood risk, as well as its effects on the environment. The author discusses issues such as the role of floodplain management in the assessment of flood risk, changes in global flood risk, influence of the observed changes in floodplain management, and flood risk on the environment. Continuous floodplains urbanization has caused an increase in the level of population and property exposure the to the danger of being flooded, increased vulnerability of riverside areas, and increased the potential economic losses. A development of built-up areas in the floodplain has a negative effect on water management in the catchment area. It also causes changes to the hydrological cycle in the environment by reducing the infiltration and retentive capability of soils and increasing surface runoff flow, as well as changes of flood regimes and intensive erosive processes. The development of industrial and business areas in the floodplains also generates higher environmental contamination as a result of flooding. Nowadays, it departs from perceiving flood protection in terms of “control” and “defence,” toward the conception of “giving the rivers their space back,” as well as “predicting” flood risk and its management. A symptom of implementing a flood risk management idea is enacting a Floods Directive, in which the most effective forms of flood control and flood risk reduction is preventative spatial planning in the floodplain.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 23
• Numer: 6
• Opis fizyczny: p.1895-1904,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Glosinska E.

• Department of Spatial Managment, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University, Dziegielowa 27, 61-680 Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. BERZ G., KRON W., LOSTE, T., RAUCH E., SCHIMTSCHEK J., SCHMIEDER J., SIEBERT A., SMOLKA A., WIRTZ A., World Map of Natural Hazards - A Global View of the Distribution and Intensity of Significant Exposures. Nat. Hazards. 23, (2-3), 443, 2001.
• 2. BARREDO J.I. Major flood disasters in Europe: 1950-2005. Nat. Hazards. 42, (1), 125, 2007.
• 3. RISTIC R., KOSTADINOV S., ABOLMASOV B., DRAG- ICEVIC S., TRIVAN G. RADIC B., TRIFUNOVIC M., RADOSAVLJEVIC Z. Torrential floods and town and coun­try planning in Serbia. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences. 12, (1), 23, 2012.
• 4. GUZZETTI F., STARK C., SALVATI, P. Evaluation of Flood and Landslide Risk to the Population of Italy. Environ. Manage. 36, (1), 15, 2005.
• 5. LERNER L. A. Assessing global exposure to natural haz­ards: Progress and future trends. Environmental Hazards. 7, (1), 10, 2007.
• 6. SCHMIDT T.P., GREIVING S., KALLIO H., FLEIS­CHHAUER M., JARVA J. Economic risk maps of floods and earthquakes for European regions. Quatern. Int. 150, (1), 103, 2006.
• 7. TOYA H., SKIDMORE M. Economic development and the impacts of natural disasters. Econ. Lett. 94, (1), 20, 2007.
• 8. BRONSTERT A., BARDOSSY A., BISMUTH C., BUITEVELD H., DISSE M., ENGEL H., FRITSCH U., HUNDECHA Y., LAMMERSEN R., NIEHOFF D. Multi- scale modelling of land-use change and river training effects on floods in the Rhine basin. River Research and Applications. 23, (10), 1102, 2007.
• 9. CARLSON T.N. Analysis and prediction of surface runoff in an urbanizing watershed using satellite imagery. J. Am. Water Resour. As. 40, (4), 1087, 2004.
• 10. MC CUEN R.H. Smart growth: hydrologic perspective. J. Prof. Iss. Eng. Ed. Pr. 129, (3), 151, 2003.
• 11. CA WALUP. The California Water and Land Use Partnership. How Urbanization Affects the Water Cycle, available at: http://www.coastal.ca.gov/nps/watercyclefacts.pdf. (last access: March 2013), 2009.
• 12. SAUL A.J., ASHLEY R.M. Urban change. In: Future flood­ing and coastal erosion risks. Thorne C.R., Evans E.P., Penning-Rowsell E. (Eds.). London, Thomas Telford, pp. 149-172, 2007.
• 13. SHI P., GE Y., YUAN Y., GUO W. Integrated risk manage­ment of flood disasters in metropolitan areas of China. Water Resource Development. 21, (4), 613, 2005.
