PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników

Czasopismo

2014 | 49 | 1 |

Tytuł artykułu

Nest-site and landscape characteristics affect the distribution of breeding pairs of European Rollers Coracias garullus in an agricultural area of southeastern France

Warianty tytułu

PL
Czynniki wpływające na wybór miejsc lęgowych przez kraski

Języki publikacji

EN

Abstrakty

EN
Understanding factors that drive the choice of breeding habitats for birds is important for species management and conservation. We addressed this question in the case of the European Roller Coradas garrulus, an endangered species listed in Annex I of the European Union directive for bird conservation. For secondary hole-nesting birds, such as rollers, the breeding micro- and macrohabitat selection may rely on the location of the nest hole in a tree and its immediate surrounding environment as well as the larger scale foraging habitat. We used both of these criteria to compare the characteristics of Green Woodpecker Picus viridis holes that either were or were not occupied by breeding pairs of the European Roller. Our study was carried out in an agricultural landscape of southeastern France where the population of European Roller is trending towards an increase. When compared to unoccupied holes, occupied holes were at a lower height (approx. 6 m above ground) and were preferentially located in dead trees with other holes in close vicinity. Occupied holes were also located in landscapes with lower land use intensity (i.e., higher proportions of meadows, fallow lands, and fewer hedgerows and built areas) than non-occupied holes. Finally, fallow lands and meadows harboured more Orthoptera, an important food resource for rollers, than other land cover categories. Thus, our results highlight the importance of these land covers for the species management and indicate that they may be favourable areas for nest-box provisioning.
PL
Badania prowadzono na terenach rolniczych w południo-wschodniej Francji (Fig. 1). Wyszukiwano dziuple (wykute przez dzięcioła zielonego) zajęte i niezajęte przez kraski. Następnie wybór miejsca gniazdowego przez te ptaki analizowano w dwóch skalach: 1) drzewa z dziuplą oraz 2) otaczającego środowiska w promieniu do 500 m od drzewa z dziuplą. W promieniu tym metodą transektową określano także liczebność prostoskrzydłych (głównego pożywienia krasek), w trzech głównych rodzajach środowisk: sadach, polach uprawnych oraz łąkach i odłogach. Zmienne związane z rodzajem użytkowania ziemi analizowane były przy pomocy analizy głównych składowych (Tab. 1). Stwierdzono, że dziuple wykorzystywane przez kraski w porównaniu do dziupli niezajętych przez te ptaki były położone niżej nad ziemią, częściej znajdowały się w drzewach martwych, a w najbliższej okolicy znajdowały się także inne dziuple (Tab. 2, 3). Dziuple zajęte przez ptaki znajdowały się na terenach charakteryzujących się niższą intensywnością rolnictwa (większy udział łąk, odłogów) niż niezajęte (Tab. 2), ptaki unikały gniazdowania na terenach zurbanizowanych, z dużym udziałem sadów i żywopłotów (Tab. 3, Fig. 2). Liczebność prostoskrzydłych różniła się pomiędzy formami użytkowania ziemi i była najwyższa na łąkach i odłogach. Uzyskane wyniki wskazują na znaczenie sposobów użytkowania ziemi dla ochrony tego gatunku i dają podstawy do wyboru miejsc, w których można np. wieszać skrzynki lęgowe dla krasek.

Wydawca

-

Czasopismo

Rocznik

Tom

49

Numer

1

Opis fizyczny

p.23-32,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

  • INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systemes de culture Horticoles, F-84000 Avignon, France
autor
  • INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systemes de culture Horticoles, F-84000 Avignon, France
autor
  • INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systemes de culture Horticoles, F-84000 Avignon, France
  • INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systemes de culture Horticoles, F-84000 Avignon, France
autor
  • INRA, UR 1115, Plantes et Systemes de culture Horticoles, F-84000 Avignon, France

