The spread of Impatiens parviflora DC. in Central European oak forests - another stage of invasion?

• Autorzy: Reczynska K. , Swierkosz K. , Dajdok Z.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In this study, we examine the pattern of occurrence of Impatiens parviflora in Central European oak forests over time and its ecological requirements within these types of communities. Research was based on phytosociological data collected in 3776 relevés. A modified TWINSPAN algorithm were used to distinguish the groups of oak forests. The ecological preferences of the I. parviflora and studied communities as well as differences between invaded and non-invaded vegetation plots were analyzed using mean weighted Ellenberg indicator values (EIVs). Finally, both the temporal pattern of I. parviflora participation and changes in its coverage in the studied communities were analyzed. Our study confirmed a high adaptability of this species with respect to temperature, moisture, soil reaction and nutrients and determined its broad ecological optimum in oak forests. However, it also revealed both a greater sensitivity of some communities within Central European oak forests to the invasion of I. parviflora and differences in habitat conditions between invaded and non-invaded vegetation plots. This suggests that the habitat niche of I. parviflora within oak forests is not accidental. The analysis of temporal changes in the frequency of I. parviflora confirmed a 20% increase in relevés over the last 50 years. However, we did not identify any statistically significant rise in the coverage of I. parviflora in oak forests specifically during the studied period.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Impatiens parviflora; spread; Central Europe; oak forest; invasive plant; long-term change; plant species; species composition; forest vegetation; small balsam

• Wydawca: -
• Czasopismo: Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: 84
• Numer: 4
• Opis fizyczny: p.401-411,fig.,ref.

Twórcy

autor

Reczynska K.

• Museum of Natural History, University of Wroclaw, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Swierkosz K.

• Museum of Natural History, University of Wroclaw, Sienkiewicza 21, 50-335 Wroclaw, Poland

autor

Dajdok Z.