• 14. HARVEY G.L., THORNE C.R., CHENG X., EVANS E.P., HAN S., SIMM J.D, WANG Y. Qualitative analysis of future food risk in the Taihu Basin, China. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 2, (2), 85, 2009.
• 15. GAO J.F. Flood response to land use change in Taihu basin. Journal of Nature Resource. 17, (2), 150, 2002.
• 16. ZONG Y., CHEN X. The 1998 flood on the Yangtze, China. Hazards. 22, (2), 165, 2000.
• 17. WAN R.R., YANG G.S. Influence of land use/cover change on storm runoff - A case study of Xitiaoxi River Basin in upstream of Taihu lake watershed. Chinese Geographical Science. 17, (4), 349, 2007.
• 18. De ROO A., SCHMUCK G., PERDIGAO V., THIELEN J. The influence of historic land use changes and future planned land use scenarios on floods in the Oder basin. Phys. Chem. Earth. 28, (33-36), 1291, 2003.
• 19. REUBEN B., POESEN J., DANJON F., GEUDENS G., MUYS B. The role of fine and coarse roots in shallow slope stability and soil erosion control with a focus on root system architecture: A review. Trees. 21, 385, 2007.
• 20. WALCZYKIEWICZ T. The decision priorities in the field of realization of flood protection systems. Water Management Journal. 2, 61, 2002 [In Polish].
• 21. Directive 2007/60/EC on the assessment and management of flood risks. European Commission.
• 22. KAMIŃSKI B., MILER A.T., OKOŃSKI B., GRAJEWSKI S., SCHWARTZ K. Floodplain Forest Technical and Monitoring Solutions for Protection of the Uroczysko Warta Floodplain Forest. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 20, (5), 1193, 2011.
• 23. TYMIŃSKI T. Hydraulic Model Investigation of Flow Conditions for Floodplains with Coniferous and Deciduous Shrubs. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21, (4), 1047, 2012.
• 24. PINIEWSKI M., ACREMAN M.C., STRATFORD C.J., OKRUSZKO T., GIEŁCZEWSKI M., TEODOROWICZ M., RYCHARSKI M., OŚWIECIMSKA-PIASKO Z. Estimation of Environmental Flows in Semi-Natural Lowland Rivers - the Narew Basin Case Study. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 20, (5), 1281, 2011.
• 25. GENELETTI D. Environmental assessment of spatial plan policies through land use scenarios A study in a fast-devel­oping town in rural Mozambique. Environ. Impact Asses. 32, 1, 2012.
• 26. BOSZKE L., KOWALSKI A. Total Mercury in Floodplain Soils of the Warta River, Poland. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 16, (4), 517, 2007.
• 27. GŁOSIŃSKA G., SOBCZYŃSKI T., BOSZKE L, BIERŁA K., SIEPAK J. Fractionation of Some Heavy Metals in Bottom Sediments from the Middle Odra River (Germany/Poland). Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 14, (3), 305, 2005.
• 28. GOSAR M. Mercury in River Sediments, Floodplains and Plants Growing thereon in Drainage Area of Idrija Mine, Slovenia. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 17, (2), 227, 2008.
• 29. LUINO F., TURCONI L., PETREA C., NIGRELLI G. Uncorrected land-use planning highlighted by flooding: the Alba case study (Piedmont, Italy). Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences. 12, 2329, 2012.
• 30. SCHETKE S., HAASE D., KOTTER T. Towards sustain­able settlement growth: A new multi-criteria assessment for implementing environmental targets into strategic urban planning. Environ. Impact Asses. 32, (1), 195, 2012.
• 31. WAANANEN A. O., LIMERINOS J. T., KOCKELMAN W. J., SPANGLE W. E., BLAIR M. L. Flood-prone areas and land-use planning: selected examples from the San Francisco Bay region, California. US. Geological Survey Professional Paper 942, US Government Printing Office, Washington, pp. 75, 1977.
