The effects of climatic conditions and forest site types on disintegration rates in Picea abies occurring at the Modrava Peat Bogs in the Šumava National Park

• Autorzy: Krejci F. , Vacek S. , Bilek L. , Mikeska M. , Hejcmanova P. , Vacek Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A survey of mountain spruce stand development in the Šumava National Park on Modrava peat bogs on an area of 1,370 ha resulting from spruce bark beetle outbreaks was performedby means of visual evaluation of aerial photographs from the period 1991–2000. In addition, our study addressed the influence of climatic effects (period1984–2000) andthe effect of forest site (climax, waterloggedandpeaty spruce stands) on the dynamics of disintegration of forest stands. We showed that new infestations were predominantly foundat short distances from their source, the average value was estimatedto be 40–60 m, whereas the longest distance for annual progress in west to east direction was estimated to be 120 m. Differences in the dynamics of disintegration between waterlogged stands and drier stands were confirmed. There was a positive relationship between the average temperature in the 2nd quarter of monitoring years which was registered as the period of the onset of bark beetle development and the proportion of degraded area in Norway spruce stands. Moreover, pronounced winter desiccation in January 1993 was a triggering mechanism with crucial importance for the outbreak of bark beetle in the studied area.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Dendrobiology
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 70
• Opis fizyczny: p.35-44,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Krejci F.

• Administration of the National Park and Protective Landscape Area of Šumava, 1. máje 260, 385 01 Vimperk, Czech Republic

autor

Vacek S.

• University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry andWoodSciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Bilek L.

• University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry andWoodSciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Mikeska M.

• University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry andWoodSciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Hejcmanova P.

• University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry andWoodSciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Vacek Z.