Bibliografia

  • Avilés J. M., Costillo E. 1998. Selection of breeding habitats by the roller (Coracias garrulus) in farming areas of the southwestern Iberian peninsula. Vogelwarte 39: 242-247.
  • Avilés J. M., Parejo D. 2002. Diet and prey type selection by rollers Coracias garrulus during the breeding season in southwest of Iberian Peninsula. Alauda 70: 227-230.
  • Aviles J. M., Parejo D. 2004. Farming practices and Roller Coracias garrulus conservation in south-west Spain. Bird Conserv. Int. 14: 173-181.
  • Aviles J. M., Sanchez J. M., Parejo D. 2000a. The Roller Coracias garrulus in Extremadura (southwestern Spain) does not show a preference for breeding in clean nestboxes. Bird Study 47: 252-254.
  • Aviles J. M., Sanchez J. M., Parejo D. 2000b. Nest-site selection and breeding success in the Roller (Coracias garrulus) in the Southwest of the Iberian peninsula. J. Ornithol. 141: 345-350.
  • Aviles J. M., Sanchez J. M., Sanchez A., Parejo D. 1999. Breeding biology of the Roller Coracias garrulus in farming areas of the southwest Iberian Peninsula. Bird Study 46: 217-223.
  • Bailey J. W., Thompson F. R. 2007. Multiscale nest-site selection by black-capped vireos. J. Wildlife Manage. 71: 828-836.
  • Barbaro L., Rossi J. P., Vetillard F., Nezan J., Jactel H. 2007. The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure. J. Biogeogr. 34: 652-664.
  • Belthoff J. R., Ritchison G. 1990. Nest-site selection by Eastern screech-owls in central Kentucky. Condor 92: 982-990.
  • Berg A. 2008. Habitat selection and reproductive success of Ortolan Buntings Emberiza hortulana on farmland in central Sweden — the importance of habitat heterogeneity. Ibis 150: 565-573.
  • Butler S. J. 2001. Nest-site selection by the European Roller (Coracias garrulus) in southern France. MSc Thesis, University of York, UK.
  • Cody M. L. 1985. An introduction to habitat selection in birds. In: Cody M. L. (ed.). Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, Orlando, pp. 3-56.
  • Cornell K. L., Donovan T. M. 2010. Effects of spatial habitat heterogeneity on habitat selection and annual fecundity for a migratory forest songbird. Landscape Ecol. 25:109-122.
  • Cramp S., Simmons K. E. K. 1985. The birds of the Western Palearctic. Vol. IV. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Czeszczewik D., Walankiewicz W., Mitrus C., Nowakowski W. 1999. Nest-box data of Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca may lead to erroneous generalizations. Vogelwelt 120: 361-365.
  • Edworthy A. B., Wiebe K. L., Martin K. 2012. Survival analysis of a critical resource for cavity-nesting communities: patterns of tree cavity longevity. Ecol. Appl. 22: 1733-1742.
  • Fisher R. J., Wiebe K. L. 2006. Nest site attributes and temporal patterns of northern flicker nest loss: effects of predation and competition. Oecologia 147: 744-753.
  • Géroudet P. 1980. Du coucou aux corvidés. Les passereaux d'Europe. Delachaux et Nestlé, Neuchâtel, pp. 62-66.
  • Gibbons P., Lindenmayer D. B. 2002. Tree hollows and wildlife conservation in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne.
  • Gibbons P., Lindenmayer D. B., Fischer J., Manning A. D., Weinberg A., Seddon J., Ryan P., Barrett G. 2008. The future of scattered trees in agricultural landscapes. Conserv. Biol. 22: 1309-1319.
  • Grzybek J., Kata K., Kata M., Snopek S., Sobus T., Szyska M. 2009. [Distribution, abundance and breeding ecology of the European Roller Coracias garrulus in south-east Poland in 1990-2008]. Notatki Ornitologiczne 50: 240-250.
  • Johnsson K., Nilson S. G., Tjernberg M. 1993. Characteristics and utilization of old Black Woodpecker Dryocopus martius holes by hole-nesting species. Ibis 135: 410-416.
  • Kosiński Z., Bilińska E., Dereziński J., Kempa M. 2011. Nestsites used by Stock Doves Columba oenas: what determines their occupancy? Acta Ornithol. 46: 155-163.
  • Kovacs A., Barov B., Orhun C., Gallo-Orsi U. 2008. International Species Action Plan for the European Roller Coracias garrulus garrulus. available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/ wildbirdVaction_plans/docs/coracias_garrulus_garrulus.pdf
  • Lambrechts M. M., Adriaensen F., Ardia D. R., Artemyev A. V., et al. 2010. The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. Acta Ornithol. 45: 1-26.
  • Manning A. D., Gibbons P., Fischer J., Oliver D. L., Lindenmayer D. B. 2013. Hollow futures? Tree decline, lag effects and hollow-dependent species. Animal Conserv. 16: 395-403.
  • Martin T. E. 1995. Avian life history evolution in relation to nest sites, nest predation, and food. Ecol. Monogr. 65: 101-127.
  • Mazgajski T. D. 2007. Effect of old nest material on nest site selection and breeding parameters in secondary hole nesters — a review. Acta Ornithol. 42: 1-14.
  • Maziarz M., Wesołowski T. 2013. Microclimate of tree cavities used by Great Tits (Parus major) in a primeval forest. Avian Biol. Res. 6: 47-56.
  • Mitrus C., Socko B. 2008. Breeding success and nest-site characteristics of Red-breasted Flycatchers Ficedula parva in a primaeval forest. Bird Study 55: 203-208.
