Geographic patterns of genetic diversity of Pinus mugo (Pinaceae) in Central European mountains

• Autorzy: Dzialuk A. , Boratynski A. , Boratynska K. , Burczyk J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The genetic diversity within and among twelve populations (379 individuals) of Pinus mugo from the Giant Mts., Carpathians and Alps was analyzed using ten chloroplast microsatellite markers. A stepwise mutation model (SMM) for microsatellite loci was used in order to estimate divergence between populations and provenances from three mountain ranges. High levels of genetic diversity and significant differentiation were found among the three population groups. The populations from Giant Mts., Carpathians and Alps were strongly differentiated between each other, while differences among populations within these massifs were much lower. The pattern of genetic structure observedin dwarf mountain pine can be characteristic in conifers with a disjunctive geographic distribution. The significant genetic structuring among isolated parts of the geographic range of the species may be a result of an ancient fragmentation andlong lasting geographic isolation between the Giant Mts., Alpine and Tatra populations of P. mugo.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

geographic pattern; genetic diversity; Pinus mugo; Pinaceae; Alps Mountains; Carpathians Mountains; dwarf mountain pine; phylogeography; chloroplast; microsatellite; Giant Mountains; geographic distribution

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Dendrobiology
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: 68
• Opis fizyczny: p.31-41,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Dzialuk A.

• Department of Genetics, Kazimierz Wielki University, Chodkiewicza 30, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland

autor

Boratynski A.

autor

Boratynska K.

autor

Burczyk J.

