Urban compression patterns: Fractals and non-Euclidean geometries - inventory and prospect

• Autorzy: Griffith D.A. , Arlinghaus S. L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Słowa kluczowe

EN

urban growth; fractal geometry; non-Euclidean geometry; city; human activity; fractal dimension; Manhattan space form

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Quaestiones Geographicae
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 31
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.21-28,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Griffith D.A.

• School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W.Campbell Road, Richardson, TX 75080-3021, USA

autor

Arlinghaus S. L.

Bibliografia

• Arlinghaus S., 1985. Fractals take a central place. Geografiska Annaler, Journal of the Stockholm School of Economics, 67B: 83-88.
• Arlinghaus S., 2010. Fractals take a non-Euclidean place. Solstice: An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics, XXI, 1. Institute of Mathematical Geography, Ann Arbor, http://www.imagenet.org/.
• Arlinghaus S. & Arlinghaus W., 1989. The fractal theory of central place hierarchies: A Diophantine analysis of fractal generators for arbitrary Loschian numbers. Geographical Analysis: An International Journal of Theoretical Geography, 21(2): 103-121.
• Arlinghaus S., Arlinghaus W. & Harary F., 1993. Sum graphs and geographic information. Solstice: An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics, IV, 1. Institute of Mathematical Geography, Ann Arbor, http://www-personal. umich.edu/ ~copyrght/ image/solstice/sols193.html. Arlinghaus S. & Batty M., 2006. Zipf's hyperboloid? Solstice: An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics, XVII, 1. Institute of Mathematical Geography, Ann Arbor, http://www.imagenet.org/.
• Arlinghaus S. & Batty M., 2010. Zipf's hyperboloid revisited: Compression and navigation - canonical form. Solstice: An Electronic Journal of Geography and Mathematics, XXI, 1. Institute of Mathematical Geography, Ann Arbor, http://www. imagenet.org/.
• Arlinghaus S. & Nystuen J., 1990. Geometry of boundary exchanges: Compression patterns for boundary dwellers. Geographical Review, 80(1): 21-31.
• Arlinghaus S. & Nystuen J., 1991. Street geometry and flows. Geographical Review, 81(2): 206-214.
• Batty M. homepage: http://www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/people/ MikesPage.htm.
• Batty M. & Longley P., references listing: http://www.casa. ucl.ac.uk/people/MikesPage. htm.
• Benguigui L. & Daoud M., 1991 Is the suburban railway system a fractal? Geographical Analysis, 23: 362-368.
• Elert G., 1995-2007. About dimension. The chaos hypertextbook, http://hypertextbook. com/chaos/33.shtml.
• Griffith D., Vojnovic I. & Messina J., 2010. Distances in residential space: Implications from estimated metric functions for minimum path distances. Paper to be submitted to Journal of Transport Geography.
• Hausdorff & Besicovitch, historical reference: http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hausdorff dimension.
• Mandelbrot B., 1982. The fractal geometry of nature. W.H. Freeman, New York.
• Ord J., 1975. Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70: 120-126.
• Rodin V. & Rodina E., 2000. The fractal dimension of Tokyo's streets. Fractals, 8: 413-418.
• Shen G., 1997. A fractal dimension analysis of urban transportation networks. Geographical & Environmental Modelling, 1: 221-236.
• Wikipedia, Fibonacci coding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Fibonacci_coding. Last accessed, August 29, 2010.