• University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry andWoodSciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• Cížková P., Svoboda M., Køenová Z. 2011. Natural regeneration of acidophilous spruce mountain forests in non-intervenion management areas of the Šumava National Park – the first results of the Biomonitoring project. Silva Gabreta 17: 19–35.
• Fahse L., Heurich M. 2011. Simulation andanalysis of outbreaks of bark beetle infestations andtheir management at the standlevel. Ecological Modelling 222: 1833–1846. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.03.014.
• Flint C.G., McFarlane B., Müller M. 2009. Human Dimensions of Forest Disturbance by Insects: An International Synthesis, Environmental Management 43:1174–1186.
• Hais M., Kucera T. 2008. Surface temperature change of spruce forest as a result of bark beetle attack: remote sensing andGIS approach. European Journal of Forest Research 127: 327–336.
• Hájek F., Svoboda M. 2007. Assessment of bark beetle damage in the Trojmezná old-growth forest (Šumava NP) using automatedclassification of aerial photographs. Silva Gabreta 13(1): 69–81.
• Heurich M., Ochs T., Andresen T., Schneider T. 2010. Object-orientatedimage analysis for the semi-automatic detection of dead trees following a spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus) outbreak. European Journal of Forest Research 129: 313–324.
• HofgaardA. 1993. Structure andRegeneration Patterns in a Virgin Picea abies Forest in Northern Sweden. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 601–608.
• Holeksa J. 2001. Coarse woody debris in a Carpathian subalpine spruce forest. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 120: 256–270.
• Jakuš R., Grodzki W., Ježik M., Jachym M. 2003. Definition of spatial patterns of bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) outbreak spreading in Tatra Mountains (Central Europe), using GIS. In: Ecology, Survey and Management of Forest Insects. Mc Manus M., Liebhold, A. (eds.). USDA Forest Service, Proceedings of the conference GTR NE-311, pp. 25–32.
• Jaworski A. 1998. Budowa, struktura i dynamika górnoreglowych borów świerkowych w Karpatech a metody postępowania hodowlanego. In: Struktura I dynamika górskich bórow świerkowych. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej, Kraków. 332: 37–68.
• Jeník J. 1998. Biodiversity of the Hercynian mountains of Central Europe. Pirineos 151/152: 83–99.
• Kautz M., Dworschak K., Gruppe A., Schopf R. 2011. Quantifying spatio-temporal dispersion of bark beetle infestations in epidemic and non-epidemic conditions. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 598–608.
• Korpe¾ Š. 1993. Dynamics of natural spruce forest in the Western Tatras on the example of the state nature reserve Kotlový Žlab. Zborník Prac o TANAP 33: 193–225.
• Korpe¾ Š. 1995. Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer Verlag, 310 p.
• Manion P.D. 1981. Tree Disease Concepts. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 399 p.
• Matìjka K. 1994. Monitoring of the forest status in the Czech Republic. Recent results andprospects. In: Investigation of the forest ecosystems and of forest damage. Lowland and submountain forests andmonitoring of the forest status.
• Matìjka K. (ed.). FGMRI, Prague, pp. 146–154. Overbeck M., Schmitt M. 2012. Modelling infestation risk of Norway spruce by Ips typographus (L.) in the Lower Saxon Harz Mountains (Germany). Forest Ecology and Management 266: 115–125.
• Overbeck M., Schmitt M., Fischer Ch., Evers J., Schulze A., Hövelmann T., Spellmann H. 2011. Ein statistisches Modell zur Regionalisierung der nutzbaren Feldkapazität von Waldstandorten in Niedersachsen. Forstarchiv 82: 92–100 (in German).
• Otto H.J. 1994. Waldökologie. Stuttgart, Ulmer, 391 p. Pfeffer A., Skuhravý V. 1995. Lýkožrout smrkový a jeho problematika I., II. [Spruce bark beetle – a review], Lesnická práce, 74 (3/4): 21; 74(5): 8–10 (in Czech).
• Pouska V., Svoboda M., Lepšová A. 2010. The diversity of woodfungi in relation to changing site conditions in an old-growth mountain spruce forest, Central Europe. European Journal of Forest Research 129: 1–13.
• Poznański R., Jaworski A. 2002. Nowoczesne metody gospodarowania w lasach górskich. Warszawa, Centrum Informacyjne Lasów Państwowych, 228 p.
• Prùša E. 1985. Die böhmischen undmährischen Urwälder – ihre Struktur und Ökologie. Verlag der Tschechoslowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Prague, 577 p.
• Saniga M., Schütz J.P. 2001. Dynamics of changes in dead wood share in selected beech virgin forests in Slovakia within their development cycle. Journal of Forest Science 47: 557–565.
• Schmidt-Vogt H. 1985. Struktur und Dynamik natürlichen Fichtenwälder in der borealen Nadelwaldzone. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 136(12): 977–944.
• Schmidt-Vogt H. 1986. Die Fichte. Band II/l Wachstum, Züchtung, Boden, Umwelt, Holz. Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg, 563 p.