Bibliografia

• Ali A.A., Martinez M., Fauvart N., Roiron P., Fioraso G., Guendon J.L., Terral J.F., Carcaillet Ch. 2006. Incendies et peuplements a Pinus mugo Turra dans les Alpes occidentals (Val de Suse, Italie) durant la transition Tardiglaciaire-Holocene: une zone refuge évidente. Comptes Rendus, Biologique 329: 494–501.
• Benito Garzón M., Sánchez de Dios R., Sáinz Ollero H. 2007. Predictive modelling of tree species distribution on the Iberian Peninsula during Last Glacial Maximum andMid -Holocene. Ecography 30: 120–134.
• Bhagwat S.A., Willis K.J. 2008. Species persistence in northerly glacial refugia of Europe: a matter of chance or biogeographical traits? Journal of Biogeography 35: 464–482.
• Birks H.J.B., Willis K.J. 2008. Alpines, trees, and refugia in Europe. Plant Ecology andDiversity 1: 147–160.
• Boratyńska K., Marcysiak K., Boratyński A. 2005. Pinus mugo (Pinaceae) in the Abruzzi Mountains: high morphological variation in isolated populations. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 147: 309-316.
• Boratyński A. 1994. Protectedandd eserving protection trees andshrubs of the Polish part of the Sudety Mts. and its prealps. 7. Pinus mugo Turra and Pinus uliginosa Neumann. Arboretum Kórnickie 39: 63-85.
• Chałupka W., Fober R. 1977. Studies on the effect of mineral fertilization on flowering andcone and seedcrops in Scots pine (Pinus silvestris L.) through an analysis of the litter drop. Arboretum Kórnickie 22: 219–235.
• Chao A., Shen T.-J. 2010 Program SPADE (Species Prediction And Diversity Estimation). Program andUser’s Guide publishedat http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw.
• Christensen K.I. 1987. Taxonomic revision of the Pinus mugo complex and P. ×rhaetica (P. mugo ×P. sylvestris) (Pinaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 7: 383-408.
• Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L. 1990. Isolation of DNA from fresh plant tissue. Focus 12: 13–15.
• Dupanloup I., Schneider S., Excoffier L. 2002. A simulatedannealing approach to define genetic structure of populations. Molecular Ecology 11: 2571–2581.
• Dzialuk A., Muchewicz E., Boratyński A., Montserrat J.M., Boratyńska K., Burczyk J. 2009. Genetic variation of Pinus uncinata (Pinaceae) in the Pyrenees determined with cpSSR markers. Plant Systematics and Evolution 277: 197–205.
• EllstrandN.E., Roose M.L. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. American Journal of Botany 74: 123–131.
• EllstrandN.C., Elam D.R. 1993. Population genetic consequences of small population size: implications for plant conservation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution andSystematics 24: 217–242.
• Excoffier L., Laval G., Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integratedsoftware package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47–50.
• Farcas S., de Beaulieu J.L., Reille M., Coldea G., Diaconeasa B., Goeury C., Goślar T., Jull T. 1999. First 14C datings of Late Glacial and Holocene pollen sequences from Romanian Carpathes. Comptes Rendus, Sciences de la Vie 322: 799–807.
• Felsenstein J. 2003. PHYLIP: phylogeny inference package v. 3.61. University of Washington, Seattle. Available at: http://evolution.gs.washington.edu/phylip.html.
• Filppula S., Szmidt A.E., Savolainen O. 1992. Genetic comparison between Pinus sylvestris and P. mugo using isozymes andchloroplast DNA. Nordic Journal of Botany 12: 381–386.
• Gómez A., Vendramin G.G., González-Martínez S.C., Alía R. 2005. Genetic diversity and differentiation of two Mediterranean pines (Pinus halepensis Mill. and Pinus pinaster Ait.) along a latitudinal cline using chloroplast microsatellite markers. Diversity and Distribution 11: 257–263.
• Goncharenko G.G., Silin A.E., Padutov V.E. 1995. Intra- andinterspecific genetic differentiation in closely relatedpines from Pinus subsection Sylvestres (Pinaceae) in the former Soviet Union. Plant Systematics and Evolution 194: 39–54.
• Hardy O.J., Vekemans X. 2002. SPAGeDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 618–620.
• Hartl D.L., Clark A.G. 2007. Principles of population genetics, fourth edithion. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
• Heuertz M., Teufel J., González-Martínez S.I., Soto A., Fady B., Alía R., Vendramin G.G. 2010. Geography determines genetic relationships between species of mountains pine (Pinus mugo complex) in western Europe. Journal of Biogeography 37: 541–556.