• Department of Botany, Institute of Environmental Biology, University of Wroclaw, Kanonia 6/8, 50-328 Wroclaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1.Hulme PE. Biological invasions in Europe: drivers, pressures, states, impacts and responses. In: Hester R, Harrison RM, editors. Biodiversity under threat, issues in environmental science and technology. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2007. p. 56-80. (Issues in Environmental Science and Technology; vol 25). http://dx.doi. org/10.1039/9781847557650-00056
• 2.Bilz M, Kell SP, Maxted N, Lansdown RV. European red list of vascular plants. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.2779/8515
• 3.Lambertini M, Leape J, Marton-Lefevre J, Mittermeier RA, Rose M, Robinson JG, et al. Invasives: a major conservation threat. Science. 2011;333:404-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.333.6041.404-b
• 4.Powell KI, Chase JM, Knight TM. Invasive plants have scale-dependent effects on diversity by altering species-area relationships. Science. 2013;339:316-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1226817
• 5.MacDougall AS, Turkington R. Are invasive species the drivers or passangers of change in degraded ecosystem? Ecology. 2005;86(1):42-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-0669
• 6.Fridley J, Stachowicz J, Naeem S, Sax DF, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, et al. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology. 2007;88:3-17. http://dx.doi. org/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88%5B3:TIPRPA%5D2.0.C0;2
• 7.Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Pyšek P, Hájek O, Knollová I, Tichý L, et al. Separating habitat invasibility by alien plants from the actual level of invasion. Ecology. 2008;89:1541-1553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/07-0682.1
• 8.Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J Ecol. 2009;97:393-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x
• 9. Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ, Lugo AE, Ewel JJ, Vermeij GJ, et al. Don't judge species on their origins. Nature. 2011;474:153-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/474153a
• 10.Vilá M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošik V, Maron JL, et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Let. 2011;14:702-708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x
• 11.Bennett JR, Dunwiddie PW, Giblin DE, Arcese P. Native versus exotic community patterns across three scales: roles of competition, environment and incomplete invasion. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst. 2012;14(6):381-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2012.10.001
• 12.Bennett JR, Vellend M, Lilley PL, Cornwell WK, Arcese P. Abundance, rarity and invasion debt among exotic species in a patchy ecosystem. Biol Invasions. 2013;15:707-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s10530-012-0320-z
• 13.Hejda M, de Bello F. Impact of plant invasions on functional diversity in the vegetation of Central Europe. J Veg Sci. 2013;24:890-897. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12026
• 14.Trepl L. Über Impatiens parviflora DC. Agriophyt in Mitteleuropa. Dissertationes Botanicae. 1984;73:1-400.
• 15.Kühn I, Brandenburg M, Klotz S. Why do alien plant species that reproduce in natural habitats occur more frequently? Divers Distrib. 2004;10:417-425. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00110.x
• 16.Sádlo F, Chytrý M, Pyšek P. Regional species pools of vascular plants in habitats of the Czech Republic. Preslia. 2007;79:303-321.
• 17.Weber E, Gut D. Assessing the risk of potentially invasive plant species in central Europe. J Nat Conserv. 2004;12:171-179. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jnc.2004.04.002
• 18.Piskorz R, Klimko M. Współwystępowanie Impatiens parviflora i wybranych roślin lasu dębowo-grabowego w Wielkopolskim Parku Narodowym. Sylwan. 2007;151(2):43-58.
• 19.Łysik M. Ten years of change in ground-layer vegetation of European beech forest in the protected area (Ojców National Park, South Poland). Pol J Ecol. 2008;56(1):17-31.
• 20.Godefroid S, Koedam N. Comparative ecology and coexistence of introduced and native congeneric forest herbs: Impatiens parviflora and I. noli-tangere. Plant Ecol Evol. 2010;143(2):119-127. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2010.397
• 21.Hejda M. What is the impact of Impatiens parviflora on diversity and composition of herbal layer communities of temperate forests? PloS ONE. 2012;7(6):e39571. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0039571
• 22.Hughes AP, Evans GC. Plant growth and the aerial environment. II. Effects of light intensity on Impatiens parviflora. New Phytol. 1962;61:154-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1962. tb06285.x
• 23.Hughes AP. Plant growth and the aerial environment. VI. The apparent efficiency of conversion of light energy of different spectral compositions by Impatiens parviflora. New Phytol. 1964;64(1):48-54. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1965.tb05374.x
• 24.Hughes AP. Plant growth and the aerial environment. VII. The growth of Impatiens parviflora in very low light intensities. New Phytol. 1965;64:55-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1965.tb05375.x
• 25.Eliás CO, Causton DR. Temperature and the growth of Impatiensparviflora DC. New Phytol. 1975;75:495-505. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1975.tb01411.x
• 26.Peace WJH, Grubb PJ. Interaction of light and mineral nutrient supply in the growth of Impatiens parviflora DC. New Phytol. 1982;90:127-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03247.x
• 27.Eliás P. Stem fungi disease (Puccinia komarovii) on Impatiens parviflora in Slovakia: effects on population dynamics and its role in regulation of plant populations. Carinthia II. 1995;53:14-16.
• 28.Elemans M. Light, nutrients and the growth of herbaceous forest species. Acta Oecol. 2004;26:197-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. actao.2004.05.003