  • Møller A. P. 1989. Parasites, predators and nest boxes — facts and artefacts in nest box studies of birds. Oikos 56: 421-423.
  • Morris A. J., Wilson J. D., Whittingham M. J., Bradbury R. B. 2005. Indirect effects of pesticides on breeding yellow-hammer (Emberiza citrinella). Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 106: 1- 16.
  • Newton I. 1998. Population limitation in birds. Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Nilsson S. G. 1984. The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: The importance of nest predation competition. Ornis Scand. 15: 167-175.
  • Paclik M., Misik J., Weidinger K. 2009. Nest predation and nest defense in European and North American woodpeckers: a review. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 46: 361-379.
  • Parejo D., Aviles J. M. 2011. Predation risk determines breeding territory choice in a Mediterranean cavity-nesting bird community. Oecologia 165: 185-191.
  • Parejo D., Aviles J. M., Pena A., Sanchez L., Ruano F., Zamora- Munoz C., Martin-Vivaldi M. 2013. Armed Rollers: Does nestling's vomit function as a defence against predators? Plos One 8: e68862
  • Parejo D., Danchin E., Aviles J. M. 2005. The heterospecific habitat copying hypothesis: can competitors indicate habitat quality? Behav. Ecol. 16: 96-105.
  • R Development Core Team 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
  • Refsnider J. M., Janzen F. J. 2010. Putting eggs in one basket: ecological and evolutionary hypotheses for variation in oviposition-site choice. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. 41: 39-57.
  • Rendell W. B., Robertson R. J. 1994. Cavity-entrance orientation and nest-site use by secondary hole-nesting birds. J. Field Ornithol. 65: 27-35.
  • Rhodes B., O'Donnell C., Jamieson I. 2009. Microclimate of natural cavity nests and its implications for a threatened secondary cavity nesting passerine of New Zealand, the South island saddleback. Condor 111: 462-469.
  • Robertson B. A. 2009. Nest-sites selection in a postfire landscape: do parents make tradeoffs between microclimate and predation risk? Auk 126: 500-510.
  • Robertson B. A., Hutto R. L. 2006. A framework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 87: 1075-1085.
  • Rodier D. 2012. Les noyers sont désormais le deuxième verger français. Agreste Primeur 277: http://agreste.agriculture. gouv.fr/publications/primeurs/.
  • Rodriguez C., Bustamante J. 2008. Patterns of Orthoptera abundance and lesser kestrel conservation in arable landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv. 17: 1753-1764.
  • Rodriguez J., Aviles J. M., Parejo D. 2011. The value of nestboxes in the conservation of Eurasian Rollers Coracias garrulus in southern Spain. Ibis 153: 735-745.
  • Sackl P., Tiefenbach M., Ilzer W., Pfeiler J., Wieser B. 2004. Monitoring the Austrian relict population of European Roller Coradas garrulus — A review of preliminary data and conservation implications. Acrocephalus 25: 51-57.
  • Sedgwick J. A., Knopf F. L. 1991. The loss of avian cavities by injury compartimentalization. Condor 93: 781-783.
  • Sosnowski J., Chmielewski S. 1996. Breeding biology of the Roller (Coracias garrulus) in the Puszcza Pilicka forest, Central Poland. Acta Ornithol. 31: 119-131.
  • Traba J., Morales M. B., de la Morena E. L. G., Delgado M. P., Kristin A. 2008. Selection of breeding territory by little bustard (Tetrax tetrax) males in Central Spain: the role of arthropod availability. Ecol. Res. 23: 615-622.
  • Tron F., Zenasni A., Bousquet G., Cramm P., Besnard A. 2008. Réévaluation du statut du rollier d'Europe (Coracias garrulus) en France. Ornithos 15: 84-89.
  • Tucker G. M., Heath H. F. 1994. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Birdlife International, Cambridge.
  • Vaclav R., Valera F., Martinez T. 2011. Social information in nest colonisation and occupancy in a long-lived, solitary breeding bird. Oecologia 165: 617-627.
  • Wesołowski T. 1995. The loss of avian cavities by injury compartimentalization in a primeval European forest. Condor 97: 256-257.
  • Wesołowski T. 2011a. Reports from nestbox studies: a review of inadequacies. Acta Ornithol. 46: 13-17.
  • Wesołowski T. 2011b. "Lifespan" of woodpecker-made holes in a primeval temperate forest: A thirty year study. Forest Ecol. Manag. 262: 1846-1852.
  • Wiebe K. L. 2001. Microclimate of tree cavity nests: Is it important for reproductive success in northern flickers? Auk 118: 412-421.
  • Winkler D. W., Wrege P. H., Allen P. E., Kast T. L., Senesac P., Wasson M. F., Llambias P. E., Ferretti V., Sullivan P. J. 2004. Breeding dispersal and philopatry in the tree swallow. Condor 106: 768-776.
  • Yeatman L. 1976. Atlas des oiseaux nicheurs de France. Société d'Etudes Ornithologiques, Paris.

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikatory

URI
10.3161/000164514X682869

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.agro-516e6da9-4ae4-41fc-84b5-e418c2d7b06c
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.