• Idury R.M., Cardon L.R. 1997. A Simple Method for AutomatedAllele Binning in Microsatellite Markers. Genome Research 7: 1104–1109.
• Jalas J., Suominen J. 1973. Atlas Florae Europaeae 2. Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki.
• Jankovská V. 2001. Vegetation development in the Western part of the Giant Mts. during the Holocene. Opera Corcontica 38: 11–19.
• Jasińska A.K., Wachowiak W., Muchewicz E., Boratyńska K., Montserrat J.M., Boratyński A. 2010. Cryptic hybrids between Pinus uncinata and P. sylvestris. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 163: 473–485.
• Johansen S. 1991. Airborne pollen andspores on the Arctic island of Jan Meyen. Grana 30: 373-379.
• Jost L. 2008. GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Molecular Ecology 17: 4015–4026.
• Kalinowski S.T. 2009. How well do evolutionary trees describe genetic relationships between populations? Heredity 102: 506–513.
• Koski V. 1987. Long geographic transfer, a possible way of eliminating pollen contamination in advancedgeneration seedorchard s of Pinus sylvestris. Forest Ecology andManagement 19: 267–272.
• Latałowa M., Tobolski K., Nalepka D. 2004. Pinus L. subgenus Pinus (subgen. Diploxyon (Koehne) Pilger) – Pine. In: Ralska-Jasiewiczowa M (ed.) Late Glacial andHolocene history of vegetation in Polandbasedon isopollen maps. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Kraków, pp 165–177.
• Lewandowski A., Boratyński A., Mejnartowicz L. 2000. Allozyme investigations on the genetic differentiation between closely relatedpines – Pinus sylvestris, P. mugo, P. uncinata and P. uliginosa (Pinaceae). Plant Systematics andEvolution 221: 15–24.
• Liu K.J., Muse S.V. 2005. PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis. Bioinformatics 21: 2128–2129.
• Magri D., Vendramin G.G., Comps B., Dupanloup I., Geburek T., Gömöry D., Latałowa M, Litt T, Paule L, Roure JM, Tantau I, van der Knaap WO, Petit RJ, de Beaulieau JL 2006. A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. New Phytologist 171: 199–221.
• Manni F., GuérardE., Heyer E. 2004. Geographic patterns of (genetic, morphologic, linguistic) variation: how barriers can be detected by “Monmonier’s algorithm”. Human Biology 76: 173–190.
• Monteleone I., Ferrazzini D., Belletti P. 2006. Effectiveness of neutral RAPD markers to detect genetic divergence between the supspecies uncinata andmugo of Pinus mugo Turra. Silva Fennica 40: 391–406.
• Neet-Sarqueda C. 1994. Genetic differentiation of Pinus sylvestris L., and Pinus mugo aggr. populations in Switzerland. Silvae Genetica 43: 207–215.
• Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283–292.
• Obidowicz A. 1996. A late glacial-holocene history of the formation of vegetation belts in the Tatra Mts. Acta Paleobotanica 36: 159–206.
• Ozenda P. 1988. Die Vegetation der Alpen im europäischen Gebirgsraum. Fischer, Stuttgart, New York.
• Peakall R., Smouse P.E. 2005. GenAlEx V6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching andresearch. Australian National University, Canberra (http://www.anu.edu.au/Bo-Zo/GenAlEx).
• Petit R.J., El Mousadik A., Pons O. 1998. Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conservation Biology 12: 844–855.
• Poldini L., Oriolo G., Francescato C. 2004. Mountain pine scrubs andheats with Ericaceae in the south-eastern Alps. Plant Biosystems 138: 53–85.
• Provan J., Soranzo N., Wilson N.J., McNicol J.W., Forrest G.I., Cottrell J., Powell W. 1998. Gene-pool variation in Caledonian and European Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) revealedby chloroplast simple- sequence repeats. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B – Biological Sciences 265: 1697–1705.
• Ramil-Rego P., Munoz-Sobrino C., Rodríguez-Guitián M., Gómez-Orellana L. 1998. Differences in the vegetation of the North Iberian Peninsula during the last 16,000 years. Plant Ecology 138: 41–62.
• Robledo-Arnuncio J.J., Collada C., Alía R., Gil L. 2005. Genetic structure of montane isolates of Pinus sylvestris L. in a Mediterranean refugial area. Journal of Biogeography 32: 595–605.
• Ronikier M., Cieślak E., Korbecka G. 2008. High genetic differentiation in the alpine plant Campanula alpina Jacq. (Campanulaceae): evidence for glacial survival in several Carpathian regions and long-term isolation between the Carpathians and the Alps. Molecular Ecology 17: 1763–1775.
• Rybnícek K., Rybnícková E. 2002. Vegetation of the Upper Orava region (NW Slovakia) in the last 11000 years. Acta Paleobotanica 42: 153–170.