• 32. AUBRECHT C., STEINNOCHER K., KOSTL M. Regional flood impact assessment based on local land use patterns and sample damage records. Environmental Research Letters. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/044014, 2011.
• 33. SCHANZE J. Dealing with future change in flood risk man­agement. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 5, (1), 1, 2012.
• 34. BECKER G., AERTS J.C.J.H., HUITEMA D. Influence of flood risk perception and other factors on risk-reducing behaviour: a survey of municipalities along the Rhine. Journal of Flood Risk Management. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12025, 2013.
• 35. ZEBISCH M., GROTHMANN T., SCHROETER D., HASSE C., FRITSCH U., CRAMER W. Climate change in Germany: vulnerability and adaptation of climate sensitive sectors. Report commissioned by the Federal Environmental Agency, Potsdam Institute of Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany, 2005.
• 36. THIEKEN A.H. Floods, flood losses and flood risk manage­ment in Germany. Habilitation Treatise. University Potsdam, 2009.
• 37. STEINFÜHRER A. ed., Recommendations for flood risk management with communities at risk. Report No. T11-07- 14, FLOODsite, HR Wallingford, UK, 2008.
• 38. RICHERT E., BIANCHIN S., HEILMEIER H., MERTA M., SEIDLER C. A method for linking results from an eval­uation of land use scenarios from the viewpoint of flood pre­vention and nature conservation. Landscape Urban Plan. 103, (2), 118, 2011.
• 39. PLATE E. J. Flood risk management: a strategy to cope with floods. In: Proceedings of Ribamod European Expert Meeting on the Oder Flood 1997. Bronstert A., Ghazi A., Hladny J., Kundzewicz Z. W, Menzel L. (Eds.). European Communities. Luxemburg. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 115-128, 1999.
• 40. UNDRO, Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Coordinator: Mitigation natural disasters: phenomena, effects and options. A Manual for policy makers and plan­ners. United Nation, New York, 1991.
• 41. SCHANZE J. Flood Risk Management - A Basic Framework. Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures, NATO Science Series. 67, 1, 2006.
• 42. AUBRECHT C., KOSTL M., KNOFLACHER M., STEIN- NOCHER K. The importance of active public communica­tion - Settlement systems and land use patterns seen from a disaster perspective. CORP 2009 Proceedings/Tagungsband, 14th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society-Strategies. Concepts and Technologies For Planning the Urban Future. Schrenk. M., Popovich V., Engelke D., Elisei P. (Eds.). Schwechat. CORP, pp. 22-25, 2010.
• 43. BURTON A.J.R., SHEPARD M.A., RIDDELL K.J. Land use and flood risk through catchment flood management plans. Water Environment Journal. 17, (4), 220, 2003.
• 44. NDRC, National Development and Reform Commission, People's Republic of China, China's National Climate Change Programme, 2007.
• 45. EVANS E.P., ASHLEY R., HALL J., PENNING- ROWSELL E., SAYERS P., THORNE C., WATKINSON A. Foresight. Future flooding. Scientific summary: volume I - future risks and their drivers. Office of Science and Technology, London, 2004.
• 46. DETR, Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions, Environment Agency and Institute for Environment and Health, Guidelines for environmental risk assessment and management. The Stationary Office, London, 2000.
• 47. THORNE C.R., EVANS E..P., PENNING-ROWSELL E. ed. Future flooding and coastal erosion risks, Thomas Telford, London, 2007.
• 48. HALL J.W., MEADOWCROFT I.C., SAYERS P.B., BRAMLEY M.E. Integrated Flood Risk Management in England and Wales. Natural Hazard Review. 4, (3), 126, 2003.
• 49. HOOIJER A., KLIJN F., PEDROLI G. B. M., VAN OS A. G. Towards sustainable flood risk management in the Rhine and Meuse river basins: synopsis of the findings of IRMA- SPONGE. River Resources Applications. 20, (3) 343, 2004.
• 50. The Water Law Act of 18 July 2001 (Polish Journal of Laws of 2012 items 647, 951 as amended). [In Polish].
