Effect of supplementary lighting on selected physiological parameters and yielding of tomato plants

• Autorzy: Gajc-Wolska J. , Kowalczyk K. , Metera A. , Mazur K. , Bujalski D. , Hemka L.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wpływ doświetlania na fotosyntezę, transpirację oraz plonowanie roślin pomidora

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Light is one of the basic factors needed by plants for their development. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of supplementary lighting of tomato plants with HPS and LED lamps on the chosen physiological parameters and yielding of autumn-winter cultivation crops. Two tomato cultivars (‘Komeett’ F, and ‘Starbuck’ Fj by De Ruiter Seeds) were used in this experiment. After the plants were planted, LED and HPS lamps of 100 pmol m-2 s_1 light intensity were installed. The results show that the introduction of a supplementary light source to tomato cultivation caused an increase in the intensity of photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll by 57.7%, 17.1%, 39.3% and 24.4% on average, respectively. Higher values of those parameters were obtained with HPS lamps than with LED lamps. The amount of marketable crops, number of fruits and mean fruit weight were higher in both combinations in which supplementary lighting was applied, and the values of these traits were higher when the cultivation was supplementary lighted with HPS lamps than with LED lamps. Due to the overhead light configuration and continued low light output, there was no increase of efficiency when using LED lamps compared to HPS lamps despite better focusing and spectral distribution.

PL

Światło jest jednym z podsta¬wowych czynników niezbędnych roślinie do rozwoju. Celem niniejszego doświadczenia było wykazanie wpływu doświetlania roślin pomidora z zastosowaniem wysokoprężnych lamp sodowych (WLS) oraz lamp diodowych (LED) na wybrane parametry fizjologiczne i plon w uprawie jesienno-zimowej. Wykorzystano dwie odmiany pomidora (Komeett Fj i Starbuck F, - De Ruiter Seeds Company). Po posadzeniu uruchomiono doświetlanie o intensywności 100 pmol nr2 s"1 złożone z lamp WLS lub LED. Wprowadzenie doświetlania do uprawy pomidora spowodowało wzrost fotosyntezy o 57,7%, transpiracji o 17,1%, przewodności szparkowej o 39,3%, jak również zawartości chlorofilu o 24%. Większy wzrost uzyskano dla lamp WLS niż dla lamp LED. Plon handlowy, liczba owoców oraz średnia waga owocu były wyższe w obu doświetlanych kombinacjach, przyrost tych parametrów był również wyższy dla lamp WLS niż diodowych. Ze względu na stosowanie oświetlenia górnego oraz wciąż niską wydajność lamp , pomimo lepszego ogniskowania i składu widmowego nie wykazano wzrostu przydatności lamp diodowych w porównaniu do lamp WLS.

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Folia Horticulturae
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: 25
• Numer: 2
• Opis fizyczny: p.153-159,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Gajc-Wolska J.

• Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, Warsaw Univesity of Life Science - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Kowalczyk K.

• Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, Warsaw Univesity of Life Science - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Metera A.

• Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, Warsaw Univesity of Life Science - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Mazur K.

• Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, Warsaw Univesity of Life Science - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Bujalski D.

• Department of Vegetable and Medicinal Plants, Warsaw Univesity of Life Science - SGGW, Nowoursynowska 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Hemka L.