• Sandoz H. 1983. Considérations sur la genèse du Pin mugho (Pinus mughus Scopoli), son berceau probable, sa répartition ancienne et actuelle. Revue Générale de Botanique 90: 23–41.
• Sannikov S., Petrova I., Schweingruber F., Egorov E., Parpan T. 2011. Genetic differentiation of Pinus mugo Turra and Pinus sylvestris L. populations in the Ukrainian Carpathians andthe Swiss Alps. Russian Journal of Ecology 42: 270–277.
• Sarvas R. 1962. Investigations on the flowering and seedcrop of Pinus silvestris. Communicationes Instituti Forestali Fenniae 53: 1–198.
• Sarvas R. 1972. Investigations on the annual cycle of development of forest trees. Active period. Communicationes Instituti Forestali Fenniae 76: 1–110.
• Schönswetter P., Stehlik I., Holderegger R., Tribsch A. 2005. Molecular evidence for glacial refugia of mountain plants in the European Alps. Moleclar Ecology 14: 3547–3555.
• Sibik J., Dite D., Sibikova I., Pukajova D. 2008. Plant communities dominated by Pinus mugo agg. in Central Europe – comparison of the oligotrophic communities rich in Sphagnum. Phytocoenology 38: 221–238.
• Sjögren P., van der Knapp W.O., Huusko A., van Leeuven J.F.N. 2008. Pollen productivity, dispersal, andcorrection factors for major tree taxa in the Swiss Apls basedon pollen-trap results. Review of Pelaeobotany andPalynology 152: 200–210.
• Slatkin M. 1995. A measure of population subdivision basedon microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139: 457– 462.
• Slavov G.T., Zhelev P. 2004. Allozyme variation, differentiation andinbreed ing in populations of Pinus mugo in Bulgaria. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 2611–2617.
• Smouse P.E., Long J., Sokal R. 1986. Multiple regression andcorrelation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology 35: 627–632.
• Sobierajska K., Boratyńska K. 2008. Variability of needle characters of Pinus mugo Turra populations in the Karkonosze Mountains in Poland. Dendrobiology 59: 41–49.
• Sobierajska K., Boratyńska K., Marcysiak K. 2010. Differentiation of Pinus mugo Turra (Pinaceae) populations in the Giant Mountains (Karkonosze, Sudetes) on the basis of cone characters. Dendrobiology 63: 33–41.
• Terrab A., Paun O., Talavera S., Tremetsberger K., Arista M., Stuessy T.F. 2006. Genetic diversity andpopulation structure in natural populations of Moroccan Atlas cedar (Cedrus atlantica; Pinaceae) determined with cpSSR markers. American Journal of Botany 93: 1274–1280.
• Terrab A., Talavera S., Arista M., Paun O., Stuessy T.F., Tremetsberger K. 2007. Genetic diversity at chloroplast microsatellites (cpSSRs) and geographic structure in endangered West Mediterranean firs (Abies spp., Pinaceae). Taxon 56: 409–416.
• Tsaryk I., Didukh Ya.P., Tasenkevich L., Waldon B., Boratyński A. 2006. Pinus mugo Turra (Pinaceae) in the Ukrainian Carpathians. Dendrobiology 55: 39–49.
• Vendramin G.G., Anzidei M., Madaghiele A., Bucci G. 1998. Distribution of genetic diversity in Pinus pinaster Ait. as revealedby chloroplast microsatellites. Theoretical andAppliedGenetics 97: 456–463.
• Vendramin G.G., Lelli L., Rossi P., Morgante M. 1996. A set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloroplast microsatellites in Pinaceae. Molecular Ecology 5: 595–598.
• Wachowiak W., Celiński K., Prus-Głowacki W. 2005. Evidence of natural reciprocal hybridization between Pinus uliginosa and P. sylvestris in the sympatric population of the species. Flora 200: 563–568.
• Wachowiak W., Prus-Głowacki W. 2008. Hybridization processes in sympatric populations of pines Pinus sylvestris L., P. mugo Turra and P. uliginosa Neumann. Plant Systematics andEvolution 271: 29–40.
• Wachowiak W., Palmé A.E., Savolainen O. 2011. Speciation history of three closely relatedpines Pinus mugo (T.), P. uliginosa (N.) and P. sylvestris (L.). Molecular Ecology 20: 1729–1743.
• Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of populations structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370.
• Willis K.J., Rudner E., Sümegi P. 2000. The full-glacial forest of central andsouthern Europe: evidence from Hungarian macrofossil charcoal, pollen andmolluscan records. Quaternary Research 53: 203–213.
• Wolfrath B., Hannon G., Feurdaean A., Ghergari L., Onac B.P., Posnert G. 2001. Reconstruction of climatic andenvironmental changes in NW Romania during the early part of the last deglaciation (15 000–13 000 cal yr BP). Quaternary Science Reviews 20: 1897–1914.
• Young A., Boyle T., Brown T. 1996. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 413–418.