• 51. MORGAN M. G., HENRION M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, pp. 348, 1990.
• 52. STEIN J. (Ed). The Random House Dictionary of the English Language, Random House, New York, 1966.
• 53. DOWNING T.E., BUTTERFIELD R., COHEN S., HUQ S., MOSS R., RAHMAN A., SOKONA Y., STEPHEN L. Vulnerability Indices: Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation, UNEP Policy Series. 3, Nairobi, 2001.
• 54. KOOMEN E., KOEKOEK A., DIJK E. Simulating Land- use Change in a Regional Planning Context. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 4, (4), 223, 2011.
• 55. CRICHTON D. The risk triangle. In: Natural Disaster Management. Ingleton J. (Ed.). London. Tudor Rose, 1999.
• 56. DEFRA E.A. Department for Environment Food and Rural Affair, Environment Agency, R&D, outputs: Flood risks to people. Phase 2. FD2321/TR1 The flood risks to people methodology, London. 2006.
• 57. KAZMIERCZAK A., CAVAN G. Surface water flooding risk to urban communities: Analysis of vulnerability, hazard and exposure. Landscape Urban Plan. 103, (2), 185, 2011.
• 58. PARRY M.L., CANZIANI O.F., PALUTIKOF J.P., VAN DER LINDEN P.J., HANSON C. E. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, UK/New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 976, 2007.
• 59. SAREWITZ D., PIELKE JR. R. A, KEYKYAH M. Vulnerability and risk: Some thoughts from a political and policy perspective. Risk Analysis., 23, (4), 508, 2003.
• 60. FLOODsite-Consortium Language of Flood Risk, www.floodsite.net, 2005.
• 61. MESSNER F., MEYER V. Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception - challenges for flood damage research. UFZ Discussion Paper, 13, 2005.
• 62. PENNING-ROWSELL E., JOHNSON C., TUNSTALL S., TAPSELL S.M., MORRIS J., CHATTERTON J., COKER A., GREEN C. The Benefits of flood and coastal defence: techniques and data for 2003. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, 2005.
• 63. UNDHA, Internationally Agreed Glossary of Basic Terms Related to Disaster Management. United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs. Glossary: Internationally Agreed Glossary of Basic Terms related to Disaster Management. Geneva 1992.
• 64. LINDLEY S.J., HANDLEY J.F., THEURAY N., PEET E., MCEVOY, D. Adaptation strategies for climate change in the urban environment: Assessing climate change related risk in UK urban areas. Journal of Risk Research. 9, (5), 543, 2006.
• 65. VAN DER SANDE C. River flood damage assessment using IKONOS imagery, E.C. Joint Research Centre & S.A.I., Ispra, Italy, pp. 77, 2001.
• 66. LIU R., LIU N. Flood area and damage estimation in Zhejiang, China. Journal Environ. Manage. 66, (1), 1, 2002.
• 67. FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Hazard MH - Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology. USA, 2003.
• 68. PILON J.P. ed. Guidelines for Reducing Flood Losses. United Nations, available at: http://www.unisdr.org/ files/558_7639.pdf (last access: March 2012), 2006.
• 69. KANG J-L., SU M-D., CHANG L-F. Loss functions and framework for regional flood damage estimation in residen­tial area. Journal of Marine Science and Technology. 13, (3), 193, 2005.
• 70. De ROO A., KUCERA J., BONK R., BARREDO J. I., BODIS K., SZABO J., THIELEN J. Flood extent and dam­age estimation in Hungary during the floods in spring 2006. Report EUR 22712 EN. Ispra: Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Environment and Sustainability. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxemburg, pp. 33, 2006.
• 71. PIELKE R. A. JR., DOWNTON M. W., BARNARD MILLER J. Z. Flood Damage in the United States, 1926­2000: A Reanalysis of National Weather Service Estimates. Boulder, CO: UCAR, pp. 86, 2002.
• 72. MERZ B., KREIBICH H., THIEKEN A., SCHMIDTKE R. Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings. Natural Hazards Earth System Sciences. 4, (1), 153, 2004.
