PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
2011 | 14 | 4 |

Tytuł artykułu

Evaluation of commercial ELISA kits for the detection of antibodies against bluetongue virus

Autorzy

Treść / Zawartość

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
The aim of this study was to estimate the diagnostic value of different commercially available ELISA kits for the detection of bluetongue virus (BTV) antibodies in infected and vaccinated animals. The relative specificity of ELISA kits was evaluated using a panel of sera originating from healthy cattle, never vaccinated nor exposed to BTV. All ELISA kits applied had a high relative specificity (99.3 - 100%). The relative sensitivity of ELISA kits assessed using a panel of sera collected from BTV infected cattle was also high and similar for all the kits (97.3 - 100%). However, the relative sensitivity evaluated on the basis of testing vaccinated animals was different: the highest sensitivity was found for Ingenasa, PrioCHECK and ID VET ELISAs (96.5 - 98.3%). Slightly lower sensitivity was calculated for Pourquier and LSI kits (82.8% and 85.4%, respectively) and much lower sensitivity was found for VMRD ELISA kit (69.5%). The repeatability of BTV ELISA kits was expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV) of results of sera tested 5 times in the same day and in different days by the period of 2 months, by the same person, in the same conditions, and by using the same equipment. The CVs of sera tested in all ELISA kits ranged from 6.1 to 9.8% and were below 10% threshold adopted as a maximum for the acceptable repeatability of the method. In conclusion, it can be stated that the applied ELISA kits can be a valuable diagnostic tool for the serological monitoring studies in the BTV contaminated premises. All the methods are very specific and sensitive when testing BTV infected animals. Nevertheless, the Ingenasa and PrioCHECK can be the most useful in sero-surveillance of livestock following vaccination.

Słowa kluczowe

Wydawca

-

Rocznik

Tom

14

Numer

4

Opis fizyczny

p.615-619,ref.

Twórcy

  • Department of Foot and Mouth Disease, National Veterinary Research Institute, 98-220 Zdunska Wola, Wodna 7, Poland

Bibliografia

  • Afshar A, Thomas FC, Wright PF, Shapiro JL, Shettigara PT, Anderson J (1987) Comparison of competitive and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of bluetongue virus antibodies in serum and whole blood. J Clin Microbiol 25: 1705-1710.
  • Anon (2008) Bluetongue. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals (mammals, birds and bees). OIE, Paris, pp. 158-174.
  • Batten CA, Bachanek-Bankowska K, Bin-Tarif A, Kgosana L, Swain AJ, Corteyn M, Darpel K, Mellor PS, Elliott HG, Oura CA (2008) Bluetongue virus: European Community inter-laboratory comparison tests to evaluate ELISA and RT-PCR detection methods. Vet Microbiol 129: 80-88.
  • Eschbaumer M, Hoffmann B, Konig P, Teifke JP, Gethmann JM, Conraths FJ, Probst C, Mettenleiter TC, Beer M (2009) Efficacy of three inactivated vaccines against bluetongue virus serotype 8 in sheep. Vaccine 27: 4169-4175.
  • Eschbaumer M, Schultz C, Wackerlin R, Gauly M, Beer M, Hoffmann B (2011) Limitations of sandwich ELISAs for bluetongue virus antibody detection. Vet Rec 168: 643.
  • Gorman BM (1990) The bluetongue viruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 162: 1-19.
  • Hofmann MA, Renzullo S, Mader M, Chaignat V, Worva G, Thuer B (2008) Genetic characterization of toggenburg orbivirus, a new bluetongue virus from goats, Switzerland. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 1855-1861.
  • Jacobson RH (1998) Validation of serological assays for diagnosis of infectious diseases. Rev Sci Tech 17: 469-526.
  • MacLachlan NJ (1994) The pathogenesis and immunology of bluetongue virus infection of ruminants. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 17: 197-206.
  • Maan S, Maan NS, Nomikou K, Batten C, Antony F, Belaganahalli MN, Samy AM, Reda AA, Al-Rashid SA, El Batel M, Oura CA, Mertens PP (2011) Novel bluetongue virus serotype from Kuwait. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 886-889.
  • Menzies FD, McCullough SJ, McKeown IM, Forster JL, Jess S, Batten C, Murchie AK, Gloster J, Fallows JG, Pelgrim W, Mellor PS, Oura CA (2008) Evidence for transplacental and contact transmission of bluetongue virus in cattle. Vet Rec 163: 203-209.
  • Niedbalski W, Kęsy A (2008) Prevalence of antibodies specific to bluetongue virus (BTV) in animals imported to Poland. Med Weter 64: 76-79.
  • Niedbalski W (2009) Prevalence of the bluetongue virus antibodies in ruminants imported to Poland in 2008. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 53: 175-178.
  • Niedbalski W (2010) Monitoring studies of bluetongue disease in ruminants imported to Poland from EU. Pol J Vet Sci 13: 333-336.
  • Oura CA, Wood JL, Sanders AJ, Bin-Tarif A, Henstock M, Edwards L, Floyd T, Simmons H, Batten CA (2009) Seroconversion, neutralising antibodies and protection in bluetongue serotype 8 vaccinated sheep. Vaccine 27: 7326-7330.
  • Purse BV, Mellor PS, Rogers DJ, Samuel AR, Mertens PP, Baylis M (2005) Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in Europe. Nat Rev Microbiol 3: 171-181.
  • Vandenbussche F, Vanbinst T, Verheyden B, Van Dessel W, Demeestere L, Houdart P, Bertels G, Praet N, Berkvens D, Mintiens K, Goris N, De Clercq K (2008) Evaluation of antibody-ELISA and real-time RT-PCR for the diagnosis and profiling of bluetongue virus serotype 8 during the epidemic in Belgium in 2006. Vet Microbiol 129: 15-27.
  • Walton TE (2004) The history of bluetongue and a current global overview. Vet Ital 40: 31-38.
  • Wilson A, Mellor P (2008) Bluetongue in Europe: vectors, epidemiology and climate change. Parasitol Res 103: S69-S77.
  • Wilson AJ, Mellor PS (2009) Bluetongue in Europe: past, present and future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364: 2669-2681.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-57bdf6f0-6da0-47ea-9259-4f25400f24fd
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.