The effect of anatomic differences on the relationship between renal artery and diaphragmatic crus

• Autorzy: Esen K. , Tok S. , Balci Y. , Apaydin F.D. , Kara E. , Uzmansel D.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anatomic differences on the relationship between renal artery and diaphragmatic crus via the touch of two structures. Materials and methods: The study included dynamic computed tomography (CT) scans of 308 patients performed mainly for characterisation of liver and renal masses. Anatomic differences including the thickness of the diaphragmatic crus, the localisation of renal artery ostium at the wall of aorta, the level of renal artery origin with respect to superior mesenteric artery were evaluated. Statistical relationships between renal artery-diaphragmatic crus contact and the anatomic differences were assessed. Results: Thickness of the diaphragmatic crus at the level of renal artery origin exhibited a statistically significant relationship to renal artery-diaphragmatic crus contact at the left (p < 0.001) and right side (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant relationship between high renal artery origin and renal artery-diaphragmatic crus contact at the left (p < 0.001) and right side (p = 0.01). The localisation of renal artery ostium at the wall of aorta (right side, p = 0.436, left side, p = 0.681) did not demonstrate a relationship to renal artery-diaphragmatic crus contact. Conclusions: Thickness of the diaphragmatic crus and high renal artery origin with respect to superior mesenteric artery are crucial anatomic differences determining the relationship of renal artery and diaphragmatic crus. (Folia Morphol 2018; 77, 1: 22–28)

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Morphologica
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: 77
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.22-28,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Esen K.

• Department of Radiology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

autor

Tok S.

• Department of Radiology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

autor

Balci Y.

• Department of Radiology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

autor

Apaydin F.D.

• Department of Radiology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

autor

Kara E.

• Department of Radiology, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

autor

Uzmansel D.

• Department of Anatomy, Mersin University, School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Anda S, Røysland P, Fougner R, et al. CT appearance of the diaphragm varying with respiratory phase and muscular tension. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986; 10(5): 744–745, indexed in Pubmed: 3745542.
• 2. Arazińska A, Polguj M, Topol M, et al. Renal artery entrapment - anatomical risk factors rating. Folia Morphol. 2016; 75(4): 486–492, doi: 10.5603/FM.a2016.0017, indexed in Pubmed: 27830874.
• 3. Brengle M, Cohen MD, Katz B. Normal appearance and size of the diaphragmatic crura in children: CT evaluation. Pediatr Radiol. 1996; 26(11): 811–814, indexed in Pubmed: 8929383.
• 4. Caskey CI, Zerhouni EA, Fishman EK, et al. Aging of the diaphragm: a CT study. Radiology. 1989; 171(2): 385–389, doi: 10.1148/radiology.171.2.2704802, indexed in Pubmed: 2704802.
• 5. D’abreu Stricland B. Developmental renal-artery stenosis. Lancet. 1962; 2(7255): 517–521, indexed in Pubmed: 13859087.
• 6. Déglise S, Corpataux JM, Haller C, et al. Bilateral renal artery entrapment by diaphragmatic crura: a rare cause of renovascular hypertension with a specific management. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007; 31(3): 481–484, doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000250114.72338.5a, indexed in Pubmed: 17538300.
• 7. Delasotta LA, Olivieri B, Malik A, et al. Thoracic renal artery: a rare variant. A case study and literature review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015; 37(5): 561–564, doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1379-2, indexed in Pubmed: 25270524.
• 8. Dovgan DJ, Lenchik L, Kaye AD. Computed tomographic evaluation of maximal diaphragmatic crural thickness. Conn Med. 1994; 58(4): 203–206, indexed in Pubmed: 8045119.
• 9. Dure-Smith P, Bloch RD, Fymat AL, et al. Renal artery entrapment by the diaphragmatic crus revealed by helical CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 170(5): 1291–1292, doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574603, indexed in Pubmed: 9574603.
• 10. Gaebel G, Hinterseher I, Saeger HD, et al. Compression of the left renal artery and celiac trunk by diaphragmatic crura. J Vasc Surg. 2009; 50(4): 910–914, doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.05.004, indexed in Pubmed: 19786242.
• 11. Gupta A, Tello R. Accessory renal arteries are not related to hypertension risk: a review of MR angiography data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 182(6): 1521–1524, doi: 10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821521, indexed in Pubmed: 15150000.
• 12. Hazırolan T, Öz M, Türkbey B, et al. CT angiography of the renal arteries and veins: normal anatomy and variants. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2011; 17(1): 67–73, doi: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.2902-09.1, indexed in Pubmed: 20151356.
• 13. He B, Hamdorf JM. Clinical importance of anatomical variations of renal vasculature during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. OA Anatomy. 2013; 1(3), doi: 10.13172/2052-7829-1-3-865.
• 14. Moes MJ, Filly RA. The neonatal diaphragmatic crura are hypertrophied: a necessary preparation for the first breath? J Ultrasound Med. 2003; 22(7): 715–718, indexed in Pubmed: 12862271.
• 15. Moore KL, Persaud T, Torchia MG. Body cavities and diaphragm. In: The developing human: clinically oriented embryology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders 2013: 145–158.
• 16. Pozzi-Mucelli F, Pellegrin A, Pozzi-Mucelli R. Radiological Imaging of the Kidney. 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin 2014: 189–222.
• 17. Restrepo CS, Eraso A, Ocazionez D, et al. The diaphragmatic crura and retrocrural space: normal imaging appearance, variants, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics. 2008; 28(5): 1289–1305, doi: 10.1148/rg.285075187, indexed in Pubmed: 18794306.
• 18. Saba L, Sanfilippo R, Montisci R, et al. Accessory renal artery stenosis and hypertension: are these correlated? Evaluation using multidetector-row computed tomographic angiography. Acta Radiol. 2008; 49(3): 278–284, doi: 10.1080/02841850701777408, indexed in Pubmed: 18365815.
• 19. Shruthi BN. Unilateral entrapment of the renal artery by diaphragmatic crus. Natl J Med Res. 2013; 3: 412–413.
• 20. Silver D, Clements JB. Renovascular hypertension from renal artery compression by congenital bands. Ann Surg. 1976; 183(2): 161–166, indexed in Pubmed: 1247314.
• 21. Singham S, Murugasu P, Macintosh J, et al. Left main renal artery entrapment by diaphragmatic crura: spiral CT angiography. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2010; 6(2): e11, doi: 10.2349/biij.6.2.e11, indexed in Pubmed: 21611033.
• 22. Spies JB, LeQuire MH, Robison JG, et al. Renovascular hypertension caused by compression of the renal artery by the diaphragmatic crus. Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 149(6): 1195–1196, doi: 10.2214/ajr.149.6.1195, indexed in Pubmed: 3500606.
• 23. Thony F, Baguet JP, Rodiere M, et al. Renal artery entrapment by the diaphragmatic crus. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(9): 1841–1849, doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2710-4, indexed in Pubmed: 15778837.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5603/FM.a2017.0073