• 73. DUTTA D., HERATH S. GIS based flood loss estimation modeling in Japan. 1st Workshop of US-Japan Cooperative Research for Urban Earthquake Disaster Mitigation, Kobe, Japan, pp. 7, 2001.
• 74. BLONG R. A new damage index. Nat. Hazards. 30, (1), 1, 2003.
• 75. AUBRECHT C., KOSTL M., STEINNOCHER K. Functional object grouping - an advanced method for inte­grated spatial and space related data mining In: Digital Earth Summit on Geoinformatics 2008: Tools for Global Change Research. Ehlers M., Behncke K., Gerstengarbe F.W., Hillen F., Koppers L., Stroink L., Wachter J. (Eds.). Herbert Wichmann, Heidelberg, pp. 94-99, 2008.
• 76. Van der HOEVEN E., AERTS J., VAN DER KLIS H., KOOMEN, E. An Integrated Discussion Support System for new Dutch flood risk management strategies. In: Planning support systems: Best practices and new methods. Geertman S., Stillwell J. C. H. (Ed.). Berlin. Springer. 2009.
• 77. RAPPORT D., FRIEND A. Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental statistics: a stress-response approach, 1979. Ottawa, Statistics Canada, pp. 90, 1979.
• 78. TURNER R.K., LORENZONI I., BEAUMONT N., BATE- MAN I.J., LANGFORD I.H., MCDONALD A.L. Coastal management for sustainable development: analysing envi­ronmental and socio-economic changes on the UK coast. Geogr. J. 164, (3), 269, 1998.
• 79. POELMANS L., VAN ROMPAEY A. Detecting and mod­elling spatial patterns of urban sprawl in highly fragmented areas: A case study in the Flanders-Brussels region. Landscape Urban Plan. 93, 10, 2009.
• 80. SALAZAR S., FRANCES F., KOMMA J., BLUME T., FRANCKE T., BRONSTERT A., BLOSCHL G. A compar­ative analysis of the effectiveness of flood management mea­sures based on the concept of "retaining water in the land­scape" in different European hydro-climatic regions. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 12, (11), 3287, 2012.
• 81. PASSINO R. State of river basin management, Ministry LL.PP. The General Directorate of Soil Protecion, 1st National Conference of the Basin Authority, Soil and Basin Plans, Rome, pp. 77-115, 1996.
• 82. DU PLESSIS L. A., VILJOEN, M. F. Determining the ben­efits of flood mitigation measures in the lower Orange River: A GIS application. Water SA. 25, (2), 205, 1999.
• 83. ARNELL N.W. Flood insurance and floodplain manage­ment. In: Flood hazard management. Handmer J. (Ed.). Geo Books, Norwich UK, pp. 117-133, 1987.
• 84. SMITH D. I. Flood damage estimation: a review of urban stage damage curves and loss functions. Water SA. 20, (3), 231, 1994.
• 85. MRC, Munich Reinsurance Company. Flooding and Insurance. 1997.
• 86. GLASCHEN S., HAUSMANN P., MENZINGER I., SCHAAD W. Floods - an insurable risk? A market survey. Swiss Reinsurance Company, Zurich, 1998.
• 87. BLANCHARD-BOEHM R. D., BERRY K. A., SHOWAL­TER P. S. Should flood insurance be mandatory? Insights in the wake of the 1997 new year's day flood in Reno-Sparks, Nevada. Appl. Geogr. 21, (S), 199, 2GG1.
• 88. KRON W. Flood insurance: from clients to global financial markets. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 2, (1), 68, 2GG9.
• 89. BHATTAMISHRA R. BARRETT S. B. Community-Based Risk Management Arrangements: A Review. World Dev. 38, (7), 92S, 2G1G.
• 90. WOŁOSZYN E. The impact of the floods on the environ­ment. In: Handbook of flood protection. Bednarczyk S., Jarzębińska T., Mackiewicz S. Voloshin E. National Water Management Authority,, 2GG6 [In Polish].

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu