Towards a general species-time-area-sampling effort relationship

• Autorzy: Ulrich W. , Zalewski M. , Hajdamowicz I. , Stanska M. , Ciurzycki W. , Tykarski P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Species – area (SAR) and species time (STR) relationships describe the increase of species richness with study area and study time and have received much attention among ecologists and are used in different branches of biodiversity research. Unknown sample size effects often hinder a direct comparison of SAR and STR shapes of different taxa and regions. Further, space and time interact during the accumulation of species due to the common sample universe. Here we develop a simple power function scaling model of species richness that integrates space, time, sample size and their interactions. We show that this model is able to precisely describe average species densities and the increase of species richness in a regional metacommunity of a large sample of spiders on Mazurian lake islands (Northern Poland). The model predicts strong area – sample size and time – sample size interactions. Judged from the SAR (z = 0.08) and STR (y = 0.64) slopes it points to only moderate spatial β-diversities but high local temporal species turnover. We suspect that the parameters of many published SARs are strongly influenced by unknown sampling time and sample size effects that make direct comparison difficult.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Araneae; spider; species richness; species accumulation; power function; biodiversity research; Mazurian Lakeland; regional scale

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 61
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.373-377,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Ulrich W.

• Chair of Ecology and Biogeography, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Lwowska 1, 87–100 Torun, Poland

autor

Zalewski M.

• Centre for Ecological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, M. Konopnickiej 1, Dziekanow Lesny, 05-092 Lomianki, Poland

autor

Hajdamowicz I.

• Department of Zoology, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Prusa 12, 08–110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Stanska M.

• Department of Zoology, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Prusa 12, 08–110 Siedlce, Poland

autor

Ciurzycki W.

• Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Botany, Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159, 02–776 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Tykarski P.

