European Union oil import dependency risk analysis

• Autorzy: Cirovic M. , Makajic-Nikolic D. , Petrovic N. , Vojosevic M. , Kuzmanovic M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In a world with growing energy demand and increasing energy scarcity, the need for new methods of risk analysis of energy supplies has been emphasized. These methods became even more important for specific energy resources whose future usage is quite questionable, such as oil. This paper will try to examine potential use of one such method for measuring energy security of countries and its dependency on external sources. One method used is failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), widely used in risk analysis and an inductive modelling approach used to evaluate potential failure modes and their causes. The main goal of FMEA is to prioritize potential risks and lead to actions that will eliminate or reduce the likelihood or effects of their occurrence. Risk evaluation and priority risk numbers were assessed based on expert opinion, using specially created scales developed for the monitored problem. In this paper we try to implement FMEA as a method for quantifying risk of oil shortage for European Union countries and their ability to respond to their growing oil demand and dependency. As a result of this study, ranking these countries by the level of risk they are exposed to will be presented, as well as analysis of the reasons underpinning such rankings.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 24
• Numer: 1
• Opis fizyczny: p.75-81,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Cirovic M.

• Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Makajic-Nikolic D.

• Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Petrovic N.

• Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Vojosevic M.

• Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Kuzmanovic M.

• Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Bibliografia

• 1. EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENERGY PORTAL. http://www.energy.eu/# (accessed 20. 12. 2013).
• 2. FRENCH GOVERNMENT ANNUAL REPORTS. http://www.premier-ministre.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/081005 _Rapport_au_Premier_ministre_final_ENG.pdf (accessed 21. 12. 2013).
• 3. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA). Factbook: Lists population, government, military, and economic information for nations recognized by the United States. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/ fields/2241.html#33 (accessed 20. 12. 2013).
• 4. CLIFTON J.J. Risk prediction, in Keller A.Z. and Wilson H.C. (Eds.) Disaster prevention, Planning and Limitation Unit, University of Bradford, Bradford, 1990.
• 5. MCDERMOTT R.E., MIKULAK R.J., BEAUREGARD M.R. The basis of FMEA, Productivity Inc., Portland, OR, 1996.
• 6. MAKAJIC-NIKOLIC D., JEDNAK S., BENKOVIC S., POZNANIC V. Project finance risk evaluation of the Electric power industry of Serbia, Energy Policy. 39, (10), 6168, 2011.
• 7. ERICSON II C.A. Hazard analysis technique for system safety. John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
• 8. AYYUB B.M. Risk analysis in engineering and economics, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2003.
• 9. ALMANNAI B., GREENOUGH R., KAY J. A decision support tool based on QFD and FMEA for the selection of manufacturing automation technologies. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 24, 501, 2008.
• 10. VUJOŠEVIC M. Fault tree analysis; view of the basic concept and technique, Tehnika. 38, (11), 1546, 1983.
• 11. PUENTE J., PINO R., PRIORE P., FUENTE D. A decision support system for applying failure mode and effects analysis, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 19, (2), 137, 2002.
• 12. KECECIOGLU D.B. Reliability Engineering Handbook. DEStech Publications, Inc., 1, 2, 2002.
• 13. ANDERSEN S., MOSTUE B.A. Risk analysis and risk management approaches applied to the petroleum industry and their applicability to IO concepts. Safety Science. 50, 2010, 2012.
• 14. ROONEY J.J., TURNER J.H., ARENDT J.S. A preliminary hazards analysis of a fluid catalytic cracking unit complex. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 1, (2), 96, 1988.
• 15. DEEGAN F.J., BURNS D.J. Failure mode and effect analysis of a subsea production system. Inst Marine Engrs Trans. 102, (3), 191, 1990.
• 16. CHEN H., MOAN T., VERHOEVEN H. Safety of dynamic positioning operations on mobile offshore drilling units. Reliability Engineering & System Safety. 93, (7), 1072, 2008.
• 17. HEKMAPATNAH M., SHAHIN A., RAVICHANDRAN N. The application of FMEA in the oil industry in Iran: the case of four litter oil canning process of Sepahan oil company. African Journal of Business Management. 5, 3019, 2011.