• Electrotechnical Institute, Pozaryskiego 28, 04-703 Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• BLAIN J., GOSSELIN A., TRUDEL M.J., 1987. Influence of HPS supplementary lighting on growth and yield of greenhouse cucumbers. HortSci. 22: 36-38.
• BLOM T. J., INGRATTA F. J., 1984.The effect of high pressure sodium lighting on the production of tomatoes, cucumbers and roses. Acta Hort. 148: 905-914.
• BLOM T.J., AND ZHENG Y., 2009. The response of plant growth and leaf gas exchange to the speed of lamp movement in greenhouse. Sci. Hort. 119: 188-192.
• DORIAS M., GOSSELIN A., TRUDEL M.J., 1991. Annual greenhouse tomato production under a sequential intercropping system using supplemental light. Sci. Hort. 45: 225-234.
• GUNNLAUGSSON B., ADALSTEINSSON S., 2006. Interlight and plant density in year-round production of tomato at northern latitudes. Acta Hort. 711: 71-75.
• FIERRO A., TREMBLAY N., GOSSELIN A., 1994. Supplemental carbon dioxide and light improvement tomato and pepper seedling growth and yield. HortSci. 29: 152-154.
• HENDRIKS J. 1992. Supplementary lighting for green¬house. Acta Hort. 312: 65-76.
• HERNANDEZ R., KUBOTA C., 2012. Tomato seedlings growth and morphological responses to supplemental LED lighting Red:Blue ratios under varied daily solar light intervals. Acta Hort. 956: 187-193.
• Hovi T., NAKKILA J., TAHVONEN R., 2004. Interlighting improves year-round cucumber production. Sci. Hort. 102: 283-294.
• Hovi T., NAKKILA J., TAHVONEN R., 2006. Increasing productivity of sweet pepper with intracanopy lighting. Acta Hort. 711: 165-170.
• HOVI-PEKKANEN T., TAHVONEN R., 2008. Effects of intracanopy lighting on yield and external fruit quality in year-round cultivated cucumber. Sci. Hort. 116: 152-161.
• JOHKAN M., SHOJI K., GOTO F., HAHIDA S., YOSHIHARA T., 2012. Effect of green light wavelength and intensity on photomorphogenesis and photosynthesis in Lactuca sativa. Environ. Exp. Bot. 75: 128-1313.
• KARAMI E., WEAVER J.B., 1972. Growth analysis of American upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. with different leaf shapes and colours. Crop Sci. 12: 317-320.
• KIM S., HAHN E., HEO J., PAEK K., 2004. Effects of LEDs on net photosynthetic rate, growth and leaf stomatal of chrysanthemum plantlets in vitro. Sci. Hort. 101: 143-151.
• KOPSELL D.A., KOPSELL D.E. 2008. Genetic and environmental factors affecting plant lutein/ zeaxantin. Agro Food Ind. Hi Tec. 19: 44-46.
• Li Q., KUBOTA CH., 2009. Effects of supplemental light quality on growth and phytochemicals of baby leaf lettuce. Environ. Exp. Bot.: 1-27.
• MASSON J., TREMBLAY N., GOSSELIN A., 1991. Nitrogen fertilization and HPS supplementary lighting influence vegetable transplant production. I. Transplant growth. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116: 594-598.
• MATSUDA R., OHASHI-KANEKO K., FUJIWARA K., GOTO E., KURATA K. 2004. Photosynthetic characteristic of rice leaves grown under red light with or without supplemental blue light. Plant Cell Physiol. 45: 1870-1874.
• Me CALL D., 1992. Effect of supplementary light on tomato transplant growth, and the after-effects on yield. Sci. Hort. 51: 65-70.
• PEREZ-BALIBREA S., MORENO D.A., GARCIA-VIGUERA C., 2008. Influence of light on health-promoting phytochemicals of broccoli sprouts. J. Sci. Food Agr. 88: 904-910.
• PETTAI H., OJA V., FREIBERG A., LAISK A., 2005. Photosynthetic activity of far-red light in green plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1708: 311-321.
• PETTERSENR.I., TORRE S., GISLEROD H.R., 2010a. Effect of intracanopy lighting on photosynthetic characteristic in cucumber. Sci. Hort. 125: 77-81.
• PETTERSEN R.I., TORRE S., GISLEROD H.R., 2010b. Effects of leaf aging and light duration on photosynthetic characteristics in a cucumber canopy. Sci. Hort. 125: 82-87.
• PISZCZEK R, GŁOWACKA B., 2005. Effect of light quality on growth of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) transplants. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 63: 77-85
• RALPH P.J., GADEMANN R., 2005. Rapid light curves: A powerful tool to assess photosynthetic activity. Aquat. Bot. 82: 222-237.
• RAVIV M., BLOM T., 2001. The effect of water availability and quality of soilless-grown cut roses. Review. Sci. Hort. 88: 257-276.
• TIBBITTS T., CAO W.W., WHEELER R.M.,1993. Growth of potatos for CELSS. Final Rapport NASA Coop. Agreement NCC: 2-301.
• TROUWBORST G., SCHAPENDONK H.C.M., RAPPOLDT K., POT S., HOGEWONING S.W., VAN IEPEREN W., 2011. The effect of intracanopy lighting on cucumber fruit- Model analysis. Sci. Hort. 129: 273-278.
• VEZINA F., TRUDEL M.J., GOSSELIN A., 1991. Influence du mode d’utilisation de l’eclairage d’appoint sur la productivité et la physiologie de la tomate de serre. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71: 923-932.
• WANG H., Gu M., Cui J., SHI K., ZHOU Y., Yu J., 2009. Effect of light quality on CO, assimilation, chlorophyll-fluorescence quenching, expression of Calvin cycle genes and carbohydrate accumulation in Cucumis sativus. J. Phytoch. Photobiol. B 96: 30-37.
• XIAOYING L., SHIRONG G., TAOTAO C. ZHIGANG X., TEZUKA T., 2012. Regulation of the growth and photosynthesis of cherry tomato seedlings by different light irradiations of light emitting diodes (LED). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 11(22): 6169-6177.