• 29.Skálová H, Pyšek P. Germination and establishment of invasive and native Impatiens species in species-specific microsites. Neobiota. 2009;8:101-109.
• 30.Schmidt W, Heinrichs S, Weckesser M, Ebrecht L, Lambertz B. Neo-phyten in Buchen- und Fichtenwäldern des Sollings. Braunschweiger Geobotanische Arbeiten. 2008;9:405-434.
• 31.Kowarik I. Biologische Invasionen - Neophyten und Neozoen in Mitteleuropa. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Ulmer; 2010.
• 32.Borisova EA. Patterns of invasive plant species distribution in the Upper Volga Basin. Russ J Biol Invasions. 2011;2(1):1-5. http://dx.doi. org/10.1134/S2075111711010024
• 33.Priede A. Invasive neophytes in the flora of Latvia: distribution and dynamics [PhD thesis]. Riga: University of Latvia; 2009.
• 34.Reczyńska K. Udział gatunków synantropijnych w zbiorowiskach z klasy Quercetea robori-petraeae Br.-Bl. et R. Tx. 1943 w Sudetach i na ich Przedgórzu. Acta Bot Silesiaca. 2011;7:113-123.
• 35.Wrzesień M, Denisow B. The usable taxons in spontaneous flora of railway areas of the central-eastern part of Poland. Acta Agrobot. 2006;59(2):95-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.5586/aa.2006.065
• 36.Dajdok Z, Wuczyński A. Alien plants in field margins and fields of southwestern Poland. Biodivers Res Conserv. 2008;9-10:19-33.
• 37.Świerkosz K, Reczyńska K, Kulpiński K, Tyc A. Udział gatunków obcych w zbiorowiskach z klasy Asplenietea trichomanis (Br.-Bl. in Meier & Br.-Bl. 1934) Oberd. 1977 w południowej Polsce. Acta Bot Silesiaca. 2011;6:97-114.
• 38.Chmura D, Sierka E. Relation between invasive plant and species richness of forest floor vegetation: a study of Impatiens parviflora DC. Pol J Ecol. 2006;54(3):417-428.
• 39.Schnitzler A, Haleb BW, Alsum EM. Examining native and exotic species diversity in European riparian forests. Biol Conserv. 2007;138:146-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.010
• 40.Roleček J. Teplomilné doubravy (Quercetea pubescentis). In: Chytrý M, editor. Vegetace České republiky. 4. Lesní a křovinná vegetace. Praha: Academia; 2013. p. 296-337.
• 41.Roleček J. Acidofilní doubravy (Quercetea robori-petraeae). In: Chytrý M, editor. Vegetace České republiky. 4. Lesní a křovinná vegetace. Praha: Academia; 2013. p. 347-365.
• 42.Reczyńska K. Diversity, distribution and conservation status of acidophilous and thermophilous oak forests (Cl. Quercetea robori-petraeae, O. Quercetalia pubescenti-petraeae) in the Sudety Mts and their foreland [PhD thesis]. Wrocław: University of Wrocław; 2013.
• 43.Westhoff V, van der Maarel E. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: Whittaker RH, editor. Classification of plant communities. The Hague: W. Junk Press; 1978. p. 289-299. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/978-94-009-9183-5_9
• 44.Willner W, Berg C, Heiselmayer P. Austrian Vegetation Database. Biodivers Ecol. 2012;4:333. http://dx.doi.org/10.7809/b-e.00125
• 45.Jansen F, Dengler J, Berg C. VegMV - the vegetation database of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Biodivers Ecol. 2012;4:149-160. http:// dx.doi.org/10.7809/b-e.00070
• 46.Chytrý M, Rafajová M. Czech National Phytosociological Database: basic statistics of the available vegetation-plot data. Preslia. 2003;75:1-75.
• 47.Chytrý M, Michalcová D. Czech National Phytosociological Database. Biodivers Ecol. 2012;4:345-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.7809/b-e.00136
• 48.Kącki Z, Śliwiński M. The Polish Vegetation Database: structure, resources and development. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2012;81:75-79. http:// dx.doi.org/10.5586/asbp.2012.014
• 49.Šibík J. Slovak Vegetation Database. Biodivers Ecol. 2012;4:429-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.7809/b-e.00216
• 50.Hennekens SM, Schaminée JHJ. TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data. J Veg Sci. 2001;12:589-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3237010
• 51.Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, et al., editors. Flora Europaea, Volumes 1-5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1968-1993.
• 52.Ochyra R, Żarnowiec J, Bednarek-Ochyra H. Census catalogue of Polish mosses. Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2003. (Biodiversity of Poland; vol 3).
• 53.Szweykowski, J. An annotated checklist of Polish liverworts and hornworts. Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 2006. (Biodiversity of Poland; vol 4).
• 54.Chytrý M, Tichý L. Diagnostic, constant and dominant species of vegetation classes and alliances of the Czech Republic: a statistical revision. Brno: Masaryk University; 2003. (Folia Facultatis Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Masarykianae Brunensis Biologia; vol 108).
• 55.Świerkosz K, Reczyńska K, Boublík K. Variability of Abies alba-dominated forests in Central Europe. Cent Eur J Biol. 2014;9(5):495-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0281-y
• 56.Matuszkiewicz JM. Zespoły leśne Polski. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2007.
• 57.Tichý L. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci. 2002;13:451-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002. tb02069.x
• 58.Roleček J, Tichý L, Zelený D, Chytrý M. Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. J Veg Sci. 2009;20:596-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01062.x
• 59.Tichý L, Holt J. Juice program for management, analysis and classification of ecological data. 1 version. Brno: Vegetation Science Group, Masaryk University Brno; 2006.
• 60.Fischer HS. On the combination of species cover values from different vegetation layers. Appl Veg Sci. 2015;1:169-170. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/avsc.12130
• 61.Chytrý M, Tichý L, Holt J, Botta-Dukát Z. Determination of diagnostic species with statistical fidelity measures. J Veg Sci. 2002;13:79-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02025.x
• 62.Tichý L, Chytrý M. Statistical determination of diagnostic species for site groups of unequal size. J Veg Sci. 2006;17:809-818. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02504.x
