The role of spatial distribution of faeces in coyote scent marking behaviour

• Autorzy: Barja I. , List R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Scats are important for chemical communication in many canids, however, little is known about the faecal marking behaviour in coyotes. In this study we tested if faeces have a function as visual and scent marks during the non-breeding period, analyzing the spatial characteristics of defecation places. We predicted that if faeces are used as chemical signals, these should be deposited in substrates and/or zones that enhance their detection by conspecifics as it happens in other canid species. The study was conducted in native grasslands at the NW limit of the Chihuahuan Desert. Results showed that the proportion of faeces in conspicuous zones (91.3%) was significantly higher than those on inconspicuous zones (8.7%). However, the number of faeces deposited on inconspicuous substrates (92.1%) was significantly higher than on conspicuous substrates (7.9%). Most faeces were on the ground (99.2%) and only 0.8% where raised. 35% of faeces were deposited in crossroads, being these strategic zones repeatedly marked by the coyotes. We observed a significant negative correlation between the number of faeces in crossroads and the distance of faeces to the centre of the crossroad. A high number of scats were found in the proximity of livestock carcasses (21%). In addition, a selection of certain road sections (track and lateral) was observed. Our results suggest that the scats have an important function as scent-marks in coyotes, using specific defecation patterns that appear to correspond to the habitat characteristics in the study area.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

feces marking; habitat; scent marking; behaviour; non-breeding period; coyote; Canis latrans; chemical communication; spatial pattern

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: 62
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.373-383,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Barja I.

• Departamento de Biologia, Unidad de Zoologia, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain

autor

List R.

• Instituto de Ecologia UNAM, Apartado 70-275 Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacan, 04510 Mexico D.F., Mexico