• Department of Ecology, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, Zwirki i Wigury 101, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• Adler P.B. 2004 – Neutral models fail to reproduce observed species-area and species time relationships in Kansas grasslands – Ecology, 85: 1265–1272.
• Adler P.B., Lauenroth W.K. 2003 – The power of time, spatiotemporal scaling of species diversity – Ecol. Lett. 6: 749–756.
• Adler P.B., White E.P., Lauenroth W.K., Kaufman D.M., Rassweiler A., Rusak J.A. 2005 – Evidence for a general species - time area relationship – Ecology, 86: 2032–2039.
• Azovsky A.I. 2011 – Species-area and species-sampling effort relationships: disentangling the effects – Ecography, 34: 18–30.
• Brooks T.M., Pimm S.L., Collar N.J. 1997 – Deforestation predicts the number of threatened birds in insular southeast Asia – Cons. Biol. 11: 382–394.
• Cam E., Nichols J.D., Hines J.E., Sauer J.R., Alpizer-ara R., Flather C.H. 2002 – Disentangling sampling and ecological explanations underlying species-area relationships – Ecology, 83: 1118–1130.
• Carey S., Ostling A., Harte J., del Moral R. 2007 – Impact of curve construction and community dynamics on the species-time relationship – Ecology, 88: 2145–2153.
• Coleman B.D. 1981 – On random placement and species–area relation – Math. Biosci. 54: 191–215.
• Colwell R.K., Coddington J.A. 1994 – Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation – Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 345: 101–118.
• Colwell R.K., Mao C.X., Chang J. 2004 – Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves – Ecology, 85: 2717–2727.
• Connor E.F., McCoy E.D. 1979 – The statistics and biology of the species - area relationship – Am. Nat. 113: 791–833.
• Den Boer P.J. 1985 – Fluctuations of density and survival of carabid populations – Oecologia, 67: 322–330.
• Dengler J. 2009 – Which function describes the species - area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation – J. Biogeogr. 36: 728–744.
• Dove A.D.M., Cribb T.H. 2006 – Species accumulation curves and their applications in parasite ecology – Trends in Parasit. 22: 568–574.
• Drakare S., Lennon J.J., Hillebrand H. 2006 – The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area relationships – Ecol. Lett. 9: 215–227.
• Fridley J.D., Peet R.K., van der Maarel E., Willems J.H. 2006 – Integration of local and regional species - area relationships from space - time species accumulation – Am. Nat. 168: 133–143.
• Goldberg D.E., Estabrook G.F. 1998 – Separating the effects of number of individuals sampled and competition on species diversity, an experimental and analytic approach – J. Ecol. 86: 983–988.
• Green J.L., Plotkin J.B. 2006 – A statistical theory for sampling species abundances – Ecol. Lett. 10: 1037–1045.
• Harrison S. 1991 – Local extinction in a metapopulation context, an empirical evaluation – Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 73–88.
• Harte J., Kinzig A., Green J. 1999 – Self-similarity and the distribution of abundance of species – Science, 284: 334–336.
• He L., Legendre P. 1996 – On species-area relationship – Am. Nat. 148: 719–737.
• Hill J.L., Curran P., Foody G.M. 1994 – The effects of sampling on the species – area curve – Gl. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 4: 97–106.
• Hurlbert S.H. 1971 – The non-concept of species diversity, a critique and alternative parameters – Ecology, 52: 577–586.
• Keating K.A. 1998 – Estimating species richness, the Michaelis-Menten model revisited – Oikos, 81: 411–416.
• Maurer B.A., McGill B.J. 2004 – Neutral and non-neutral macroecology – Basic Appl. Ecol. 5: 413–422.
• McGlinn D.J., Palmer W.M. 2009 – Modelling the sampling effect in the species - time - area relationship – Ecology, 90: 836–846.
• Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., de Fonseca G.A.B., Kent J. 2000 – Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities – Nature, 403: 853–858.
• Palmer M.W., White P.S. 1994 – Scale dependence and the species - area relationship – Am. Nat. 144: 717–740.
• Platnick N.I. 2009 – The world spider catalogue, version 9.5 – American Museum of Natural History. http,//research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/INTRO3.html.
• Pielou E. 1975 – Mathematical ecology – New York, Wiley, 385 pp.
• Plotkin J.B., Potts M.D., Yu D.W., Bunyavejchewin S., Condit R., Foster R., Hubbell S., LaFrankie J., Manokaran N., Seng L.H., Sukumar R., Nowak M.A., Ashton P.S. 2000 – Predicting species diversity in tropical forests – Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 10850–10854.
• Preston F.W. 1960 – Time and space and the variation of species – Ecology, 41: 611–627.
• Pueyo S. 2006 – Self-similarity in species-area relationship and in species abundance distribution – Oikos, 112: 156–162.
• Rosenzweig M.L. 1995 – Species diversity in space and time – Univ. Press, Cambridge, 434 pp.
• Scheiner S.M. 2003 – Six types of species – area curves – Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 441–447.
• Schoereder J.H., Galbiati J.H., Ribas C.R., Sobrinho T.G., Sperber C.F., De Souza O., Lopes-Andrade C. 2004 – Should we use proportional sampling for species – area studies? – J. Biogeogr. 31: 1219–1226.
• Thompson G.G., Thompson S.A. 2007 – Using species accumulation curves to estimate trapping effort in fauna surveys and species richness – Austral Ecol. 32: 564–569.
• Tjørve E. 2003 – Shapes and functions of species – area curves, a review of possible models – J. Biogeogr. 30: 827–835.
• Tjørve E. 2009 – Shapes and functions of species-area curves (II), a review of new models and parameterizations – J. Biogeogr. 36: 1435–1445.
• Ulrich W. 2006 – Decomposing the process of species accumulation into area dependent and time dependent parts – Ecol. Res. 21: 578–585.
• Ulrich W., Buszko J. 2003 – Species - area relationships of butterflies in Europe and species richness forecasting – Ecography, 26: 365–374.
• Ulrich W., Buszko J. 2004 – Habitat reduction and patterns of species loss – Basic Appl. Ecol. 5: 231–240.
• Ulrich W., Buszko J. 2005 – Detecting biodiversity hotspots using species - area and endemics - area relationships: The case of butterflies – Biodiv. Cons. 14: 1977–1988.
• Ulrich W., Buszko J. 2007 – Sampling design and the shape of species - area curves at the regional scale – Acta Oecol. 31: 54–59.
• Ulrich W., Zalewski M., Hajdamowicz I., Stańska M., Ciurzycki W., Tykarski P. 2010a – Tourism disassembles patterns of co-occurrence and weakens responses to environmental conditions of spider communities on small lake islands – Comm. Ecol. 11: 5–12.
• Ulrich W., Hajdamowicz I., Zalewski M., Stańska M., Ciurzycki W., Tykarski P. 2010b – Species assortment or habitat filtering: a case study of spider communities on lake islands – Ecol. Res. 25: 375–381.
• White E.P., Adler P.D., Lauenroth W.K., Gill R.A., Greenberg D., Kaufnman D.M., Rassweiler A., Rusak J.A., Smith M.D., Steinbeck J.R ., Waide R.B., Yao J. 2006 – A comparison of the species - time relationship across ecosystems and taxonomic groups – Oikos, 112: 185–195.
• Williams M.R. 1995 – An extreme value function model of the species incidence and species - area relations – Ecology, 76: 2607–2616.
• Williamson M., Gaston K.J., Lonsdale W.M. 2001 – The species - area relationship does not have an asymptote! – J. Biogeogr. 28: 827–830.
• Zalewski M., Ulrich W. 2006 – Dispersal as a key element of community structure: The case of ground beetles on lake islands – Div. Distr. 12: 767–775.