• 63.Willner W, Tichý L, Chytrý M. Effects of different fidelity measures and contexts on the determination of diagnostic species. J Veg Sci. 2009;20:130-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.05390.x
• 64.Botta-Dukát Z, Chytrý M, Hájková P, Havlová M. Vegetation of lowland wet meadows along a climatic continentality gradient in Central Europe. Preslia. 2005;77:89-111.
• 65.Ellenberg H, Weber HE, Dull R, Wirth V, Werner W, Paulisen D. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Göttingen: Goltze; 1991. (Scripta Geobotanica; vol 18).
• 66.R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.
• 67.Zelený D, Schaffers AP. Too good to be true: pitfalls of using mean Ellenberg indicator values in vegetation analyses. J Veg Sci. 2012;23:419-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01366.x
• 68.Hammer 0, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Elec-tronica. 2001;4(1):1-9.
• 69.Coombe DE. Biological flora of the British Isles Impatiens parviflora DC. J Ecol. 1956;44:701-713. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2256857
• 70.Chmura D, Sierka E. The occurrence of invasive alien plant species in selected forest nature reserves in southern Poland as a conservation problem. Nat Conserv. 2006;62(5):3-11.
• 71.Chmura D, Sierka E, Orczewska A. Autecology of Impatiens parviflora in natural forest stands. Bot Stec. 2007;11:17-27.
• 72.Dobravolskaité R. Alien species Impatiens parviflora invasion into forest communities of Lithuania. Bot Lith. 2012;18(1):3-12. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10279-012-0001-y
• 73.Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovský Z, Pyšek P. Habitat requirements, short-term population dynamics and coexistence of native and invasive Impatiens species: a field study. Biol Invasions. 2013;16(1):177-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0512-1
• 74.Hill MO, Mountford JO, Roy DB, Bunce RGH. Ellenberg's indicator values for British plants. ECOFACT volume 2 technical annex. Huntingdon: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology; 1999.
• 75.Vervoort A, Jacquemart AL. Habitat overlap of the invasive Impatiens parviflora DC with its native congener I. noli-tan-gere L. Phytocoenologia. 2012;42(3-4):249-257. http://dx.doi. org/10.1127/0340-269X/2012/0042-0496
• 76.Węglarski K. Amplitudy ekologiczne wybranych gatunków roślin naczyniowych Wielkopolskiego Parku Narodowego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM; 1991.
• 77.Chmura D, Gucwa-Przepióra E. Interactions between arbuscular mycorrhiza and the growth of the invasive alien annual Impatiens parviflora DC: a study of forest type and soil properties in nature reserves (S Poland). Appl Soil Ecol. 2012;62:71-80. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.07.013
• 78.Zarzycki K. Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland. Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences; 1984. (Biodiversity of Poland; vol 2).
• 79.Machado JL, Walters MB, Reich PB. Below-ground resources limit seedling growth in forest understories but do not alter biomass distribution. Ann Forest Sci. 2003;60:319-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ forest:2003023
• 80.Kujawa-Pawlaczyk J. Rozprzestrzenianie się i neofityzm Impatiens parviflora DC. w Puszczy Białowieskiej. Phytocoenosis. 1991;3(1):213-222.
• 81.Piskorz R, Klimko M. Kolonizacja powalonych drzew i buchto-wisk dzików przez Impatiens parviflora DC. w zbiorowiskach Galio sylvatici-Carpinetum wybranych rezerwatów Wielkopolskiego Parku Narodowego. Rocz AR Pozn Bot. 2001;4:151-163.
• 82.Kupcinskiene E, Zybartaite L, Janulioniene R, Zukauskiene J, Pau-lauskas A. Molecular diversity of small balsam populations in relation to site characteristics. Cent Eur J Biol. 2013;8(10):1048-1061. http:// dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0228-3
• 83.Obidziński T, Symonides E. The influence of the groundlayer structure on the invasion of small balsam (Impatiensparviflora DC.) to natural and degraded forests. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 2000;69:1-8. http://dx.doi. org/10.5586/asbp.2000.041
• 84.Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Kučera T. Inclusion of native and alien species in temperate nature reserves: a historical study from Central Europe. Conserv Biol. 2003;17(5):1414-1424. http://dx.doi. org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02248.x
• 85.Jakubowska-Gabara J. Recesja zespołu świetlistej dąbrowy Potentillo albae-Quercetum Libb. 1933 w Polsce. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego; 1993.
• 86.Matuszkiewicz JM. Zmiany w dąbrowach acydofilnych. Załącznik CD, tabela dokumentacyjna Nr 49. In: Matuszkiewicz JM, editor. Geobotaniczne rozpoznanie tendencji rozwojowych zbiorowisk leśnych w wybranych regionach Polski. Warszawa: Instytut Geografii i Przestrzennego Zagospodarowania, Polska Akademia Nauk; 2007. p. 730-741. (Monografie; vol 8).
• 87.Richardson DM, Pyšek P. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility. Prog Phys Geog. 2006;30(3):409-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309133306pp490pr
• 88.Richardson DM, Pyšek P, Carlton JT. A compendium of essential concepts and terminology in biological invasions. In: Richardson DM, editor. Fifty years of invasion ecology: the legacy of Charles Elton. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2011. p. 409-420.
• 89.Lonsdale WM. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology. 1999;80:1522-1536. http://dx.doi. org/10.2307/176544
• 90.Davis MA, Grime P, Thompson K. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invisibility. J Ecol. 2000;88:528-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00473.x
• 91.Chmura D, Sierka E. The invasibility of deciduous forest communities after disturbance: a case study of Carex brizoides and Impatiens parviflora invasion. For Ecol Manage. 2007;242 487-495. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j .foreco.2007.01.083
• 92.Tilman D. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:10854-10861. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403458101

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5586/asbp.2015.039