• Skuhravý V. 1997. Národní park Šumava a lýkožrout smrkový [Šumava National Park andspruce bark beetle]. Planeta 4: 22–24 (in Czech).
• Skuhravý V. 2002. Lýkožrout smrkový a jeho kalamity [Spruce bark beetle andits calamities], Prague, Agrospoj, 196 (in Czech).
• Sofron J. 1980. Vegetation einiger auserlesener Hochmoore von Šumavské plánì. Folia musei rerum natur. Bohemiae occidentalis, ser. bot. 1: 3–27.
• Svoboda M. 2005. Struktura horského smrkového lesa v oblasti Trojmezné ve vztahuk historickému vývoji a stanovištním podmínkám [The structure of mountain spruce forest in the locality Trojmezná in relation to its historical development and site conditions], Silva Gabreta 11: 43–62. (in Czech)
• Svoboda M., Pouska V. 2008. Structure of a Central-European mountain spruce old-growth forest with respect to historical development. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 2177–2188.
• Svoboda M., Fraves S., Janda P., Bace R., Zenahlíková J. 2010. Natural development and regeneration of a Central European mountain spruce forest. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 707–714.
• Štícha V., Kupka I., Zahradník D., Vacek S. 2010. Influence of micro-relief andweedcompetition on natural regeneration of mountain forests in the Šumava Mountains. Journal of Forest Science 56: 218–224.
• Tiede D., Lang S., Hoffmann Ch. 2006. Supervised andForest Type-specific Multi-scale Segmentation for a One-level-representation of Single
• Trees. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Object-basedImage Analysis. Lang S., Blaschke T., Schöpfer E. (eds.) July 4–5, 2006 Salzburg, Austria.
• Tranquillini, W. 1979. Physiological Ecology of the Alpine Timberline. Berlin, 137 p.
• Vacek S. 1990. Analýza autochtonních smrkových populací na Strmé stráni v Krkonoších, [Analysis of autochthonous spruce populations in the locality Strmá stráò in Krkonoše Mts.]. Opera Corcontica 27: 59–103. (in Czech)
• Vacek S. 2003. Minimum area of forest left to spontaneous development in protected areas. Journal of Forest Science 49: 349–358.
• Vacek S., Lepš J. 1987. Changes in the horizontal structure in a spruce forest over a 9-year periodof pollutant exposure in the Krkonoše Mountains, Czechoslovakia. Forest Ecology and Management, 22: 291–295.
• Vacek S., Lepš J. 1996. Spatial dynamics of forest decline: the role of neighbouring trees. Journal of Vegetation Science 7: 789–798.
• Vacek S., Hejcmanová P., Hejcman M. 2012. Vegetative reproduction of Picea abies by artificial layering at the ecotone of the alpine timberline in the Giant (Krkonoše) Mountains, Czech Republic. Forest Ecology and Management 263: 199–207.
• Vacek S., Krejcí F., Matìjka K., Podrázský V., Remeš J., Ulbrichová I., Zatloukal V., Simon J., Minx T., Jankovský L., Turcáni M., Lepšová A., Starý J., Viewegh J., Bednaøík J., Malík K., Bílek L., Štícha V., Semelová V., Vokoun J., Mikeska M., Prausová R., Ešnerová J., Mánek J., Kucera A., Vojtìch O., Jakuš R., Kozel J., Malík V., Vojtíšek R., Baláš M. 2009. Lesní ekosystémy v národním parku Šumava [Forest ecosystems in Šumava National Park], Kostelec nad Cernými lesy, Lesnická práce, 512 p. (in Czech).
• Vacek S., Matìjka K., Simon J., Malík V., Schwarz O., Podrázský V., Minx T., Tesaø V., Andìl P., Jankovský L., Mikeska M. 2007. Zdravotní stav a dynamika lesních ekosystémù Krkonoš podstresem vyvolaným znecištìním ovzduší [Health standandd ynamic of forest ecosystems in Krkonoše Mts. under the air pollution stress], Folia forestalia Bohemica. Kostelec nad Cernýmilesy, Lesnická práce, 4: 216 p. (in Czech).
• Vacek S., Podrázský V., Matìjka K. 2006. Dynamics of the health status of forest stands and its prediction on research plots in the Šumava Mts. Journal of Forest Science 52: 457–473.
• Vacek, S., Simon J., Remeš J., Podrázský V., Minx T., Mikeska M., Malík V., Jankovský L., Turcáni M., Jakuš R., Schwarz O., Kozel J., Valenta M., Licka D., Hlásny T., Zubrik M., Krejcí F., Tøešòák J., Hofmeister Š. 2007. Obhospodaøování bohatì strukturovaných a pøírodì blízkých lesù, [Management of structurally differentiated and close-to-nature forest stands], Kostelec nad Cernými lesy, Lesnická práce, 447 p. (in Czech).
• Vacek S., Zingari P.C., Jeník J., Vancura K., Simon J., Smejkal J. 2003. Mountain forests of the Czech Republic. Prague, Ministry of agriculture of the Czech Republic, 320 p.
• Vrška T., Hort L., Odehnalová P., Adam D., Horal D. 2001. The Milešice virgin forest after 24 years (1972–1996). Journal of Forest Science 47: 255–276.
• Zemek F., Heøman M., Klouda Z. 1999. Bark beetle calamity assessment from remotly sensedd ata, Silva Gabreta 3: 161–172.
• Žídek V. 2003. Od analogových snímkù k digitálním objektùm, [From analog photographs to digital objects], Folia Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis: Facultas Silviculturae et Technologiae Ligni, Brno, Res Publica Bohemia, 159 p. (in Czech).

Uwagi

rekord w opracowaniu