Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2015 | 24 | 1 |
Tytuł artykułu

Influence of applying infiltration and retention objects to the rainwater runoff on a plot and catchment scale – case study of Słuzewiecki Stream subcatchment in Warsaw

Treść / Zawartość
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
This article presents the results of an analysis aimed at determining the influence of applying selected types of objects for the infiltration and retention of rainwater (LID – low impact development objects), on a plot scale (area of a shopping mall) and in the subcatchment of Służewiecki Stream in Warsaw, on the characteristics of surface runoff/outflow as well as retention and infiltration depths, in response to a single rainfall event. The following types of objects were accounted for in the study: permeable soil layer, green roof, permeable paved parking lot surface, and infiltration trench. The SWMM model (storm water management model), designed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was used to carry out simulation calculations for the individual scenarios of applying infiltration and retention objects on a plot and catchment scale. The effect of applying LID objects throughout the analyzed area was, in both cases, a reduction in the depth of surface runoff, outflow volume and, at the same time, an increase in the infiltration and retention depths. The most significant reduction in surface runoff on the plot scale (approximately 99%) occurred in the case of calculation scenarios calling for the application of infiltration trenches (scenario LID3), as well as permeable layers of soil and gravel (LID5 and LID6). The most significant reduction in runoff/outflow on the catchment scale was achieved by the combined application of objects of “permeable soil layer” and so-called “green roofs” (LID5). The reduction in the runoff depth and peak flow rate amounted to 50.0 and 38.5%, respectively, as compared to runoff from the catchment at the current state of its urbanization. The influence of urbanization that the plot of land and subcatchment area had undergone between 1970 and 2005 also was analyzed. The increased urbanization of the catchment, determined as 40%, resulted in an increase in the maximum flow rate in the “Rosoła” profile (approximately 19 times higher), as well as outflow volume (approximately 39 time higher).
Słowa kluczowe
Opis fizyczny
  • Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
  • 1. CHANCELLERY OF THE SEJM. Water law, Act of 5 January 2011 on changes in the Water law act as well as other acts (OJ of 15 January 2011, no. 32, item 159). 2011 [In Polish].
  • 2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (NCBiR). Natural environment, agriculture and forestry - BIOSTRATEG (Strategic program for scientific research and developmental work). 2013 [In Polish].
  • 3. MARSALEK J., SCHREIER H. Innovation in Stormwater Management in Canada: The Way Forward, Water Quality Research Journal of Canada 44, (1), v–x, 2009.
  • 4. BARSZCZ M. Innovative methods of managing rainwater in urbanized catchments. Gas Water and Sanitary Technology 1, 12, 2013 [In Polish].
  • 5. ŻBIKOWSKI A., ŻELAZO J. Flood protection – difficulties and perspectives. Water Management 5, 98, 1994 [In Polish].
  • 6. SAKSON G., ZAWILSKI M. Influence of applying LID objects on the functioning of urban sewerage systems. Gas Water and Sanitary Technology 6, 246, 2013 [In Polish].
  • 7. GILROY K.L., MCCUEN R.H. Spatio-temporal effects of low impact development practices. Journal of Hydrology 367, 228, 2009.
  • 8. ZIMMERMAN M. J., WALDRON M. C., BARBARO J. R., SORENSON J. R. Effects of Low-impact-development (LID) Practices on Streamflow, Runoff Quantity, and Runoff Quality in the Ipswich River Basin, Massachusetts – a Summary of Field and Modeling Studies. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1361, 40, 2010.
  • 9. AHIABLAME L.M., BERNARD A. E., INDRAJEET C. Effectiveness of low impact development practices in two urbanized watersheds: Retrofitting with rain barrel/cistern and porous pavement. Journal of Environmental Management 119, 151, 2013.
  • 10. PYKE C., WARREN M. W., JOHNSON T., LAGRO J., SCHARFENBERG J., GROTH P., FREED R., SCHROEER W., MAIN E. Assessment of low impact development for managing stormwater with changing precipitation due to climate change. Landscape and Urban Planning 103, 166, 2011.
  • 11. BŁASZCZYK W., STAMATELLO H., BŁASZCZYK P. Sewerage; Arkada Publishing: Warsaw, 1983 [In Polish].
  • 12. POLISH NORMS PN-S-02204. Motor vehicle roads, Road Drainage; Polish Committee for Standardization, 1997 [In Polish].
  • 13. BŁASZCZYK P. (Ed.) Principles of planning and designing sewage systems in urban-industrial agglomerations and large cities; Research Institute on Environmental Development; Warsaw, 1983 [In Polish].
  • 14. SAWICKA-SIARKIEWICZ H., BŁASZCZYK P. Sewage equipment in urbanized areas. Technical and ecological conditions: Institute of Environmental Protection: Warsaw, 2007 [In Polish].
  • 15. BARSZCZ M. Predicting maximum probable flows caused by heavy rainfall in the urbanized Służewiecki Stream catchment. Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Sciences 4, (46), 3, 2009 [In Polish].
  • 16. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS). National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Washington, DC, 1975.
  • 17. ROSSMAN L. A. Storm water management model user`s manual version 5.0. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, 2010.
  • 18. SŁYŚ D. Rainwater retention and infiltration; Publishing House of Rzeszow Technical University: Rzeszow, 2008 [In Polish].
  • 19. GEIGER W., DREISEITL H. New means of draining rainwater, 1st ed.; Projprzem-EKO: Bydgoszcz, 1999 [In Polish].
  • 20. BARSZCZ M. Normalized rainfall depth distributions during rainfalls in the area of an experimental catchment in Warsaw. Water-Environment-Rural Areas Vol. 12, 3 (39), 27, 2012 [In Polish].
  • 21. DEBUSK K.M., WYNN K.M. Storm-water bioretention for runoff quality and quantity mitigation. Journal of Environmental Engineering 137, 800, 2011.
  • 22. DREELIN E.A., FOWLER L., CARROLL C.R. A test of porous pavement effectiveness on clay soils during natural storm events. Water Res. 40, 799, 2006.
  • 23. HAIFENG J., YUWEN L., SHAW L.Y., YURONG C. Planning of LID-BMPs for urban runoff control: The case of Beijing Olympic Village. Separation and Purification Technology 84, 112, 2012.
  • 24. HUA-PENG Q., ZHUO-XI L., GUANGTAO F. The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management 129, 577, 2013.
  • 25. CHAPMAN C., HORNER R.R. Performance assessment of a street-drainage bioretention system. Water Environ. Res. 82, 109, 2010.
Typ dokumentu
Identyfikator YADDA
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.