• 18. NABHANI N., JADERI F., SA’IDI E. Risk assessment and risk management of Abadan refinery’s sandblasting unit using FMEA method. International Conference on Chemical, Environmental Science and Engineering (ICEEBS'2012), July 28-29, Pattaya, Thailand, 2012.
• 19. AZADEH A., EBRAHIMIPOUR V., BAVAR P. A pump FMEA approach to improve reliability centered maintenance procedure: the case of centrifugal pumps in onshore industry. Proceedings of the 6th WSEAS International Conference on FLUID MECHANICS (FLUIDS'09). pp. 38-45, 2009.
• 20. AZADEH A., EBRAHIMIPOUR V., BAVAR P. A fuzzy inference system for pump failure diagnosis to improve maintenance process: The case of a petrochemical industry. Expert Systems with Applications. 37, (1), 627, 2010.
• 21. WANG Y., CHENG G., HU H., WU W. Development of a risk-based maintenance strategy using FMEA for a continuous catalytic reforming plant. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 25, (6), 958, 2012.
• 22. CATELANI M., CIANI L., LUONGO V. Safety analysis in oil & gas industry in compliance with standards IEC61508 and IEC61511: Methods and applications. In: IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference: Instrumentation and Measurement for Life, I2MTC, Minneapolis, USA. pp. 686-690, 2013.
• 23. HEDENUS F., AZAR C., JOHANSSON D.J.A. Energy security policies in EU-25 – The expected cost of oil supply disruptions. Energy policy 38, (3), 1241, 2010.
• 24. CHRISTIE E. Oil and gas dependence of EU-15 countries. Verein, Wiener Inst. für Internat. Wirtschaftsvergleiche (WIIW), 2007.
• 25. JOZI S.A., SAFFARIAN S., SHAFIE M. Environmental risk assessment of a gas power plant exploitation unit using integrated top-eFMEA method. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21, (1), 95, 2012.
• 26. DEUTCH J., SCHLESINGER J.R., VICTOR D.G. National security consequences of US oil dependency. Council on foreign relations. New York, 2006.
• 27. DIETER H. The Russian dimension and Europe’s external energy policy. University of Oxford, 2007.
• 28. EU-COMMISSION. Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003 on the promotion of the use of biofuels or other renewable fuels for transport. Official Journal of the European Union. 5, 2003.
• 29. COHEN A. Europe’s Strategic Dependence on Russian Energy. The Heritage Foundation, Backgrounder 2083, 2007.
• 30. ANDERSEN S.S. EU energy policy: Interest interaction and supranational authority. ARENA, 2000.
• 31. UMBACH F. Global energy security and the implications for the EU. Energy Policy. 38, (3), 1229, 2010.
• 32. EUROPEAN UNION COMMISSION detailed statistics on EU and candidate countries. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index. php/Consumption_of_energy (accessed 12. 12. 2013).
• 33. European Commission. A European strategy for sustainable, Competitive and secure energy, Brussels, COM (2006), 105, 2006.
• 34. European Commission. Energy for the future: renewable sources of energy. White Paper for a Community Strategy and Action Plan, Brussels, COM (97), 599, 1997.
• 35. ARABIAN-HOSEYNABADI H., ORAEE H., TAVNER P. J. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) for wind turbines. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 32, (7), 817, 2010.
• 36. FEILI H. R., AKAR N., LOTFIZADEH H., BAIRAMPOUR M., NASIRI S. Risk analysis of geothermal power plants using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) technique. Energy Conversion and Management. 72, 69, 2013.
• 37. THIVEL P. X., BULTEL Y., DELPECH F. Risk analysis of a biomass combustion process using MOSAR and FMEA methods. Journal of hazardous materials. 151, (1), 221, 2008.
• 38. AGNOLUCCI P. Use of economic instruments in the German renewable electricity policy. Energy Policy. 34, (18), 3538, 2006.
• 39. BOON F. P., DIEPERINK C. Local civil society based renewable energy organisations in the Netherlands: Exploring the factors that stimulate their emergence and development. Energy Policy. 69, 297, 2014.
• 40. KAMP L. M., SMITS R. E., ANDRIESSE C. D. Notions on learning applied to wind turbine development in the Netherlands and Denmark. Energy policy, 32, (14), 1625, 2004.
• 41. MAXOULIS C. N., KALOGIROU S. A. Cyprus energy policy: the road to the 2006 world renewable energy congress trophy. Renewable Energy. 33, (3), 355, 2008.
• 42. YANG Y., LI, J., SUN X., CHEN J. Measuring external oil supply risk: A modified diversification index with country risk and potential oil exports. Energy, 68, 930, 2014.
• 43. LESBIREL S. H. Diversification and energy security risks: the Japanese case. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 5, (1), 1, 2004.
• 44. WABIRI NJERI, HAMMED AMUSA. Quantifying South Africa's crude oil import risk: A multi-criteria portfolio model. Economic modelling. 27, (1), 445, 2010.
• 45. LIU H., LIU L., LIU N. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems With Applications. 40, (2), 828, 2013.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15244/pjoes/26105