Bibliografia

• Agosta W.C. 1992 – Chemical communication: the language of pheromones – Scientific American Library, New York, 179 pp.
• Alberts A.C. 1992 – Constraints on the design of chemical communication systems in terrestrial vertebrates – Am. Nat. 139: S62–S69.
• Albone E.S. 1984 – Mammalian semiochemistry: the investigation of chemical signals between mammals – Wiley & Sons, New York, 360 pp.
• Andelt W.F., Kie J.G., Knowlton F.F., Cardwel K. 1987 – Variation in coyote diets associated with season and successional changes in vegetation – J. Wildl. Manage. 51: 273–277.
• Asa C.S., Mech L.D., Seal U.S. 1985 – The use of urine, faeces and anal-secretions in scent-marking by a captive wolf (Canis lupus) pack – Anim. Behav. 33: 1034–1036.
• Barja I. 2004 – Patrones de señalización con heces en el lobo ibérico – Etología, 11: 1–7 (in Spanish, English summary).
• Barja I. 2009 – Decision making in plant selection during the faecal-marking behaviour of wild wolves – Anim. Behav. 77: 489–493.
• Barja I., De Miguel F.J., Bárcena F. 2001 – Distribución espacial de los excrementos de zorro rojo (Vulpes vulpes, Linnaeus 1758) en los Montes do Invernadeiro (Ourense) – Galemys 13: 171–178 (in Spanish, English summary).
• Barja I., De Miguel F.J., Bárcena F. 2004 – Importance of the crossroads in faecal marking behaviour of the wolves (Canis lupus) – Naturwissenschaften, 91: 489–492.
• Barja I., De Miguel F.J., Bárcena F. 2005 – Faecal marking behaviour of Iberian wolf in different zones of their territory – Folia Zool. 54: 21–29.
• Barja I., List R. 2006 – Faecal marking behaviour in ringtails (Bassariscus astutus) during the non-breeding period: spatial characteristics of latrines and single faeces – Chemoecology, 16: 219–222.
• Barrette C., Messier F. 1980 – Scent-marking in free-ranging coyotes, Canis latrans – Anim. Behav. 28: 814–819.
• Bowen W.D., Cowan I.M. 1980 – Scent marking in coyotes – Can. J. Zool. 58: 473–480.
• Brown D.E. 1994 – Grasslands (In: Biotic communities, Ed: D.E. Brown) – Southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, pp. 107–141.
• Brown R.E., Macdonald D.W. 1985 – Social odours in mammals – Clarendon Press, Oxford, 386 pp.
• Buesching C.D. 2001 – The subcaudal gland of the European badger (Meles meles), chemistry and scent-marking behaviour – University of Oxford, Oxford, 207 pp.
• Calder C.J., Gorman M.L. 1991 – The effects of red fox Vulpes vulpes faecal odours on the feeding behaviour of Orkney voles Microtus arvalis – J. Zool. 224: 599–606.
• Ceballos G., Mellink E., Hanebury L. 1993 – Distribution and conservation status of prairie dogs (Cynomys mexicanus and C. ludovicianus) in Mexico – Biol. Conserv. 63: 115–112.
• Ceballos G., List R., Pacheco J., Manzano P., Santos G., Royo M. 2005 – Prairie dogs, cattle, and crops: diversity and conservation of the grassland ecosystem in northwestern Chihuahua, Mexico (In: Biodiversity, ecosystems, and conservation in northern Mexico, Eds: J.L.E. Cartron, G. Ceballos, R. Felger) – Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 425–438.
• Conroy J.W.H., French D.D. 1987 – The use of spraints to monitor populations of otters (Lutra lutra L.) – Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 58: 247–262.
• Dickman C.R., Doncaster C.P. 1984 – Responses of small mammals to red fox (Vulpes vulpes) odour – J. Zool. 204: 521–531.
• Fox M.W. 1975 – The wild canids – Robert, E. Krieger Publishing Company, Florida.
• Fox M.W., Cohen J.A. 1978 – Canid Communication (In: How animals communicate, Ed: T.A. Sebeok) – Indiana University Press, Indiana, pp. 728–748.
• García A E. 1973 – Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köepen – Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico, 146 pp.
• Gese E.M., Rongstad O.J., Mytton W.R. 1988 – Home range and habitat use of coyotes in southeastern Colorado – J. Wildl. Manage. 52: 640–646.
• Gese E.M., Ruff R.L. 1997 – Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors – Anim. Behav. 54: 1155–1166.
• Gorman M.L. 1980 – Sweaty mongooses and other smelly carnivores – Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 45: 87–105.
• Gorman M.L. 1989 – Olfactory communication in carnivores (In: Carnivore behaviour, ecology and evolution, Ed: J.L. Gittleman) – Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 57–88.
• Gorman M.L., Trowbridge B.J. 1989 – The role of odor in the social lives of carnivores (In: Carnivore behaviour, ecology and evolution, Ed: J.L. Gittleman) – Cornell University Press, New York, pp. 57–139.
• Henr y J.D. 1977 – The use of urine marking in the scavenging behavior of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) – Behaviour, 61: 82–105.
• Kleiman D.G. 1966 – Scent marking in the canidae – Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 18: 167–177.
• Kruuk H. 1972 – The spotted hyaena: a study of predation and social behaviour – University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 335 pp.
• List R. 1997 – Ecology of kit fox (Vulpes macrotis) and coyote (Canis latrans) and the conservation of the prairie dog ecosystem in northern México – Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford, 189 pp.
• List R., Macdonald D.W. 1998 – Carnivora and their larger mammalian prey: species inventory and abundance in the Janos-Nuevo Casas Grandes prairie dog complex – Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología, 3: 95–112.
• List R., Macdonald D.W. 2001 – Foraging behaviour of coyotes in prairie dog towns of northwestern Mexico – Canid Biology and Conservation Conference, 2001: 72.
• List R., Manzano-Fischer P., Macdonald D.W. 2003 – Coyote and kit fox diets in a prairie dog complex in Mexico (In: The Swift Fox: Ecology and Conservation of Swift Foxes in a changing world, Eds: M. Sovada, L. Carbyn) – Canadian Plains Research Center, University of Regina, Canada, pp. 183–188.
• Lockhart M., Pacheco J., List R., Ceballos G. 2002 – Black-footed ferrets thrive in Mexico – Endangered Species Bulletin, 28: 12–13.
• Macdonald D.W. 1980 – Patterns of scent marking with urine and faeces amongst carnivore communities – Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 45: 107–139.
• Mason C.F., Macdonald S.M. 1987 – The use of spraints for surveying otter Lutra lutra populations: an evaluation – Biol. Conserv. 41: 167–177.
• Miguel F.J. de Valencia A., Arroyo M., Monclús R. 2009 – Spatial distribution of scent marks in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes L.): do red foxes select certain plants as signal posts? – Pol. J. Ecol. 57: 605–609.
• Navarro-Castilla A., Barja I. 2014 – Antipredatory response and food intake in wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) under simulated predation risk by resident and novel carnivorous predators – Ethology 120: 90–98.
• Pacheco J., Ceballos G., List R. 2000 – Los mamíferos de la región de Janos-Casas Grandes, Chihuahua, México. 1999–2000 – Revista Mexicana de Mastozoología, 4: 71–85.
• Paquet P.C. 1991 – Scent-marking behavior of sympatric wolves (Canis lupus) and coyotes (C. Latrans) in Riding Mountain National Park – Can. J. Zool. 69: 1721–1727.
• Peters R .P., Mech L.D. 1975 – Scent-marking in wolves – Am. Sci. 63: 628–637.
• Piñeiro A., Barja I. 2012 – The plant physical features selected by wildcats as signal posts: An economic approach to fecal marking – Naturwissenschaften, 99: 801–809.
• Piñeiro A., Barja I. (in press) – Evaluating the function of wildcat faecal marks in relation to the defence of favourable hunting areas – Ethol. Ecol. Evol.
• Robinson I.H., Delibes M. 1988 – The distribution of faeces by the Spanish lynx (Felis pardina) – J. Zool. 216: 577–582.
• Semarnat 2000 – Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2001, Protección ambiental –Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-lista de especies en riesgo – Diario Ofical de la Federación, 582: 1–80.
• Smith J.L.D., Mcdousgal C., Miquelle D. 1989 – Scent marking in free-ranging tigers, Panthera tigris – Anim. Behav. 37: 1–10.
• Sillero-Zubiri C., Macdonald D.W. 1998 – Scent-marking and territorial behaviour of Ethiopian wolves Canis simensis – J. Zool. 24: 351–361.
• Stewart P.D., Macdonald D.W., Newman C., Cheesman C. 2001 – Boundary faeces and matched advertisement in the European badger (Meles meles): a potential role in range exclusion – J. Zool. 255: 191–198.
• Thiessen D.D., Rice M. 1976 – Mammalian scent gland marking and social behaviour – Psychol. Rev. 83: 505–539.
• Vilà C., Urios V., Castroviejo J. 1994 – Use of faeces for marking in Iberian wolves (Canis lupus) – Can. J. Zool. 72: 374–377.
• Wells M.C., Bekoff M. 1981 – An observational study of scent marking in coyotes, Canis latrans – Anim. Behav. 29: 332–350.